Resumen:
|
[ES] Nowadays, the majority of optimisation processes that are followed to obtain new
optimum designs involve expensive simulations that are costly and time comsuming.
Besides, designs involving aerodynamics are usually ...[+]
[ES] Nowadays, the majority of optimisation processes that are followed to obtain new
optimum designs involve expensive simulations that are costly and time comsuming.
Besides, designs involving aerodynamics are usually highly constrained in terms of
infeasible geometries to be avoided so that it is really important to provide the
optimisers effective datum or starting points that enable them to reach feasible
solutions.
This MSc Thesis aims to continue the development of an alternative design
methodology applied to a 2D airfoil at a cruise flight condition by combining concepts
of Dynamic Data Driven Application Systems (DDDAS) paradigm with Multiobjec-
tive Optimisation. For this purpose, a surrogate model based on experimental data
has been used to run a multiobjective optimisation and the given optimum designs
have been considered as starting points for a direct optimisation, saving number of
evaluations in the process. Throughout this work, a technique for retrieving experi-
mental airfoil lift and drag coefficients was conducted. Later, a new parametrisation
technique using Class-Shape Transformation (CST) was implemented in order to
map the considered airfoils into the design space. Then, a response surface model
considering Radial Basis Functions (RBF) and Kriging approaches was constructed
and the multiobjective optimisation to maximise lift and minimise drag was under-
taken using stochastic algorithms, MOTSII and NSGA. Alternatively, a full direct
optimisation from datum airfoil and a direct optimisation from optimum surrogate-
based optimisation designs were performed with Xfoil and the results were compared.
As an outcome, the developed design methodology based on the combination
of surrogate-based and direct optimisation was proved to be more effective than a
single full direct optimisation to make the whole process faster by saving number
of evaluations. In addition, further work guidelines are presented to show potential
directions in which to expand and improve this methodology.
[-]
|