Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Sanchis-Perucho, Pau![]() |
es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Robles Martínez, Ángel![]() |
es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Durán, Freddy![]() |
es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | FERRER, J.![]() |
es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Seco, Aurora![]() |
es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-02-18T04:32:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-18T04:32:12Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-06-01 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 0376-7388 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/161699 | |
dc.description.abstract | [EN] This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of degassing membrane (DM) technology for recovering dissolved methane from AnMBR effluents. For that purpose, a PDMS membrane module was operated for treating the effluent from an AnMBR prototype-plant, which treated urban wastewater (UWW) at ambient temperature. Different transmembrane pressures and liquid flow rates were applied for evaluating methane recovery efficiency. Maximum methane recoveries were achieved when increasing the vacuum pressure and reducing the liquid flow rate, reaching a maximum methane recovery efficiency of around 80% at a transmembrane pressure (TMP) of 0.8 bars and a treatment flow rate (Q(L)) of 50 L h(-1). The results revealed that the combination of PDMS DMs and AnMBR technology would allow to reduce the energy demand of UWW treatment, achieving net energy productions while reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Optimum operation was determined at a TMP of 0.8 bars and a Q(L) of 150 L h(-1) when combining energy, environmental and economic targets. Under these operating conditions, the combination AnMBR + DM resulted in energy requirements and greenhouse gases emissions of -0.040 kWh and 0.113 kg of CO2-eq per m(3) of treated water, respectively, resulting in a DM payback period of around 10.5 years. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | This research work was supported by Generalitat Valenciana via the fellowships CPI-16-155 and C12747, as well as the financial aid received from Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad via Juan de la Cierva contract FJCI-2014-21616. This research work was also possible thanks to co-finance of the European financial instrument for the Environment (LIFE+) during the implementation of the Project Membrane for ENERGY and WATER RECOVERY "MEMORY" (LIFE13 ENV/ES/001353). | es_ES |
dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | es_ES |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Membrane Science | es_ES |
dc.rights | Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd) | es_ES |
dc.subject | Anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) | es_ES |
dc.subject | Greenhouse gas (GHG) | es_ES |
dc.subject | Methane recovery | es_ES |
dc.subject | PDMS degassing Membrane | es_ES |
dc.subject | Urban wastewater | es_ES |
dc.subject.classification | TECNOLOGIA DEL MEDIO AMBIENTE | es_ES |
dc.title | PDMS membranes for feasible recovery of dissolved methane from AnMBR effluents | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118070 | es_ES |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//FJCI-2014-21616/ES/FJCI-2014-21616/ | es_ES |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC//LIFE13 ENV%2FES%2F001353/EU/Membrane for ENERGY and WATER RECOVERY/LIFE MEMORY/ | es_ES |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/GVA//CPI-16-155/ | es_ES |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/GVA//C12747/ | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | Abierto | es_ES |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto Universitario de Ingeniería del Agua y del Medio Ambiente - Institut Universitari d'Enginyeria de l'Aigua i Medi Ambient | es_ES |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ingeniería Hidráulica y Medio Ambiente - Departament d'Enginyeria Hidràulica i Medi Ambient | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Sanchis-Perucho, P.; Robles Martínez, Á.; Durán, F.; Ferrer, J.; Seco, A. (2020). PDMS membranes for feasible recovery of dissolved methane from AnMBR effluents. Journal of Membrane Science. 604:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118070 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | S | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118070 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 1 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpfin | 12 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.volume | 604 | es_ES |
dc.relation.pasarela | S\421283 | es_ES |
dc.contributor.funder | Generalitat Valenciana | es_ES |
dc.contributor.funder | European Commission | es_ES |
dc.contributor.funder | Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad | es_ES |
dc.description.references | McCarty, P. L., Bae, J., & Kim, J. (2011). Domestic Wastewater Treatment as a Net Energy Producer–Can This be Achieved? Environmental Science & Technology, 45(17), 7100-7106. doi:10.1021/es2014264 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Pretel, R., Shoener, B. D., Ferrer, J., & Guest, J. S. (2015). Navigating environmental, economic, and technological trade-offs in the design and operation of submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBRs). Water Research, 87, 531-541. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2015.07.002 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Guest, J. S., Skerlos, S. J., Barnard, J. L., Beck, M. B., Daigger, G. T., Hilger, H., … Love, N. G. (2009). A New Planning and Design Paradigm to Achieve Sustainable Resource Recovery from Wastewater. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(16), 6126-6130. doi:10.1021/es9010515 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Smith, A. L., Stadler, L. B., Love, N. G., Skerlos, S. J., & Raskin, L. (2012). Perspectives on anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatment of domestic wastewater: A critical review. Bioresource Technology, 122, 149-159. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.055 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Robles, Á., Ruano, M. V., Charfi, A., Lesage, G., Heran, M., Harmand, J., … Ferrer, J. (2018). A review on anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBRs) focused on modelling and control aspects. Bioresource Technology, 270, 612-626. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.049 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Wang, W., Yang, Q., Zheng, S., & Wu, D. (2013). Anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) for bamboo industry wastewater treatment. Bioresource Technology, 149, 292-300. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2013.09.068 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Pretel, R., Robles, A., Ruano, M. V., Seco, A., & Ferrer, J. (2014). The operating cost of an anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) treating sulphate-rich urban wastewater. Separation and Purification Technology, 126, 30-38. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2014.02.013 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Xia, T., Gao, X., Wang, C., Xu, X., & Zhu, L. (2016). An enhanced anaerobic membrane bioreactor treating bamboo industry wastewater by bamboo charcoal addition: Performance and microbial community analysis. Bioresource Technology, 220, 26-33. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.08.057 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Aslam, M., McCarty, P. L., Shin, C., Bae, J., & Kim, J. (2017). Low energy single-staged anaerobic fluidized bed ceramic membrane bioreactor (AFCMBR) for wastewater treatment. Bioresource Technology, 240, 33-41. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.017 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Aslam, M., Charfi, A., Lesage, G., Heran, M., & Kim, J. (2017). Membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment: A review of mechanical cleaning by scouring agents to control membrane fouling. Chemical Engineering Journal, 307, 897-913. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.144 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Giménez, J. B., Martí, N., Ferrer, J., & Seco, A. (2012). Methane recovery efficiency in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor (SAnMBR) treating sulphate-rich urban wastewater: Evaluation of methane losses with the effluent. Bioresource Technology, 118, 67-72. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.019 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Giménez, J. B., Martí, N., Robles, A., Ferrer, J., & Seco, A. (2014). Anaerobic treatment of urban wastewater in membrane bioreactors: evaluation of seasonal temperature variations. Water Science and Technology, 69(7), 1581-1588. doi:10.2166/wst.2014.069 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Cookney, J., Mcleod, A., Mathioudakis, V., Ncube, P., Soares, A., Jefferson, B., & McAdam, E. J. (2016). Dissolved methane recovery from anaerobic effluents using hollow fibre membrane contactors. Journal of Membrane Science, 502, 141-150. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2015.12.037 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Heile, S., Chernicharo, C. A. L., Brandt, E. M. F., & McAdam, E. J. (2017). Dissolved gas separation for engineered anaerobic wastewater systems. Separation and Purification Technology, 189, 405-418. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2017.08.021 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Chen, S., & Smith, A. L. (2018). Methane-driven microbial fuel cells recover energy and mitigate dissolved methane emissions from anaerobic effluents. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, 4(1), 67-79. doi:10.1039/c7ew00293a | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Raghoebarsing, A. A., Pol, A., van de Pas-Schoonen, K. T., Smolders, A. J. P., Ettwig, K. F., Rijpstra, W. I. C., … Strous, M. (2006). A microbial consortium couples anaerobic methane oxidation to denitrification. Nature, 440(7086), 918-921. doi:10.1038/nature04617 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Knittel, K., & Boetius, A. (2009). Anaerobic Oxidation of Methane: Progress with an Unknown Process. Annual Review of Microbiology, 63(1), 311-334. doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.61.080706.093130 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Hatamoto, M., Yamamoto, H., Kindaichi, T., Ozaki, N., & Ohashi, A. (2010). Biological oxidation of dissolved methane in effluents from anaerobic reactors using a down-flow hanging sponge reactor. Water Research, 44(5), 1409-1418. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2009.11.021 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Matsuura, N., Hatamoto, M., Sumino, H., Syutsubo, K., Yamaguchi, T., & Ohashi, A. (2010). Closed DHS system to prevent dissolved methane emissions as greenhouse gas in anaerobic wastewater treatment by its recovery and biological oxidation. Water Science and Technology, 61(9), 2407-2415. doi:10.2166/wst.2010.219 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Myung, J., Saikaly, P. E., & Logan, B. E. (2018). A two-staged system to generate electricity in microbial fuel cells using methane. Chemical Engineering Journal, 352, 262-267. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2018.07.017 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Chen, S., & Smith, A. L. (2019). Performance and microbial ecology of methane-driven microbial fuel cells at temperatures ranging from 25 to 5 °C. Water Research, 166, 115036. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2019.115036 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Crone, B. C., Garland, J. L., Sorial, G. A., & Vane, L. M. (2017). Corrigendum to «Significance of dissolved methane in effluents of anaerobically treated low strength wastewater and potential for recovery as an energy product: A review» [Water Res. 104 (2016) 520–531]. Water Research, 111, 420. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2017.01.035 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Henares, M., Izquierdo, M., Penya-Roja, J. M., & Martínez-Soria, V. (2016). Comparative study of degassing membrane modules for the removal of methane from Expanded Granular Sludge Bed anaerobic reactor effluent. Separation and Purification Technology, 170, 22-29. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2016.06.024 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Henares, M., Izquierdo, M., Marzal, P., & Martínez-Soria, V. (2017). Demethanization of aqueous anaerobic effluents using a polydimethylsiloxane membrane module: Mass transfer, fouling and energy analysis. Separation and Purification Technology, 186, 10-19. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2017.05.035 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Bandara, W. M. K. R. T. W., Satoh, H., Sasakawa, M., Nakahara, Y., Takahashi, M., & Okabe, S. (2011). Removal of residual dissolved methane gas in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor treating low-strength wastewater at low temperature with degassing membrane. Water Research, 45(11), 3533-3540. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2011.04.030 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Bandara, W. M. K. R. T. W., Kindaichi, T., Satoh, H., Sasakawa, M., Nakahara, Y., Takahashi, M., & Okabe, S. (2012). Anaerobic treatment of municipal wastewater at ambient temperature: Analysis of archaeal community structure and recovery of dissolved methane. Water Research, 46(17), 5756-5764. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2012.07.061 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Malek, A., Li, K., & Teo, W. K. (1997). Modeling of Microporous Hollow Fiber Membrane Modules Operated under Partially Wetted Conditions. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 36(3), 784-793. doi:10.1021/ie960529y | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Lu, J.-G., Zheng, Y.-F., & Cheng, M.-D. (2008). Wetting mechanism in mass transfer process of hydrophobic membrane gas absorption. Journal of Membrane Science, 308(1-2), 180-190. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2007.09.051 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Wickramasinghe, S. R., Semmens, M. J., & Cussler, E. L. (1993). Hollow fiber modules made with hollow fiber fabric. Journal of Membrane Science, 84(1-2), 1-14. doi:10.1016/0376-7388(93)85046-y | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Helton, J. C., & Davis, F. J. (2003). Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 81(1), 23-69. doi:10.1016/s0951-8320(03)00058-9 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Sin, G., Gernaey, K. V., Neumann, M. B., van Loosdrecht, M. C. M., & Gujer, W. (2009). Uncertainty analysis in WWTP model applications: A critical discussion using an example from design. Water Research, 43(11), 2894-2906. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2009.03.048 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Merkel, T. C., Bondar, V. I., Nagai, K., Freeman, B. D., & Pinnau, I. (2000). Gas sorption, diffusion, and permeation in poly(dimethylsiloxane). Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics, 38(3), 415-434. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0488(20000201)38:3<415::aid-polb8>3.0.co;2-z | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Sanders, D. F., Smith, Z. P., Guo, R., Robeson, L. M., McGrath, J. E., Paul, D. R., & Freeman, B. D. (2013). Energy-efficient polymeric gas separation membranes for a sustainable future: A review. Polymer, 54(18), 4729-4761. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2013.05.075 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Robeson, L. M., Smith, Z. P., Freeman, B. D., & Paul, D. R. (2014). Contributions of diffusion and solubility selectivity to the upper bound analysis for glassy gas separation membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 453, 71-83. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2013.10.066 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Zarebska, A., Amor, Á. C., Ciurkot, K., Karring, H., Thygesen, O., Andersen, T. P., … Norddahl, B. (2015). Fouling mitigation in membrane distillation processes during ammonia stripping from pig manure. Journal of Membrane Science, 484, 119-132. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2015.03.010 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Chan, R., & Chen, V. (2004). Characterization of protein fouling on membranes: opportunities and challenges. Journal of Membrane Science, 242(1-2), 169-188. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2004.01.029 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Robb, W. L. (1968). THIN SILICONE MEMBRANES-THEIR PERMEATION PROPERTIES AND SOME APPLICATIONS. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 146(1 Materials in), 119-137. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1968.tb20277.x | es_ES |
dc.description.references | PINNAU, I., & HE, Z. (2004). Pure- and mixed-gas permeation properties of polydimethylsiloxane for hydrocarbon/methane and hydrocarbon/hydrogen separation. Journal of Membrane Science, 244(1-2), 227-233. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2004.06.055 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Raharjo, R. D., Freeman, B. D., Paul, D. R., Sarti, G. C., & Sanders, E. S. (2007). Pure and mixed gas CH4 and n-C4H10 permeability and diffusivity in poly(dimethylsiloxane). Journal of Membrane Science, 306(1-2), 75-92. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2007.08.014 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Glória, R. M., Motta, T. M., Silva, P. V. O., Costa, P. da, Brandt, E. M. F., Souza, C. L., & Chernicharo, C. A. L. (2016). STRIPPING AND DISSIPATION TECHNIQUES FOR THE REMOVAL OF DISSOLVED GASES FROM ANAEROBIC EFFLUENTS. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 33(4), 713-721. doi:10.1590/0104-6632.20160334s20150291 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Cookney, J., Cartmell, E., Jefferson, B., & McAdam, E. J. (2012). Recovery of methane from anaerobic process effluent using poly-di-methyl-siloxane membrane contactors. Water Science and Technology, 65(4), 604-610. doi:10.2166/wst.2012.897 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Yang, L., Zeng, S., Chen, J., He, M., & Yang, W. (2010). Operational energy performance assessment system of municipal wastewater treatment plants. Water Science and Technology, 62(6), 1361-1370. doi:10.2166/wst.2010.394 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Buer, T., & Cumin, J. (2010). MBR module design and operation. Desalination, 250(3), 1073-1077. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2009.09.111 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Krzeminski, P., van der Graaf, J. H. J. M., & van Lier, J. B. (2012). Specific energy consumption of membrane bioreactor (MBR) for sewage treatment. Water Science and Technology, 65(2), 380-392. doi:10.2166/wst.2012.861 | es_ES |