- -

Airborne Pheromone Quantification in Treated Vineyards with Different Mating Disruption Dispensers against Lobesia botrana

RiuNet: Institutional repository of the Polithecnic University of Valencia

Share/Send to

Cited by

Statistics

Airborne Pheromone Quantification in Treated Vineyards with Different Mating Disruption Dispensers against Lobesia botrana

Show simple item record

Files in this item

dc.contributor.author Gavara, Aitor es_ES
dc.contributor.author Vacas, Sandra es_ES
dc.contributor.author Navarro, Ismael es_ES
dc.contributor.author Primo Millo, Jaime es_ES
dc.contributor.author Navarro-Llopis, Vicente es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2021-04-09T03:31:23Z
dc.date.available 2021-04-09T03:31:23Z
dc.date.issued 2020-05 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/164961
dc.description.abstract [EN] Mating disruption (MD) is widely used against the European grapevine moth (EGVM), Lobesia botrana (Denis and Schiffermuller; Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), by installing passive dispensers or aerosol devices. The present work reports a new sampling and quantification methodology to obtain absolute data about field airborne pheromone concentration based on air samplings and sensitive chromatographic-spectroscopic methods. Samplings were performed in fields treated with passive dispensers or aerosol devices at different moments throughout the crop cycle to study how they act and how the disruption is triggered. Moreover, pheromone adsorption and releasing capacity of vine leaves were studied to elucidate their role in the disruption. Although both types of dispensers were effective in limiting the damage inflicted by EGVM, they performed differently and provided different airborne pheromone concentration profiles. Results also proved that leaves were able to adsorb and release part of the airborne pheromone acting as subsequent and additional pheromone sources. This fact could explain the different concentration profiles. Moreover, our results suggest that lower pheromone emission than that of the current passive dispensers still could provide an adequate performance in the field. Competitive mechanisms involved in MD using both dispensers, the dynamics of the airborne pheromone throughout the time and the importance of the canopy are discussed. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship This research received funding from Conselleria de Agricultura, Medio Ambiente, Cambio Climatico y Desarrollo Rural (Generalitat Valenciana) under grant agreement S8456000. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher MDPI es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Insects es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject European grapevine moth es_ES
dc.subject Tortricidae es_ES
dc.subject Passive dispensers es_ES
dc.subject Aerosol devices es_ES
dc.subject Air samples es_ES
dc.subject GC-MS es_ES
dc.subject MS es_ES
dc.subject Pest control es_ES
dc.subject Field trials es_ES
dc.subject.classification QUIMICA ORGANICA es_ES
dc.title Airborne Pheromone Quantification in Treated Vineyards with Different Mating Disruption Dispensers against Lobesia botrana es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/insects11050289 es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/GVA//S8456000/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto Agroforestal Mediterráneo - Institut Agroforestal Mediterrani es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Química - Departament de Química es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Gavara, A.; Vacas, S.; Navarro, I.; Primo Millo, J.; Navarro-Llopis, V. (2020). Airborne Pheromone Quantification in Treated Vineyards with Different Mating Disruption Dispensers against Lobesia botrana. Insects. 11(5):1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11050289 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11050289 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 19 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 11 es_ES
dc.description.issue 5 es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn 2075-4450 es_ES
dc.identifier.pmid 32397370 es_ES
dc.identifier.pmcid PMC7291346 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\416002 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Generalitat Valenciana es_ES
dc.description.references Witzgall, P., Kirsch, P., & Cork, A. (2010). Sex Pheromones and Their Impact on Pest Management. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 36(1), 80-100. doi:10.1007/s10886-009-9737-y es_ES
dc.description.references Lucchi, A., Sambado, P., Juan Royo, A. B., Bagnoli, B., Conte, G., & Benelli, G. (2018). Disrupting mating of Lobesia botrana using sex pheromone aerosol devices. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(22), 22196-22204. doi:10.1007/s11356-018-2341-3 es_ES
dc.description.references Gordon, D., Zahavi, T., Anshelevich, L., Harel, M., Ovadia, S., Dunkelblum, E., & Harari, A. R. (2005). Mating Disruption of Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): Effect of Pheromone Formulations and Concentrations. Journal of Economic Entomology, 98(1), 135-142. doi:10.1093/jee/98.1.135 es_ES
dc.description.references Williamson, E. R., Folwell, R. J., Knight, A., & Howell, J. F. (1996). Economics of employing pheromones for mating disruption of the codling moth, Carpocapsa pomonella. Crop Protection, 15(5), 473-477. doi:10.1016/0261-2194(96)00013-0 es_ES
dc.description.references Knight, A. L. (1995). Evaluating Pheromone Emission Rate and Blend in Disrupting Sexual Communication of Codling Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Environmental Entomology, 24(6), 1396-1403. doi:10.1093/ee/24.6.1396 es_ES
dc.description.references Welter, S. C., Pickel, C., Millar, J., Cave, F., Van Steenwyk, R. A., & Dunley, J. (2005). Pheromone mating disruption offers selective management options for key pests. California Agriculture, 59(1), 16-22. doi:10.3733/ca.v059n01p16 es_ES
dc.description.references Vacas, S., Alfaro, C., Primo, J., & Navarro-Llopis, V. (2011). Studies on the development of a mating disruption system to control the tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta Povolny (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Pest Management Science, 67(11), 1473-1480. doi:10.1002/ps.2202 es_ES
dc.description.references Miller, J. R., & Gut, L. J. (2015). Mating Disruption for the 21st Century: Matching Technology With Mechanism. Environmental Entomology, 44(3), 427-453. doi:10.1093/ee/nvv052 es_ES
dc.description.references Witzgall, P., Stelinski, L., Gut, L., & Thomson, D. (2008). Codling Moth Management and Chemical Ecology. Annual Review of Entomology, 53(1), 503-522. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093323 es_ES
dc.description.references Ozlem Altindisli, F., Ozsemerci, F., Koclu, T., Akkan, Ü., & Keskin, N. (2016). Isonet LTT, a new alternative material for mating disruption ofLobesia botrana(Den. & Schiff.) in Turkey. BIO Web of Conferences, 7, 01029. doi:10.1051/bioconf/20160701029 es_ES
dc.description.references Lucchi, A., Ladurner, E., Iodice, A., Savino, F., Ricciardi, R., Cosci, F., … Benelli, G. (2018). Eco-friendly pheromone dispensers—a green route to manage the European grapevine moth? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(10), 9426-9442. doi:10.1007/s11356-018-1248-3 es_ES
dc.description.references Miller, J. R., Gut, L. J., de Lame, F. M., & Stelinski, L. L. (2006). Differentiation of Competitive vs. Non-competitive Mechanisms Mediating Disruption of Moth Sexual Communication by Point Sources of Sex Pheromone (Part I): Theory1. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 32(10), 2089-2114. doi:10.1007/s10886-006-9134-8 es_ES
dc.description.references Stelinski, L. L., Gut, L. J., Haas, M., McGhee, P., & Epstein, D. (2007). Evaluation of aerosol devices for simultaneous disruption of sex pheromone communication in Cydia pomonella and Grapholita molesta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Journal of Pest Science, 80(4), 225-233. doi:10.1007/s10340-007-0176-7 es_ES
dc.description.references McGhee, P. S., Gut, L. J., & Miller, J. R. (2014). Aerosol emitters disrupt codling moth, Cydia pomonella , competitively. Pest Management Science, 70(12), 1859-1862. doi:10.1002/ps.3732 es_ES
dc.description.references McGhee, P. S., Miller, J. R., Thomson, D. R., & Gut, L. J. (2016). Optimizing Aerosol Dispensers for Mating Disruption of Codling Moth, Cydia pomonella L. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 42(7), 612-616. doi:10.1007/s10886-016-0724-9 es_ES
dc.description.references Vacas, S., Alfaro, C., Zarzo, M., Navarro-Llopis, V., & Primo, J. (2011). Effect of sex pheromone emission on the attraction of Lobesia botrana. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 139(3), 250-257. doi:10.1111/j.1570-7458.2011.01124.x es_ES
dc.description.references Wilson, H., & Daane, K. M. (2017). Review of Ecologically-Based Pest Management in California Vineyards. Insects, 8(4), 108. doi:10.3390/insects8040108 es_ES
dc.description.references Ioriatti, C., Anfora, G., Tasin, M., De Cristofaro, A., Witzgall, P., & Lucchi, A. (2011). Chemical Ecology and Management of Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 104(4), 1125-1137. doi:10.1603/ec10443 es_ES
dc.description.references Ioriatti, C., & Lucchi, A. (2016). Semiochemical Strategies for Tortricid Moth Control in Apple Orchards and Vineyards in Italy. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 42(7), 571-583. doi:10.1007/s10886-016-0722-y es_ES
dc.description.references Benelli, Lucchi, Thomson, & Ioriatti. (2019). Sex Pheromone Aerosol Devices for Mating Disruption: Challenges for a Brighter Future. Insects, 10(10), 308. doi:10.3390/insects10100308 es_ES
dc.description.references Vassiliou, V. A. (2009). Control of Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in vineyards in Cyprus using the Mating Disruption Technique. Crop Protection, 28(2), 145-150. doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2008.09.013 es_ES
dc.description.references Alfaro, C., Navarro-Llopis, V., & Primo, J. (2009). Optimization of pheromone dispenser density for managing the rice striped stem borer, Chilo suppressalis (Walker), by mating disruption. Crop Protection, 28(7), 567-572. doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2009.02.006 es_ES
dc.description.references Epstein, D. L., Stelinski, L. L., Reed, T. P., Miller, J. R., & Gut, L. J. (2006). Higher Densities of Distributed Pheromone Sources Provide Disruption of Codling Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) Superior to That of Lower Densities of Clumped Sources. Journal of Economic Entomology, 99(4), 1327-1333. doi:10.1093/jee/99.4.1327 es_ES
dc.description.references Schwalbe, C. P., & Mastro, V. C. (1988). Gypsy moth mating disruption: Dosage effects. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 14(2), 581-588. doi:10.1007/bf01013908 es_ES
dc.description.references Karg, G., & Sauer, A. E. (1995). Spatial distribution of pheromone in vineyards treated for mating disruption of the grape vine mothLobesia botrana measured with electroantennograms. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 21(9), 1299-1314. doi:10.1007/bf02027563 es_ES
dc.description.references Sauer, A. E., Karg, G., Koch, U. T., De Kramer, J. J., & Milli, R. (1992). A portable EAG system for the measurement of pheromone concentrations in the field. Chemical Senses, 17(5), 543-553. doi:10.1093/chemse/17.5.543 es_ES
dc.description.references Karg, G., & Sauer, A. E. (1997). Seasonal Variation of Pheromone Concentration in Mating Disruption Trials Against European Grape Vine Moth Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) Measured by EAG. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 23(2), 487-501. doi:10.1023/b:joec.0000006373.19897.eb es_ES
dc.description.references Sauer, A. E., & Karg2, G. (1998). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 24(2), 289-302. doi:10.1023/a:1022532425253 es_ES
dc.description.references Abad, E., Martínez, K., Gustems, L., Gómez, R., Guinart, X., Hernández, I., & Rivera, J. (2007). Ten years measuring PCDDs/PCDFs in ambient air in Catalonia (Spain). Chemosphere, 67(9), 1709-1714. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.05.083 es_ES
dc.description.references Li, Y., Jiang, G., Wang, Y., Cai, Z., & Zhang, Q. (2008). Concentrations, profiles and gas–particle partitioning of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans in the ambient air of Beijing, China. Atmospheric Environment, 42(9), 2037-2047. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.12.005 es_ES
dc.description.references Lohmann, R., & Jones, K. C. (1998). Dioxins and furans in air and deposition: A review of levels, behaviour and processes. Science of The Total Environment, 219(1), 53-81. doi:10.1016/s0048-9697(98)00237-x es_ES
dc.description.references Cecinato, A., Balducci, C., Romagnoli, P., & Perilli, M. (2012). Airborne psychotropic substances in eight Italian big cities: Burdens and behaviours. Environmental Pollution, 171, 140-147. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2012.07.033 es_ES
dc.description.references Cahiez, G., Guerret, O., Moyeux, A., Dufour, S., & Lefevre, N. (2017). Eco-Friendly and Industrially Scalable Synthesis of the Sex Pheromone of Lobesia botrana. Important Progress for the Eco-Protection of Vineyard. Organic Process Research & Development, 21(10), 1542-1546. doi:10.1021/acs.oprd.7b00206 es_ES
dc.description.references Zaranski, M. T., Patton, G. W., McConnell, L. L., Bidleman, T. F., & Mulik, J. D. (1991). Collection of nonpolar organic compounds from ambient air using polyurethane foam-granular adsorbent sandwich cartridges. Analytical Chemistry, 63(13), 1228-1232. doi:10.1021/ac00013a009 es_ES
dc.description.references López, A., Coscollà, C., & Yusà, V. (2017). Selection of sampling adsorbents and optimisation and validation of a GC-MS/MS method for airborne pesticides. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 97(10), 949-964. doi:10.1080/03067319.2017.1373771 es_ES
dc.description.references Vacas, S., Alfaro, C., Navarro-Llopis, V., & Primo, J. (2010). Mating disruption of California red scale, Aonidiella aurantii Maskell (Homoptera: Diaspididae), using biodegradable mesoporous pheromone dispensers. Pest Management Science, 66(7), 745-751. doi:10.1002/ps.1937 es_ES
dc.description.references Wehrenfennig, C., Schott, M., Gasch, T., Düring, R. A., Vilcinskas, A., & Kohl, C.-D. (2013). On-site airborne pheromone sensing. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 405(20), 6389-6403. doi:10.1007/s00216-013-7113-9 es_ES
dc.description.references Klaschka, U. (2008). The infochemical effect—a new chapter in ecotoxicology. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 15(6), 452-462. doi:10.1007/s11356-008-0019-y es_ES
dc.description.references Shaver, T. N. (1983). Environmental Fate of ( Z )-11-Hexadecenal and ( Z )-9-Tetradecenal, Components of a Sex Pheromone of the Tobacco Budworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environmental Entomology, 12(6), 1802-1804. doi:10.1093/ee/12.6.1802 es_ES
dc.description.references WALL, C., STURGEON, D. M., GREENWAY, A. R., & PERRY, J. N. (1981). CONTAMINATION OF VEGETATION WITH SYNTHETIC SEX-ATTRACTANT RELEASED FROM TRAPS FOR THE PEA MOTH, CYDIA NIGRICANA. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 30(2), 111-115. doi:10.1111/j.1570-7458.1981.tb03083.x es_ES
dc.description.references NOLDUS, L. P. J. J., POTTING, R. P. J., & BARENDREGT, H. E. (1991). Moth sex pheromone adsorption to leaf surface: bridge in time for chemical spies. Physiological Entomology, 16(3), 329-344. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3032.1991.tb00571.x es_ES
dc.description.references Karg, G., Suckling, D. M., & Bradley, S. J. (1994). Absorption and release of pheromone ofEpiphyas postvittana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) by apple leaves. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 20(8), 1825-1841. doi:10.1007/bf02066225 es_ES
dc.description.references Schmitz, V., Charlier, L., Roehrich, R., & Stockel, J. (1997). Etude du mécanisme de la confusion sexuelle chez l’Eudémis de la vigne,Lobesia botranaDen. et Schiff. (Lep., Tortricidae) IV - Quel est le rôle de la fixation de la phéromone par le feuillage? Journal of Applied Entomology, 121(1-5), 41-46. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0418.1997.tb01368.x es_ES
dc.description.references Suckling, D. M., Daly, J. M., Chen, X., & Karg, G. (2007). Field electroantennogram and trap assessments of aerosol pheromone dispensers for disrupting mating inEpiphyas postvittana. Pest Management Science, 63(2), 202-209. doi:10.1002/ps.1312 es_ES
dc.description.references Girling, R. D., Higbee, B. S., & Cardé, R. T. (2013). The Plume Also Rises: Trajectories of Pheromone Plumes Issuing from Point Sources in an Orchard Canopy at Night. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 39(9), 1150-1160. doi:10.1007/s10886-013-0341-9 es_ES
dc.description.references Anfora, G., Tasin, M., Backman, A.-C., Cristofaro, A., Witzgall, P., & Ioriatti, C. (2005). Attractiveness of year-old polyethylene Isonet sex pheromone dispensers for Lobesia botrana. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 117(3), 201-207. doi:10.1111/j.1570-7458.2005.00349.x es_ES


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record