- -

Discovering shifts in competitive strategies in probiotics, accelerated with TechMining

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Discovering shifts in competitive strategies in probiotics, accelerated with TechMining

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Vicente;Palli;de - ...
Tamaño: 455.6Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión del Autor.
Abrir
[Cerrado]
Nombre: Scientometrics_ju ...
Tamaño: 1.206Mb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Solicitar una copia al autor
dc.contributor.author Vicente Gomila, José Miguel es_ES
dc.contributor.author Palli, Anna es_ES
dc.contributor.author de la Calle, Begoña es_ES
dc.contributor.author Artacho Ramírez, Miguel Ángel es_ES
dc.contributor.author Jimémez, Sara es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-15T03:32:15Z
dc.date.available 2020-07-15T03:32:15Z
dc.date.issued 2017-06 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 0138-9130 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/148001
dc.description.abstract [EN] Profiling the technological strategy of different competitors is a key element for the companies in a given industry, as well to technology planners and R&D strategists. The analysis of the patent portfolio of a company as well as its evolution in the time line is of interest for technology analysts and decision makers. However, the need for the participation of experts in the field of a company as well as patent specialists, slows down the process. Bibliometrics and text mining techniques contribute to the interpretation of specialists. The present paper tries to offer a step by step procedure to analyze the technology strategy of several companies through the analysis of their portfolio claims, combined with the use of TechMining with the help of a text mining tool. The procedure, complemented with a semantic TRIZ analysis provides key insights in disclosing the technological analysis of some competitors in the field of probiotics for livestock health. The results show interesting shifts in the key probiotic and prebiotic ingredients for which companies claim protection and therefore offers clues about their technology intention in the life sciences industry in a more dynamic, convenient and simple way. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship The authors would like to thank the contribution of the research institute IRTA, to the TRIZ company triz XXI and to Fernando Palop and their wise insights and guidance. The authors thank the usage of Search Technology s VantagePoint and IHS-Markit s Goldfire. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Springer-Verlag es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Scientometrics es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Technology strategy es_ES
dc.subject Bibliometrics es_ES
dc.subject Animal health es_ES
dc.subject Tech mining es_ES
dc.subject Semantic TRIZ es_ES
dc.subject.classification PROYECTOS DE INGENIERIA es_ES
dc.title Discovering shifts in competitive strategies in probiotics, accelerated with TechMining es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.type Comunicación en congreso es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s11192-017-2339-5 es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Proyectos de Ingeniería - Departament de Projectes d'Enginyeria es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Vicente Gomila, JM.; Palli, A.; De La Calle, B.; Artacho Ramírez, MÁ.; Jimémez, S. (2017). Discovering shifts in competitive strategies in probiotics, accelerated with TechMining. Scientometrics. 111(3):1907-1923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2339-5 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.conferencename 6th Global TechMining Conference (GTM 2016) es_ES
dc.relation.conferencedate Septiembre 13-13,2016 es_ES
dc.relation.conferenceplace Valencia, España es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2339-5 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1907 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 1923 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 111 es_ES
dc.description.issue 3 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\342380 es_ES
dc.description.references Abbas, A., Zhang, L., & Khan, S. (2014). A literature review on the state-of-the-art in patent analysis. World Patent Information, 37, 3–13. es_ES
dc.description.references Allen, H., Levine, T., Bandrick, M., & Casey, T. (2012). Treatment, promotion, commotion: Antibiotic alternatives in food-producing animals. Trends in Microbiology, 21(3), 114–119. es_ES
dc.description.references Animal Task Force. (2013). Research & innovation for a sustainable livestock sector in Europe. http://www.animaltaskforce.eu/Portals/0/ATF/horizon2020/ATF%20white%20paper%20Research%20priorities%20for%20a%20sustainable%20livestock%20sector%20in%20Europe.pdf . Accessed September 4, 2016. es_ES
dc.description.references Abramson, D. (2011). Patent strategies for life sciences companies to navigate the changing patent landscape. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 17, 358–364. es_ES
dc.description.references Banan-Mwine Daliri, E., & Lee, B. H. (2015). New perspectives on probiotics and disease. Food Science and Human Wellness, 4, 56–65. es_ES
dc.description.references Bubela, T., Gold, R., Gregory, G., Cahoy, D., & Castle, D. (2013). Patent landscaping for life sciences innovation: Toward consistent and transparent practices. Nature Biotechnology, 31, 202–206. es_ES
dc.description.references Chih-Hung, H. (2013). Patent value assessment and commercialization strategy. Technology forecasting & Social Change, 80, 307–319. es_ES
dc.description.references Choi, S., Yoon, J., Kim, K., Lee, J. Y., & Kim, C.-H. (2011). SAO network analysis of patents for technology trends identification: A case study of polymer electrolyte membrane technology in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Scientometrics, 88, 863–883. es_ES
dc.description.references Collins, M. D., & Gibson, G. (1999). Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics: Approaches for modulating the microbial ecology of the gut. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 69(suppl), 1052S–1057S. es_ES
dc.description.references Ernst, H. (1998). Patent portfolio for strategic technology management. Journal of Engineering Technology Management, 15, 279–308. es_ES
dc.description.references Ferraro, G., & Wanner, L. (2011). Towards the derivation of verbal content relations from patent claims using deep syntactic structures. Knowledge-Based Systems, 24, 1233–1244. es_ES
dc.description.references Foligné, B., Daniel, C., & Pot, B. (2013). Probiotics from research to market: The possibilities, risks and challenges. Current Opinion in Microbiology, 16(3), 284–292. es_ES
dc.description.references Gerken, J., & Moehrle, M. (2012). A new instrument for technology monitoring: Novelty in patents measured by semantic patent analysis. Scientometrics, 91, 645–670. es_ES
dc.description.references Grant, R. (2006). Contemporary strategic analysis (5th ed.). ISBN 1-405-1999-3. es_ES
dc.description.references Grant, E., Van den Hof, M., & Gold, R. (2014). Patent landscape analysis: A methodology in need of harmonized standards. World Patent Information, 39, 3–10. es_ES
dc.description.references He, J., Yamanaka, T., & Kano, S. (2016). Mapping university receptor based on claim embodiment quantitative analysis: A study of 31 cases form the University of Tokio. World Patent Information, 46, 49–55. es_ES
dc.description.references IHS Goldfire. www.ihsmarkit.com . Accessed November 2016. es_ES
dc.description.references Kaushik, G. (Ed.) (2015). Applied environmental biotechnology: Present scenario and future trends. Springer. ISBN 978-81-322-2122-7. es_ES
dc.description.references Kim, B., Miller, D., & Mahoney, J. (2016). The impact of the timing of patents on innovation performance. Research Policy, 45(2016), 914–928. es_ES
dc.description.references Kume, H. (2010). From low power to no power through energy harvesting: Powering up the battery-free world. Nikkei Elctronics Asia; October 31, 2010; Accessed November 2011. es_ES
dc.description.references Lanjouw, J., & Schankerman, M. (1999). The quality of ideas: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators. 7345. National Bureau for Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, USA. http://www.nber.org . Accessed September 2016. es_ES
dc.description.references Lee, C., Kim, J., Kwon, O., & Woo, H. G. (2016). Stochastic technology life cycle analysis using multiple patent indicators. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 106(2016), 53–64. es_ES
dc.description.references Mogee, M. E. (1991). Using patent data for technology analysis and planning. Research-Technology Management, 34(4), 43–49. es_ES
dc.description.references Niwa, S. (2016). Patent claims and economic growth. Economic Modelling, 54, 377–381. es_ES
dc.description.references Noh, H., Jo, Y., & Lee, S. (2015). Keyword selection and processing strategy for applying text mining to patent analysis. World Patent Information, 42, 4348–4360. es_ES
dc.description.references O’Callaghan, T. F., Ross, R. P., Stanton, C., & Clarke, G. (2016). The gut micorbiome as a virtual endocrine organ with implicaitons for farm and domestic animal endocrinology. Domestic Animal Endocrinology, 56, S44–S55. es_ES
dc.description.references Pargaonkar, Y. (2016). Leveraging patent landscape analysis and IP competitive intelligence. World Patent Information, 45, 10–20. es_ES
dc.description.references Park, H., Yoon, J., & Kim, K. (2012). Identifiying patent infringement using SAO based semantic technological similarities. Scientometrics, 90, 515–529. es_ES
dc.description.references Park, H., Yoon, J., & Kim, K. (2013). Identification and evaluation of corporations for merger and acquisition strategies using patent information and text mining. Scientometrics, 97, 883–909. es_ES
dc.description.references Porter, M. (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business Review. January 2008. 1–17. Reprint R0801E. www.hbrreprints.org . es_ES
dc.description.references Porter, A. L., & Cunningham, S. (2005). Tech Mining. Hoboken: Wiley Interscience. es_ES
dc.description.references Porter, A., & Newman, N. (2011). Mining external R&D. Technovation, 31, 171–176. es_ES
dc.description.references Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on additives for use in animal nutrition Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32003R1831 . es_ES
dc.description.references Rose, C., Cronin, J., & Schwartz, R. (2007). Communicating the value of your intellectual property to Wall Street. Research Technology Management, 50(2), 36–40. es_ES
dc.description.references Schrezenmeir, J., & De Vrese, M. (2001). Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics—Approaching a definition. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 73(2), 361s–364s. es_ES
dc.description.references Soranzo, B., Nosella, A., & Filippini, R. (2016). Managing firm patents: A bibliometric investigation into the state of the art. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 42, 15–30. es_ES
dc.description.references Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15, 285–305. es_ES
dc.description.references The patent guide; A handbook for analyzing and interpreting patent data. UK Intellectual patent office. es_ES
dc.description.references Tong, X., & Frame, D. (1994). Technological performance with patent claims data. Research Policy, 23, 133–141. es_ES
dc.description.references VantagePoint. www.theVantagePoint.com . Accessed September 20, 2016. es_ES
dc.description.references Verberne, S., D’hondt, E., & Oostdijk, N. (2010). Quantifying the challenges in parsing patent claims. In The 1st international workshop on Advances in Patent Information Retrieval (AsPIRe’10), Milton Keynes, UK. es_ES
dc.description.references Verbitsky, M. (2004). Semantic TRIZ, triz-journal.com. http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/2004/ . es_ES
dc.description.references Vicente-Gomila, J. M. (2014). The contribution of syntactic-semantic approach to the search for complimentary literatures for scientific or technical discovery. Scientometrics. doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1299-2 . es_ES
dc.description.references Vicente-Gomila, J. M., & Palop, F. (2013). Combining tech-mining and semantic-TRIZ for a faster and better technology analysis: A case in energy storage systems. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 25(6), 725–743. es_ES
dc.description.references Wang, M., Chiu, T., & Chen, W. (2009). Exploring potential R&D collaborators based on patent portfolio analysis: The case of biosensors. In PICMET 2009 Proceedings, August 2–6, Portland, Oregon, USA. es_ES
dc.description.references Wang, J., Lu, F., & Loh, H. (2015). A two-level parser for patent claim parsing. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 29, 431–439. es_ES
dc.description.references Weenen, T. C., Pronker, E. S., Commandeur, H. R., & Claasen, E. (2013). Patenting in the European medical nutrition industry: Trends, opportunities and strategies. PharmaNutrition, 1, 13–21. es_ES
dc.description.references Xie, Z., & Miyazaki, K. (2013). Evaluating the effectiveness of keyword search strategy for patent identification. World Patent Information, 35(1), 20–30. es_ES
dc.description.references Yang, Y., & Choct, M. (2009). Dietary modulation of gut microflora in broiler chickens: A review of the role of six kinds of alternatives to in-feed antibiotics. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 65, 97–114. es_ES
dc.description.references Yang, S.-Y., & Soo, V.-W. (2012). Extract conceptual graphs from plain texts in patent claims. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 25, 874–887. es_ES
dc.description.references Yoon, J., Park, H., & Kim, K. (2013). Identifying technological competition trends for R&D planning using dynamic patent maps: SAO-bassed content analysis. Scientometrics, 94, 313–331. es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem