- -

Adjusting wastewater treatment effluent standards to protect the receiving waters: the case of low flow rivers in central Spain

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Adjusting wastewater treatment effluent standards to protect the receiving waters: the case of low flow rivers in central Spain

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

[Cerrado]
Nombre: Bolinches;De;Paredes ...
Tamaño: 1.803Mb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Solicitar una copia al autor
dc.contributor.author Bolinches, Antonio es_ES
dc.contributor.author De Stefano, Lucia es_ES
dc.contributor.author Paredes Arquiola, Javier es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2021-03-23T04:31:33Z
dc.date.available 2021-03-23T04:31:33Z
dc.date.issued 2020-09-23 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 1866-6280 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/164059
dc.description.abstract [EN] Freshwater quality is deteriorating worldwide. In populated areas, urban pollution is the main pressure on surface continental waters, but intensive wastewater treatment is costly. Setting standards for treatment of wastewater before discharge is a major policy instrument for water authorities, balancing environmental gains and operational costs. Discharge permits usually define concentration limits at the discharge point of the plant effluent. This approach, however, may not guarantee the good status of the receiving waters. Discharge permits should be directly linked to pollutant concentration in the river. Our paper develops an approach to adaptively adjust discharge permits and applies it to Madrid and the Manzanares river, a city of more than 3 million inhabitants discharging its treated wastewater to a stream having less than 2 m(3) s(-1) average flow. Stricter limits to 5-day biological oxygen demand (11 mg O-2 L-1), ammonium (0.5 mg N-NH4 L-1), nitrate (5.9 mg N-NO3 L-1), and phosphate (0.17 mg P-PO4 L-1) at plant effluent are required to meet the river environmental objectives. The results can be generalized to assess wastewater management decisions in other geographical areas. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship The authors wish to thank the Tagus River Basin Authority (Confederacion Hidrografica del Tajo) for their availability and readiness to share information, and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable and constructive comments. This research was funded by the Botin Foundation, Spain. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Springer-Verlag es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Environmental Earth Sciences es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Wastewater es_ES
dc.subject Water framework directive es_ES
dc.subject Water quality es_ES
dc.subject Tagus basin es_ES
dc.subject.classification INGENIERIA HIDRAULICA es_ES
dc.title Adjusting wastewater treatment effluent standards to protect the receiving waters: the case of low flow rivers in central Spain es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s12665-020-09184-z es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Cerrado es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ingeniería Hidráulica y Medio Ambiente - Departament d'Enginyeria Hidràulica i Medi Ambient es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Bolinches, A.; De Stefano, L.; Paredes Arquiola, J. (2020). Adjusting wastewater treatment effluent standards to protect the receiving waters: the case of low flow rivers in central Spain. Environmental Earth Sciences. 79:1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-09184-z es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-09184-z es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 17 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 79 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\418318 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Fundación Botín es_ES
dc.description.references AEMET (2018) Standard climate Values: Madrid, Retiro. https://www.aemet.es/en/serviciosclimaticos/datosclimatologicos/valoresclimatologicos?l=3195&k=mad. Accessed 25 June 2019 es_ES
dc.description.references Alexakis D, Kagalou I, Tsakiris G (2013) Assessment of pressures and impacts on surface water bodies of the Mediterranean. Case study: Pamvotis Lake, Greece. Environ Earth Sci 70:687–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-2152-7 es_ES
dc.description.references Anderson DM, Glibert PM, Burkholder JM (2002) Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication: nutrient sources, composition, and consequences. Estuaries 25:704–726. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02804901 es_ES
dc.description.references Andreu J, Capilla J, Sanchís E (1996) AQUATOOL, a generalized decision-support system for water-resources planning and operational management. J Hydrol 177:269–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(95)02963-X es_ES
dc.description.references Arora S, Keshari AK (2018) Estimation of re-aeration coefficient using MLR for modelling water quality of rivers in urban environment. Groundw Sustain Dev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2017.11.006 es_ES
dc.description.references Asad Ismaiel I, Bird G, McDonald MA et al (2018) Establishment of background water quality conditions in the Great Zab River catchment: influence of geogenic and anthropogenic controls on developing a baseline for water quality assessment and resource management. Environ Earth Sci 77:50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-7190-8 es_ES
dc.description.references Astaraie-Imani M, Kapelan Z, Fu G, Butler D (2012) Assessing the combined effects of urbanisation and climate change on the river water quality in an integrated urban wastewater system in the UK. J Environ Manag 112:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.039 es_ES
dc.description.references Bahamonde PA, Fuzzen ML, Bennett CJ et al (2015) Whole organism responses and intersex severity in rainbow darter (Etheostoma caeruleum) following exposures to municipal wastewater in the Grand River basin, ON, Canada. Part A Aquat Toxicol 159:290–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AQUATOX.2014.11.023 es_ES
dc.description.references Bowie GL, Mills WB, Porcella DB et al (1985) Rates, constants, and kinetics formulations in surface water quality modeling. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens es_ES
dc.description.references Carey RO, Migliaccio KW (2009) Contribution of wastewater treatment plant effluents to nutrient dynamics in aquatic systems: a review. Environ Manag 44:205–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9309-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Chang F-J, Tsai Y-H, Chen P-A et al (2015) Modeling water quality in an urban river using hydrological factors and data driven approaches. J Environ Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.12.014 es_ES
dc.description.references Chapra SC (2008) Surface water-quality modeling. Waveland Press, Long Grove es_ES
dc.description.references Confederación Hidrográfica del Tajo (2018) Resultados/informes: aguas superficiales—control fisicoquímico. https://www.chtajo.es/LaCuenca/CalidadAgua/Resultados_Informes/Paginas/RISupFisicoQuímico.aspx. Accessed 24 May 2018 es_ES
dc.description.references Corominas L, Acuña V, Ginebreda A, Poch M (2013) Integration of freshwater environmental policies and wastewater treatment plant management. Sci Total Environ 445–446:185–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2012.12.055 es_ES
dc.description.references Council of the European Communities (1991) Council Directive of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste water treatment (91/271/EEC). OJ es_ES
dc.description.references Cox BA, Whitehead PG (2009) Impacts of climate change scenarios on dissolved oxygen in the River Thames, UK. Hydrol Res 40:138–152. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2009.096 es_ES
dc.description.references Cubillo F, Rodriguez B, Barnwell TO (1992) A system for control of river water quality for the community of Madrid using QUAL2E. Water Sci Technol 26:1867–1873 es_ES
dc.description.references Dodds W, Smith V (2016) Nitrogen, phosphorus, and eutrophication in streams. Inl Waters 6:155–164. https://doi.org/10.5268/IW-6.2.909 es_ES
dc.description.references Dojlido J, Best GA (1993) Chemistry of water and water pollution. E. Horwood, Chichester es_ES
dc.description.references Donigian AS (2002) Watershed model calibration and validation: the HSPF experience. Proc Water Environ Fed 2002:44–73 es_ES
dc.description.references Duh JD, Shandas V, Chang H, George LA (2008) Rates of urbanisation and the resiliency of air and water quality. Sci Total Environ 400:238–256 es_ES
dc.description.references European Commission (2019) Report from the commission to the European Parliament and Council on the implementation of the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) and the Floods Directive (2007/60/EC). Brussels es_ES
dc.description.references European Parliament and Council (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. OJ 2014–7001 es_ES
dc.description.references Even S, Mouchel J-M, Servais P et al (2007) Modelling the impacts of combined sewer overflows on the river Seine water quality. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.12.007 es_ES
dc.description.references Fonseca A, Botelho C, Boaventura RAR, Vilar VJP (2014) Integrated hydrological and water quality model for river management: a case study on Lena River. Sci Total Environ 485–486:474–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.03.111 es_ES
dc.description.references Gallego Bernad MS, Sánchez Pérez MÁ (2006) La destrucción ambiental del río Tajo: orígenes, procesos y consecuencias. In: V congreso Ibérico sobre Gestión y Planificación del Agua, Faro es_ES
dc.description.references Genkai-Kato M, Carpenter SR (2005) Eutrophication due to phosphorus recycling in relation to lake morphometry, temperature, and macrophytes. Ecology 86(1):210–219 es_ES
dc.description.references Google Earth (2018) Google Earth. https://earth.google.com/web/@40.4012607,-3.71553269,604.85487896a,8051.22382757d,35y,0h,0t,0r. Accessed 24 May 2018 es_ES
dc.description.references Griffiths JA, Ka F, Chan S et al (2017) Reach-scale variation surface water quality in a reticular canal system in the lower Yangtze River Delta region, China. J Environ Manag 196:80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.02.079 es_ES
dc.description.references Hernández-Sancho F, Molinos-Senante M, Sala-Garrido R (2011) Cost modelling for wastewater treatment processes. Desalination 268:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DESAL.2010.09.042 es_ES
dc.description.references Hutchins MG, Bowes MJ (2018) Balancing water demand needs with protection of river water quality by minimising stream residence time: an example from the Thames, UK. Water Resour Manag 32:2561–2568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-1946-0 es_ES
dc.description.references IGN Instituto Geográfico Nacional (2018) Centro de Descargas del CNIG (IGN). https://centrodedescargas.cnig.es/CentroDescargas/index.jsp. Accessed 24 May 2018 es_ES
dc.description.references IGN Instituto Geográfico Nacional (2020) Atlas Nacional de España. https://atlasnacional.ign.es/. Accessed 19 May 2020 es_ES
dc.description.references INE (2018) Cifras oficiales de población resultantes de la revisión del Padrón municipal. https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Tabla.htm?t=2881&L=0. Accessed 7 Apr 2019 es_ES
dc.description.references INE Instituto Nacional de Estadística (2018) Survey on water supply and sewerage. https://www.ine.es/dynt3/inebase/index.htm?type=pcaxis&path=/t26/p069/p03/serie&file=pcaxis&L=1. Accessed 24 May 2018 es_ES
dc.description.references Jasinska EJ, Goss GG, Gillis PL et al (2015) Assessment of biomarkers for contaminants of emerging concern on aquatic organisms downstream of a municipal wastewater discharge. Sci Total Environ 530–531:140–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2015.05.080 es_ES
dc.description.references Jin L, Whitehead PG, Heppell CM et al (2016) Modelling flow and inorganic nitrogen dynamics on the Hampshire Avon: linking upstream processes to downstream water quality. Sci Total Environ 572:1496–1506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.156 es_ES
dc.description.references Kloas W, Urbatzka R, Opitz R et al (2009) Endocrine disruption in aquatic vertebrates. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1163:187–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04453.x es_ES
dc.description.references Kottek M, Grieser J, Beck C et al (2006) World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorol Zeitschrift 15:259–263. https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130 es_ES
dc.description.references Lastra A (2017) Minimizando el impacto de los vertidos en tiempo de lluvia. El caso de Madrid. In: V Jornadas de Ingeniería del Agua, p 2017 es_ES
dc.description.references Loos S, Middelkoop H, van der Perk M, van Beek R (2009) Large scale nutrient modelling using globally available datasets: a test for the Rhine basin. J Hydrol 369:403–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.02.019 es_ES
dc.description.references Madrid City Council (2017) Padrón Municipal de Habitantes Ciudad de Madrid, pp 1–45 es_ES
dc.description.references Madrid City Council (2018) Zonas Alcantarillado Municipio Madrid. https://www.madrid.es/UnidadesDescentralizadas/Agua/DeInformacionsobreAgua/SistemasDepuracion/2017ZonasAlcantarilladoMunicipioMadrid.pdf.pdf. Accessed 24 May 2018 es_ES
dc.description.references Mapama M de AA y M ambiente (2011) Resolución de 30 de junio de 2011, de la Secretaría de Estado de Medio Rural y Agua, por la que se declaran las zonas sensibles en las cuencas intercomunitarias. Off Bull Spain es_ES
dc.description.references Mapama M de AA y M ambiente (2016) Real Decreto 1/2016, de 8 de enero, por el que se aprueba la revisión de los Planes Hidrológicos de las demarcaciones (...) y de la parte española de las demarcaciones hidrográficas del Cantábrico Oriental, Miño-Sil, Duero, Tajo, Guadiana y Ebro. Off Bull Spain 16, pp 2972–4301 es_ES
dc.description.references Mapama M de AA y M ambiente (2018) Redes de seguimiento. https://sig.mapama.gob.es/redes-seguimiento/. Accessed 26 June 2019 es_ES
dc.description.references McGrane SJ (2016) Impacts of urbanisation on hydrological and water quality dynamics, and urban water management: a review. Hydrol Sci J 61:2295–2311. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2015.1128084 es_ES
dc.description.references Momblanch A, Paredes-Arquiola J, Munné A et al (2015) Managing water quality under drought conditions in the Llobregat River Basin. Sci Total Environ 503–504:300–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.069 es_ES
dc.description.references Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW et al (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50:885–900. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23153 es_ES
dc.description.references Morris L, Colombo V, Hassell K et al (2017) Municipal wastewater effluent licensing: a global perspective and recommendations for best practice. Sci Total Environ 580:1327–1339. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2016.12.096 es_ES
dc.description.references Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6 es_ES
dc.description.references Ostace GS, Baeza JA, Guerrero J et al (2013) Development and economic assessment of different WWTP control strategies for optimal simultaneous removal of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus. Comput Chem Eng 53:164–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPCHEMENG.2013.03.007 es_ES
dc.description.references Paredes J, Andreu J, Solera A (2010) A decision support system for water quality issues in the Manzanares River (Madrid, Spain). Sci Total Environ 408:2576–2589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.02.037 es_ES
dc.description.references Paredes-Arquiola S (2013) Modelo gescal para la simulación de la calidad del agua en sistemas de recursos hídricos es_ES
dc.description.references Paredes-Arquiola J, Andreu-Álvarez J, Martín-Monerris M, Solera A (2010) Water quantity and quality models applied to the Jucar River Basin, Spain. Water Resour Manag 24:2759–2779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9578-z es_ES
dc.description.references Paredes-Arquiola J, Solera A, Martinez-Capel F et al (2014) Integrating water management, habitat modelling and water quality at the basin scale and environmental flow assessment: case study of the Tormes River, Spain. Hydrol Sci J 59:878–889. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.821573 es_ES
dc.description.references Paul MJ, Meyer JL (2001) Streams in the urban landscape. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:333–365. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114040 es_ES
dc.description.references Santhi C, Arnold JG, Williams JR et al (2001) Validation of the SWAT model on a large river basin with point and nonpoint sources. J Am Water Resour Assoc 37:1169–1188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2001.tb03630.x es_ES
dc.description.references Sferratore A, Billen G, Garnier J, Théry S (2005) Modeling nutrient (N, P, Si) budget in the Seine watershed: application of the Riverstrahler model using data from local to global scale resolution. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 19:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GB002496 es_ES
dc.description.references Singh J, Knapp HV, Arnold JG, Demissie M (2005) Hydrological modeling of the Iroquois river watershed using HSPF and SWAT. J Am Water Resour Assoc 41:343–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03740.x es_ES
dc.description.references Smith VH, Tilman GD, Nekola JC (1999) Eutrophication: impacts of excess nutrient inputs on freshwater, marine, and terrestrial ecosystems. Environ Pollut 100:179–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00091-3 es_ES
dc.description.references Soares Cruz MA, de Azevedo GA, de Aragão R et al (2019) Spatial and seasonal variability of the water quality characteristics of a river in Northeast Brazil. Environ Earth Sci 78:68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8087-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Soil Conservation Service (1972) SCS national engineering handbook, section 4: hydrology es_ES
dc.description.references Thomann RV, Mueller JA (1987) Principles of surface water quality modeling and control. HarperCollins, New York es_ES
dc.description.references United Nations Environment Program (2015) Good practices for regulating wastewater treatment. Legislations, Policies and Standards es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem