- -

Evaluation of long-term protection from nursery to vineyard provided by Trichoderma atroviride SC1 against fungal grapevine trunk pathogens

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Evaluation of long-term protection from nursery to vineyard provided by Trichoderma atroviride SC1 against fungal grapevine trunk pathogens

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Berbegal Martinez, Monica es_ES
dc.contributor.author Ramón-Albalat, Antonio es_ES
dc.contributor.author León Santana, Maela es_ES
dc.contributor.author Armengol Fortí, Josep es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2021-02-25T04:49:12Z
dc.date.available 2021-02-25T04:49:12Z
dc.date.issued 2020-03 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 1526-498X es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/162360
dc.description This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Berbegal, M., Ramón¿Albalat, A., León, M. and Armengol, J. (2020), Evaluation of long¿term protection from nursery to vineyard provided by Trichoderma atroviride SC1 against fungal grapevine trunk pathogens. Pest. Manag. Sci., 76: 967-977, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5605. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. es_ES
dc.description.abstract [EN] BACKGROUND Fungal grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) represent a threat to viticulture, being responsible for important economic losses worldwide. Nursery and vineyard experiments were set up to evaluate the ability of Trichoderma atroviride SC1 to reduce infections of GTD pathogens in grapevine planting material during the propagation process and to assess the long-term protection provided by this biocontrol agent on grapevine plants in young vineyards during two growing seasons. RESULTS Reductions of some GTD pathogen incidence and severity were found on grapevine propagation material after nursery application of T. atroviride SC1 during the grafting process, and also after additional T. atroviride SC1 treatments performed during two growing seasons in young vineyards, when compared with untreated plants. CONCLUSION Trichoderma atroviride SC1 showed promise to reduce infections caused by some GTD pathogens in nurseries, and also when establishing new vineyards. This biological control agent could possibly be a valuable component in an integrated management approach where various strategies are combined to reduce GTD infections. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher John Wiley & Sons es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Pest Management Science es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Biocontrol es_ES
dc.subject Black-foot es_ES
dc.subject Botryosphaeria dieback es_ES
dc.subject Petri disease es_ES
dc.subject Vitis vinifera L es_ES
dc.subject.classification BOTANICA es_ES
dc.subject.classification PRODUCCION VEGETAL es_ES
dc.title Evaluation of long-term protection from nursery to vineyard provided by Trichoderma atroviride SC1 against fungal grapevine trunk pathogens es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1002/ps.5605 es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto Agroforestal Mediterráneo - Institut Agroforestal Mediterrani es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ecosistemas Agroforestales - Departament d'Ecosistemes Agroforestals es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Berbegal Martinez, M.; Ramón-Albalat, A.; León Santana, M.; Armengol Fortí, J. (2020). Evaluation of long-term protection from nursery to vineyard provided by Trichoderma atroviride SC1 against fungal grapevine trunk pathogens. Pest Management Science. 76(3):967-977. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5605 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5605 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 967 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 977 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 76 es_ES
dc.description.issue 3 es_ES
dc.identifier.pmid 31472038 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\403015 es_ES
dc.description.references Gramaje, D., Úrbez-Torres, J. R., & Sosnowski, M. R. (2018). Managing Grapevine Trunk Diseases With Respect to Etiology and Epidemiology: Current Strategies and Future Prospects. Plant Disease, 102(1), 12-39. doi:10.1094/pdis-04-17-0512-fe es_ES
dc.description.references Mondello, V., Songy, A., Battiston, E., Pinto, C., Coppin, C., Trotel-Aziz, P., … Fontaine, F. (2018). Grapevine Trunk Diseases: A Review of Fifteen Years of Trials for Their Control with Chemicals and Biocontrol Agents. Plant Disease, 102(7), 1189-1217. doi:10.1094/pdis-08-17-1181-fe es_ES
dc.description.references Gramaje, D., & Armengol, J. (2011). Fungal Trunk Pathogens in the Grapevine Propagation Process: Potential Inoculum Sources, Detection, Identification, and Management Strategies. Plant Disease, 95(9), 1040-1055. doi:10.1094/pdis-01-11-0025 es_ES
dc.description.references Kaplan, J., Travadon, R., Cooper, M., Hillis, V., Lubell, M., & Baumgartner, K. (2016). Identifying economic hurdles to early adoption of preventative practices: The case of trunk diseases in California winegrape vineyards. Wine Economics and Policy, 5(2), 127-141. doi:10.1016/j.wep.2016.11.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Úrbez-Torres, J. R., & Gubler, W. D. (2010). Susceptibility of grapevine pruning wounds to infection by Lasiodiplodia theobromae and Neofusicoccum parvum. Plant Pathology, 60(2), 261-270. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3059.2010.02381.x es_ES
dc.description.references Eskalen, A., Feliciano, A. J., & Gubler, W. D. (2007). Susceptibility of Grapevine Pruning Wounds and Symptom Development in Response to Infection by Phaeoacremonium aleophilum and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora. Plant Disease, 91(9), 1100-1104. doi:10.1094/pdis-91-9-1100 es_ES
dc.description.references Elena, G., & Luque, J. (2016). Seasonal Susceptibility of Grapevine Pruning Wounds and Cane Colonization in Catalonia, Spain Following Artificial Infection with Diplodia seriata and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora. Plant Disease, 100(8), 1651-1659. doi:10.1094/pdis-10-15-1186-re es_ES
dc.description.references Díaz, G. A., & Latorre, B. A. (2013). Efficacy of paste and liquid fungicide formulations to protect pruning wounds against pathogens associated with grapevine trunk diseases in Chile. Crop Protection, 46, 106-112. doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2013.01.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Harman, G. E., & Kubicek, C. P. (Eds.). (1998). Trichoderma And Gliocladium, Volume 2. doi:10.1201/9781482267945 es_ES
dc.description.references Harman, G. E. (2000). Myths and Dogmas of Biocontrol Changes in Perceptions Derived from Research on Trichoderma harzinum T-22. Plant Disease, 84(4), 377-393. doi:10.1094/pdis.2000.84.4.377 es_ES
dc.description.references Mukherjee, M., Mukherjee, P. K., Horwitz, B. A., Zachow, C., Berg, G., & Zeilinger, S. (2012). Trichoderma–Plant–Pathogen Interactions: Advances in Genetics of Biological Control. Indian Journal of Microbiology, 52(4), 522-529. doi:10.1007/s12088-012-0308-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Rajesh, R. W., Rahul, M. S., & Ambalal, N. S. (2016). Trichoderma: A significant fungus for agriculture and environment. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 11(22), 1952-1965. doi:10.5897/ajar2015.10584 es_ES
dc.description.references Harman, G. E. (2006). Overview of Mechanisms and Uses of Trichoderma spp. Phytopathology®, 96(2), 190-194. doi:10.1094/phyto-96-0190 es_ES
dc.description.references Pieterse, C. M. J., Zamioudis, C., Berendsen, R. L., Weller, D. M., Van Wees, S. C. M., & Bakker, P. A. H. M. (2014). Induced Systemic Resistance by Beneficial Microbes. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 52(1), 347-375. doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102340 es_ES
dc.description.references Van Wees, S. C., Van der Ent, S., & Pieterse, C. M. (2008). Plant immune responses triggered by beneficial microbes. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 11(4), 443-448. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2008.05.005 es_ES
dc.description.references Berlanas, C., Andrés-Sodupe, M., López-Manzanares, B., Maldonado-González, M. M., & Gramaje, D. (2018). Effect of white mustard cover crop residue, soil chemical fumigation and Trichoderma spp. root treatment on black-foot disease control in grapevine. Pest Management Science, 74(12), 2864-2873. doi:10.1002/ps.5078 es_ES
dc.description.references Fourie, P. H., & Halleen, F. (2006). Chemical and biological protection of grapevine propagation material from trunk disease pathogens. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 116(4), 255-265. doi:10.1007/s10658-006-9057-9 es_ES
dc.description.references Dissanayake, A. (2016). Botryosphaeriaceae: Current status of genera and species. Mycosphere, 7(7), 1001-1073. doi:10.5943/mycosphere/si/1b/13 es_ES
dc.description.references Mostert, L., Groenewald, J. Z., Summerbell, R. C., Gams, W., & Crous, P. W. (2006). Taxonomy and Pathology of Togninia (Diaporthales) and its Phaeoacremonium Anamorphs. Studies in Mycology, 54, 1-113. doi:10.3114/sim.54.1.1 es_ES
dc.description.references GARDES, M., & BRUNS, T. D. (1993). ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes - application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Molecular Ecology, 2(2), 113-118. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.1993.tb00005.x es_ES
dc.description.references Travadon, R., Lawrence, D. P., Rooney-Latham, S., Gubler, W. D., Wilcox, W. F., Rolshausen, P. E., & Baumgartner, K. (2015). Cadophora species associated with wood-decay of grapevine in North America. Fungal Biology, 119(1), 53-66. doi:10.1016/j.funbio.2014.11.002 es_ES
dc.description.references O’Donnell, K., & Cigelnik, E. (1997). Two Divergent Intragenomic rDNA ITS2 Types within a Monophyletic Lineage of the FungusFusariumAre Nonorthologous. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 7(1), 103-116. doi:10.1006/mpev.1996.0376 es_ES
dc.description.references Jacobs, K., Bergdahl, D. R., Wingfield, M. J., Halik, S., Seifert, K. A., Bright, D. E., & Wingfield, B. D. (2004). Leptographium wingfieldii introduced into North America and found associated with exotic Tomicus piniperda and native bark beetles. Mycological Research, 108(4), 411-418. doi:10.1017/s0953756204009748 es_ES
dc.description.references Savazzini, F., Longa, C. M. O., Pertot, I., & Gessler, C. (2008). Real-time PCR for detection and quantification of the biocontrol agent Trichoderma atroviride strain SC1 in soil. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 73(2), 185-194. doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2008.02.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Longa, C. M. O., Pertot, I., & Tosi, S. (2008). Ecophysiological requirements and survival of aTrichoderma atrovirideisolate with biocontrol potential. Journal of Basic Microbiology, 48(4), 269-277. doi:10.1002/jobm.200700396 es_ES
dc.description.references Úrbez-Torres, J. R., Haag, P., Bowen, P., Lowery, T., & O’Gorman, D. T. (2015). Development of a DNA Macroarray for the Detection and Identification of Fungal Pathogens Causing Decline of Young Grapevines. Phytopathology®, 105(10), 1373-1388. doi:10.1094/phyto-03-15-0069-r es_ES
dc.subject.ods 02.- Poner fin al hambre, conseguir la seguridad alimentaria y una mejor nutrición, y promover la agricultura sostenible es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem