- -

Sustainable Management of Contemporary Art Galleries: A Delphi Survey for the Spanish Art Market

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Sustainable Management of Contemporary Art Galleries: A Delphi Survey for the Spanish Art Market

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Mateos-Ronco, Alicia es_ES
dc.contributor.author Peiró Torralba, Nieves es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2020-12-05T04:33:07Z
dc.date.available 2020-12-05T04:33:07Z
dc.date.issued 2019-01-02 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/156521
dc.description.abstract [EN] The art market operates in a very different way from conventional economic markets, ranging from its behaviors of supply and demand, the trading of goods, and the economic agents intervening in it. In addition, it is a highly unregulated market, with very little standardized information in economic terms. This paper focuses on art galleries, which are the most influential intermediaries in the Spanish primary contemporary fine-art market and perform a role that goes beyond the mere distribution of works of art. This study develops and applies a prospective methodology based on the subjective information compiled by experts, known as the Delphi method, to identify and evaluate the factors that determine the current situation and future outlook for Spanish contemporary art galleries. The results show, on one hand, that the method employed constitutes a valid option to provide reliable information. In addition, they show that the survival of these organizations will depend on their ability to adapt to the changing conditions of the economic environment, reactivating and internationalizing demand, and redirecting their business model towards sustainable management by implementing appropriate business management models and techniques. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher MDPI AG es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Sustainability es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Contemporary art market es_ES
dc.subject Art galleries es_ES
dc.subject Sustainable management es_ES
dc.subject Delphi method es_ES
dc.subject Foresight study es_ES
dc.subject.classification ECONOMIA, SOCIOLOGIA Y POLITICA AGRARIA es_ES
dc.title Sustainable Management of Contemporary Art Galleries: A Delphi Survey for the Spanish Art Market es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/su11020541 es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Economía y Ciencias Sociales - Departament d'Economia i Ciències Socials es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Mateos-Ronco, A.; Peiró Torralba, N. (2019). Sustainable Management of Contemporary Art Galleries: A Delphi Survey for the Spanish Art Market. Sustainability. 11(2):1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020541 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020541 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 15 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 11 es_ES
dc.description.issue 2 es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn 2071-1050 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\381519 es_ES
dc.description.references Baumol, W. J. (1985). Unnatural Value: Or Art Investment as Floating Crap Game. Journal of Arts Management and Law, 15(3), 47-60. doi:10.1080/07335113.1985.9942162 es_ES
dc.description.references Ginsburgh, V., & Jeanfils, P. (1995). Long-term comovements in international markets for paintings. European Economic Review, 39(3-4), 538-548. doi:10.1016/0014-2921(94)00060-d es_ES
dc.description.references Chanel, O. (1995). Is art market behaviour predictable? European Economic Review, 39(3-4), 519-527. doi:10.1016/0014-2921(94)00058-8 es_ES
dc.description.references Gérard-Varet, L.-A. (1995). On pricing the priceless: Comments on the economics of the visual art market. European Economic Review, 39(3-4), 509-518. doi:10.1016/0014-2921(94)00057-7 es_ES
dc.description.references Holub, H. W., Hutter, M., & Tappeiner, G. (1993). Light and shadow in art price computation. Journal of Cultural Economics, 17(1), 49-69. doi:10.1007/bf00820767 es_ES
dc.description.references Beckert, J., & Rössel, J. (2013). THE PRICE OF ART. European Societies, 15(2), 178-195. doi:10.1080/14616696.2013.767923 es_ES
dc.description.references Schönfeld, S., & Reinstaller, A. (2007). The effects of gallery and artist reputation on prices in the primary market for art: a note. Journal of Cultural Economics, 31(2), 143-153. doi:10.1007/s10824-007-9031-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Abdullah, A., Khadaroo, I., & Napier, C. J. (2018). Managing the performance of arts organisations: Pursuing heterogeneous objectives in an era of austerity. The British Accounting Review, 50(2), 174-184. doi:10.1016/j.bar.2017.10.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Komarova, N., & Velthuis, O. (2017). Local contexts as activation mechanisms of market development: contemporary art in emerging markets. Consumption Markets & Culture, 21(1), 1-21. doi:10.1080/10253866.2017.1284065 es_ES
dc.description.references Landeta, J., Matey, J., Ruíz, V., & Galter, J. (2008). Results of a Delphi survey in drawing up the input–output tables for Catalonia. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(1), 32-56. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2007.01.005 es_ES
dc.description.references Hayes, T. (2007). Delphi study of the future of marketing of higher education. Journal of Business Research, 60(9), 927-931. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.009 es_ES
dc.description.references Okoli, C., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42(1), 15-29. doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Maguire, J. S., & Matthews, J. (2012). Are we all cultural intermediaries now? An introduction to cultural intermediaries in context. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 15(5), 551-562. doi:10.1177/1367549412445762 es_ES
dc.description.references JOY*, A., & SHERRY, JR.‡, J. F. (2003). Disentangling the paradoxical alliances between art market and art world. Consumption Markets & Culture, 6(3), 155-181. doi:10.1080/1025386032000153759 es_ES
dc.description.references Mateos-Ronco, A., & Server Izquierdo, R. J. (2011). Drawing up the official adjustment rules for damage assessment in agricultural insurance: Results of a Delphi survey for fruit crops in Spain. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1542-1556. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.04.003 es_ES
dc.description.references Webler, T., Levine, D., Rakel, H., & Renn, O. (1991). A novel approach to reducing uncertainty: The group Delphi. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 39(3), 253-263. doi:10.1016/0040-1625(91)90040-m es_ES
dc.description.references STRAUSS, H. J., & ZEIGLER, L. H. (1975). The Delphi Technique and Its Uses In Social Science Research*. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 9(4), 253-259. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1975.tb00574.x es_ES
dc.description.references Rowe, G., Wright, G., & Bolger, F. (1991). Delphi: A reevaluation of research and theory. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 39(3), 235-251. doi:10.1016/0040-1625(91)90039-i es_ES
dc.description.references Woudenberg, F. (1991). An evaluation of Delphi. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 40(2), 131-150. doi:10.1016/0040-1625(91)90002-w es_ES
dc.description.references Turoff, M. (1970). The design of a policy Delphi. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2(2), 149-171. doi:10.1016/0040-1625(70)90161-7 es_ES
dc.description.references Landeta, J., Barrutia, J., & Lertxundi, A. (2011). Hybrid Delphi: A methodology to facilitate contribution from experts in professional contexts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1629-1641. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.009 es_ES
dc.description.references Nowack, M., Endrikat, J., & Guenther, E. (2011). Review of Delphi-based scenario studies: Quality and design considerations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1603-1615. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.006 es_ES
dc.description.references Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (2011). The Delphi technique: Past, present, and future prospects — Introduction to the special issue. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1487-1490. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.09.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 15(4), 353-375. doi:10.1016/s0169-2070(99)00018-7 es_ES
dc.description.references Dajani, J. S., Sincoff, M. Z., & Talley, W. K. (1979). Stability and agreement criteria for the termination of Delphi studies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 13(1), 83-90. doi:10.1016/0040-1625(79)90007-6 es_ES
dc.description.references Chaffin, W. W., & Talley, W. K. (1980). Individual stability in Delphi studies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 16(1), 67-73. doi:10.1016/0040-1625(80)90074-8 es_ES
dc.description.references Rowe, G., Wright, G., & McColl, A. (2005). Judgment change during Delphi-like procedures: The role of majority influence, expertise, and confidence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(4), 377-399. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2004.03.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Curioni, S. B., & Rizzi, E. M. R. (2016). Two realms in confrontation: consensus or discontinuity? An exploratory study on the convergence of critical assessment and market evaluation in the contemporary art system. Museum Management and Curatorship, 31(5), 440-459. doi:10.1080/09647775.2016.1227571 es_ES
dc.description.references Estadística de Financiación y Gasto Público en Cultura http://www.culturaydeporte.gob.es/servicios-al-ciudadano/estadisticas/cultura/mc/culturabase/gasto-publico/resultados-gasto-publico.html es_ES
dc.description.references Prinz, A., Piening, J., & Ehrmann, T. (2014). The success of art galleries: a dynamic model with competition and information effects. Journal of Cultural Economics, 39(2), 153-176. doi:10.1007/s10824-014-9217-2 es_ES
dc.description.references Wróblewski, Ł., Dziadzia, B., & Dacko-Pikiewicz, Z. (2018). Sustainable Management of the Offer of Cultural Institutions in the Cross-Border Market for Cultural Services—Barriers and Conditions. Sustainability, 10(9), 3253. doi:10.3390/su10093253 es_ES
dc.subject.ods 08.- Fomentar el crecimiento económico sostenido, inclusivo y sostenible, el empleo pleno y productivo, y el trabajo decente para todos es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem