Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Losilla, Josep-Maria | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Oliveras, Isabel | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Marin-Garcia, Juan A. | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Vives, Jaume | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-03T05:53:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-06-03T05:53:12Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-09 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 0895-4356 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/145114 | |
dc.description.abstract | [EN] Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the agreement and compare the performance of three different instruments in assessing risk of bias (RoB) of comparative cohort studies included in a health psychology meta-analysis. Study Design and Setting: Three tools were applied to 28 primary studies included in the selected meta-analysis: the Newcastle Ottawa Scale, quality of cohort studies (Q-Coh), and risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I). Results: Interrater agreement varied greatly from tool to tool. For overall RoB, 75% of the studies were rated as low RoB with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, 11% of the studies with Q-Coh, and no study was found to be at low RoB using ROBINS-I. No influence of quality ratings on the meta-analysis results was found for any of the tools. Conclusion: Assessing RoB using the three tools may lead to opposite conclusions, especially at low and high levels of RoB. Domain based tools (Q-Coh and ROBINS-I) provide a more comprehensive framework for identifying potential sources of bias, which is essential to improving the quality of future research. Both further guidance on the application of RoB tools and improvements in the reporting of primary studies are necessary. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (grant number: PSI2014-52962-P). I.O. was supported by funding from a predoctoral grant from the Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport of Spanish Government (grant number: FPU14/04514). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the article. | es_ES |
dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | es_ES |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | es_ES |
dc.rights | Reserva de todos los derechos | es_ES |
dc.subject | Risk of bias | es_ES |
dc.subject | Methodological quality | es_ES |
dc.subject | Systematic review | es_ES |
dc.subject | Meta-analysis,Domain of bias | es_ES |
dc.subject | Quality tool | es_ES |
dc.subject.classification | ORGANIZACION DE EMPRESAS | es_ES |
dc.title | Three risk of bias tools lead to opposite conclusions in observational research synthesis | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.021 | es_ES |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MECD//FPU14%2F04514/ES/FPU14%2F04514/ | es_ES |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//PSI2014-52962-P/ES/VALORACION E INCLUSION EN META-ANALISIS DE LA CALIDAD DE LOS ESTUDIOS DE COHORTES Y DE CASOS Y CONTROLES/ | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | Cerrado | es_ES |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Organización de Empresas - Departament d'Organització d'Empreses | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Losilla, J.; Oliveras, I.; Marin-Garcia, JA.; Vives, J. (2018). Three risk of bias tools lead to opposite conclusions in observational research synthesis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 101:61-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.021 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | S | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.021 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 61 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpfin | 72 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.volume | 101 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.pmid | 29864541 | es_ES |
dc.relation.pasarela | S\369975 | es_ES |
dc.contributor.funder | Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad | es_ES |
dc.contributor.funder | Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte | es_ES |