- -

Internet y su repercusión en la autopercepción individual del bienestar

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Internet y su repercusión en la autopercepción individual del bienestar

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Lozano Aguilar, José Félix es_ES
dc.contributor.author Femenía Mulet, Sabrina es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-17T07:03:15Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-17T07:03:15Z
dc.date.issued 2020-04-18
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/146510
dc.description.abstract [ES] Vivimos en una sociedad conectada, donde el uso de Internet ha crecido considerablemente en los últimos años, y se espera siga creciendo aún más a lo largo y ancho del mundo. Como consecuencia, está cambiando el modo en el que las personas nos relacionamos con los demás, pero también con nosotros mismos, e incluso nuestra propia percepción de nuestra propia identidad y bienestar.El presente trabajo pretende analizar la influencia de determinados aspectos sociodemográficos en el uso de internet y su impacto en la percepción del bienestar de las personas.Así, tomando los datos de la European Social Survey se ha analizado la relación entre el uso de internet y la percepción de bienestar- medida a través de autoevaluaciones de nivel de felicidad y satisfacción con la vida de las personas incluidas en la encuesta. Además, factores sociodemográficos tales como edad, género, nivel de ingresos o país también han sido evaluados. Tras aplicar distintos análisis estadísticos los resultados concluyen, entre otros, que las personas que no han utilizado  previamente internet incrementan su bienestar al incrementar su frecuencia de uso. . Y también que el uso de internet influye de forma distinta en las personas dependiendo de sus características sociodemográficas.  Se presentan los resultados y conclusiones adicionales para su discusión. es_ES
dc.description.abstract [EN] Internet use has been growing in the last years, and it is expected it continues expanding all over the world. Its adoption and usage are changing the way individuals interact and relate to others, and to themselves, but also their Wellbeing perception. The present study aims to analyze sociodemographic aspects such as gender, age, education, income source or country, related to the Internet use and how it impacts on Wellbeing perception.By this way, based on records from the European Social Survey - year 2016, it has been examined the relationship of Internet use and WB perception through Life Satisfaction and Happiness self-report evaluation of individuals involved in the survey. Moreover, sociodemographic factors as age, gender, education, income source or country have been examined. Several statistical studies as the ANOVA test of one factor (P-value 0.000), post-hoc Bonferroni-Tukey’ tests, or comparison tests for column proportions, when it is required, have been considered to each analysis.  Results conclude, among others, that individuals that never use the internet, increase life satisfaction and happiness with increasing the frequency of internet use. And also, the internet use influences different individuals WB attending their interval age. Further results and conclusions are presented for discussion. es_ES
dc.language Español es_ES
dc.publisher Universitat Politècnica de València es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Ciencia, Técnica y Mainstreaming Social es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd) es_ES
dc.subject Uso de Internet es_ES
dc.subject Bienestar es_ES
dc.subject Sociodemográfico es_ES
dc.subject ESS es_ES
dc.subject Internet use es_ES
dc.subject Wellbeing es_ES
dc.subject Life satisfaction es_ES
dc.subject Sociodemographic es_ES
dc.title Internet y su repercusión en la autopercepción individual del bienestar es_ES
dc.title.alternative Internet and its impact on self-perception of wellbeing es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.4995/citecma.2020.12358
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Proyectos de Ingeniería - Departament de Projectes d'Enginyeria es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Lozano Aguilar, JF.; Femenía Mulet, S. (2020). Internet y su repercusión en la autopercepción individual del bienestar. Ciencia, Técnica y Mainstreaming Social. 0(4):29-42. https://doi.org/10.4995/citecma.2020.12358 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod OJS es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 29 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 42 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 0 es_ES
dc.description.issue 4 es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn 2530-7924
dc.relation.pasarela OJS\12358 es_ES
dc.description.references Argyle, Michael. (2013). The psychology of happiness. Routledge. Argyle, M. (2001). The psicology of hapiness. Incompletaincomplete. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315812212 es_ES
dc.description.references Attié, Elodie & Meyer-Waarden, Lars (2013). The Impacts of Social Value, Cognitive Factors and Well-Being on the Use of the Internet of Things and Smart Connected Objects. es_ES
dc.description.references Barney, Darin. (2004). The network society (Vol. 2). Polity. https://doi.org/10.1145/1029383.1029382 es_ES
dc.description.references Blank, Grant, & Groselj, Darja. (2016, March). Dimensions of Internet use: amount, variety, and types. In Current Research on Information Technologies and Society: Papers from the 2013 Meetings of the American Sociological Association (p. 27). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.889189 es_ES
dc.description.references Carr, Nicholas. (2011), ¿Qué está haciendo internet con nuestra mente? Superficiales, Madrid, Taurus. https://doi.org/10.12795/AdMIRA.2011.01.11 es_ES
dc.description.references Castell, Manuel, (1996), La era de la información. Vol 1. La sociedad red, Madrid, Alianza Editorial. es_ES
dc.description.references Castellacci, Fulvio, & Tveito, Vegard. (2018). Internet use and well-being: A survey and a theoretical framework. Research Policy, 47(1), 308-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.11.007 es_ES
dc.description.references De los Santos, Gerardo. E.; de los Santos Jr., Alafredo G. & Milliron, Mark David. (Eds.). (2001). Access in the information age: Community college bridging the digital divide. Mission Viejo, CA: League for Innovation in the Community College es_ES
dc.description.references Diener, Edward & Biswas-Diener, Robert. (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being?. Social indicators research, 57(2), 119-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2350-6_6 es_ES
dc.description.references Diener, Ed, Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2002). Subjective well-being. Handbook of positive psychology, 16(2), 63-73. es_ES
dc.description.references Diener, Edward; Suh, Eunkook M.; Lucas, Richard E., & Smith, Heidi L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological bulletin, 125(2), 276. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.125.2.276 es_ES
dc.description.references DiMaggio, Paul; Hargittai, Eszter; Celeste, Coral, & Shafer, Steven (2004). From unequal access to differentiated use: A literature review and agenda for research on digital inequality. Social inequality, 355-400. es_ES
dc.description.references Djankov, Simon; Nikolova, Elena & Zilinsky, Jan. (2016). The happiness gap in Eastern Europe. Journal of Comparative Economics, 44(1), 108-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2015.10.006 es_ES
dc.description.references Easterlin, Richard A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In Nations and households in economic growth (pp. 89-125). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-205050-3.50008-7 es_ES
dc.description.references Easterlin, Richard A. (2010). Happiness, growth and the life cycle. Europe Journal of Psychology, 7(2), 395-398. es_ES
dc.description.references Easterlin, Richard A. (2013). Happiness, growth, and public policy. Economic Inquiry, 51(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00505.x es_ES
dc.description.references Ferro, Enrico; Helbig, Natalie C., & Gil-Garcia, J. Ramón. (2011). The role of IT literacy in defining digital divide policy needs. Government Information Quarterly, 28(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.05.007 es_ES
dc.description.references Filmus, Yuval. (2010). Two proofs of the central limit theorem. Recuperado de http://www. cs. toronto. edu/yuvalf/CLT. pdf. es_ES
dc.description.references Fortin, Nicole; Helliwell, John F., & Wang, Shun. (2015). How does subjective well-being vary around the world by gender and age. World happiness report, 42-75 es_ES
dc.description.references Frey, Bruno S. (2018). Happiness Can Be Measured. In Economics of Happiness (pp. 5-11). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75807-7_2 es_ES
dc.description.references Goslee, Susan & Conte, Chris. (1998). Losing ground bit by bit: Low-income communities in the information age. Benton Foundation. es_ES
dc.description.references Graham, Carol & Pozuelo, Julia R. (2017). Happiness, stress, and age: How the U curve varies across people and places. Journal of Population Economics, 30(1), 225-264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-016-0611-2 es_ES
dc.description.references Grinstead, Charles Miller & Snell, James Laurie (1997). Introduction to probability. 1997. American Mathematical Society. es_ES
dc.description.references Gross, Elisheva F.; Juvonen, Jaana & Gable, Shelly L. (2002). Internet use and well-being in adolescence. Journal of social issues, 58(1), 75-90 https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00249 es_ES
dc.description.references Gunkel, David J. (2003). Second thoughts: toward a critique of the digital divide. New media & society, 5(4), 499-522. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144480354003 es_ES
dc.description.references Haidt, Jonathan (2006), The Happiness Hypothesis. Finding modern Truth in Ancient Wirsdom, Basic Books, New York. es_ES
dc.description.references Huang, Chiungjung. (2010). Internet use and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(3), 241-249. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0217 es_ES
dc.description.references Huppert, Felicia A. & So, Timthy. (2009, July). What percentage of people in Europe are flourishing and what characterises them. In IX ISQOLS Conference. es_ES
dc.description.references Judge, Timothy A., Thoresen, Carl J., Bono, Joyce E., & Patton, Gregory K. (2001). The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.127.3.376 es_ES
dc.description.references Kahneman, Daniel & Deaton, Angus (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 107(38), 16489-16493 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1011492107 es_ES
dc.description.references Levin, RichardI. & Rubin, David S. (2004). Estadística para administración y economía.Pearson Educación, pp.338. es_ES
dc.description.references Lissitsa, Sabina & Chachashvili-Bolotin, Svetlana (2016). Life satisfaction in the internetage-Changes in the pastdecade. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 197-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Lyubomirsky Sonja; King, Laura & DienerEdward (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect:does happiness lead to success? Psychol Bull 2005;131(6):803-855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803 es_ES
dc.description.references Naiman, Robert J.; Melillo, Jerry M.; Lock, Maurice. A., & Reice, Seth. R. (1987). Longitudinal patterns of ecosystemprocesses and community structure in a subarctic river continuum. Ecology, 68(5), 1139-1156. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939199 es_ES
dc.description.references Norris, Pippa. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164887 es_ES
dc.description.references Nowland, Rebecca; Necka, Elizabeth A. & Cacioppo, John T. (2018). Loneliness and social internet use: pathways to reconnection in a digital world?. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(1), 70-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617713052 es_ES
dc.description.references OECD(2000b). Schoolingfor tomorrow: Learningto bridgethe digital divide. Paris:Author. es_ES
dc.description.references OECD (2013). SkillsOutlook 2013:First Resultsfrom the Survey ofAdult Skills."Programme for the InternationalAssessment ofAdult Competencies (PIAAC). https://doi.org/10.1787/g2a03c190-en es_ES
dc.description.references OECD (2017).Key Issues for Digitaltransformation in the G20. es_ES
dc.description.references Pal, Devika. (2017). Relationship between problematicinternet use and psychological wellbeing among adolescents inSweden. es_ES
dc.description.references Pavot, William & Diener, Edward. (1993).The affective andcognitive context ofself-reported measures of subjectivewell-being. Social Indicators Research, 28(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01086714 es_ES
dc.description.references Pavot, William& Diener,Edward. (2009). Review of thesatisfaction with life scale. In Assessing well-being(pp. 101-117). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4_5 es_ES
dc.description.references Pednekar, Neha Kishor & Tung, Suninder (2017). Problematic internet use in adolescents: Roleof identity styles,emotional autonomy, attachment, family environment and well-being. Indian Journal of Health & Wellbeing, 8(4). es_ES
dc.description.references Quintana, David; Cervantes, Alejandro; Sáez, Yago & Isasi, Pedro. (2018). Internet use and psychological well-being at advanced age: Evidence from the English longitudinal study of aging. International journal of environmental research and public health, 15(3), 480 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15030480 es_ES
dc.description.references Riff, Carol D. (2017), "Eduaimonic well-being, inequality, and health: Recent findings and future directions", Int. Rev. Econo. 2017 June: 64 (2) 159-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-017-0277-4 es_ES
dc.description.references Seligman, M. E. (2004). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. Simon and Schuster. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.161.5.936 es_ES
dc.description.references Seligman, Martin. E. P. (2002). Authentic Happiness. New York: Free Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Seligman, Martin (2011). Flourish. New York: Free Press. pp. 16-20. ISBN 9781439190760. es_ES
dc.description.references Stanton, Catherine. (2008). The Central Limit Theorem: Java Probability Applets. Accessed at http://www.math.csusb.edu/faculty/stanton/probstat/clt.html, Accessed January 2008. es_ES
dc.description.references Tripathi, Gautani & Ahad, Mohd Abdul (2017). Impact of excessive use of internet on cognitive development of youngsters. International Journal of Information Technology, 9(3), 281-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-017-0028-55 es_ES
dc.description.references Twenge, Jean M., Sherman, Rine A., & Lyubomirsky, Sonja. (2016). More happiness for young people and less for mature adults: Time period differences in subjective well-being in the United States, 1972-2014. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(2), 131-141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615602933 es_ES
dc.description.references Van Deursen, A.lexander & Van Dijk, Jan.(2011). Internet skills and the digital divide. New media & society, 13(6), 893-911.https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810386774 es_ES
dc.description.references Van Dijk, Teun A.(2013). News as discourse. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203062784 es_ES
dc.description.references Veenhoven, Ruut. (1991). Questions on happiness: Classical topics, modern answers, blind spots. Subjective well-being: Aninterdisciplinaryperspective, 2, 7-26. es_ES
dc.description.references Veenhoven, Ruut. (2013). The four qualities of life ordering concepts and measures of the goodlife. In The exploration of happiness (pp. 195-226). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5702-8_11 es_ES
dc.description.references Vittersø, Joar; Søholt, Yngvil;Hetland, Audun & Røysamb,Espen. (2010).Was Hercules happy? Some answers from a functional model of human well-being. Social Indicators Research, 95(1), 1. https://doi.org./10.1007/s11205-009-9447-4 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem