Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | López, Salvador | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Yepes, V. | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-02-09T04:32:37Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-09T04:32:37Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-07-26 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 1687-8086 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/160912 | |
dc.description.abstract | [EN] Deciding whether certain factors should be considered drivers of innovation in construction firms is crucial in terms of improving their performance and survival in an environment that is changing by leaps and bounds. Throughout the years, construction companies have been considered to be traditional and without the tendency to innovate. However, several studies have confirmed that this perception of the sector is evolving and that successful instruments from other industries are gradually being adapted for the benefit of the industry. The objective of this paper is therefore to investigate the potential factors affecting the performance of these organizations. Eighteen factors related to the individual, group, and organizational levels were identified through a review of the literature and an instrument developed that was validated by experienced professionals. A questionnaire was sent to 103 people working in the sector at the national level to obtain their views. The results of the classification analysis indicate that "technology and equipment" and "software acquisition" are considered the two most significant factors. In addition, these 18 factors can be classified into 7 groups: (i) internal drivers of innovation; (ii) innovation within the organization; (iii) technological innovation; (iv) technological links with the environment; (v) external drivers of innovation; (vi) innovation in processes; (vii) a culture of innovation in the company. Innovation in processes has the highest level of impact. This research deepens the current understanding of the factors at different organizational levels that must be highlighted in the implementation of an R&D system in order for companies to improve their performance and survival in future processes. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | This research was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, along with FEDER, Grant no. BIA2017-85098-R. | es_ES |
dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Hindawi Limited | es_ES |
dc.relation.ispartof | Advances in Civil Engineering | es_ES |
dc.rights | Reconocimiento (by) | es_ES |
dc.subject | Construction companies | es_ES |
dc.subject | R&D&I | es_ES |
dc.subject | Innovation | es_ES |
dc.subject | Spain | es_ES |
dc.subject.classification | INGENIERIA DE LA CONSTRUCCION | es_ES |
dc.title | Impact of R&D&I on the Performance of Spanish Construction Companies | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1155/2020/7835231 | es_ES |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2013-2016/BIA2017-85098-R/ES/DISEÑO Y MANTENIMIENTO OPTIMO ROBUSTO Y BASADO EN FIABILIDAD DE PUENTES E INFRAESTRUCTURAS VIARIAS DE ALTA EFICIENCIA SOCIAL Y MEDIOAMBIENTAL BAJO PRESUPUESTOS RESTRICTIVOS/ | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | Abierto | es_ES |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ingeniería de la Construcción y de Proyectos de Ingeniería Civil - Departament d'Enginyeria de la Construcció i de Projectes d'Enginyeria Civil | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | López, S.; Yepes, V. (2020). Impact of R&D&I on the Performance of Spanish Construction Companies. Advances in Civil Engineering. 2020:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7835231 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | S | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7835231 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 1 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpfin | 14 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.volume | 2020 | es_ES |
dc.relation.pasarela | S\416368 | es_ES |
dc.contributor.funder | Agencia Estatal de Investigación | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Torres-Machí, C., Carrión, A., Yepes, V., & Pellicer, E. (2013). Employability of Graduate Students in Construction Management. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 139(2), 163-170. doi:10.1061/(asce)ei.1943-5541.0000139 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Sierra, L. A., Yepes, V., & Pellicer, E. (2018). A review of multi-criteria assessment of the social sustainability of infrastructures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 496-513. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.022 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Herrero, M. J., Escavy, J. I., & Bustillo, M. (2013). The Spanish building crisis and its effect in the gypsum quarry production (1998–2012). Resources Policy, 38(2), 123-129. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.02.005 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Navarro, I. J., Yepes, V., & Martí, J. V. (2019). A Review of Multicriteria Assessment Techniques Applied to Sustainable Infrastructure Design. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2019, 1-16. doi:10.1155/2019/6134803 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Pellicer, E., Correa, C. L., Yepes, V., & Alarcón, L. F. (2012). Organizational Improvement Through Standardization of the Innovation Process in Construction Firms. Engineering Management Journal, 24(2), 40-53. doi:10.1080/10429247.2012.11431935 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Pérez-Luño, A., Wiklund, J., & Cabrera, R. V. (2011). The dual nature of innovative activity: How entrepreneurial orientation influences innovation generation and adoption. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(5), 555-571. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.03.001 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Fagerberg, J., & Verspagen, B. (2002). Technology-gaps, innovation-diffusion and transformation: an evolutionary interpretation. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1291-1304. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00064-1 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Sierra, L. A., Pellicer, E., & Yepes, V. (2017). Method for estimating the social sustainability of infrastructure projects. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 65, 41-53. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2017.02.004 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Blayse, A. M., & Manley, K. (2004). Key influences on construction innovation. Construction Innovation, 4(3), 143-154. doi:10.1108/14714170410815060 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Castro, A. L., Yepes, V., Pellicer, E., & Cuéllar, A. J. (2012). Knowledge management in the construction industry: state of the art and trends in research. Revista de la construcción, 11(3), 62-73. doi:10.4067/s0718-915x2012000300006 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Yepes, V., Pellicer, E., & Ortega, A. J. (2012). Designing a Benchmark Indicator for Managerial Competences in Construction at the Graduate Level. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 138(1), 48-54. doi:10.1061/(asce)ei.1943-5541.0000075 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808678 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Prasad Mishra, B., & Srinivasan, R. (2005). A framework for technology innovation. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 2(1), 61-69. doi:10.1108/97279810580000371 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ahmed, P. K. (1998). Culture and climate for innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 1(1), 30-43. doi:10.1108/14601069810199131 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Imoudu Enegbuma, W., Godwin Aliagha, U., & Nita Ali, K. (2014). Preliminary building information modelling adoption model in Malaysia. Construction Innovation, 14(4), 408-432. doi:10.1108/ci-01-2014-0012 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and Creativity in Organizations. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297-1333. doi:10.1177/0149206314527128 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Lim, J. N., & Ofori, G. (2007). Classification of innovation for strategic decision making in construction businesses. Construction Management and Economics, 25(9), 963-978. doi:10.1080/01446190701393026 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Gann, D. M., & Salter, A. J. (2000). Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: the construction of complex products and systems. Research Policy, 29(7-8), 955-972. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(00)00114-1 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ling, F. Y. Y. (2003). Managing the implementation of construction innovations. Construction Management and Economics, 21(6), 635-649. doi:10.1080/0144619032000123725 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Seaden, G., & Manseau, A. (2001). Public policy and construction innovation. Building Research & Information, 29(3), 182-196. doi:10.1080/09613210010027701 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Winch, G. (1998). Zephyrs of creative destruction: understanding the management of innovation in construction. Building Research & Information, 26(5), 268-279. doi:10.1080/096132198369751 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Seaden, G., Guolla, M., Doutriaux, J., & Nash, J. (2003). Strategic decisions and innovation in construction firms. Construction Management and Economics, 21(6), 603-612. doi:10.1080/0144619032000134138 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Sexton, M., & Barrett, P. (2003). A literature synthesis of innovation in small construction firms: insights, ambiguities and questions. Construction Management and Economics, 21(6), 613-622. doi:10.1080/0144619032000134147 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Hartmann, A. (2006). The context of innovation management in construction firms. Construction Management and Economics, 24(6), 567-578. doi:10.1080/01446190600790629 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Goodrum, P. M., & Haas, C. T. (2002). Partial Factor Productivity and Equipment Technology Change at Activity Level in U.S. Construction Industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(6), 463-472. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2002)128:6(463) | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Nam, C. H., & Tatum, C. B. (1997). Leaders and champions for construction innovation. Construction Management and Economics, 15(3), 259-270. doi:10.1080/014461997372999 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Barlow, J. (2000). Innovation and learning in complex offshore construction projects. Research Policy, 29(7-8), 973-989. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(00)00115-3 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Kumaraswamy, M., & Dulaimi, M. (2001). Empowering innovative improvements through creative construction procurement. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 8(5-6), 325-334. doi:10.1046/j.1365-232x.2001.00215.x | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Gulezian, R., & Samelian, F. (2003). Baseline Determination in Construction Labor Productivity-Loss Claims. Journal of Management in Engineering, 19(4), 160-165. doi:10.1061/(asce)0742-597x(2003)19:4(160) | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Hanna, A. S., Taylor, C. S., & Sullivan, K. T. (2005). Impact of Extended Overtime on Construction Labor Productivity. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(6), 734-739. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2005)131:6(734) | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Xu, Y., Yeung, J. F. Y., Chan, A. P. C., Chan, D. W. M., Wang, S. Q., & Ke, Y. (2010). Developing a risk assessment model for PPP projects in China — A fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach. Automation in Construction, 19(7), 929-943. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2010.06.006 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Zhao, X., Hwang, B.-G., Pheng Low, S., & Wu, P. (2015). Reducing Hindrances to Enterprise Risk Management Implementation in Construction Firms. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(3), 04014083. doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000945 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Damanpour, F. (1996). Organizational Complexity and Innovation: Developing and Testing Multiple Contingency Models. Management Science, 42(5), 693-716. doi:10.1287/mnsc.42.5.693 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Sierra, L. A., Yepes, V., García-Segura, T., & Pellicer, E. (2018). Bayesian network method for decision-making about the social sustainability of infrastructure projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 521-534. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.140 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of Culture and Organizational Analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(3), 339. doi:10.2307/2392246 | es_ES |
dc.subject.ods | 09.- Desarrollar infraestructuras resilientes, promover la industrialización inclusiva y sostenible, y fomentar la innovación | es_ES |
dc.subject.ods | 08.- Fomentar el crecimiento económico sostenido, inclusivo y sostenible, el empleo pleno y productivo, y el trabajo decente para todos | es_ES |