- -

Grouping of breeding rabbit does at different time points: effects on fertility, mortality and weight

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Grouping of breeding rabbit does at different time points: effects on fertility, mortality and weight

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Braconnier, Michèle es_ES
dc.contributor.author Munari, Chiara es_ES
dc.contributor.author Gómez, Yamenah es_ES
dc.contributor.author Gebhardt-Henrich, Sabine es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-27T07:42:16Z
dc.date.available 2020-07-27T07:42:16Z
dc.date.issued 2020-06-30
dc.identifier.issn 1257-5011
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/148726
dc.description.abstract [EN] Semi-group housing in breeding does has been shown to reduce production and breeding success in comparison to single-housed animals. One reason for this reduction could be stress and aggression when grouping does only 2 d after artificial insemination. The aim of this study was to test different time points of grouping on fertility of does, body weight of both kits and does, and mortality rates. Hence, does were separated and housed individually one day before giving birth to their kits. The does were then artificially inseminated on day 10 postpartum (dpp) and regrouped according to the treatment (time point) on 12 (TG12), 18 (TG18), or 22 (TG22) dpp, respectively. In total, five trials with three groups pertaining to the three treatments (eight does per treatment group) were conducted. Non-pregnant does were replaced with pregnant does before each new trial (57 different does needed). Data were analysed with (generalised) linear mixed effect models and survival analysis. There were no significant differences in fertility, body weight or mortality of does among the treatments. The average fertility rate (number of kindling events/number of artificial inseminations×100) was low (40.92%) and seasonal effects may have partially masked treatment effects, as most trials took place during winter. Likewise, the survival rate of kits was not influenced by the treatment (survival test: χ2=2.3, df = 2, P = 0.3). Body weight of the kits was also not affected by the time point of grouping (average weight: 447.70±46.42 g (TG12), 452.20±55.30 g (TG18) and 460.06±89.23 g (TG22); P = 0.33). In conclusion, grouping does at a later time point in the reproductive cycle did not show any significant improvement in the breeding or productive success in a Swiss semi-group housing system. An elongated separation from conspecifics did not enhance the welfare of semi-group housed rabbits. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship We thank the Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office (BLV, Project No. 2.18.04) for the financial support for this study. Also many thanks to Felix Näf, Frans Köhlen and the team of KaniSwiss for the professional support throughout the experiment. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Universitat Politècnica de València es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof World Rabbit Science es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento - No comercial - Compartir igual (by-nc-sa) es_ES
dc.subject Rabbit es_ES
dc.subject Reproduction es_ES
dc.subject Survival rate es_ES
dc.subject Semi-group housing es_ES
dc.subject Management es_ES
dc.subject Body weight es_ES
dc.title Grouping of breeding rabbit does at different time points: effects on fertility, mortality and weight es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.4995/wrs.2020.13107
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FSVO//2.18.04/CH/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Braconnier, M.; Munari, C.; Gómez, Y.; Gebhardt-Henrich, S. (2020). Grouping of breeding rabbit does at different time points: effects on fertility, mortality and weight. World Rabbit Science. 28(2):73-80. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2020.13107 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod OJS es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2020.13107 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 73 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 80 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 28 es_ES
dc.description.issue 2 es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn 1989-8886
dc.relation.pasarela OJS\13107 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Bundesamt für Lebensmittelsicherheit und Veterinärwesen, Suiza es_ES
dc.description.references Albers P.C.H., de Vries H. 2001. Elo-rating as a tool in the sequential estimation of dominance strengths. Anim. Behav., 61: 489-495. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1571 es_ES
dc.description.references Al-Saef A.M., Khalil M.H., Al-Homidan A.H., Al-Dobaib S.N., Al-Sobayil K.A., García M.L., Baselga M. 2008. Crossbreeding effects for litter and lactation traits in a Saudi project to develop new lines of rabbits suitable for hot climates. Livest. Sci., 118: 238-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2008.01.025 es_ES
dc.description.references Andrist C.A., Bigler L., Würbel H., Roth B.A. 2014. Masking odour when regrouping rabbit does: Effect on aggression, stress and lesions. Livest. Sci., 170: 150-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2014.10.017 es_ES
dc.description.references Andrist C.A., Bigler L.M., Würbel H., Roth B.A. 2012. Effects of group stability on aggression, stress and injuries in breeding rabbits. Appl. Anim. Behavi. Sci., 142: 182-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.10.017 es_ES
dc.description.references Arias-Álvarez M., García-García R.M., Torres-Rovira L., González-Bulnes A., Rebollar P.G., Lorenzo P.L. 2010. Influence of hormonal and nonhormonal estrus synchronization methods on follicular and oocyte quality in primiparous lactating does at early postpartum period. Theriogenology, 73: 26-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.07.017 es_ES
dc.description.references Bates D., Maechler M., Bolker B., Walker S. 2019. lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models using "Eigen" and S4. Available at https://cran.r-project.org/package=lme4 Accessed March 2020. es_ES
dc.description.references Bench C.J., Gonyou,H.W. 2007. Effect of environmental enrichment and breed line on the incidence of belly nosing in piglets weaned at 7 and 14 days-of-age. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 105: 26-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.06.010 es_ES
dc.description.references Braconnier M., Gómez Y., Gebhardt-Henrich S.G. 2020. Different regrouping schedules in semi group-housed rabbit does: Effects on agonistic behaviour, stress and lesions. Appl. Anim.Behav. Sci., 228, 105024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2020.105024 es_ES
dc.description.references Buijs S., Maertens L. 2015. Impact of housing system (cage vs. part-time housing) and floor type on rabbit doe welfare. In Proc.: 19th International Symposium on Housing and Diseases of Rabbits, Fur Providing Animals and Pet Animals. es_ES
dc.description.references Canty A., Ripley B. 2019. boot: Bootstrap Functions (Originally by Angelo Canty for S). Available at https://cran.r-project.org/package=boot. Accessed March 2020. es_ES
dc.description.references Cardinali R., Dal Bosco A., Bonanno A., Di Grigoli A., Rebollar P.G., Lorenzo P.L., Castellini C. 2008. Connection between body condition score, chemical characteristics of body and reproductive traits of rabbit does. Livest. Sci., 116: 209-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2007.10.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Castellini C., Bosco A.D., Mugnai C. 2003. Comparison of different reproduction protocols for rabbit does: effect of litter size and mating interval. Livest. Prod. Sci., 83: 131-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(03)00070-8 es_ES
dc.description.references Chu L.R., Garner J.P., Mench J.A. 2004. A behavioral comparison of New Zealand White rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) housed individually or in pairs in conventional laboratory cages. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 85: 121-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2003.09.011 es_ES
dc.description.references Coureaud G., Schaal B., Coudert P., Hudson R., Rideaud P., Orgeur P. 2000. Mimicking Natural Nursing Conditions Promotes EarlyPup Survival in Domestic Rabbits. Ethology, 106: 207-225. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2000.00521.x es_ES
dc.description.references Dal Bosco A., Mugnai C., Martino M., Szendrő Z., Mattioli S., Cambiotti V., Cartoni Mancinelli A., Moscati L., Castellini C. 2019. Housing Rabbit Does in a Combi System with Removable Walls: Effect on Behaviour and Reproductive Performance. Animals, 9: 528. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9080528 es_ES
dc.description.references DiVincenti L., Rehrig A.N., Rehrig A.N. 2016. The Social Nature of European Rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science: JAALAS. es_ES
dc.description.references EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). 2005. The impact of the current housing and husbandry systems on the health and welfare of farmed domestic rabbits. EFSA Journal. 267: 1-31. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2005.267 es_ES
dc.description.references Gerencsér Z., Matics Z., Szabó R.T., Kustos K., Mikó A., Nagy I., Odermatt M., Atkári T., Szendrő Z. 2019. Aggressiveness, Mating Behaviour and Lifespan of Group Housed Rabbit Does. Animals, 9: 708. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9100708 es_ES
dc.description.references Graf S.B.A.B. 2010. Aspekte des agonistischen Verhaltens weiblicher Zuchtkaninchen in der Gruppenhaltung 127. es_ES
dc.description.references Graf S., Bigler L., Failing K., Würbel H., Buchwalder T. 2011. Regrouping rabbit does in a familiar or novel pen: Effects on agonistic behaviour, injuries and core body temperature. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 135: 121-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.10.009 es_ES
dc.description.references Harned M.A., Casida L.E. 1969. Some postpartum reproductive phenomena in the domestic rabbit. J. Anim. Sci., 28: 785-801. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1969.286785x es_ES
dc.description.references Højsgaard U.H.S. 2017. pbkrtest: Parametric Bootstrap and Kenward Roger Based Methods for Mixed Model Comparison. Available at https://cran.r-project.org/package=pbkrtest. Accessed March 2020. es_ES
dc.description.references Holst D. von, Hutzelmeyer H., Kaetzke P., Khaschei M., Rödel H.G. 2002. Social rank, fecundity and lifetime reproductive success in wild European rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol., 51: 245-254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-001-0427-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Holst D. von, Hutzelmeyer H., Kaetzke P., Khaschei M., Schönheiter R. 1999. Social rank, stress, fitness, and life expectancy in wild rabbits. Naturwissenschaften, 86: 388-393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001140050638 es_ES
dc.description.references Hudson R., Shaal B., Bilkó Á., Altbäcker V. 1996. Just three minutes a day: The behaviour of young rabbits viewed in the context of limited maternal care. In Proc. 6th World Rabbit Congress, 1996 July, Toulouse, France. 2: 395-403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2007.01447.x es_ES
dc.description.references Hudson R., Shaal B., Martínez-Gómez M., Distel H. 2000. Motheryoung relations in the European rabbit: physiological and behavioural locks and keys. World Rabbit Sci., 8: 85-90. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2000.424 es_ES
dc.description.references Kermabon A.Y., Prunier A., Djiane J., Salesse R. 1995. Gonadotropins in Lactating Sows Exposed to Long or Short Days during Pregnancy and Lactation: Serum Concentrations and Ovarian Receptors1. Biol. Reprod., 53: 1095-1102. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod53.5.1095 es_ES
dc.description.references Kulik L., Neumann C. 2019. EloRating: Animal Dominance Hierarchies by Elo Rating. Available at https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/EloRating/index.html. Accessed September 2019. es_ES
dc.description.references Machado L.C., Martínez-Paredes E., Cervera C. 2019. Performance of rabbit does housed in collective pens and individual cages. World Rabbit Sci., 27: 227-235. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2019.11540 es_ES
dc.description.references Maertens, L., Buijs, S. 2015. Production performances of semigroup housed rabbit does. In Proc.: 19th International Symposium on Housing and Diseases of Rabbits, Furproviding Animals and Pet Animals. Celle, Germany, pp. 22-31. es_ES
dc.description.references Manteca X. 1998. Neurophysiology and assessment of welfare. Meat Sci., 49: 205-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(98)90049-3 es_ES
dc.description.references Mugnai C., Dal Bosco A., Castellini C. 2009. Effect of different rearing systems and pre-kindling handling on behaviour and performance of rabbit does. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 118: 91-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.02.007 es_ES
dc.description.references Munari C., Mugnai C., Braconnier M., Toscano M.J., Gebhardt-Henrich S.G. 2020. Effect of different management protocols for grouping does on aggression and dominance hierarchies. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 104999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2020.104999 es_ES
dc.description.references Pratt N.C., Lisk R.D. 1991. Role of progesterone in mediating stress-related litter deficits in the golden hamster (Mesocricetus auratus). J. Reprod. Fert., 92: 139-146. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0920139 es_ES
dc.description.references R Core Team. 2019. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/ es_ES
dc.description.references Rödel H.G., Starkloff A., Bautista A., Friedrich A.C., Von Holst D. 2008. Infanticide and maternal offspring defence in European rabbits under natural breeding conditions. Ethology, 114: 22-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2007.01447.x es_ES
dc.description.references Rommers J.M., Boiti C., De Jong I., Brecchia G. 2006. Performance and behaviour of rabbit does in a group-housing system with natural mating or artificial insemination. Reprod. Nutr. Dev., 46: 677-687. https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:2006038 es_ES
dc.description.references Rommers J.M., Kemp B., Houwers H.W., Gunnink H., De Jong I.C. 2012. Description of nestbox visits and suckling events in a group housing system for rabbit does as compared to individual cages. World Rabbit Sci., 20: 231-240. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2012.1231 es_ES
dc.description.references Schlolaut W., Hudson R., Rödel H.G. 2013. Impact of rearing management on health in domestic rabbits: A review. World Rabbit Sci., 21: 145-159. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2013.1029 es_ES
dc.description.references Szendrő Z., Trocino A., Hoy S., Xiccato G., Villagrá A., Maertens L. (2019). A review of recent research outcomes on the housing of farmed domestic rabbits: reproducing does. World Rabbit Sci., 27: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2019.10599 es_ES
dc.description.references Szendrő Z., Mikó A., Odermatt M., Gerencsér Z., Radnai I., Dezséry B., Garai É., Nagy I., Szendrő K., Matics Z., 2013a. Comparison of performance and welfare of singlecaged and group-housed rabbit does. Animal, 7: 463-468. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731112001760 es_ES
dc.description.references Szendrő Z., Mikó A., Odermatt M., Gerencsér Z., Radnai I., Dezséry B., Garai É., Nagy I., Szendrő K., Matics Z. 2013b. Comparison of performance and welfare of single-caged and group-housed rabbit does. Animal, 7: 463-468. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731112001760 es_ES
dc.description.references Theau-Clément M. 2000. Advances in biostimulation methods applied to rabbit reproduction. In Proc.: 7th World Rabbit Congress, 4-7 july 2000, Valencia, Spain, 8: 61-79. es_ES
dc.description.references Therneau T.M. 2019. survival: Survival Analysis. Available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/survival/index.html. Accessed September 2019. es_ES
dc.description.references Vella D., Donnelly T.M. 2012. Basic Anatomy, Physiology, and Husbandry, 3rd ed., Ferrets, Rabbits, and Rodents. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4160-6621-7.00012-9 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem