- -

Risk Analysis of a Fuel Storage Terminal Using HAZOP and FTA

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Risk Analysis of a Fuel Storage Terminal Using HAZOP and FTA

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Fuentes;González- ...
Tamaño: 3.669Mb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Fuentes Bargues, José Luis es_ES
dc.contributor.author González-Cruz, María-Carmen es_ES
dc.contributor.author González-Gaya, Cristina es_ES
dc.contributor.author Baixauli-Perez, M.P. es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-18T03:31:41Z
dc.date.available 2020-07-18T03:31:41Z
dc.date.issued 2017-06-30 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 1660-4601 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/148241
dc.description.abstract [EN] The size and complexity of industrial chemical plants, together with the nature of the products handled, means that an analysis and control of the risks involved is required. This paper presents a methodology for risk analysis in chemical and allied industries that is based on a combination of HAZard and OPerability analysis (HAZOP) and a quantitative analysis of the most relevant risks through the development of fault trees, fault tree analysis (FTA). Results from FTA allow prioritizing the preventive and corrective measures to minimize the probability of failure. An analysis of a case study is performed; it consists in the terminal for unloading chemical and petroleum products, and the fuel storage facilities of two companies, in the port of Valencia (Spain). HAZOP analysis shows that loading and unloading areas are the most sensitive areas of the plant and where the most significant danger is a fuel spill. FTA analysis indicates that the most likely event is a fuel spill in tank truck loading area. A sensitivity analysis from the FTA results show the importance of the human factor in all sequences of the possible accidents, so it should be mandatory to improve the training of the staff of the plants. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship This paper was funded by the Universitat Politècnica de València and UNED, both of Spain. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher MDPI AG es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof International Journal of Environmental research and Public Health es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Risk es_ES
dc.subject HAZard and OPerability analysis (HAZOP) es_ES
dc.subject Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) es_ES
dc.subject Fuel es_ES
dc.subject Storage es_ES
dc.subject.classification PROYECTOS DE INGENIERIA es_ES
dc.title Risk Analysis of a Fuel Storage Terminal Using HAZOP and FTA es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/ijerph14070705 es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Proyectos de Ingeniería - Departament de Projectes d'Enginyeria es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Fuentes Bargues, JL.; González-Cruz, M.; González-Gaya, C.; Baixauli-Perez, M. (2017). Risk Analysis of a Fuel Storage Terminal Using HAZOP and FTA. International Journal of Environmental research and Public Health. 14(7):1-26. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070705 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070705 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 26 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 14 es_ES
dc.description.issue 7 es_ES
dc.identifier.pmid 28665325 es_ES
dc.identifier.pmcid PMC5551143 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\340158 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Universitat Politècnica de València es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia es_ES
dc.description.references Tixier, J., Dusserre, G., Salvi, O., & Gaston, D. (2002). Review of 62 risk analysis methodologies of industrial plants. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 15(4), 291-303. doi:10.1016/s0950-4230(02)00008-6 es_ES
dc.description.references Planas, E., Arnaldos, J., Darbra, R. M., Muñoz, M., Pastor, E., & Vílchez, J. A. (2014). Historical evolution of process safety and major-accident hazards prevention in Spain. Contribution of the pioneer Joaquim Casal. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 28, 109-117. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2013.04.005 es_ES
dc.description.references Woodruff, J. M. (2005). Consequence and likelihood in risk estimation: A matter of balance in UK health and safety risk assessment practice. Safety Science, 43(5-6), 345-353. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2005.07.003 es_ES
dc.description.references Reniers, G. L. L., Dullaert, W., Ale, B. J. M., & Soudan, K. (2005). Developing an external domino accident prevention framework: Hazwim. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 18(3), 127-138. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2005.03.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Høj, N. P., & Kröger, W. (2002). Risk analyses of transportation on road and railway from a European Perspective. Safety Science, 40(1-4), 337-357. doi:10.1016/s0925-7535(01)00053-4 es_ES
dc.description.references Marhavilas, P. K., Koulouriotis, D., & Gemeni, V. (2011). Risk analysis and assessment methodologies in the work sites: On a review, classification and comparative study of the scientific literature of the period 2000–2009. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 24(5), 477-523. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2011.03.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Hailwood, M., Gawlowski, M., Schalau, B., & Schönbucher, A. (2009). Conclusions Drawn from the Buncefield and Naples Incidents Regarding the Utilization of Consequence Models. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 32(2), 207-231. doi:10.1002/ceat.200800595 es_ES
dc.description.references Willey, R. J., Hendershot, D. C., & Berger, S. (2007). The accident in Bhopal: Observations 20 years later. Process Safety Progress, 26(3), 180-184. doi:10.1002/prs.10191 es_ES
dc.description.references Estadísticas\Radiografía Económica del Sector Químico 2016www.feique.org/pdfs/Radiografia_Economica_del_sector_2016.pdf es_ES
dc.description.references Estadísticas de Seguridad\Informe de Siniestrabilidad 2013www.feique.org/pdfs/informeseguridad2015.pdf es_ES
dc.description.references ¿Qué Hacemos?/Riesgos: Prevención y Planificación/Tecnológicos/Químicos/Distribuciónwww.proteccioncivil.es/riesgos/quimicos/distribucion es_ES
dc.description.references Papers Prevention. Nº 238: HAZOP at Processing Facilitieswww.insht.es/InshtWeb/Contenidos/Documentacion/FichasTecnicas/NTP/Ficheros/201a300/ntp_238.pdf es_ES
dc.description.references Dunjó, J., Fthenakis, V., Vílchez, J. A., & Arnaldos, J. (2010). Hazard and operability (HAZOP) analysis. A literature review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 173(1-3), 19-32. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.08.076 es_ES
dc.description.references Demichela, M., & Camuncoli, G. (2014). Risk based decision making. Discussion on two methodological milestones. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 28, 101-108. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2013.05.010 es_ES
dc.description.references Mitkowski, P. T., & Bal, S. K. (2015). Integration of Fire and Explosion Index in 3D Process Plant Design Software. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 38(7), 1212-1222. doi:10.1002/ceat.201400644 es_ES
dc.description.references Bendixen, L. M., & O’Neill, J. K. (1984). Chemical plant risk assessment using HAZOP and fault tree methods. Plant/Operations Progress, 3(3), 179-184. doi:10.1002/prsb.720030314 es_ES
dc.description.references Demichela, M., Marmo, L., & Piccinini, N. (2002). Recursive operability analysis of a complex plant with multiple protection devices. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 77(3), 301-308. doi:10.1016/s0951-8320(02)00063-7 es_ES
dc.description.references COZZANI, V., BONVICINI, S., SPADONI, G., & ZANELLI, S. (2007). Hazmat transport: A methodological framework for the risk analysis of marshalling yards. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 147(1-2), 412-423. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.065 es_ES
dc.description.references Casamirra, M., Castiglia, F., Giardina, M., & Lombardo, C. (2009). Safety studies of a hydrogen refuelling station: Determination of the occurrence frequency of the accidental scenarios. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34(14), 5846-5854. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.01.096 es_ES
dc.description.references Kim, E., Lee, K., Kim, J., Lee, Y., Park, J., & Moon, I. (2011). Development of Korean hydrogen fueling station codes through risk analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36(20), 13122-13131. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.07.053 es_ES
dc.description.references Declaración Ambiental y Responsabilidad Social Corporativawww.tepsa.es es_ES
dc.description.references Chang, J. I., & Lin, C.-C. (2006). A study of storage tank accidents. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 19(1), 51-59. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2005.05.015 es_ES
dc.description.references Aneziris, O. N., Papazoglou, I. A., Konstantinidou, M., & Nivolianitou, Z. (2014). Integrated risk assessment for LNG terminals. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 28, 23-35. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2013.07.014 es_ES
dc.description.references Taveau, J. (2011). Explosion of fixed roof atmospheric storage tanks, part 1: Background and review of case histories. Process Safety Progress, 30(4), 381-392. doi:10.1002/prs.10459 es_ES
dc.description.references Papers Prevention. Nº 333: Probabilistic Risk Analysis: Fault Tree Analysiswww.insht.es/InshtWeb/Contenidos/Documentacion/FichasTecnicas/NTP/Ficheros/301a400/ntp_333.pdf es_ES
dc.description.references Ronza, A., Carol, S., Espejo, V., Vílchez, J. A., & Arnaldos, J. (2006). A quantitative risk analysis approach to port hydrocarbon logistics. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 128(1), 10-24. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.032 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem