- -

Relationship between ambidexterity andentrepreneurial intensity

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Relationship between ambidexterity andentrepreneurial intensity

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Castaño-Martínez; ...
Tamaño: 1.495Mb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Castaño-Martínez, María-Soledad es_ES
dc.contributor.author Galindo-Martín, Miguel-Ángel es_ES
dc.contributor.author Méndez-Picazo, María-Teresa es_ES
dc.contributor.author Palacios Marqués, Daniel es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2021-04-28T03:31:57Z
dc.date.available 2021-04-28T03:31:57Z
dc.date.issued 2020 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 1331-677X es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/165720
dc.description.abstract [EN] Within organisational analysis, a concept that has been gaining importance has been organisational ambidexterity, where two factors play an important role: entrepreneurial intensity and innovations. The objective of this article is to analyse the relationship between entrepreneurial intensity and ambidexterity. The conceptualisation of ambidexterity distinguishes between ambidextrous activities and ambidextrous outcomes. To carry out this objective, we have tested several theoretical relationships. We have used partial least squares methodology to develop an empirical study in 25 European countries. Results confirm that collaboration networks have a positive effect on entrepreneurship intensity. This effect is greater than the one obtained by ambidextrous activities or new technologies. We also show that entrepreneurship intensity has a mediating role between ambidextrous activities and ambidextrous outcomes. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Taylor & Francis es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Economic Research-Ekonomska Istra ivanja es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Entrepreneurial intensity es_ES
dc.subject Ambidextrous activities es_ES
dc.subject Ambidextrous outcomes es_ES
dc.subject Innovation es_ES
dc.subject.classification ORGANIZACION DE EMPRESAS es_ES
dc.title Relationship between ambidexterity andentrepreneurial intensity es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1080/1331677X.2019.1595084 es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Organización de Empresas - Departament d'Organització d'Empreses es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Castaño-Martínez, M.; Galindo-Martín, M.; Méndez-Picazo, M.; Palacios Marqués, D. (2020). Relationship between ambidexterity andentrepreneurial intensity. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istra ivanja. 33(1):2410-2426. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1595084 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1595084 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 2410 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 2426 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 33 es_ES
dc.description.issue 1 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\427685 es_ES
dc.description.references Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306-333. doi:10.1002/smj.821 es_ES
dc.description.references Faisal Ahammad, M., Mook Lee, S., Malul, M., & Shoham, A. (2015). Behavioral Ambidexterity: The Impact of Incentive Schemes on Productivity, Motivation, and Performance of Employees in Commercial Banks. Human Resource Management, 54(S1), s45-s62. doi:10.1002/hrm.21668 es_ES
dc.description.references Ambos, T. C., Mäkelä, K., Birkinshaw, J., & D’Este, P. (2008). When Does University Research Get Commercialized? Creating Ambidexterity in Research Institutions. Journal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1424-1447. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00804.x es_ES
dc.description.references Antoncic, B., & Hisrich, R. D. (2001). Intrapreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 495-527. doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(99)00054-3 es_ES
dc.description.references Brem, A. (2017). Creativity and routine: conceptual considerations on managing organisational ambidexterity in entrepreneurial ventures. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 21(3), 261. doi:10.1504/ijeim.2017.083472 es_ES
dc.description.references Burgelman, R. A. (1983). Corporate Entrepreneurship and Strategic Management: Insights from a Process Study. Management Science, 29(12), 1349-1364. doi:10.1287/mnsc.29.12.1349 es_ES
dc.description.references Burgers, J. H., Jansen, J. J. P., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Structural differentiation and corporate venturing: The moderating role of formal and informal integration mechanisms. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(3), 206-220. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.01.006 es_ES
dc.description.references Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects. Organization Science, 20(4), 781-796. doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0426 es_ES
dc.description.references Cassis, Y., & Minoglou, I. P. (2005). Entrepreneurship in Theory and History: State of the Art and New Perspectives. Entrepreneurship in Theory and History, 3-21. doi:10.1057/9780230522633_1 es_ES
dc.description.references Cesinger, B., Hughes, M., Mensching, H., Bouncken, R., Fredrich, V., & Kraus, S. (2016). A socioemotional wealth perspective on how collaboration intensity, trust, and international market knowledge affect family firms’ multinationality. Journal of World Business, 51(4), 586-599. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2016.02.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Cooper, A. C., & Dunkelberg, W. C. (1986). Entrepreneurship and paths to business ownership. Strategic Management Journal, 7(1), 53-68. doi:10.1002/smj.4250070106 es_ES
dc.description.references Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75-87. doi:10.1002/smj.4250100107 es_ES
dc.description.references Dai, Y., Du, K., Byun, G., & Zhu, X. (2017). Ambidexterity in new ventures: The impact of new product development alliances and transactive memory systems. Journal of Business Research, 75, 77-85. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.02.009 es_ES
dc.description.references Dakhli, M., & De Clercq, D. (2004). Human capital, social capital, and innovation: a multi-country study. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16(2), 107-128. doi:10.1080/08985620410001677835 es_ES
dc.description.references Davis, J. P., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2011). Rotating Leadership and Collaborative Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(2), 159-201. doi:10.1177/0001839211428131 es_ES
dc.description.references De Carolis, D. M., & Saparito, P. (2006). Social Capital, Cognition, and Entrepreneurial Opportunities: A Theoretical Framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 41-56. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00109.x es_ES
dc.description.references Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39. doi:10.2307/3151312 es_ES
dc.description.references Fukuyama, F. (2000). Social capital and civil society (International Monetary Fund Working Paper, 74). Washington, DC: Springer. es_ES
dc.description.references Galindo, M.-Á., & Méndez, M. T. (2014). Entrepreneurship, economic growth, and innovation: Are feedback effects at work? Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 825-829. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.052 es_ES
dc.description.references Gartner, W. B. (1985). A Conceptual Framework for Describing the Phenomenon of New Venture Creation. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 696-706. doi:10.5465/amr.1985.4279094 es_ES
dc.description.references Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). THE ANTECEDENTS, CONSEQUENCES, AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209-226. doi:10.2307/20159573 es_ES
dc.description.references Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Project (GEM) (2016). APS-Global data 2012. Retrieved from http://www.gemconsortium.org/data/sets. Accessed 25 May 2016. es_ES
dc.description.references Gulati, R., & Sytch, M. (2007). Dependence Asymmetry and Joint Dependence in Interorganizational Relationships: Effects of Embeddedness on a Manufacturer’s Performance in Procurement Relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 32-69. doi:10.2189/asqu.52.1.32 es_ES
dc.description.references Heavey, C., & Simsek, Z. (2016). Distributed Cognition in Top Management Teams and Organizational Ambidexterity. Journal of Management, 43(3), 919-945. doi:10.1177/0149206314545652 es_ES
dc.description.references Hitt, M. A., Lee, H., & Yucel, E. (2002). Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2/3), 353-372. doi:10.1023/a:1016247920461 es_ES
dc.description.references Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. (2009). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1411-1431. doi:10.1057/jibs.2009.24 es_ES
dc.description.references Jones, G. R., & Butler, J. E. (1992). Managing Internal Corporate Entrepreneurship: An Agency Theory Perspective. Journal of Management, 18(4), 733-749. doi:10.1177/014920639201800408 es_ES
dc.description.references Kaasa, A. (2009). Effects of different dimensions of social capital on innovative activity: Evidence from Europe at the regional level. Technovation, 29(3), 218-233. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2008.01.003 es_ES
dc.description.references Kafouros, M. I., Buckley, P. J., Sharp, J. A., & Wang, C. (2008). The role of internationalization in explaining innovation performance. Technovation, 28(1-2), 63-74. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.009 es_ES
dc.description.references Koryak, O., Lockett, A., Hayton, J., Nicolaou, N., & Mole, K. (2018). Disentangling the antecedents of ambidexterity: Exploration and exploitation. Research Policy, 47(2), 413-427. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.12.003 es_ES
dc.description.references Kotabe, M., Srinivasan, S. S., & Aulakh, P. S. (2002). Multinationality and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of R&D and Marketing Capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(1), 79-97. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491006 es_ES
dc.description.references Krauss, S. I., Frese, M., Friedrich, C., & Unger, J. M. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation: A psychological model of success among southern African small business owners. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14(3), 315-344. doi:10.1080/13594320500170227 es_ES
dc.description.references Kuratko, D. F., & Morris, M. H. (2018). Corporate Entrepreneurship: A Critical Challenge for Educators and Researchers. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 1(1), 42-60. doi:10.1177/2515127417737291 es_ES
dc.description.references Kyoon Yoo, D. (2014). Substructures of perceived knowledge quality and interactions with knowledge sharing and innovativeness: a sensemaking perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(3), 523-537. doi:10.1108/jkm-09-2013-0362 es_ES
dc.description.references LAWSON, B., & SAMSON, D. (2001). DEVELOPING INNOVATION CAPABILITY IN ORGANISATIONS: A DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES APPROACH. International Journal of Innovation Management, 05(03), 377-400. doi:10.1142/s1363919601000427 es_ES
dc.description.references Liao, J., & Welsch, H. (2003). Social capital and entrepreneurial growth aspiration: a comparison of technology- and non-technology-based nascent entrepreneurs. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14(1), 149-170. doi:10.1016/s1047-8310(03)00009-9 es_ES
dc.description.references Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance. The Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135. doi:10.2307/258632 es_ES
dc.description.references Lyon, D. W., Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2000). Enhancing Entrepreneurial Orientation Research: Operationalizing and Measuring a Key Strategic Decision Making Process. Journal of Management, 26(5), 1055-1085. doi:10.1177/014920630002600503 es_ES
dc.description.references March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87. doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 es_ES
dc.description.references Martinez-Conesa, I., Soto-Acosta, P., & Carayannis, E. G. (2017). On the path towards open innovation: assessing the role of knowledge management capability and environmental dynamism in SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(3), 553-570. doi:10.1108/jkm-09-2016-0403 es_ES
dc.description.references Miller, D. (1983). The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770-791. doi:10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770 es_ES
dc.description.references Morris, M. H., & Paul, G. W. (1987). The relationship between entrepreneurship and marketing in established firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(3), 247-259. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(87)90012-7 es_ES
dc.description.references Morris, M. H., & Sexton, D. L. (1996). The concept of entrepreneurial intensity: Implications for company performance. Journal of Business Research, 36(1), 5-13. doi:10.1016/0148-2963(95)00158-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266. doi:10.5465/amr.1998.533225 es_ES
dc.description.references Oparaocha, G. O. (2016). Towards building internal social network architecture that drives innovation: a social exchange theory perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(3), 534-556. doi:10.1108/jkm-06-2015-0212 es_ES
dc.description.references O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present, and Future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324-338. doi:10.5465/amp.2013.0025 es_ES
dc.description.references Palacios-Marqués, D., Popa, S., & Pilar Alguacil Mari, M. (2016). The effect of online social networks and competency-based management on innovation capability. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(3), 499-511. doi:10.1108/jkm-05-2015-0175 es_ES
dc.description.references Patel, P. C., Messersmith, J. G., & Lepak, D. P. (2013). Walking the Tightrope: An Assessment of the Relationship between High-Performance Work Systems and Organizational Ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1420-1442. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0255 es_ES
dc.description.references Phene, A., Tallman, S., & Almeida, P. (2010). When Do Acquisitions Facilitate Technological Exploration and Exploitation? Journal of Management, 38(3), 753-783. doi:10.1177/0149206310369939 es_ES
dc.description.references Pittiglio, R., Sica, E., & Villa, S. (2009). Innovation and internationalization: the case of Italy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(6), 588-602. doi:10.1007/s10961-009-9107-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Rezende, J., Torres, A., Nicolini, A., Correia, A., & Bernardes, R. (2016). Integrating enabling contexts and ambidexterity to create Intellectual Capital faculty’s competencies on undergraduate Business Management programs. Intangible Capital, 12(4), 1006. doi:10.3926/ic.724 es_ES
dc.description.references Roldán Bravo, M. I., Ruiz-Moreno, A., & Lloréns Montes, F. J. (2018). Examining desorptive capacity in supply chains: the role of organizational ambidexterity. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(2), 534-553. doi:10.1108/ijopm-12-2016-0751 es_ES
dc.description.references Rothaermel, F. T., & Alexandre, M. T. (2009). Ambidexterity in Technology Sourcing: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity. Organization Science, 20(4), 759-780. doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0404 es_ES
dc.description.references Rothaermel, F. T., & Hess, A. M. (2007). Building Dynamic Capabilities: Innovation Driven by Individual-, Firm-, and Network-Level Effects. Organization Science, 18(6), 898-921. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0291 es_ES
dc.description.references Sarkees, M., & Hulland, J. (2009). Innovation and efficiency: It is possible to have it all. Business Horizons, 52(1), 45-55. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2008.08.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Scheepers, R., Hough, J., & Bloom, J. (2013). Entrepreneurial intensity: A comparative analysis of established companies in South Africa. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 10(2), 238-255. doi:10.4102/sajems.v10i2.585 es_ES
dc.description.references Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J. F., & Souder, D. (2009). A Typology for Aligning Organizational Ambidexterity’s Conceptualizations, Antecedents, and Outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 864-894. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00841.x es_ES
dc.description.references Soto-Acosta, P., & Meroño-Cerdan, A. L. (2008). Analyzing e-business value creation from a resource-based perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 28(1), 49-60. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2007.05.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450-463. doi:10.5465/amj.2005.17407911 es_ES
dc.description.references Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). SOCIAL CAPITAL AND VALUE CREATION: THE ROLE OF INTRAFIRM NETWORKS. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464-476. doi:10.2307/257085 es_ES
dc.description.references Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8-29. doi:10.2307/41165852 es_ES
dc.description.references Tushman, M., Smith, W. K., Wood, R. C., Westerman, G., & O’Reilly, C. (2010). Organizational designs and innovation streams. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(5), 1331-1366. doi:10.1093/icc/dtq040 es_ES
dc.description.references Uotila, J., Maula, M., Keil, T., & Zahra, S. A. (2009). Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: analysis of S&P 500 corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 30(2), 221-231. doi:10.1002/smj.738 es_ES
dc.description.references Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A., Santoro, G., & Papa, A. (2016). Ambidexterity, external knowledge and performance in knowledge-intensive firms. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(2), 374-388. doi:10.1007/s10961-016-9502-7 es_ES
dc.description.references Heli Wang, & Jiatao Li. (2008). Untangling the Effects of Overexploration and Overexploitation on Organizational Performance: The Moderating Role of Environmental Dynamism†. Journal of Management, 34(5), 925-951. doi:10.1177/0149206308321547 es_ES
dc.description.references Williams, A. M., & Shaw, G. (2011). Internationalization and innovation in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(1), 27-51. doi:10.1016/j.annals.2010.09.006 es_ES
dc.description.references World Bank (2016). World Development Indicators. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators. Accessed 2 April 2016. es_ES
dc.description.references Zahra, S. A. (1993). A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior: A Critique and Extension. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 17(4), 5-21. doi:10.1177/104225879301700401 es_ES
dc.description.references Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(1), 43-58. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(94)00004-e es_ES
dc.description.references Zahra, S. A., & Nielsen, A. P. (2002). Sources of capabilities, integration and technology commercialization. Strategic Management Journal, 23(5), 377-398. doi:10.1002/smj.229 es_ES
dc.description.references Zortea-Johnston, E., Darroch, J., & Matear, S. (2011). Business orientations and innovation in small and medium sized enterprises. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 8(2), 145-164. doi:10.1007/s11365-011-0170-7 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem