Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Zarzo Castelló, Manuel | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-02-10T04:31:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-10T04:31:27Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/160978 | |
dc.description.abstract | [EN] Given the enormous number of perfumes available on the market, it is of interest to guide consumers in their purchase of a new fragrance. One approach is to project the multidimensional perceptual space of scents on a two-dimensional sensory map based on meaningful dimensions. One of the pioneering studies on this issue mapped 94 commercial perfumes according to two axes. Such an odor map is discussed here in detail by applying Principal Component Analysis to the numeric odor description of 176 fragrances. Quantitative odor profiles were obtained from Fragrantica's website and three fragrances guides published by Haarmann & Reimer, Michael Edwards, and the French Society of Perfumers. A sensory map was obtained that reflected the similarities and dissimilarities between those odor descriptors most commonly used in perfumery. This representation was consistent with other related plots that have been previously reported. One dimension discriminated between fragrances targeted at men versus women. An orthogonal factor distinguished perfumes for daytime versus nighttime wear. These ratings, as well as seasonal preferences, could be estimated based on the main odor character attributes applied to describe the scent. The results provide a scientific basis for the comprehensive classification of commercial perfumes compiled by Edwards according to his famous "Fragrance Wheel". | es_ES |
dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
dc.publisher | MDPI AG | es_ES |
dc.relation.ispartof | Cosmetics | es_ES |
dc.rights | Reconocimiento (by) | es_ES |
dc.subject | Odor analysis | es_ES |
dc.subject | Fragrance | es_ES |
dc.subject | Olfactory psychophysics | es_ES |
dc.subject | Perceptual freshness | es_ES |
dc.subject | Odor descriptor | es_ES |
dc.subject.classification | ESTADISTICA E INVESTIGACION OPERATIVA | es_ES |
dc.title | Understanding the perceptual spectrum of commercial perfumes as a basis for a standard sensory wheel of fragrances | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/cosmetics7010003 | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | Abierto | es_ES |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Estadística e Investigación Operativa Aplicadas y Calidad - Departament d'Estadística i Investigació Operativa Aplicades i Qualitat | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Zarzo Castelló, M. (2020). Understanding the perceptual spectrum of commercial perfumes as a basis for a standard sensory wheel of fragrances. Cosmetics. 7(3):1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics7010003 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | S | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics7010003 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 1 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpfin | 21 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.volume | 7 | es_ES |
dc.description.issue | 3 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2079-9284 | es_ES |
dc.relation.pasarela | S\399806 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Eurofragrance 2011: Feminine Fragrances Genealogyhttp://www.eurofragance.com/docs/26_2011_fem_geneology_eurofragance.jpg | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Olfactive Families of Fragrances According to the French Society of Perfumershttps://www.parfumeurs-createurs.org/fr/filiere-parfum/les-familles-olfactives-102 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Osmoz Website for Olfactory Exploration of Men’s and Women’s Commercial Fragranceshttp://www.osmoz.com/perfumes/search | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Chastrette, M., Laumer, J.-Y. de S., & Sauvegrain, P. (1991). Analysis of a system of description of odors by means of four different multivariate statistical methods. Chemical Senses, 16(1), 81-93. doi:10.1093/chemse/16.1.81 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Milotic, D. (2003). The impact of fragrance on consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 3(2), 179-191. doi:10.1002/cb.131 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Cadoret, M., Lê, S., & Pagès, J. (2009). A Factorial Approach for Sorting Task data (FAST). Food Quality and Preference, 20(6), 410-417. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.02.010 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Veramendi, M., Herencia, P., & Ares, G. (2013). Perfume Odor Categorization: To What Extent Trained Assessors and Consumers Agree? Journal of Sensory Studies, 28(1), 76-89. doi:10.1111/joss.12025 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Kostov, B., Bécue-Bertaut, M., & Husson, F. (2014). An original methodology for the analysis and interpretation of word-count based methods: Multiple factor analysis for contingency tables complemented by consensual words. Food Quality and Preference, 32, 35-40. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.06.009 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Teixeira, M. A., Rodríguez, O., & Rodrigues, A. E. (2010). Perfumery Radar: A Predictive Tool for Perfume Family Classification. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 49(22), 11764-11777. doi:10.1021/ie101161v | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Teixeira, M. A., Barrault, L., Rodríguez, O., Carvalho, C. C., & Rodrigues, A. E. (2014). Perfumery Radar 2.0: A Step toward Fragrance Design and Classification. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 53(21), 8890-8912. doi:10.1021/ie403968w | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Notes on Scent. Cabinethttp://cabinetmagazine.org/issues/32/jasper_wagner.php | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Zarzo, M. (2012). What is a Fresh Scent in Perfumery? Perceptual Freshness is Correlated with Substantivity. Sensors, 13(1), 463-483. doi:10.3390/s130100463 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Zarzo, M., & Stanton, D. T. (2009). Understanding the underlying dimensions in perfumers’ odor perception space as a basis for developing meaningful odor maps. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 71(2), 225-247. doi:10.3758/app.71.2.225 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Zarzo, M. (2015). Underlying dimensions in the descriptive space of perfumery odors: Part II. Food Quality and Preference, 43, 79-87. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.02.018 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | HARPER, R. (1975). SOME CHEMICALS REPRESENTING PARTICULAR ODOUR QUALITIES. Chemical Senses, 1(3), 353-357. doi:10.1093/chemse/1.3.353 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Fenko, A., Schifferstein, H. N. J., Huang, T.-C., & Hekkert, P. (2009). What makes products fresh: The smell or the colour? Food Quality and Preference, 20(5), 372-379. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.02.007 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Yokoyama, K., & Ebisawa, F. (1993). Detection and evaluation of fragrances by human reactions using a chemical sensor based on adsorbate detection. Analytical Chemistry, 65(6), 673-677. doi:10.1021/ac00054a004 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Higuchi, T., Shoji, K., & Hatayama, T. (2004). Multidimensional scaling of fragrances: A comparison between the verbal and non-verbal methods of classifying fragrances1. Japanese Psychological Research, 46(1), 10-19. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5884.2004.00232.x | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Lindqvist, A. (2012). Perfume Preferences and How They Are Related to Commercial Gender Classifications of Fragrances. Chemosensory Perception, 5(2), 197-204. doi:10.1007/s12078-012-9119-7 | es_ES |