Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Colonnese, Fabio | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-01-19T12:18:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-01-19T12:18:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-11-17 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1133-6137 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/159412 | |
dc.description.abstract | [EN] This article frames and discusses the use of found-objects as scale models or part of them in the architecture design and communication. While this age of digital technologies and semiautomatic production techniques has affected most of the traditional workflow and tools of architectural design process, the use of foundobjects in model-making is still practiced, revealed and promoted by contemporary architects and teachers. The historical roots and critical function of this practice in the artistic vanguards is here briefly presented before discussing their potential roles in relationship with the digital tools currently permeating the design process. Three different categories of found-objects modeling are finally identified and discussed, in relationship with the semantic and operative opportunities they offer to architectural representation. | es_ES |
dc.description.abstract | [IT] Sebbene questa stagione di tecnologie digitali e tecniche di produzione semiautomatica ha condizionato la maggior parte della tradizionale catena di montaggio e gli strumenti del processo di progettazione e rappresentazione, l'uso di found-objects nella modellistica è ancora praticato, rivelato e promosso da architetti e docenti contemporanei. Questo potrebbe essere interpretato come il sintomo di una sorta di resistenza analogica o un modo per introdurre incidenti pianificati e incertezza in un processo di progettazione deterministico e omologante, ma lo scenario è sfaccettato. Questo contributo discute l'uso di found-objects come modelli nella progettazione dell'architettura e nella pratica della comunicazione. In particolare, descrive le loro radici storiche e la loro funzione critica nella ricerca delle avanguardie artistiche, classifica il loro ruolo nelle diverse fasi del processo di progettazione tradizionale e contemporaneo e si concentra su interazioni e differenze degli approcci analogici e digitali, in relazione alle opportunità semantiche della rappresentazione architettonica. | es_ES |
dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
dc.language | Italiano | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Universitat Politècnica de València | es_ES |
dc.relation.ispartof | EGA Expresión Gráfica Arquitectónica | es_ES |
dc.rights | Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd) | es_ES |
dc.subject | Found-object | es_ES |
dc.subject | Architectural modelling | es_ES |
dc.subject | Concept models | es_ES |
dc.subject | Reverse modeling | es_ES |
dc.subject | Modello di architettura | es_ES |
dc.subject | Modelo concettuale | es_ES |
dc.title | Mapping the Objet Trouvée as a model, between analogical and digital approaches | es_ES |
dc.title.alternative | L’Objet Trouvé come modello tra approcci analogici e digitali | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4995/ega.2020.12934 | |
dc.rights.accessRights | Abierto | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Colonnese, F. (2020). Mapping the Objet Trouvée as a model, between analogical and digital approaches. EGA Expresión Gráfica Arquitectónica. 25(40):156-167. https://doi.org/10.4995/ega.2020.12934 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | OJS | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.4995/ega.2020.12934 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 156 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpfin | 167 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.volume | 25 | es_ES |
dc.description.issue | 40 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2254-6103 | |
dc.relation.pasarela | OJS\12934 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | - Buchloh, B., 1985. Readymade, Objet Trouvée, Idée Reçue. In: Dissent: The issue of Modern Art in Boston. Boston: Institute of Contemporary Art, pp. 106-22. Carpo, M., 2001. Architecture in the Age of Printing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Dal Co, F. (ed.), 2010. M9: a new Museum for a New City. Bergamo: Mondadori. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | - Ford, C., 2012. The Found Object in Design. Forward: The Design Journal of AIA NAC, no. 112, pp. 38-51. Gay, F., 2004. Tra forma e figura. Venezia: Cafoscarina. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | - Hertzberger , H., 1959. Untitled. Forum voor Architectuur en Daarmee Verbonden Kunsten, no. 14, 8, pp. 271-277. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | - Isenberg, B., 2009. Conversations with Frank Gehry. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | - Le Corbusier, 1957. Entretiens avec les étudaints des écoled d'Architecture. Paris: Minuit. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | - Mindrup, M., 2014. Kurt Schwitters' architectural models. Kurt Schwitter Society Journal, no. 4, pp. 23-38. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | - OMA, 2004. Prada-sponge. https://oma.eu/projects/prada-sponge (September 2013). | es_ES |
dc.description.references | - Politakis , C., 2017. Architectural Colossi and the Human Body. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315512938 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | - Robbins, D., 1990. The Independent Group: Postwar Britain and The Aesthetics of Plenty. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | - Samonà, G. (ed.), 1974. Frülicht (1902-22). Milano, Mazzotta. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | - Supermodels, 2014. A+U, no. 522. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | - Ungers, O.M., 1976. Designing and Thinking in Images, Metaphors and Analogies. In: Hans Hollein (ed.), MANtransFORMS: An International Exhibition on Aspects of Design. New York: Smithsonian Institution, pp. 98-113. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | - Weston, R., 2002. Utzon: Inspiration, Vision, Architecture. Hellerup: Bløndal. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | - Yagou, A., 2013. Modernist complexity on a small scale: The Dandanah glass building blocks of 1920 from an object-based research perspective. Deutsches Museum Preprint, no. 6, pp. 5-62. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | - Yaneva , A., 2009. Made by the Office for Metropolitan Architecture: An Ethnography of Design. Rotterdam, 010 Publishers. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | - McKnight, J., 2015. Sou Fujimoto creates installation from potato chips and ping-pong balls. Dezeen, 23 October 2015. https://www.dezeen.com/2015/10/23/sou-fujimoto-architecture-is-everywhere- installation-chicago-biennial-2015-household-items/ | es_ES |