Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Garcia-Bernabeu, Ana | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Cabello, José Manuel | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Ruiz, Francisco | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-02-24T04:31:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-24T04:31:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-05 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/162248 | |
dc.description.abstract | [EN] The evaluation of regional innovation performance through composite innovation indices can serve as a valuable tool for policy-making. While discussion on the best methodology to construct composite innovation indices continues, we are interested in deepening the use of reference levels and the aggregation issue. So far, additive aggregation methods are, largely, the most widespread aggregation rule, thus allowing for full compensability among single indicators. In this paper, we present an integrated assessment methodology to evaluate regional innovation performance using the Multi-Reference Point based Weak and Strong Composite Indicator (MRP-WSCI) approach, which allows defining reference levels and different degrees of compensability. As an example of application to the Regional Innovation Scoreboard, the proposed technique is developed to measure the innovation performance of Spain¿s regions taking into account Spanish and European reference levels. The main features of the proposed approach are: (i) absolute or relative reference levels could be previously defined by the decision maker; (ii) by establishing the reference levels, the resulting composite innovation index is an easy-to-interpret measure; and (iii) the non-compensatory strong composite indicator provides an additional layer of information for policy-making (iv) a visualization tool called Light-Diagram is proposed to track the specific strengths and weaknesses of the regions' innovation performance. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | This research has been partially supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Project ECO2016-76567-C4-4-R), by the Regional Government of Andalucia (research group SEJ-417), and by the ERDF funds (Project UMA18-FEDERJA-065). | es_ES |
dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
dc.publisher | MDPI AG | es_ES |
dc.relation.ispartof | Mathematics | es_ES |
dc.rights | Reconocimiento (by) | es_ES |
dc.subject | Regional innovation | es_ES |
dc.subject | Composite indices | es_ES |
dc.subject | Multi-criteria decision making | es_ES |
dc.subject | Multi-reference point scheme | es_ES |
dc.subject | Compensability | es_ES |
dc.subject | Visualization tools | es_ES |
dc.subject.classification | ECONOMIA APLICADA | es_ES |
dc.title | A Multi-Criteria Reference Point Based Approach for Assessing Regional Innovation Performance in Spain | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/math8050797 | es_ES |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//ECO2016-76567-C4-4-R/ES/BUSQUEDA DE LA EFICIENCIA Y SOSTENIBILIDAD DE LAS DECISIONES PUBLICAS: UN ENFOQUE MULTICRITERIO/ | es_ES |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/UMA//UMA18-FEDERJA-065/ES/Análisis multicriterio de problemas del ámbito social y medioambiental/ | es_ES |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/Junta de Andalucía//SEJ-417/ES/Toma De Decisiones Con Criterios Multiples Y Su Aplic. Al Sector Publico/ | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | Abierto | es_ES |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Economía y Ciencias Sociales - Departament d'Economia i Ciències Socials | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Garcia-Bernabeu, A.; Cabello, JM.; Ruiz, F. (2020). A Multi-Criteria Reference Point Based Approach for Assessing Regional Innovation Performance in Spain. Mathematics. 8(5):1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8050797 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | S | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.3390/math8050797 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 1 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpfin | 21 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.volume | 8 | es_ES |
dc.description.issue | 5 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2227-7390 | es_ES |
dc.relation.pasarela | S\413113 | es_ES |
dc.contributor.funder | Junta de Andalucía | es_ES |
dc.contributor.funder | Universidad de Málaga | es_ES |
dc.contributor.funder | European Regional Development Fund | es_ES |
dc.contributor.funder | Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Hauser, C., Siller, M., Schatzer, T., Walde, J., & Tappeiner, G. (2018). Measuring regional innovation: A critical inspection of the ability of single indicators to shape technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129, 43-55. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.10.019 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Makkonen, T., & van der Have, R. P. (2012). Benchmarking regional innovative performance: composite measures and direct innovation counts. Scientometrics, 94(1), 247-262. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0753-2 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Asheim, B. T., Smith, H. L., & Oughton, C. (2011). Regional Innovation Systems: Theory, Empirics and Policy. Regional Studies, 45(7), 875-891. doi:10.1080/00343404.2011.596701 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Buesa, M., Heijs, J., & Baumert, T. (2010). The determinants of regional innovation in Europe: A combined factorial and regression knowledge production function approach. Research Policy, 39(6), 722-735. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.016 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Di Cagno, D., Fabrizi, A., Meliciani, V., & Wanzenböck, I. (2016). The impact of relational spillovers from joint research projects on knowledge creation across European regions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 108, 83-94. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.021 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Capello, R., & Lenzi, C. (2012). Territorial patterns of innovation: a taxonomy of innovative regions in Europe. The Annals of Regional Science, 51(1), 119-154. doi:10.1007/s00168-012-0539-8 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Navarro, M., Gibaja, J. J., Bilbao-Osorio, B., & Aguado, R. (2009). Patterns of Innovation in EU-25 Regions: A Typology and Policy Recommendations. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27(5), 815-840. doi:10.1068/c0884r | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Pinto, H. (2009). The Diversity of Innovation in the European Union: Mapping Latent Dimensions and Regional Profiles. European Planning Studies, 17(2), 303-326. doi:10.1080/09654310802553571 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ruiz, F., El Gibari, S., Cabello, J. M., & Gómez, T. (2020). MRP-WSCI: Multiple reference point based weak and strong composite indicators. Omega, 95, 102060. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2019.04.003 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Hollenstein, H. (1996). A composite indicator of a firm’s innovativeness. An empirical analysis based on survey data for Swiss manufacturing. Research Policy, 25(4), 633-645. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(95)00874-8 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Gu *, W., & Tang, J. (2004). Link between innovation and productivity in Canadian manufacturing industries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13(7), 671-686. doi:10.1080/1043890410001686806 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Tang, J., & Le, C. D. (2007). Multidimensional Innovation and Productivity. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(7), 501-516. doi:10.1080/10438590600914585 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Kumar, S., Haleem, A., & Sushil. (2019). Assessing innovativeness of manufacturing firms using an intuitionistic fuzzy based MCDM framework. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 26(6), 1823-1844. doi:10.1108/bij-12-2017-0343 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Grupp, H., & Mogee, M. E. (2004). Indicators for national science and technology policy: how robust are composite indicators? Research Policy, 33(9), 1373-1384. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.09.007 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Schibany, A., & Streicher, G. (2008). The European Innovation Scoreboard: drowning by numbers? Science and Public Policy, 35(10), 717-732. doi:10.3152/030234208x398512 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Kozłowski, J. (2015). Innovation indices: the need for positioning them where they properly belong. Scientometrics, 104(3), 609-628. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1632-4 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Carayannis, E. G., Goletsis, Y., & Grigoroudis, E. (2018). Composite innovation metrics: MCDA and the Quadruple Innovation Helix framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 131, 4-17. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.008 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., Tasiou, M., & Torrisi, G. (2018). On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices: A Review of the Issues of Weighting, Aggregation, and Robustness. Social Indicators Research, 141(1), 61-94. doi:10.1007/s11205-017-1832-9 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | El Gibari, S., Gómez, T., & Ruiz, F. (2018). Building composite indicators using multicriteria methods: a review. Journal of Business Economics, 89(1), 1-24. doi:10.1007/s11573-018-0902-z | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ruiz, F., Cabello, J. M., & Luque, M. (2011). An application of reference point techniques to the calculation of synthetic sustainability indicators. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62(1), 189-197. doi:10.1057/jors.2009.187 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Cabello, J. M., Ruiz, F., Pérez-Gladish, B., & Méndez-Rodríguez, P. (2014). Synthetic indicators of mutual funds’ environmental responsibility: An application of the Reference Point Method. European Journal of Operational Research, 236(1), 313-325. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2013.11.031 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ruiz, F., Cabello, J. M., & Pérez-Gladish, B. (2018). Building Ease-of-Doing-Business synthetic indicators using a double reference point approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 131, 130-140. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.005 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | El Gibari, S., Gómez, T., & Ruiz, F. (2018). Evaluating university performance using reference point based composite indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1235-1250. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2018.10.003 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Mazziotta, M., & Pareto, A. (2017). Measuring Well-Being Over Time: The Adjusted Mazziotta–Pareto Index Versus Other Non-compensatory Indices. Social Indicators Research, 136(3), 967-976. doi:10.1007/s11205-017-1577-5 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Munda, G., & Nardo, M. (2009). Noncompensatory/nonlinear composite indicators for ranking countries: a defensible setting. Applied Economics, 41(12), 1513-1523. doi:10.1080/00036840601019364 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Cabello, J. M., Navarro, E., Prieto, F., Rodríguez, B., & Ruiz, F. (2014). Multicriteria development of synthetic indicators of the environmental profile of the Spanish regions. Ecological Indicators, 39, 10-23. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.013 | es_ES |
dc.subject.ods | 09.- Desarrollar infraestructuras resilientes, promover la industrialización inclusiva y sostenible, y fomentar la innovación | es_ES |