- -

Influence of values, attitudes towards transport modes and companions on travel behavior

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Influence of values, attitudes towards transport modes and companions on travel behavior

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Arroyo-López;Ruiz;MARS ...
Tamaño: 657.0Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión del Autor.
Abrir
[Cerrado]
Nombre: 1-s2.0-S136984781 ...
Tamaño: 904.2Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Solicitar una copia al autor
dc.contributor.author Arroyo-López, María Rosa es_ES
dc.contributor.author Ruiz Sánchez, Tomás es_ES
dc.contributor.author MARS, LIDÓN es_ES
dc.contributor.author Rasouli, Soora es_ES
dc.contributor.author Timmermans, Harry es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2021-02-06T04:34:03Z
dc.date.available 2021-02-06T04:34:03Z
dc.date.issued 2020-05 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 1369-8478 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/160842
dc.description.abstract [EN] The design and implementation of transport policies to promote active transport requires a deep comprehension of the factors that influence travel behavior. In this context, psychological factors and social interactions play an important role in explaining travel-related decisions. Even though, the importance of psychosocial variables in travel behavior research has been widely recognized during recent years, there is a lack of understanding of how these factors interact. This paper aims to better understand the interrelationships between values, attitudes towards transport modes and a subset of the social network composed by habitual trips and activities companions. For this purpose, a theoretical framework is proposed which posits all the possible relationships among these factors. In order to test this conceptual framework, two Structural Equation Models are estimated considering attitudes towards active transport (bike and walking), using a dataset from a web-based survey developed for the MINERVA project in Valencia (Spain). The data is composed by 404 respondents who provided valid information regarding all the variables of the study. Results confirm the hierarchical value-attitude-behavior structure while several effects are also found directly between values and attitudes. For instance, individuals who attach more importance to Stimulation and Achievement values are higher active transport user, while values traditionally associated with car use are no longer maintaining this relation. Besides that, positive attitudes towards walking and cycling are strongly associated with a higher use of active transport, and also seem to discourage the use of motorized modes. Several characteristics of companions affects personal values and active travel and less influence is found on attitudes. These findings are useful to develop transport policies and campaigns to promote sustainable transport, such as the design of strategies in the context of Travel Behavior Change Programs. Limitations of this research include several aspects related to online surveys, for instance, sample size and underrepresentation of individuals over 55 years. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserve es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship This study has been partially funded by the Ministerio de Economia, Industria y Competitividad of Spain, project MINERVA (TRA2015-71184-C2-1-R). es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Elsevier es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Travel behavior es_ES
dc.subject Values es_ES
dc.subject Attitudes es_ES
dc.subject Companions es_ES
dc.subject SEM es_ES
dc.subject.classification INGENIERIA E INFRAESTRUCTURA DE LOS TRANSPORTES es_ES
dc.title Influence of values, attitudes towards transport modes and companions on travel behavior es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.trf.2020.04.002 es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//TRA2015-71184-C2-1-R/ES/ESTUDIO DE LA MOVILIDAD DE PERSONAS MEDIANTE METODOS INNOVADORES DE RECOGIDA DE DATOS/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ingeniería e Infraestructura de los Transportes - Departament d'Enginyeria i Infraestructura dels Transports es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Arroyo-López, MR.; Ruiz Sánchez, T.; Mars, L.; Rasouli, S.; Timmermans, H. (2020). Influence of values, attitudes towards transport modes and companions on travel behavior. Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 71:8-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.04.002 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.04.002 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 8 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 22 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 71 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\407646 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad es_ES
dc.description.references Alemi, F., Circella, C., Handy, S. (2017). Measuring Environmental and Transportation-Related Attitudes in the California Millennials’ Study. In Presented at 11th International Conferences on Transport Survey Methods, Estérel, Montreal, Canada, 24-29 September, 2017. es_ES
dc.description.references Axhausen, K. W. (2006). Social factors in future travel: an assessment. IEE Proceedings - Intelligent Transport Systems, 153(2), 156. doi:10.1049/ip-its:20060008 es_ES
dc.description.references Browne, M.; Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Testing Structural Equation Models. es_ES
dc.description.references Carrasco, J. A., Miller, E. J., & Wellman, B. (2008). How Far and with Whom Do People Socialize? Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2076(1), 114-122. doi:10.3141/2076-13 es_ES
dc.description.references A definition of «social environment». (2001). American Journal of Public Health, 91(3), 465a-465. doi:10.2105/ajph.91.3.465a es_ES
dc.description.references De Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2007). Value Orientations to Explain Beliefs Related to Environmental Significant Behavior. Environment and Behavior, 40(3), 330-354. doi:10.1177/0013916506297831 es_ES
dc.description.references De Groot, J., & Steg, L. (2007). General Beliefs and the Theory of Planned Behavior: The Role of Environmental Concerns in the TPB. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(8), 1817-1836. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00239.x es_ES
dc.description.references Dijst, M., Farag, S., & Schwanen, T. (2008). A Comparative Study of Attitude Theory and other Theoretical Models for Understanding Travel Behaviour. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 40(4), 831-847. doi:10.1068/a39151 es_ES
dc.description.references García J., Mars, L., Arroyo, R., Casquero, D., Di Ciommo, F. and Ruiz, T. (2019). Personal values, attitudes and travel intentions towards cycling and walking, and actual behavior. Sustainability 2019, 11(13), 3574. es_ES
dc.description.references Gardner, B., & Abraham, C. (2010). Going Green? Modeling the Impact of Environmental Concerns and Perceptions of Transportation Alternatives on Decisions to Drive. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(4), 831-849. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00600.x es_ES
dc.description.references Gärling, T., & Fujii, S. (2009). Travel behavior modification: Theories, methods, and programs. In The expanding sphere of travel behaviour research: selected papers from the 11th international conference on travel behaviour research. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 97–128. es_ES
dc.description.references Ho, C., & Mulley, C. (2013). Tour-based mode choice of joint household travel patterns on weekend and weekday. Transportation, 40(4), 789-811. doi:10.1007/s11116-013-9479-0 es_ES
dc.description.references Homer, P. M., & Kahle, L. R. (1988). A structural equation test of the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 638-646. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.638 es_ES
dc.description.references Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 es_ES
dc.description.references Hunecke, M., Haustein, S., Böhler, S., & Grischkat, S. (2008). Attitude-Based Target Groups to Reduce the Ecological Impact of Daily Mobility Behavior. Environment and Behavior, 42(1), 3-43. doi:10.1177/0013916508319587 es_ES
dc.description.references Kim, J., Choi, K., Kim, S., & Fujii, S. (2016). How to promote sustainable public bike system from a psychological perspective? International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 11(4), 272-281. doi:10.1080/15568318.2016.1252450 es_ES
dc.description.references Klöckner, C. A., & Matthies, E. (2009). Structural Modeling of Car Use on the Way to the University in Different Settings: Interplay of Norms, Habits, Situational Restraints, and Perceived Behavioral Control. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(8), 1807-1834. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00505.x es_ES
dc.description.references Lind, H. B., Nordfjærn, T., Jørgensen, S. H., & Rundmo, T. (2015). The value-belief-norm theory, personal norms and sustainable travel mode choice in urban areas. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 119-125. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Muñoz, B., Monzon, A., & Lois, D. (2013). Cycling Habits and Other Psychological Variables Affecting Commuting by Bicycle in Madrid, Spain. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2382(1), 1-9. doi:10.3141/2382-01 es_ES
dc.description.references Nordlund, A. M., & Garvill, J. (2003). Effects of values, problem awareness, and personal norm on willingness to reduce personal car use. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(4), 339-347. doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(03)00037-9 es_ES
dc.description.references Pojani, E., Van Acker, V., & Pojani, D. (2018). Cars as a status symbol: Youth attitudes toward sustainable transport in a post-socialist city. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 58, 210-227. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2018.06.003 es_ES
dc.description.references Paulssen, M., Temme, D., Vij, A., & Walker, J. L. (2013). Values, attitudes and travel behavior: a hierarchical latent variable mixed logit model of travel mode choice. Transportation, 41(4), 873-888. doi:10.1007/s11116-013-9504-3 es_ES
dc.description.references Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 25 (pp. 1–65). New York, NY, USA: Academic Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Srinivasan, S., & Bhat, C. R. (2008). An exploratory analysis of joint-activity participation characteristics using the American time use survey. Transportation, 35(3), 301-327. doi:10.1007/s11116-007-9155-3 es_ES
dc.description.references Thomas, G. O., Walker, I., & Musselwhite, C. (2014). Grounded Theory analysis of commuters discussing a workplace carbon-reduction target: Autonomy, satisfaction, and willingness to change behaviour in drivers, pedestrians, bicyclists, motorcyclists, and bus users. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 26, 72-81. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2014.06.009 es_ES
dc.description.references Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4-70. doi:10.1177/109442810031002 es_ES
dc.description.references Vovsha, P., Petersen, E., & Donnelly, R. (2003). Explicit Modeling of Joint Travel by Household Members: Statistical Evidence and Applied Approach. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1831(1), 1-10. doi:10.3141/1831-01 es_ES
dc.description.references Ye, R., & Titheridge, H. (2017). Satisfaction with the commute: The role of travel mode choice, built environment and attitudes. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 52, 535-547. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2016.06.011 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem