- -

Genetic evaluation combining purebred and crossbred data in a pig breeding scheme

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Genetic evaluation combining purebred and crossbred data in a pig breeding scheme

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Ibáñez-Escriche, Noelia es_ES
dc.contributor.author Reixach, J. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Lleonart, N. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Noguera, J. L. es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2020-03-16T14:46:50Z
dc.date.available 2020-03-16T14:46:50Z
dc.date.issued 2011-12 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 0021-8812 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/138962
dc.description.abstract [EN] Genetic evaluations using purebred data alone and combined purebred and crossbred information were performed for lean meat percentage in a pig breeding scheme. One purebred (PB) model and 2 crossbred models (CCPS1 and CCPS2) were used in the analyses. Data were obtained from the Seleccion Batalle S.A. Company (Riudarenes, Spain) and spanned a period of 4 yr (2006 to 2009). The data corresponded to 3 nuclei of purebred populations, Landrace (LD), Duroc (DU), and Pietrain (PI); 1 multiplying farm with animals from a 2-way cross (TB1; DU x LD); and commercial farms with animals from a 3-way cross (TB2; TB1 x PI). Genetic parameters were similar across the models, with the exception of purebred PI. The DU and LD purebreds presented large heritabilities (0.5 to 0.6) for lean meat percentage, whereas the PI purebred showed a lower heritability (approximately 0.1) for the PB model and moderate heritability for the CCPS1 and CCPS2 models (0.2 to 0.3). The mean reliability of the predicted purebred breeding values was clearly increased when the CCPS1 and CCPS2 models were used. Moreover, a reranking of the animals with important changes in the selection decisions was observed in the PI purebred. In a simulation study, the CCPS1 model achieved a greater response to selection than the PB model for the PI purebred. On another hand, between the CCPS1 and CCPS2 models, CCPS1 was slightly superior in terms of predictive ability, exhibiting a greater robustness. These results illustrate the usefulness of using crossbred models to evaluate lean meat percentage in this pig breeding scheme. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship Financial support was provided by the IRTA, Lleida, Spain (grant 0502-21191). es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher American Society of Animal Science es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Animal Science es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Bayesian analysis es_ES
dc.subject Crossbred es_ES
dc.subject Cross-validation es_ES
dc.subject Pig es_ES
dc.subject Purebred es_ES
dc.subject Reliability es_ES
dc.subject Response to selection es_ES
dc.subject.classification PRODUCCION ANIMAL es_ES
dc.title Genetic evaluation combining purebred and crossbred data in a pig breeding scheme es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.2527/jas.2011-3959 es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/IRTA//0502-21102/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Cerrado es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ciencia Animal - Departament de Ciència Animal es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Ibáñez-Escriche, N.; Reixach, J.; Lleonart, N.; Noguera, JL. (2011). Genetic evaluation combining purebred and crossbred data in a pig breeding scheme. Journal of Animal Science. 89(12):3881-3889. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-3959 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-3959 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 3881 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 3889 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 89 es_ES
dc.description.issue 12 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\393272 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries es_ES
dc.description.references Bijma, P., & van Arendonk, J. A. M. (1998). Maximizing genetic gain for the sire line of a crossbreeding scheme utilizing both purebred and crossbred information. Animal Science, 66(2), 529-542. doi:10.1017/s135772980000970x es_ES
dc.description.references Busk, H., Olsen, E. V., & Brøndum, J. (1999). Determination of lean meat in pig carcasses with the Autofom classification system. Meat Science, 52(3), 307-314. doi:10.1016/s0309-1740(99)00007-8 es_ES
dc.description.references Dekkers, J. C. M. (2007). Marker-assisted selection for commercial crossbred performance1. Journal of Animal Science, 85(9), 2104-2114. doi:10.2527/jas.2006-683 es_ES
dc.description.references Ducos, A., Bidanel, J., Ducrocq, V., Boichard, D., & Groeneveld, E. (1993). Multivariate restricted maximum likelihood estimation of genetic parameters for growth, carcass and meat quality traits in French Large White and French Landrace pigs. Genetics Selection Evolution, 25(5), 475. doi:10.1186/1297-9686-25-5-475 es_ES
dc.description.references Elzo, M. A. (1994). Restricted maximum likelihood procedures for the estimation of additive and nonadditive genetic variances and covariances in multibreed populations1. Journal of Animal Science, 72(12), 3055-3065. doi:10.2527/1994.72123055x es_ES
dc.description.references Gilbert, H., Bidanel, J.-P., Gruand, J., Caritez, J.-C., Billon, Y., Guillouet, P., … Sellier, P. (2007). Genetic parameters for residual feed intake in growing pigs, with emphasis on genetic relationships with carcass and meat quality traits. Journal of Animal Science, 85(12), 3182-3188. doi:10.2527/jas.2006-590 es_ES
dc.description.references Knapp, P., Willam, A., & Sölkner, J. (1997). Genetic parameters for lean meat content and meat quality traits in different pig breeds. Livestock Production Science, 52(1), 69-73. doi:10.1016/s0301-6226(97)00120-6 es_ES
dc.description.references Lo, L. L., Fernando, R. L., & Grossman, M. (1993). Covariance between relatives in multibreed populations: additive model. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 87(4), 423-430. doi:10.1007/bf00215087 es_ES
dc.description.references Lutaaya, E., Misztal, I., Mabry, J. W., Short, T., Timm, H. H., & Holzbauer, R. (2001). Genetic parameter estimates from joint evaluation of purebreds and crossbreds in swine using the crossbred model. Journal of Animal Science, 79(12), 3002. doi:10.2527/2001.79123002x es_ES
dc.description.references Lutaaya, E., Misztal, I., Mabry, J. W., Short, T., Timm, H. H., & Holzbauer, R. (2002). Joint evaluation of purebreds and crossbreds in swine. Journal of Animal Science, 80(9), 2263. doi:10.2527/2002.8092263x es_ES
dc.description.references Munilla Leguizamon, S., & Cantet, R. J. (2010). Equivalence of multibreed animal models and hierarchical Bayes analysis for maternally influenced traits. Genetics Selection Evolution, 42(1), 20. doi:10.1186/1297-9686-42-20 es_ES
dc.description.references Tholen, E., Baulain, U., Henning, M. D., & Schellander, K. (2003). Comparison of different methods to assess the composition of pig bellies in progeny testing. Journal of Animal Science, 81(5), 1177-1184. doi:10.2527/2003.8151177x es_ES
dc.description.references Wei, M. 1992. Combined crossbred and purebred selection in animal breeding. PhD Thesis.Department of Animal Breeding, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, the Netherlands. es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem