- -

Response of residential water demand to dynamic pricing: Evidence from an online experiment

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Response of residential water demand to dynamic pricing: Evidence from an online experiment

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem

Marzano, R.; Rougé, C.; Garrone, P.; Harou, JJ.; Pulido-Velazquez, M. (2020). Response of residential water demand to dynamic pricing: Evidence from an online experiment. Water Resources and Economics. 32:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wre.2020.100169

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/166641

Ficheros en el ítem

Metadatos del ítem

Título: Response of residential water demand to dynamic pricing: Evidence from an online experiment
Autor: Marzano, Riccardo Rougé, Charles Garrone, Paola Harou, Julien J. Pulido-Velazquez, M.
Entidad UPV: Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ingeniería Hidráulica y Medio Ambiente - Departament d'Enginyeria Hidràulica i Medi Ambient
Fecha difusión:
Resumen:
[EN] Urban water demand management is key to water supply sustainability in high-density, water stressed areas throughout the world, and emerging technologies could transform it. In particular, smart metering could allow ...[+]
Palabras clave: Dynamic pricing , Urban water , Online experiment , Water scarcity
Derechos de uso: Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd)
Fuente:
Water Resources and Economics. (issn: 2212-4284 )
DOI: 10.1016/j.wre.2020.100169
Editorial:
Elsevier
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wre.2020.100169
Código del Proyecto:
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/619172/EU/SmartH2O: an ICT Platform to leverage on Social Computing for the efficient management of Water Consumption/
Agradecimientos:
The research for this paper was funded by the European Commission research project FP7-ICT-619172 SmartH2O: An ICT Platform to leverage on Social Computing for the efficient management of Water Consumption.
Tipo: Artículo

References

Olmstead, S. M., & Stavins, R. N. (2009). Comparing price and nonprice approaches to urban water conservation. Water Resources Research, 45(4). doi:10.1029/2008wr007227

Pérez-Urdiales, M., & García-Valiñas, M. Á. (2016). Efficient water-using technologies and habits: A disaggregated analysis in the water sector. Ecological Economics, 128, 117-129. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.011

Rougé, C., Harou, J. J., Pulido-Velazquez, M., Matrosov, E. S., Garrone, P., Marzano, R., … Rizzoli, A.-E. (2018). Assessment of Smart-Meter-Enabled Dynamic Pricing at Utility and River Basin Scale. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 144(5), 04018019. doi:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000888 [+]
Olmstead, S. M., & Stavins, R. N. (2009). Comparing price and nonprice approaches to urban water conservation. Water Resources Research, 45(4). doi:10.1029/2008wr007227

Pérez-Urdiales, M., & García-Valiñas, M. Á. (2016). Efficient water-using technologies and habits: A disaggregated analysis in the water sector. Ecological Economics, 128, 117-129. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.011

Rougé, C., Harou, J. J., Pulido-Velazquez, M., Matrosov, E. S., Garrone, P., Marzano, R., … Rizzoli, A.-E. (2018). Assessment of Smart-Meter-Enabled Dynamic Pricing at Utility and River Basin Scale. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 144(5), 04018019. doi:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000888

Vesal, M., Rahmati, M. H., & Hosseinabadi, N. T. (2018). The externality from communal metering of residential water: The case of Tehran. Water Resources and Economics, 23, 53-58. doi:10.1016/j.wre.2018.01.002

Cominola, A., Giuliani, M., Piga, D., Castelletti, A., & Rizzoli, A. E. (2015). Benefits and challenges of using smart meters for advancing residential water demand modeling and management: A review. Environmental Modelling & Software, 72, 198-214. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.07.012

Brelsford, C., & Abbott, J. K. (2017). Growing into Water Conservation? Decomposing the Drivers of Reduced Water Consumption in Las Vegas, NV. Ecological Economics, 133, 99-110. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.10.012

Pulido-Velazquez, M., Andreu, J., Sahuquillo, A., & Pulido-Velazquez, D. (2008). Hydro-economic river basin modelling: The application of a holistic surface–groundwater model to assess opportunity costs of water use in Spain. Ecological Economics, 66(1), 51-65. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.016

Pulido-Velazquez, M., Alvarez-Mendiola, E., & Andreu, J. (2013). Design of Efficient Water Pricing Policies Integrating Basinwide Resource Opportunity Costs. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 139(5), 583-592. doi:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000262

Macian-Sorribes, H., Pulido-Velazquez, M., & Tilmant, A. (2015). Definition of efficient scarcity-based water pricing policies through stochastic programming. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 19(9), 3925-3935. doi:10.5194/hess-19-3925-2015

Faruqui, A., & Sergici, S. (2010). Household response to dynamic pricing of electricity: a survey of 15 experiments. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 38(2), 193-225. doi:10.1007/s11149-010-9127-y

Ito, K., Ida, T., & Tanaka, M. (2018). Moral Suasion and Economic Incentives: Field Experimental Evidence from Energy Demand. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 10(1), 240-267. doi:10.1257/pol.20160093

Joskow, P. L., & Wolfram, C. D. (2012). Dynamic Pricing of Electricity. American Economic Review, 102(3), 381-385. doi:10.1257/aer.102.3.381

Dutta, G., & Mitra, K. (2017). A literature review on dynamic pricing of electricity. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68(10), 1131-1145. doi:10.1057/s41274-016-0149-4

Espey, M. (1998). Gasoline demand revisited: an international meta-analysis of elasticities. Energy Economics, 20(3), 273-295. doi:10.1016/s0140-9883(97)00013-3

Sterner, T. (2007). Fuel taxes: An important instrument for climate policy. Energy Policy, 35(6), 3194-3202. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.10.025

Brons, M., Nijkamp, P., Pels, E., & Rietveld, P. (2008). A meta-analysis of the price elasticity of gasoline demand. A SUR approach. Energy Economics, 30(5), 2105-2122. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2007.08.004

Havranek, T., Irsova, Z., & Janda, K. (2012). Demand for gasoline is more price-inelastic than commonly thought. Energy Economics, 34(1), 201-207. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2011.09.003

Holtedahl, P., & Joutz, F. L. (2004). Residential electricity demand in Taiwan. Energy Economics, 26(2), 201-224. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2003.11.001

Halicioglu, F. (2007). Residential electricity demand dynamics in Turkey. Energy Economics, 29(2), 199-210. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2006.11.007

Mizutani, F., Tanaka, T., & Nakamura, E. (2018). The effect of demand response on electricity consumption under the existence of the reference price effect: Evidence from a dynamic pricing experiment in Japan. The Electricity Journal, 31(1), 16-22. doi:10.1016/j.tej.2018.01.004

Briesch, R. A., Krishnamurthi, L., Mazumdar, T., & Raj, S. P. (1997). A Comparative Analysis of Reference Price Models. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 202-214. doi:10.1086/209505

Kalyanaram, G., Robinson, W. T., & Urban, G. L. (1995). Order of Market Entry: Established Empirical Generalizations, Emerging Empirical Generalizations, and Future Research. Marketing Science, 14(3_supplement), G212-G221. doi:10.1287/mksc.14.3.g212

Espey, M., Espey, J., & Shaw, W. D. (1997). Price elasticity of residential demand for water: A meta-analysis. Water Resources Research, 33(6), 1369-1374. doi:10.1029/97wr00571

Marzano, R., Rougé, C., Garrone, P., Grilli, L., Harou, J. J., & Pulido-Velazquez, M. (2018). Determinants of the price response to residential water tariffs: Meta-analysis and beyond. Environmental Modelling & Software, 101, 236-248. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.12.017

Nauges, C., & Thomas, A. (2003). Environmental and Resource Economics, 26(1), 25-43. doi:10.1023/a:1025673318692

Wichman, C. J. (2014). Perceived price in residential water demand: Evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 107, 308-323. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2014.02.017

Nataraj, S., & Hanemann, W. M. (2011). Does marginal price matter? A regression discontinuity approach to estimating water demand. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 61(2), 198-212. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2010.06.003

Gaudin, S. (2006). Effect of price information on residential water demand. Applied Economics, 38(4), 383-393. doi:10.1080/00036840500397499

Garrone, P., Grilli, L., & Marzano, R. (2019). Price elasticity of water demand considering scarcity and attitudes. Utilities Policy, 59, 100927. doi:10.1016/j.jup.2019.100927

Herter, K., & Wayland, S. (2010). Residential response to critical-peak pricing of electricity: California evidence. Energy, 35(4), 1561-1567. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2009.07.022

Qiu, Y., Kirkeide, L., & Wang, Y. D. (2016). Effects of Voluntary Time-of-Use Pricing on Summer Electricity Usage of Business Customers. Environmental and Resource Economics, 69(2), 417-440. doi:10.1007/s10640-016-0084-5

Aubin, C., Fougère, D., Husson, E., & Ivaldi, M. (1995). Real-time pricing of electricity for residential customers: Econometric analysis of an experiment. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 10(S1), S171-S191. doi:10.1002/jae.3950100510

Pellerano, J. A., Price, M. K., Puller, S. L., & Sánchez, G. E. (2016). Do Extrinsic Incentives Undermine Social Norms? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Energy Conservation. Environmental and Resource Economics, 67(3), 413-428. doi:10.1007/s10640-016-0094-3

Brent, D. A., & Ward, M. B. (2019). Price perceptions in water demand. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 98, 102266. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2019.102266

Castledine, A., Moeltner, K., Price, M. K., & Stoddard, S. (2014). Free to choose: Promoting conservation by relaxing outdoor watering restrictions. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 107, 324-343. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2014.02.004

Ferraro, P. J., Miranda, J. J., & Price, M. K. (2011). The Persistence of Treatment Effects with Norm-Based Policy Instruments: Evidence from a Randomized Environmental Policy Experiment. American Economic Review, 101(3), 318-322. doi:10.1257/aer.101.3.318

Crone, D. L., & Williams, L. A. (2017). Crowdsourcing participants for psychological research in Australia: A test of Microworkers. Australian Journal of Psychology, 69(1), 39-47. doi:10.1111/ajpy.12110

Hirth, M, T. HoBfeld, and P. Tran-Gia, P. (2011). Anatomy of a crowdsourcing platform - using the example of microworkers.com. Fifth Int. Conf. Innovat. Mobile Internet Serv. Ubiquitous Comput. (IMIS), June 2011, 322-329. doi: 10.1109/IMIS.2011.89.

Abeler, J., Nosenzo, D., & Raymond, C. (2019). Preferences for Truth‐Telling. Econometrica, 87(4), 1115-1153. doi:10.3982/ecta14673

Horton, J. J., Rand, D. G., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (2011). The online laboratory: conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experimental Economics, 14(3), 399-425. doi:10.1007/s10683-011-9273-9

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions. The Journal of Business, 59(S4), S251. doi:10.1086/296365

Andreoni, J. (1995). Warm-Glow versus Cold-Prickle: The Effects of Positive and Negative Framing on Cooperation in Experiments. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(1), 1-21. doi:10.2307/2118508

Charness, G., Gneezy, U., & Kuhn, M. A. (2012). Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81(1), 1-8. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2011.08.009

Greenwald, A. G. (1976). Within-subjects designs: To use or not to use? Psychological Bulletin, 83(2), 314-320. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.2.314

Inman, D., & Jeffrey, P. (2006). A review of residential water conservation tool performance and influences on implementation effectiveness. Urban Water Journal, 3(3), 127-143. doi:10.1080/15730620600961288

Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 526-537. doi:10.1037/h0037039

Arbués, F., Garcı́a-Valiñas, M. Á., & Martı́nez-Espiñeira, R. (2003). Estimation of residential water demand: a state-of-the-art review. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 32(1), 81-102. doi:10.1016/s1053-5357(03)00005-2

Dalhuisen, J. M., Florax, R. J. G. M., de Groot, H. L. F., & Nijkamp, P. (2003). Price and Income Elasticities of Residential Water Demand: A Meta-Analysis. Land Economics, 79(2), 292-308. doi:10.2307/3146872

Garrone, P., Grilli, L., & Marzano, R. (2020). Incentives to water conservation under scarcity: Comparing price and reward effects through stated preferences. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, 118632. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118632

Vatn, A. (2010). An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 69(6), 1245-1252. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.018

Agthe, D. E., & Billings, R. B. (1987). Equity, Price Elasticity, and Household Income Under Increasing Block Rates for Water. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 46(3), 273-286. doi:10.1111/j.1536-7150.1987.tb01966.x

Kallbekken, S., & Aasen, M. (2010). The demand for earmarking: Results from a focus group study. Ecological Economics, 69(11), 2183-2190. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.003

Sahin, O., Siems, R. S., Stewart, R. A., & Porter, M. G. (2016). Paradigm shift to enhanced water supply planning through augmented grids, scarcity pricing and adaptive factory water: A system dynamics approach. Environmental Modelling & Software, 75, 348-361. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.05.018

Borenstein, S. (2012). Effective and Equitable Adoption of Opt-In Residential Dynamic Electricity Pricing. Review of Industrial Organization, 42(2), 127-160. doi:10.1007/s11151-012-9367-3

Tembata, K., & Takeuchi, K. (2018). Collective decision making under drought: An empirical study of water resource management in Japan. Water Resources and Economics, 22, 19-31. doi:10.1016/j.wre.2017.11.001

Maas, A., Goemans, C., Manning, D. T., Burkhardt, J., & Arabi, M. (2020). Complements of the house: Estimating demand-side linkages between residential water and electricity. Water Resources and Economics, 29, 100140. doi:10.1016/j.wre.2019.02.001

[-]

recommendations

 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem