Almansa, C., & Martínez-Paz, J. M. (2011). What weight should be assigned to future environmental impacts? A probabilistic cost benefit analysis using recent advances on discounting. Science of The Total Environment, 409(7), 1305-1314. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.12.004
Berbel, J., & Expósito, A. (2017). Economic challenges for the EU Water Framework Directive reform and implementation. European Planning Studies, 26(1), 20-34. doi:10.1080/09654313.2017.1364353
Boeuf, B., Fritsch, O., & Martin-Ortega, J. (2016). Undermining European Environmental Policy Goals? The EU Water Framework Directive and the Politics of Exemptions. Water, 8(9), 388. doi:10.3390/w8090388
[+]
Almansa, C., & Martínez-Paz, J. M. (2011). What weight should be assigned to future environmental impacts? A probabilistic cost benefit analysis using recent advances on discounting. Science of The Total Environment, 409(7), 1305-1314. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.12.004
Berbel, J., & Expósito, A. (2017). Economic challenges for the EU Water Framework Directive reform and implementation. European Planning Studies, 26(1), 20-34. doi:10.1080/09654313.2017.1364353
Boeuf, B., Fritsch, O., & Martin-Ortega, J. (2016). Undermining European Environmental Policy Goals? The EU Water Framework Directive and the Politics of Exemptions. Water, 8(9), 388. doi:10.3390/w8090388
Bolinches, A., De Stefano, L., & Paredes-Arquiola, J. (2020). Designing river water quality policy interventions with scarce data: the case of the Middle Tagus Basin, Spain. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 65(5), 749-762. doi:10.1080/02626667.2019.1708915
Brouwer, R. (2008). The potential role of stated preference methods in the Water Framework Directive to assess disproportionate costs. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51(5), 597-614. doi:10.1080/09640560802207860
CHG Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana. 2015. “Anejo 12 Del Plan Hidrológico. Objetivos Medioambientales y Exenciones.” http://planhidrologico2015.chguadiana.es/corps/planhidrologico2015/data/resources/file/documentos2015/definitivos/segundaetapa/RPH_14_1Rev-T2-Ane12_OMAs_vf.pdf.
CHT Confederación Hidrografica del Tajo. 2018a. “Memoria de Documentos Iniciales: Programa, Calendario, Estudio General Sobre La Demarcación y Fórmulas de Consulta. Plan Hidrológico de La Demarcación Hidrográfica Del Tajo Revisión de Tercer Ciclo (2021-2027).” http://www.chtajo.es/LaCuenca/Planes/PlanHidrologico/Planif_2021-2027/Documents/Doc_Iniciales/20181019_DocumentosinicialesTERCERcicloMEMORIA.pdf.
CHT Confederación Hidrografica del Tajo. 2018b. “Resultados/Informes: Aguas Superficiales - Control Fisicoquímico.” 2018. http://www.chtajo.es/LaCuenca/CalidadAgua/Resultados_Informes/Paginas/RISupFisicoQuímico.aspx.
Courtecuisse, Arnaud. 2005. “Water Prices and Households’ Available Income: Key Indicators for the Assessment of Potential Disproportionate Costs-Illustration from the Artois-Picardie Basin (France).” Paper presented at the IWG-Env International Work Session on Water Statistics. Vienna, June 20-22. http://mdgs.un.org/unsd/environment/envpdf/pap_wasess5b3france.pdf
European Commission. 2008. Guide to Cost Benefit Analysis of Investment Projects. Luxembourg: EC.
European Commission. 2009. Guidance Document No. 20, on Exemptions to the Environmental Objectives. Luxembourg: EC.
European Commission. 2010. “Compliance Costs of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive.” http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-urbanwaste/info/pdf/Cost of UWWTD-Final report_2010.pdf.
European Commission. 2019. “SWD(2019) 30 Final. COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT European Overview: River Basin Management Plans.” Brussels: EC. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=SWD:2019:30:FIN&qid=1551267381862&from=EN.
European Environment Agency. 2019a. “Natura 2000 Data: The European Network of Protected Sites.” 2019. https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/natura-10#tab-gis-data.
European Environment Agency. 2019b. “WISE WFD Database (Water Framework Directive Database).” 2019. https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/wise-wfd-3.
European Parliament and Council. 2000. “Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy.” OJ, no. L 327: 2014–7001. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02000L0060-20141120&from=EN.
European Water Directors. 2016. “WFD Reporting Guidance 2016.” http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/help/WFD/WFD_521_2016/Guidance/WFD_ReportingGuidance.pdf.
European Water Directors. 2019. The Future of the Water Framework Directive (WFD): Water Directors Input to the Fitness Check Process on Experiences and Challenges of WFD’s Implementation and Options for the Way Forward. Brussels: European Water Directors.
Eurostat. 2019. “Database: Eurostat.” 2019. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/environment/environmental-protection-expenditure/database.
Feld, C. K., Segurado, P., & Gutiérrez-Cánovas, C. (2016). Analysing the impact of multiple stressors in aquatic biomonitoring data: A ‘cookbook’ with applications in R. Science of The Total Environment, 573, 1320-1339. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.243
Galioto, F., Marconi, V., Raggi, M., & Viaggi, D. (2013). An Assessment of Disproportionate Costs in WFD: The Experience of Emilia-Romagna. Water, 5(4), 1967-1995. doi:10.3390/w5041967
Görlach, By Benjamin, and Britta Pielen. 2007. “Disproportionate Costs in the EC Water Framework Directive: The Concept and Its Practical Implementation.” Paper presented at the Environmental Economics Conference, London, March 23, 2007.
Hering, D., Borja, A., Carstensen, J., Carvalho, L., Elliott, M., Feld, C. K., … Pont, D. (2010). The European Water Framework Directive at the age of 10: A critical review of the achievements with recommendations for the future. Science of The Total Environment, 408(19), 4007-4019. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.05.031
Hernández-Sancho, F., Molinos-Senante, M., & Sala-Garrido, R. (2010). Economic valuation of environmental benefits from wastewater treatment processes: An empirical approach for Spain. Science of The Total Environment, 408(4), 953-957. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.028
INE Instituto Nacional de Estadística. 2018a. “Cifras Oficiales de Población Resultantes de La Revisión Del Padrón Municipal.” 2018. https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Tabla.htm?t=2881&L=0.
INE Instituto Nacional de Estadística. 2018b. “Survey on Water Supply and Sewerage.” 2018. http://www.ine.es/dynt3/inebase/index.htm?type=pcaxis&path=/t26/p069/p03/serie&file=pcaxis&L=1.
Jähnig, S. C., Brabec, K., Buffagni, A., Erba, S., Lorenz, A. W., Ofenböck, T., … Hering, D. (2010). A comparative analysis of restoration measures and their effects on hydromorphology and benthic invertebrates in 26 central and southern European rivers. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47(3), 671-680. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01807.x
Jensen, C. L., Jacobsen, B. H., Olsen, S. B., Dubgaard, A., & Hasler, B. (2013). A practical CBA-based screening procedure for identification of river basins where the costs of fulfilling the WFD requirements may be disproportionate – applied to the case of Denmark. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2(2), 164-200. doi:10.1080/21606544.2013.785676
Klauer, B., Sigel, K., & Schiller, J. (2016). Disproportionate costs in the EU Water Framework Directive—How to justify less stringent environmental objectives. Environmental Science & Policy, 59, 10-17. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.017
Macháč, J., & Brabec, J. (2017). Assessment of Disproportionate Costs According to the WFD: Comparison of Applications of two Approaches in the Catchment of the Stanovice Reservoir (Czech Republic). Water Resources Management, 32(4), 1453-1466. doi:10.1007/s11269-017-1879-z
Martin-Ortega, J., Skuras, D., Perni, A., Holen, S., & Psaltopoulos, D. (2014). The Disproportionality Principle in the WFD: How to Actually Apply it? Economics of Water Management in Agriculture, 214-256. doi:10.1201/b17309-14
Molinos-Senante, M., Hernández-Sancho, F., & Sala-Garrido, R. (2010). Economic feasibility study for wastewater treatment: A cost–benefit analysis. Science of The Total Environment, 408(20), 4396-4402. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.07.014
OECD. 2009. Managing Water for All: An OECD Perspective on Pricing. Paris: OECD.
PALMER, M. A., MENNINGER, H. L., & BERNHARDT, E. (2010). River restoration, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity: a failure of theory or practice? Freshwater Biology, 55, 205-222. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02372.x
Renno, J., and B. Klauer. 2018. “EG-Wasserrahmenrichtlinie: Eine Vertiefte Analyse Der Beiden Leipziger Ansätze Zur Begründung von Ausnahmen Mit Der Unverhältnismäßigkeit Der Kosten,” no. 4. https://www.ufz.de/index.php?de=20939&pub_id=21203.
Roumboutsos, A. B. (2010). Sustainability, Social Discount Rates and the Selection of Project Procurement Method. International Advances in Economic Research, 16(2), 165-174. doi:10.1007/s11294-009-9250-7
Segurado, P., Almeida, C., Neves, R., Ferreira, M. T., & Branco, P. (2018). Understanding multiple stressors in a Mediterranean basin: Combined effects of land use, water scarcity and nutrient enrichment. Science of The Total Environment, 624, 1221-1233. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.201
Thaler, T., Boteler, B., Dworak, T., Holen, S., & Lago, M. (2013). Investigating the use of environmental benefits in the policy decision process: a qualitative study focusing on the EU water policy. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57(10), 1515-1530. doi:10.1080/09640568.2013.816271
[-]