- -

Sustainability and interoperability: An economic study on BIM implementation by a small Civil Engineering firm

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Sustainability and interoperability: An economic study on BIM implementation by a small Civil Engineering firm

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem

Aranda Domingo, JÁ.; Martin-Dorta, N.; Naya Sanchis, F.; Conesa-Pastor, J.; Contero, M. (2020). Sustainability and interoperability: An economic study on BIM implementation by a small Civil Engineering firm. Sustainability. 12(22):1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229581

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/166660

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Aranda;Martn-Dort ...
Tamaño: 5.791Mb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Abrir/Preview

Metadatos del ítem

Título: Sustainability and interoperability: An economic study on BIM implementation by a small Civil Engineering firm
Autor: Aranda Domingo, José Ángel Martin-Dorta, Norena Naya Sanchis, Ferran Conesa-Pastor, Julián Contero, Manuel
Entidad UPV: Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ingeniería Gráfica - Departament d'Enginyeria Gràfica
Fecha difusión:
Resumen:
[EN] Sustainability and interoperability are two closely related concepts. By analyzing the three fundamental facets of sustainability-economic, ecological and ethical/social-it is easier to address their connection with ...[+]
Palabras clave: BIM , IFC , Linear construction design , Retaining walls , Parameterization , Reinforced concrete design , Structural calculation , Georeferencing , IFC federation , Costs
Derechos de uso: Reconocimiento (by)
Fuente:
Sustainability. (eissn: 2071-1050 )
DOI: 10.3390/su12229581
Editorial:
MDPI AG
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229581
Agradecimientos:
The authors wish to acknowledge support from ISTRAM, CivileStudio and the engineering firm for the information provided.
Tipo: Artículo

References

Grilo, A., & Jardim-Goncalves, R. (2010). Value proposition on interoperability of BIM and collaborative working environments. Automation in Construction, 19(5), 522-530. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2009.11.003

Bynum, P., Issa, R. R. A., & Olbina, S. (2013). Building Information Modeling in Support of Sustainable Design and Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(1), 24-34. doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000560

BuildingSMART Internationalhttps://www.buildingsmart.org/ [+]
Grilo, A., & Jardim-Goncalves, R. (2010). Value proposition on interoperability of BIM and collaborative working environments. Automation in Construction, 19(5), 522-530. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2009.11.003

Bynum, P., Issa, R. R. A., & Olbina, S. (2013). Building Information Modeling in Support of Sustainable Design and Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(1), 24-34. doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000560

BuildingSMART Internationalhttps://www.buildingsmart.org/

Modelos digitales del terreno: Introducción y aplicaciones a las ciencias ambientales. Oviedo Univ. Oviedo 1994, 118http://www.etsimo.uniovi.es/~feli

Baltsavias, E. P. (1999). A comparison between photogrammetry and laser scanning. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 54(2-3), 83-94. doi:10.1016/s0924-2716(99)00014-3

Hirpa, D., Hare, W., Lucet, Y., Pushak, Y., & Tesfamariam, S. (2016). A bi-objective optimization framework for three-dimensional road alignment design. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 65, 61-78. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.016

Yepes, V., Alcala, J., Perea, C., & González-Vidosa, F. (2008). A parametric study of optimum earth-retaining walls by simulated annealing. Engineering Structures, 30(3), 821-830. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.05.023

Nehate, G., & Rys, M. (2006). 3D Calculation of Stopping-Sight Distance from GPS Data. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 132(9), 691-698. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(2006)132:9(691)

Borga, M., Tonelli, F., & Selleroni, J. (2004). A physically based model of the effects of forest roads on slope stability. Water Resources Research, 40(12). doi:10.1029/2004wr003238

Vanmarcke, E. H. (1977). Reliability of Earth Slopes. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 103(11), 1247-1265. doi:10.1061/ajgeb6.0000518

Istram Softwarehttps://www.istram.net

CivileStudio Softwarehttps://www.civilestudio.com

Bates, P. ., & De Roo, A. P. . (2000). A simple raster-based model for flood inundation simulation. Journal of Hydrology, 236(1-2), 54-77. doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(00)00278-x

Bryde, D., Broquetas, M., & Volm, J. M. (2013). The project benefits of Building Information Modelling (BIM). International Journal of Project Management, 31(7), 971-980. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.12.001

Ghaffarianhoseini, A., Tookey, J., Ghaffarianhoseini, A., Naismith, N., Azhar, S., Efimova, O., & Raahemifar, K. (2017). Building Information Modelling (BIM) uptake: Clear benefits, understanding its implementation, risks and challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 75, 1046-1053. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.083

Love, P. E. D., & Matthews, J. (2019). The ‘how’ of benefits management for digital technology: From engineering to asset management. Automation in Construction, 107, 102930. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102930

Shin, M., Lee, H., & Kim, H. (2018). Benefit–Cost Analysis of Building Information Modeling (BIM) in a Railway Site. Sustainability, 10(11), 4303. doi:10.3390/su10114303

Barlish, K., & Sullivan, K. (2012). How to measure the benefits of BIM — A case study approach. Automation in Construction, 24, 149-159. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2012.02.008

Ham, N., Moon, S., Kim, J.-H., & Kim, J.-J. (2018). Economic Analysis of Design Errors in BIM-Based High-Rise Construction Projects: Case Study of Haeundae L Project. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(6), 05018006. doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001498

Hong, Y., Hammad, A. W. A., Akbarnezhad, A., & Arashpour, M. (2020). A neural network approach to predicting the net costs associated with BIM adoption. Automation in Construction, 119, 103306. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103306

[-]

recommendations

 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem