- -

Competences of Flexible Professionals: Validation of an Invariant Instrument across Mexico, Chile, Uruguay, and Spain

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Competences of Flexible Professionals: Validation of an Invariant Instrument across Mexico, Chile, Uruguay, and Spain

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Conchado Peiró, Andrea es_ES
dc.contributor.author Carot Sierra, José Miguel es_ES
dc.contributor.author Vázquez Barrachina, Elena es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2021-05-22T03:31:58Z
dc.date.available 2021-05-22T03:31:58Z
dc.date.issued 2020-06 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/166651
dc.description.abstract [EN] The purpose of this study was to validate and test latent mean differences in a second-order factorial structure for self-assessed competences across four Spanish-speaking countries (Spain, Chile, Mexico, and Uruguay). Assessments of 11,802 higher education graduates about their own level of competences were examined. According to our findings, latent mean differences observed in our data lend support to earlier findings in the context of universities from these four countries. In order to compare assessments from different countries, we previously found support for metric and scalar invariance in a second-order factor structure, including innovation, cooperation, knowledge management, and communication, organizational and participative competences. These findings have serious managerial implications in regard to institutional evaluations developed by national accreditation bodies and identification of competence requirements by the labor market. In addition, our research provides a powerful tool for young students and employers, as it contains valuable information about what competences should be expected by students when finishing their studies. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship This research was funded by the European Commission, grant number AML/19.0902/04/16909/II-0546-A, and grant number CIT2-CT-2004-506352. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher MDPI AG es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Sustainability es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Cross-cultural research es_ES
dc.subject Competences es_ES
dc.subject Invariance es_ES
dc.subject Bologna es_ES
dc.subject Latin America es_ES
dc.subject Spain es_ES
dc.subject.classification ESTADISTICA E INVESTIGACION OPERATIVA es_ES
dc.title Competences of Flexible Professionals: Validation of an Invariant Instrument across Mexico, Chile, Uruguay, and Spain es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/su12125224 es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC//AML%2F19.0902%2F04%2F16909%2FII-0546-A/EU/EL PROFESIONAL FLEXIBLE EN LA SOCIEDAD DEL CONOCIMIENTO/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP6/506352/EU/The flexible professional in the knowledge society new demands on higher education in Europe/REFLEX/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Estadística e Investigación Operativa Aplicadas y Calidad - Departament d'Estadística i Investigació Operativa Aplicades i Qualitat es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Conchado Peiró, A.; Carot Sierra, JM.; Vázquez Barrachina, E. (2020). Competences of Flexible Professionals: Validation of an Invariant Instrument across Mexico, Chile, Uruguay, and Spain. Sustainability. 12(12):1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125224 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125224 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 13 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 12 es_ES
dc.description.issue 12 es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn 2071-1050 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\428881 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder European Commission es_ES
dc.description.references Le Deist, F. D., & Winterton, J. (2005). What Is Competence? Human Resource Development International, 8(1), 27-46. doi:10.1080/1367886042000338227 es_ES
dc.description.references Cseh, M. (2003). Facilitating Learning in Multicultural Teams. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5(1), 26-40. doi:10.1177/1523422302239181 es_ES
dc.description.references McClelland, D. C. (1998). Identifying Competencies with Behavioral-Event Interviews. Psychological Science, 9(5), 331-339. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00065 es_ES
dc.description.references Winterton, J. (2009). Competence across Europe: highest common factor or lowest common denominator? Journal of European Industrial Training, 33(8/9), 681-700. doi:10.1108/03090590910993571 es_ES
dc.description.references Shavelson, R. J. (2010). On the measurement of competency. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 2(1), 41-63. doi:10.1007/bf03546488 es_ES
dc.description.references Lozano, R., Merrill, M., Sammalisto, K., Ceulemans, K., & Lozano, F. (2017). Connecting Competences and Pedagogical Approaches for Sustainable Development in Higher Education: A Literature Review and Framework Proposal. Sustainability, 9(10), 1889. doi:10.3390/su9101889 es_ES
dc.description.references Zamora-Polo, F., Sánchez-Martín, J., Corrales-Serrano, M., & Espejo-Antúnez, L. (2019). What Do University Students Know about Sustainable Development Goals? A Realistic Approach to the Reception of this UN Program Amongst the Youth Population. Sustainability, 11(13), 3533. doi:10.3390/su11133533 es_ES
dc.description.references Mochizuki, Y., & Fadeeva, Z. (2010). Competences for sustainable development and sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11(4), 391-403. doi:10.1108/14676371011077603 es_ES
dc.description.references Lambrechts, W., Mulà, I., Ceulemans, K., Molderez, I., & Gaeremynck, V. (2013). The integration of competences for sustainable development in higher education: an analysis of bachelor programs in management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 65-73. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.034 es_ES
dc.description.references Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4-70. doi:10.1177/109442810031002 es_ES
dc.description.references Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Peng, K., & Greenholtz, J. (2002). What’s wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales?: The reference-group effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 903-918. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.903 es_ES
dc.description.references Morse, B. J., Weinhardt, J. M., Griffeth, R. W., & de Oliveira, M. Z. (2014). Cross-cultural Measurement Invariance of the Employment Opportunity Index (EOI) in Mexican and Brazilian Professionals. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 22(2), 139-148. doi:10.1111/ijsa.12064 es_ES
dc.description.references Heijke, H., Meng, C., & Ramaekers, G. (2003). An investigation into the role of human capital competences and their pay‐off. International Journal of Manpower, 24(7), 750-773. doi:10.1108/01437720310502113 es_ES
dc.description.references Semeijn, J. H., Velden, R. van der, Heijke, H., Vleuten, C. van der, & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2006). Competence indicators in academic education and early labour market success of graduates in health sciences. Journal of Education and Work, 19(4), 383-413. doi:10.1080/13639080600867158 es_ES
dc.description.references Billing, D. (2007). Teaching for transfer of core/key skills in higher education: Cognitive skills. Higher Education, 53(4), 483-516. doi:10.1007/s10734-005-5628-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2007). Self-Efficacy for Self-Regulated Learning. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(3), 443-463. doi:10.1177/0013164407308475 es_ES
dc.description.references Hernández‐March, J., Martín del Peso, M., & Leguey, S. (2009). Graduates’ Skills and Higher Education: The employers’ perspective. Tertiary Education and Management, 15(1), 1-16. doi:10.1080/13583880802699978 es_ES
dc.description.references Smits, W. (2007). Industry-specific or generic skills? Conflicting interests of firms and workers. Labour Economics, 14(3), 653-663. doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2006.09.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Garcia‐Aracil, A., Mora, J., & Vila, L. E. (2004). The rewards of human capital competences for young European higher education graduates. Tertiary Education and Management, 10(4), 287-305. doi:10.1080/13583883.2004.9967133 es_ES
dc.description.references García-Aracil, A., & Van der Velden, R. (2007). Competencies for young European higher education graduates: labor market mismatches and their payoffs. Higher Education, 55(2), 219-239. doi:10.1007/s10734-006-9050-4 es_ES
dc.description.references Conchado, A., Carot, J. M., & Bas, M. C. (2015). Competencies for knowledge management: development and validation of a scale. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(4), 836-855. doi:10.1108/jkm-10-2014-0447 es_ES
dc.description.references Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (2000). 5. Three Likelihood-Based Methods for Mean and Covariance Structure Analysis with Nonnormal Missing Data. Sociological Methodology, 30(1), 165-200. doi:10.1111/0081-1750.00078 es_ES
dc.description.references Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1985). The Effects of Sampling Error and Model Characteristics on Parameter Estimation for Maximum Likelihood Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 20(3), 255-271. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2003_2 es_ES
dc.description.references Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 es_ES
dc.description.references Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230-258. doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 es_ES
dc.description.references Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(2), 173-180. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4 es_ES
dc.description.references Chen, F. F., Sousa, K. H., & West, S. G. (2005). Teacher’s Corner: Testing Measurement Invariance of Second-Order Factor Models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 12(3), 471-492. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1203_7 es_ES
dc.description.references Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233-255. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0902_5 es_ES
dc.description.references Hong, S., Malik, M. L., & Lee, M.-K. (2003). Testing Configural, Metric, Scalar, and Latent Mean Invariance Across Genders in Sociotropy and Autonomy Using a Non-Western Sample. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(4), 636-654. doi:10.1177/0013164403251332 es_ES
dc.description.references Hancock, G. R. (2001). Effect size, power, and sample size determination for structured means modeling and mimic approaches to between-groups hypothesis testing of means on a single latent construct. Psychometrika, 66(3), 373-388. doi:10.1007/bf02294440 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem