- -

Impact of R&D&I on the Performance of Spanish Construction Companies

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Impact of R&D&I on the Performance of Spanish Construction Companies

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author López, Salvador es_ES
dc.contributor.author Yepes, V. es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2021-02-09T04:32:37Z
dc.date.available 2021-02-09T04:32:37Z
dc.date.issued 2020-07-26 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 1687-8086 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/160912
dc.description.abstract [EN] Deciding whether certain factors should be considered drivers of innovation in construction firms is crucial in terms of improving their performance and survival in an environment that is changing by leaps and bounds. Throughout the years, construction companies have been considered to be traditional and without the tendency to innovate. However, several studies have confirmed that this perception of the sector is evolving and that successful instruments from other industries are gradually being adapted for the benefit of the industry. The objective of this paper is therefore to investigate the potential factors affecting the performance of these organizations. Eighteen factors related to the individual, group, and organizational levels were identified through a review of the literature and an instrument developed that was validated by experienced professionals. A questionnaire was sent to 103 people working in the sector at the national level to obtain their views. The results of the classification analysis indicate that "technology and equipment" and "software acquisition" are considered the two most significant factors. In addition, these 18 factors can be classified into 7 groups: (i) internal drivers of innovation; (ii) innovation within the organization; (iii) technological innovation; (iv) technological links with the environment; (v) external drivers of innovation; (vi) innovation in processes; (vii) a culture of innovation in the company. Innovation in processes has the highest level of impact. This research deepens the current understanding of the factors at different organizational levels that must be highlighted in the implementation of an R&D system in order for companies to improve their performance and survival in future processes. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship This research was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, along with FEDER, Grant no. BIA2017-85098-R. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Hindawi Limited es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Advances in Civil Engineering es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Construction companies es_ES
dc.subject R&D&I es_ES
dc.subject Innovation es_ES
dc.subject Spain es_ES
dc.subject.classification INGENIERIA DE LA CONSTRUCCION es_ES
dc.title Impact of R&D&I on the Performance of Spanish Construction Companies es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1155/2020/7835231 es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2013-2016/BIA2017-85098-R/ES/DISEÑO Y MANTENIMIENTO OPTIMO ROBUSTO Y BASADO EN FIABILIDAD DE PUENTES E INFRAESTRUCTURAS VIARIAS DE ALTA EFICIENCIA SOCIAL Y MEDIOAMBIENTAL BAJO PRESUPUESTOS RESTRICTIVOS/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ingeniería de la Construcción y de Proyectos de Ingeniería Civil - Departament d'Enginyeria de la Construcció i de Projectes d'Enginyeria Civil es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation López, S.; Yepes, V. (2020). Impact of R&D&I on the Performance of Spanish Construction Companies. Advances in Civil Engineering. 2020:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7835231 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7835231 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 14 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 2020 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\416368 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Agencia Estatal de Investigación es_ES
dc.description.references Torres-Machí, C., Carrión, A., Yepes, V., & Pellicer, E. (2013). Employability of Graduate Students in Construction Management. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 139(2), 163-170. doi:10.1061/(asce)ei.1943-5541.0000139 es_ES
dc.description.references Sierra, L. A., Yepes, V., & Pellicer, E. (2018). A review of multi-criteria assessment of the social sustainability of infrastructures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 496-513. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.022 es_ES
dc.description.references Herrero, M. J., Escavy, J. I., & Bustillo, M. (2013). The Spanish building crisis and its effect in the gypsum quarry production (1998–2012). Resources Policy, 38(2), 123-129. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.02.005 es_ES
dc.description.references Navarro, I. J., Yepes, V., & Martí, J. V. (2019). A Review of Multicriteria Assessment Techniques Applied to Sustainable Infrastructure Design. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2019, 1-16. doi:10.1155/2019/6134803 es_ES
dc.description.references Pellicer, E., Correa, C. L., Yepes, V., & Alarcón, L. F. (2012). Organizational Improvement Through Standardization of the Innovation Process in Construction Firms. Engineering Management Journal, 24(2), 40-53. doi:10.1080/10429247.2012.11431935 es_ES
dc.description.references Pérez-Luño, A., Wiklund, J., & Cabrera, R. V. (2011). The dual nature of innovative activity: How entrepreneurial orientation influences innovation generation and adoption. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(5), 555-571. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.03.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Fagerberg, J., & Verspagen, B. (2002). Technology-gaps, innovation-diffusion and transformation: an evolutionary interpretation. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1291-1304. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00064-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Sierra, L. A., Pellicer, E., & Yepes, V. (2017). Method for estimating the social sustainability of infrastructure projects. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 65, 41-53. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2017.02.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Blayse, A. M., & Manley, K. (2004). Key influences on construction innovation. Construction Innovation, 4(3), 143-154. doi:10.1108/14714170410815060 es_ES
dc.description.references Castro, A. L., Yepes, V., Pellicer, E., & Cuéllar, A. J. (2012). Knowledge management in the construction industry: state of the art and trends in research. Revista de la construcción, 11(3), 62-73. doi:10.4067/s0718-915x2012000300006 es_ES
dc.description.references Yepes, V., Pellicer, E., & Ortega, A. J. (2012). Designing a Benchmark Indicator for Managerial Competences in Construction at the Graduate Level. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 138(1), 48-54. doi:10.1061/(asce)ei.1943-5541.0000075 es_ES
dc.description.references North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808678 es_ES
dc.description.references Prasad Mishra, B., & Srinivasan, R. (2005). A framework for technology innovation. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 2(1), 61-69. doi:10.1108/97279810580000371 es_ES
dc.description.references Ahmed, P. K. (1998). Culture and climate for innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 1(1), 30-43. doi:10.1108/14601069810199131 es_ES
dc.description.references Imoudu Enegbuma, W., Godwin Aliagha, U., & Nita Ali, K. (2014). Preliminary building information modelling adoption model in Malaysia. Construction Innovation, 14(4), 408-432. doi:10.1108/ci-01-2014-0012 es_ES
dc.description.references Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and Creativity in Organizations. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297-1333. doi:10.1177/0149206314527128 es_ES
dc.description.references Lim, J. N., & Ofori, G. (2007). Classification of innovation for strategic decision making in construction businesses. Construction Management and Economics, 25(9), 963-978. doi:10.1080/01446190701393026 es_ES
dc.description.references Gann, D. M., & Salter, A. J. (2000). Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: the construction of complex products and systems. Research Policy, 29(7-8), 955-972. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(00)00114-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Ling, F. Y. Y. (2003). Managing the implementation of construction innovations. Construction Management and Economics, 21(6), 635-649. doi:10.1080/0144619032000123725 es_ES
dc.description.references Seaden, G., & Manseau, A. (2001). Public policy and construction innovation. Building Research & Information, 29(3), 182-196. doi:10.1080/09613210010027701 es_ES
dc.description.references Winch, G. (1998). Zephyrs of creative destruction: understanding the management of innovation in construction. Building Research & Information, 26(5), 268-279. doi:10.1080/096132198369751 es_ES
dc.description.references Seaden, G., Guolla, M., Doutriaux, J., & Nash, J. (2003). Strategic decisions and innovation in construction firms. Construction Management and Economics, 21(6), 603-612. doi:10.1080/0144619032000134138 es_ES
dc.description.references Sexton, M., & Barrett, P. (2003). A literature synthesis of innovation in small construction firms: insights, ambiguities and questions. Construction Management and Economics, 21(6), 613-622. doi:10.1080/0144619032000134147 es_ES
dc.description.references Hartmann, A. (2006). The context of innovation management in construction firms. Construction Management and Economics, 24(6), 567-578. doi:10.1080/01446190600790629 es_ES
dc.description.references Goodrum, P. M., & Haas, C. T. (2002). Partial Factor Productivity and Equipment Technology Change at Activity Level in U.S. Construction Industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(6), 463-472. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2002)128:6(463) es_ES
dc.description.references Nam, C. H., & Tatum, C. B. (1997). Leaders and champions for construction innovation. Construction Management and Economics, 15(3), 259-270. doi:10.1080/014461997372999 es_ES
dc.description.references Barlow, J. (2000). Innovation and learning in complex offshore construction projects. Research Policy, 29(7-8), 973-989. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(00)00115-3 es_ES
dc.description.references Kumaraswamy, M., & Dulaimi, M. (2001). Empowering innovative improvements through creative construction procurement. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 8(5-6), 325-334. doi:10.1046/j.1365-232x.2001.00215.x es_ES
dc.description.references Gulezian, R., & Samelian, F. (2003). Baseline Determination in Construction Labor Productivity-Loss Claims. Journal of Management in Engineering, 19(4), 160-165. doi:10.1061/(asce)0742-597x(2003)19:4(160) es_ES
dc.description.references Hanna, A. S., Taylor, C. S., & Sullivan, K. T. (2005). Impact of Extended Overtime on Construction Labor Productivity. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(6), 734-739. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2005)131:6(734) es_ES
dc.description.references Xu, Y., Yeung, J. F. Y., Chan, A. P. C., Chan, D. W. M., Wang, S. Q., & Ke, Y. (2010). Developing a risk assessment model for PPP projects in China — A fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach. Automation in Construction, 19(7), 929-943. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2010.06.006 es_ES
dc.description.references Zhao, X., Hwang, B.-G., Pheng Low, S., & Wu, P. (2015). Reducing Hindrances to Enterprise Risk Management Implementation in Construction Firms. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(3), 04014083. doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000945 es_ES
dc.description.references Damanpour, F. (1996). Organizational Complexity and Innovation: Developing and Testing Multiple Contingency Models. Management Science, 42(5), 693-716. doi:10.1287/mnsc.42.5.693 es_ES
dc.description.references Sierra, L. A., Yepes, V., García-Segura, T., & Pellicer, E. (2018). Bayesian network method for decision-making about the social sustainability of infrastructure projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 521-534. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.140 es_ES
dc.description.references Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of Culture and Organizational Analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(3), 339. doi:10.2307/2392246 es_ES
dc.subject.ods 09.- Desarrollar infraestructuras resilientes, promover la industrialización inclusiva y sostenible, y fomentar la innovación es_ES
dc.subject.ods 08.- Fomentar el crecimiento económico sostenido, inclusivo y sostenible, el empleo pleno y productivo, y el trabajo decente para todos es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem