- -

A survey on 3D CAD model quality assurance and testing

RiuNet: Institutional repository of the Polithecnic University of Valencia

Share/Send to

Cited by

Statistics

A survey on 3D CAD model quality assurance and testing

Show simple item record

Files in this item

dc.contributor.author González-Lluch, C. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Company, P. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Contero, Manuel es_ES
dc.contributor.author Camba, J.D. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Plumed, R. es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-15T03:32:01Z
dc.date.available 2020-07-15T03:32:01Z
dc.date.issued 2017-02 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 0010-4485 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/147996
dc.description.abstract [EN] A new taxonomy of issues related to CAD model quality is presented, which distinguishes between explicit and procedural models. For each type of model, morphologic, syntactic, and semantic errors are characterized. The taxonomy was validated successfully when used to classify quality testing tools, which are aimed at detecting and repairing data errors that may affect the simplification, interoperability, and reusability of CAD models. The study shows that low semantic level errors that hamper simplification are reasonably covered in explicit representations, although many CAD quality testers are still unaffordable for Small and Medium Enterprises, both in terms of cost and training time. Interoperability has been reasonably solved by standards like STEP AP 203 and AP214, but model reusability is not feasible in explicit representations. Procedural representations are promising, as interactive modeling editors automatically prevent most morphologic errors derived from unsuitable modeling strategies. Interoperability problems between procedural representations are expected to decrease dramatically with STEP AP242. Higher semantic aspects of quality such as assurance of design intent, however, are hardly supported by current CAD quality testers. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and the European Regional Development Fund, through the ANNOTA project (Ref. TIN2013-46036-C3-1-R). es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Elsevier es_ES
dc.relation info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//TIN2013-46036-C3-1-R/ES/LA APLICACION DE LAS ANOTACIONES 3D EN EL CONTEXTO INDUSTRIAL DE LA EMPRESA BASADA EN MODELOS (MODEL BASED ENTERPRISE) Y LA FORMACION TECNICA/ es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Computer-Aided Design es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd) es_ES
dc.subject Quality assurance es_ES
dc.subject CAD model quality testing es_ES
dc.subject.classification EXPRESION GRAFICA EN LA INGENIERIA es_ES
dc.title A survey on 3D CAD model quality assurance and testing es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.cad.2016.10.003 es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ingeniería Gráfica - Departament d'Enginyeria Gràfica es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation González-Lluch, C.; Company, P.; Contero, M.; Camba, J.; Plumed, R. (2017). A survey on 3D CAD model quality assurance and testing. Computer-Aided Design. 83:64-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2016.10.003 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2016.10.003 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 64 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 79 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 83 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\355252 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder European Regional Development Fund es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad es_ES


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record