- -

Genetic parameters and direct, maternal and heterosis effects on litter size in a diallel cross among three commercial varieties of Iberian pig

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Genetic parameters and direct, maternal and heterosis effects on litter size in a diallel cross among three commercial varieties of Iberian pig

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Noguera;Ibáñez-Es ...
Tamaño: 888.4Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión del Autor.
Abrir
[Cerrado]
Nombre: genetic_parameter ...
Tamaño: 186.8Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Solicitar una copia al autor
dc.contributor.author Noguera, J.L. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Ibáñez-Escriche, Noelia es_ES
dc.contributor.author Casellas, J. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Rosas, J.P. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Varona, L. es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-05T03:33:00Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-05T03:33:00Z
dc.date.issued 2019-12 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 1751-7311 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/145415
dc.description.abstract [EN] The Iberian pig is one of the pig breeds that has the highest meat quality. Traditionally, producers have bred one of the available varieties, exclusively, and have not used crosses between them, which has contrasted sharply with other populations of commercial pigs for which crossbreeding has been a standard procedure. The objective of this study was to perform an experiment under full diallel design among three contemporary commercial varieties of Iberian pig and estimate the additive genetic variation and the crossbreeding effects (direct, maternal and heterosis) for prolificacy. The data set comprised 18 193 records for total number born and number born alive from 3800 sows of three varieties of the Iberian breed (Retinto, Torbiscal and Entrepelado) and their reciprocal crosses (Retinto × Torbiscal, Torbiscal × Retinto, Retinto × Entrepelado, Entrepelado × Retinto, Torbiscal × Entrepelado and Entrepelado × Torbiscal), and a pedigree of 4609 individuals. The analysis was based on a multiple population repeatability model, and we developed a model comparison test that indicated the presence of direct line, maternal and heterosis effects. The results indicated the superiorities of the direct line effect of the Retinto and the maternal effect of the Entrepelado populations. All of the potential crosses produced significant heterosis, and additive genetic variation was higher in the Entrepelado than it was in the other two populations. The recommended cross for the highest yield in prolificacy is a Retinto father and an Entrepelado mother to generate a hybrid commercial sow. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship The work was partially funded by the Center for Industrial Technological Development (CDTI) via grant IDI-20170304 and by grant CGL-2016-80155 from the Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness (MINECO), Spain. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Cambridge University Press es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Animal es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Prolificacy es_ES
dc.subject Diallel cross es_ES
dc.subject Heritability es_ES
dc.subject Crossbreeding es_ES
dc.subject Iberian pig es_ES
dc.subject.classification PRODUCCION ANIMAL es_ES
dc.title Genetic parameters and direct, maternal and heterosis effects on litter size in a diallel cross among three commercial varieties of Iberian pig es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1017/S1751731119001125 es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//CGL2016-80155-R/ES/ANALISIS ¿OMICO¿ DE CARACTERES REPRODUCTIVOS EN UN CRUCE DIAELICO ENTRE TRES ESTIRPES DE CERDO IBERICO/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MCIU//IDI-20170304/ES/Mejora de la eficiencia productiva y de la calidad de la carne en el programa piramidal de mejora genética de ibérico 'Castúa/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//RYC-2016-19764/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ciencia Animal - Departament de Ciència Animal es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Noguera, J.; Ibáñez-Escriche, N.; Casellas, J.; Rosas, J.; Varona, L. (2019). Genetic parameters and direct, maternal and heterosis effects on litter size in a diallel cross among three commercial varieties of Iberian pig. Animal. 13(12):2765-2772. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119001125 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119001125 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 2765 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 2772 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 13 es_ES
dc.description.issue 12 es_ES
dc.identifier.pmid 31159900 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\389176 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad es_ES
dc.description.references Tsai, T.-S., Rajasekar, S., & St. John, J. C. (2016). The relationship between mitochondrial DNA haplotype and the reproductive capacity of domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus). BMC Genetics, 17(1). doi:10.1186/s12863-016-0375-4 es_ES
dc.description.references Wolf, J. B., & Wade, M. J. (2009). What are maternal effects (and what are they not)? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1520), 1107-1115. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0238 es_ES
dc.description.references Srirattana, K., McCosker, K., Schatz, T., & St. John, J. C. (2017). Cattle phenotypes can disguise their maternal ancestry. BMC Genetics, 18(1). doi:10.1186/s12863-017-0523-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Fernández, A., Rodrigáñez, J., Zuzúarregui, J., Rodríguez, M. C., & Silió, L. (2008). Genetic parameters for litter size and weight at different parities in Iberian pigs. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(S1), 98. doi:10.5424/sjar/200806s1-378 es_ES
dc.description.references García-Casco, J. M., Fernández, A., Rodríguez, M. C., & Silió, L. (2012). Heterosis for litter size and growth in crosses of four strains of Iberian pig. Livestock Science, 147(1-3), 1-8. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2012.03.005 es_ES
dc.description.references Cameron, N. M. (2011). Maternal Programming of Reproductive Function and Behavior in the Female Rat. Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience, 3. doi:10.3389/fnevo.2011.00010 es_ES
dc.description.references Noguera, J. L., Rodríguez, C., Varona, L., Tomàs, A., Muñoz, G., Ramírez, O., … Sánchez, A. (2009). A bi-dimensional genome scan for prolificacy traits in pigs shows the existence of multiple epistatic QTL. BMC Genomics, 10(1), 636. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-10-636 es_ES
dc.description.references Southwood, O. I., & Kennedy, B. W. (1990). Estimation of direct and maternal genetic variance for litter size in Canadian Yorkshire and Landrace swine using an animal model. Journal of Animal Science, 68(7), 1841. doi:10.2527/1990.6871841x es_ES
dc.description.references Martınez, A. M., Delgado, J. V., Rodero, A., & Vega-Pla, J. L. (2000). Genetic structure of the Iberian pig breed using microsatellites. Animal Genetics, 31(5), 295-301. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2052.2000.00645.x es_ES
dc.description.references Dekkers, J. C. M., Mathur, P. K., & Knol, E. F. (s. f.). Genetic improvement of the pig. The genetics of the pig, 390-425. doi:10.1079/9781845937560.0390 es_ES
dc.description.references Haley, C. S., Lee, G. J., & Ritchie, M. (1995). Comparative reproductive performance in Meishan and Large White pigs and their crosses. Animal Science, 60(2), 259-267. doi:10.1017/s1357729800008420 es_ES
dc.description.references Hwang, J. H., An, S. M., Kwon, S., Park, D. H., Kim, T. W., Kang, D. G., … Kim, C. W. (2017). DNA methylation patterns and gene expression associated with litter size in Berkshire pig placenta. PLOS ONE, 12(9), e0184539. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0184539 es_ES
dc.description.references Fabuel, E., Barragán, C., Silió, L., Rodríguez, M. C., & Toro, M. A. (2004). Analysis of genetic diversity and conservation priorities in Iberian pigs based on microsatellite markers. Heredity, 93(1), 104-113. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800488 es_ES
dc.description.references Serra, X., Gil, F., Pérez-Enciso, M., Oliver, M. ., Vázquez, J. ., Gispert, M., … Noguera, J. . (1998). A comparison of carcass, meat quality and histochemical characteristics of Iberian (Guadyerbas line) and Landrace pigs. Livestock Production Science, 56(3), 215-223. doi:10.1016/s0301-6226(98)00151-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Gelfand, A. E., & Smith, A. F. M. (1990). Sampling-Based Approaches to Calculating Marginal Densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85(410), 398-409. doi:10.1080/01621459.1990.10476213 es_ES
dc.description.references Irgang, R., Fávero, J. A., & Kennedy, B. W. (1994). Genetic parameters for litter size of different parities in Duroc, Landrace, and large white sows. Journal of Animal Science, 72(9), 2237-2246. doi:10.2527/1994.7292237x es_ES
dc.description.references Ogawa, S., Konta, A., Kimata, M., Ishii, K., Uemoto, Y., & Satoh, M. (2018). Estimation of genetic parameters for farrowing traits in purebred Landrace and Large White pigs. Animal Science Journal, 90(1), 23-28. doi:10.1111/asj.13120 es_ES
dc.description.references Ibáñez-Escriche, N., Magallón, E., Gonzalez, E., Tejeda, J. F., & Noguera, J. L. (2016). Genetic parameters and crossbreeding effects of fat deposition and fatty acid profiles in Iberian pig lines1. Journal of Animal Science, 94(1), 28-37. doi:10.2527/jas.2015-9433 es_ES
dc.description.references Peripato, A. C., De Brito, R. A., Matioli, S. R., Pletscher, L. S., Vaughn, T. T., & Cheverud, J. M. (2004). Epistasis affecting litter size in mice. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 17(3), 593-602. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00702.x es_ES
dc.description.references Serrano, M. P., Valencia, D. G., Nieto, M., Lázaro, R., & Mateos, G. G. (2008). Influence of sex and terminal sire line on performance and carcass and meat quality of Iberian pigs reared under intensive production systems. Meat Science, 78(4), 420-428. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.07.006 es_ES
dc.description.references Quaas, R. L. (1976). Computing the Diagonal Elements and Inverse of a Large Numerator Relationship Matrix. Biometrics, 32(4), 949. doi:10.2307/2529279 es_ES
dc.description.references Quinton, V. M., Wilton, J. W., Robinson, J. A., & Mathur, P. K. (2006). Economic weights for sow productivity traits in nucleus pig populations. Livestock Science, 99(1), 69-77. doi:10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.06.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Barea, R., Nieto, R., Vitari, F., Domeneghini, C., & Aguilera, J. F. (2010). Effects of pig genotype (Iberian v. Landrace × Large White) on nutrient digestibility, relative organ weight and small intestine structure at two stages of growth. animal, 5(4), 547-557. doi:10.1017/s1751731110002181 es_ES
dc.description.references Bidanel, J. P. (s. f.). Biology and genetics of reproduction. The genetics of the pig, 218-241. doi:10.1079/9781845937560.0218 es_ES
dc.description.references Boletín Oficial del Estado 2014. Real Decreto 4/2014, de 10 de enero, por el que se aprueba la norma de calidad para la carne, el jamón, la paleta y la caña de lomo ibérico. BOE-A-2014-318. es_ES
dc.description.references Putz, A. M., Tiezzi, F., Maltecca, C., Gray, K. A., & Knauer, M. T. (2015). Variance component estimates for alternative litter size traits in swine. Journal of Animal Science, 93(11), 5153-5163. doi:10.2527/jas.2015-9416 es_ES
dc.description.references Cassady, J. P., Young, L. D., & Leymaster, K. A. (2002). Heterosis and recombination effects on pig reproductive traits. Journal of Animal Science, 80(9), 2303. doi:10.2527/2002.8092303x es_ES
dc.description.references Gilles, G. (2009). Dry cured ham quality as related to lipid quality of raw material and lipid changes during processing: a review. Grasas y Aceites, 60(3), 297-307. doi:10.3989/gya.130908 es_ES
dc.description.references Perez-Enciso, M., & Gianola, D. (1992). Estimates of genetic parameters for litter size in six strains of Iberian pigs. Livestock Production Science, 32(3), 283-293. doi:10.1016/s0301-6226(12)80007-8 es_ES
dc.description.references Rodriguez, C., Rodrigañez, J., & Silio, L. (1994). Genetic analysis of maternal ability in Iberian pigs. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 111(1-6), 220-227. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0388.1994.tb00461.x es_ES
dc.description.references Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P., & van der Linde, A. (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 64(4), 583-639. doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00353 es_ES
dc.description.references Coster, A., Madsen, O., Heuven, H. C. M., Dibbits, B., Groenen, M. A. M., van Arendonk, J. A. M., & Bovenhuis, H. (2012). The Imprinted Gene DIO3 Is a Candidate Gene for Litter Size in Pigs. PLoS ONE, 7(2), e31825. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031825 es_ES
dc.description.references Willham, R. L. (1972). The Role of Maternal Effects in Animal Breeding: III. Biometrical Aspects of Maternal Effects in Animals. Journal of Animal Science, 35(6), 1288-1293. doi:10.2527/jas1972.3561288x es_ES
dc.description.references Ferraz, J. B. S., & Johnson, R. K. (1993). Animal model estimation of genetic parameters and response to selection for litter size and weight, growth, and backfat in closed seedstock populations of large white and Landrace swine2. Journal of Animal Science, 71(4), 850-858. doi:10.2527/1993.714850x es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem