- -

Validity and sensitivity of instrumented postural and gait assessment using low-cost devices in Parkinson's disease

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Validity and sensitivity of instrumented postural and gait assessment using low-cost devices in Parkinson's disease

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Álvarez;Latorre;Agular ...
Tamaño: 739.4Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Álvarez, Ignacio es_ES
dc.contributor.author Latorre, Jorge es_ES
dc.contributor.author Aguilar, Miquel es_ES
dc.contributor.author Pastor, Pau es_ES
dc.contributor.author Llorens Rodríguez, Roberto es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2021-05-27T03:34:17Z
dc.date.available 2021-05-27T03:34:17Z
dc.date.issued 2020-11-11 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 1743-0003 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/166830
dc.description.abstract [EN] Background Accurate assessment of balance and gait is necessary to monitor the clinical progress of Parkinson's disease (PD). Conventional clinical scales can be biased and have limited accuracy. Novel interactive devices are potentially useful to detect subtle posture or gait-related impairments. Methods Posturographic and single and dual-task gait assessments were performed to 54 individuals with PD and 43 healthy controls with the Wii Balance Board and the Kinect v2 and the, respectively. Individuals with PD were also assessed with the Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment, the Functional Gait Assessment and the 10-m Walking Test. The influence of demographic and clinical variables on the performance in the instrumented posturographic and gait tests, the sensitivity of these tests to the clinical condition and phenotypes, and their convergent validity with clinical scales were investigated. Results Individuals with PD in H&Y I and I.5 stages showed similar performance to controls. The greatest differences in posture and gait were found between subjects in H&Y II.5 and H&Y I-I.5 stage, as well as controls. Dual-tasking enhanced the differences among all groups in gait parameters. Akinetic/rigid phenotype showed worse postural control and gait than other phenotypes. High significant correlations were found between the limits of stability and most of gait parameters with the clinical scales. Conclusions Low-cost devices showed potential to objectively quantify posture and gait in established PD (H&Y >= II). Dual-tasking gait evaluation was more sensitive to detect differences among PD stages and compared to controls than free gait. Gait and posture were more impaired in akinetic/rigid PD. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship This study has been funded by project VALORA, Grant 201701-10 of the Fundacio la Marato de la TV3 (Barcelona, Spain) and the European Union through the Operational Program of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) of the Valencian Community 2014-2020 (IDIFEDER/2018/029) to RL, and Alter Laboratories SA to PP. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Springer (Biomed Central Ltd.) es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Parkinson's disease es_ES
dc.subject Gait es_ES
dc.subject Posture es_ES
dc.subject Kinect es_ES
dc.subject Wii balance board es_ES
dc.subject.classification TEORIA DE LA SEÑAL Y COMUNICACIONES es_ES
dc.title Validity and sensitivity of instrumented postural and gait assessment using low-cost devices in Parkinson's disease es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1186/s12984-020-00770-7 es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/Fundació La Marató de TV3//201701-10/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/GVA//IDIFEDER%2F2018%2F029/ES/INTERFACES DE REALIDAD MIXTA APLICADA A SALUD Y TOMA DE DECISIONES/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Álvarez, I.; Latorre, J.; Aguilar, M.; Pastor, P.; Llorens Rodríguez, R. (2020). Validity and sensitivity of instrumented postural and gait assessment using low-cost devices in Parkinson's disease. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 17(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-00770-7 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-00770-7 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 10 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 17 es_ES
dc.description.issue 1 es_ES
dc.identifier.pmid 33176833 es_ES
dc.identifier.pmcid PMC7656721 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\424702 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Laboratorios Alter, S.A. es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Fundació La Marató de TV3 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder European Regional Development Fund es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Generalitat Valenciana es_ES
dc.description.references Nussbaum RL, Ellis CE. Alzheimer’s Disease and Parkinson’s Disease. N Engl J Med. 2003;13:56–64. es_ES
dc.description.references Hass CJ, Malczak P, Nocera J, Stegemöller EL, Shukala A, Malaty I, et al. Quantitative normative Gait data in a large cohort of ambulatory persons with parkinson’s disease. PLoS ONE. 2012;2:12. es_ES
dc.description.references Hass CJ, Bishop M, Moscovich M, Stegemöller EL, Skinner J, Malaty IA, et al. Defining the clinically meaningful difference in gait speed in persons with Parkinson disease. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2014;38:233–8. es_ES
dc.description.references Koh S, Park K, Lee D. Gait analysis in patients with Parkinson ’ s disease: relationship to clinical features and freezing. J Mov Disord. 2008;1:6. es_ES
dc.description.references Nanhoe-Mahabier W, Snijders AH, Delval A, Weerdesteyn V, Duysens J, Overeem S, et al. Walking patterns in Parkinson’s disease with and without freezing of gait. Neuroscience. 2011;182:217–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.02.061. es_ES
dc.description.references Raffegeau TE, Krehbiel LM, Kang N, Thijs FJ, Altmann LJP, Cauraugh JH, et al. A meta-analysis: Parkinson’s disease and dual-task walking. Park Relat Disord. 2019;62:28–35. es_ES
dc.description.references Panyakaew P, Bhidayasiri R. The spectrum of preclinical gait disorders in early Parkinson’s disease: Subclinical gait abnormalities and compensatory mechanisms revealed with dual tasking. J Neural Transm. 2013;120:1665–72. es_ES
dc.description.references Bloem BR, Marinus J, Almeida Q, Dibble L, Nieuwboer A, Post B, et al. Measurement instruments to assess posture, gait, and balance in Parkinson’s disease: Critique and recommendations. Mov Disord. 2016;31:1342–55. es_ES
dc.description.references Delval A, Snijders AH, Weerdesteyn V, Duysens JE, Defebvre L, Giladi N, et al. Objective detection of subtle freezing of gait episodes in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2010;25:1684–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.23159. es_ES
dc.description.references Verghese J, Holtzer R, Lipton RB, Wang C. Quantitative gait markers and incident fall risk in older adults. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009;64A:896–901. es_ES
dc.description.references Schlachetzki JCM, Barth J, Marxreiter F, Gossler J, Kohl Z, Reinfelder S, et al. Wearable sensors objectively measure gait parameters in Parkinson’s disease. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:1–18. es_ES
dc.description.references Godinho C, Domingos J, Cunha G, Santos AT, Fernandes RM, Abreu D, et al. A systematic review of the characteristics and validity of monitoring technologies to assess Parkinson’s disease. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016;13:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-016-0136-7. es_ES
dc.description.references Micó-Amigo ME, Kingma I, Faber GS, Kunikoshi A, van Uem JMT, van Lummel RC, et al. Is the assessment of 5 meters of gait with a single body-fixed-sensor enough to recognize idiopathic Parkinson’s disease-associated gait? Ann Biomed Eng. 2017;45:1266–78. es_ES
dc.description.references Rovini E, Maremmani C, Cavallo F. How wearable sensors can support parkinson’s disease diagnosis and treatment: a systematic review. Front Neurosci. 2017;9:12. es_ES
dc.description.references Chen S, Lach J, Lo B, Yang GZ. Toward Pervasive Gait Analysis With Wearable Sensors: A Systematic Review. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2016;9:1521–37. es_ES
dc.description.references Díaz S, Stephenson JB, Labrador MA. Use of wearable sensor technology in gait, balance, and range of motion analysis. Appl Sci. 2020;10(1):234. es_ES
dc.description.references Park DS, Lee G. Validity and reliability of balance assessment software using the Nintendo Wii balance board: usability and validation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11:99. es_ES
dc.description.references Holmes JD, Jenkins ME, Johnson AM, Hunt MA, Clark RA. Validity of the Nintendo Wii balance board for the assessment of standing balance in Parkinson’s disease. Clin Rehabil. 2013;27:361–6. es_ES
dc.description.references Llorens R, Latorre J, Noé E, Keshner EA. Posturography using the Wii Balance BoardTM. A feasibility study with healthy adults and adults post-stroke. Gait Posture. 2016;43:228–32. es_ES
dc.description.references Bower KJ, McGinley JL, Miller KJ, Clark RA. Instrumented static and dynamic balance assessment after stroke using Wii Balance Boards: Reliability and association with clinical tests. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:32321. es_ES
dc.description.references Eltoukhy M, Kuenze C, Andersen MS, Oh J, Signorile J. Prediction of ground reaction forces for Parkinson’s disease patients using a kinect-driven musculoskeletal gait analysis model. Med Eng Phys. 2017;50:75–82. es_ES
dc.description.references Eltoukhy M, Kuenze C, Oh J, Jacopetti M, Wooten S, Signorile J. Microsoft Kinect can distinguish differences in over-ground gait between older persons with and without Parkinson’s disease. Med Eng Phys. 2017;44:1–7. es_ES
dc.description.references Dolatabadi E, Taati B, Mihailidis A. Concurrent validity of the Microsoft Kinect for Windows v2 for measuring spatiotemporal gait parameters. Med Eng Phys. 2016;38:952–8. es_ES
dc.description.references Mentiplay BF, Perraton LG, Bower KJ, Pua YH, McGaw R, Heywood S, et al. Gait assessment using the Microsoft Xbox One Kinect: Concurrent validity and inter-day reliability of spatiotemporal and kinematic variables. J Biomech. 2015;48:2166–70. es_ES
dc.description.references Cao Y, Li BZ, Li QN, Xie JD, Cao BZ, Yu SY. Kinect-based gait analyses of patients with Parkinson’s disease, patients with stroke with hemiplegia, and healthy adults. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2017;9:447–9. es_ES
dc.description.references Galna B, Barry G, Jackson D, Mhiripiri D, Olivier P, Rochester L. Accuracy of the Microsoft Kinect sensor for measuring movement in people with Parkinson’s disease. Gait Posture. 2014;39:1062–8. es_ES
dc.description.references Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992;55:181–4. es_ES
dc.description.references Goetz CG, Poewe W, Rascol O, Sampaio C, Stebbins GT, Counsell C, et al. Movement Disorder Society Task Force report on the Hoehn and Yahr staging scale: status and recommendations. Mov Disord. 2004;19:1020–8. es_ES
dc.description.references Escribano-Aparicio MV, Pérez-Dively M, García-García FJ, Pérez-Martín A, Romero L, Ferrer G, et al. Validación del MMSE de Folstein en una población española de bajo nivel educativo1. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 1999;34:319–26. es_ES
dc.description.references Latorre J, Colomer C, Alcañiz M, Llorens R. Gait analysis with the Kinect v2: Normative study with healthy individuals and comprehensive study of its sensitivity, validity, and reliability in individuals with stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019;16:12. es_ES
dc.description.references Eltoukhy M, Oh J, Kuenze C, Signorile J. Improved kinect-based spatiotemporal and kinematic treadmill gait assessment. Gait Posture. 2017;51:77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.10.001. es_ES
dc.description.references Rajput AH, Voll A, Rajput ML, Robinson CA, Rajput A. Course in parkinson disease subtypes: a 39-year clinicopathologic study. Neurology. 2009;73:206–12. es_ES
dc.description.references Rajput AH, Sitte HH, Rajput A, Fenton ME, Pifl C, Hornykiewicz O. Globus pallidus dopamine and Parkinson motor subtypes: Clinical and brain biochemical correlation. Neurology. 2008;70(16 Pt 2):1403–10. es_ES
dc.description.references Fahn S. Unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale. Recent Dev Park Dis. 1987;2:153–64. es_ES
dc.description.references Kaufer DI, Cummings JL, Ketchel P, Smith V, MacMillan A, Shelley T, et al. Validation of the NPI-Q, a Brief Clinical Form of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2000;12:233–9. https://doi.org/10.1176/jnp.12.2.233. es_ES
dc.description.references Chaudhuri KR, Martinez-Martin P, Brown RG, Sethi K, Stocchi F, Odin P, et al. The metric properties of a novel non-motor symptoms scale for Parkinson’s disease: results from an international pilot study. Mov Disord. 2007;22:1901–11. es_ES
dc.description.references Christenson GA, Faber RJ, De Zwaan M, Raymond NC, Specker SM, Ekern MD, et al. Compulsive buying: descriptive characteristics and psychiatric comorbidity. J Clin Psychiatry. 1994;55:5–11. es_ES
dc.description.references Peto V, Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R, Greenhall R. The development and validation of a short measure of functioning and well being for individuals with Parkinson’s disease. Qual life Res. 1995;4:241–8. es_ES
dc.description.references Lang JT, Kassan TO, Devaney LL, Colon-Semenza C, Joseph MF. Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change for the 10-meter walk test in older adults with Parkinson’s disease. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2016;39:165–70. es_ES
dc.description.references Woodhull-McNeal AP. Changes in posture and balance with age. Aging Clin Exp Res. 1992;4:219–25. es_ES
dc.description.references Terrier P, Reynard F. Effect of age on the variability and stability of gait: a cross-sectional treadmill study in healthy individuals between 20 and 69 years of age. Gait Posture. 2015;41:170–4. es_ES
dc.description.references Bohannon RW, Williams AA. Normal walking speed: A descriptive meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. 2011;97:182–9. es_ES
dc.description.references Elbaz A, Artaud F, Dugravot A, Tzourio C, Singh-Manoux A. The gait speed advantage of taller stature is lost with age. Sci Rep. 2018;8:12. es_ES
dc.description.references Laroche DP, Marques NR, Shumila HN, Logan CR, Laurent RS, Goncąlves M. Excess body weight and gait influence energy cost of walking in older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47:1017–25. es_ES
dc.description.references Stylianou AP, McVey MA, Lyons KE, Pahwa R, Luchies CW. Postural sway in patients with mild to moderate parkinson’s disease. Int J Neurosci. 2011;121:614–21. es_ES
dc.description.references Mancini M, Horak FB, Zampieri C, Carlson-Kuhta P, Nutt JG, Chiari L. Trunk accelerometry reveals postural instability in untreated Parkinson’s disease. Park Relat Disord. 2011;17:557–62. es_ES
dc.description.references Morris M, Iansek R, Smithson F, Huxham F. Postural instability in Parkinson’s disease: a comparison with and without a concurrent task. Gait Posture. 2000;12:205–16. es_ES
dc.description.references Schoneburg B, Mancini M, Horak F, Nutt JG. Framework for understanding balance dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2013;89:1474–82. es_ES
dc.description.references Doná F, Aquino CC, Gazzola JM, Borges V, Silva SMCA, Ganança FF, et al. Changes in postural control in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a posturographic study. Physiother. 2016;102:272–9. es_ES
dc.description.references Rossi M, Soto A, Santos S, Sesar A, Labella T. A Prospective Study of Alterations in Balance among Patients with Parkinson’s Protocol of the Postural Evaluation. Eur Neurol. 2009;11:171–6. es_ES
dc.description.references Ganesan M, Kumar P, Gupta A, Sathyaprabha TN. Dynamic posturography in evaluation of balance in patients of Parkinson ’ s disease with normal pull test : Concept of a diagonal pull test q. Park Relat Disord. 2010;16:595–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2010.08.005. es_ES
dc.description.references Kim SM, Kim DH, Yang Y, Ha SW, Han JH. Gait Patterns in Parkinson’s Disease with or without Cognitive Impairment. Dement Neurocognitive Disord. 2018;17:57. es_ES
dc.description.references Galletly R, Brauer SG. Does the type of concurrent task affect preferred and cued gait in people with Parkinson’s disease? Aust J Physiother. 2005;51:175–80. es_ES
dc.description.references O’Shea S, Morris ME, Iansek R. Dual task interference during gait in people with Parkinson disease: effects of motor versus cognitive secondary tasks. Phys Ther. 2002;82:888–97. es_ES
dc.description.references Penko AL, Streicher MC, Koop MM, Dey T, Rosenfeldt AB, Bazyk AS, et al. Dual-task interference disrupts parkinson’s gait across multiple cognitive domains. Neuroscience. 2018;379:375–82. es_ES
dc.description.references Yogev-seligmann G, Hausdorff JM, Giladi N. The role of executive function and attention in gait. Mov Disord. 2008;23:329–42. es_ES
dc.description.references Giladi GYN. The contribution of postural control and bilateral coordination to the impact of dual tasking on gait. Exp Brain Res. 2013;226:81–93. es_ES
dc.description.references Micó-Amigo ME, Kingma I, Heinzel S, Nussbaum S, Heger T, van Lummel RC, et al. Dual vs single tasking during circular walking: what better reflects progression in Parkinson’s disease? Front Neurol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00372/full. es_ES
dc.description.references Duncan RP, Combs-Miller SA, McNeely ME, Leddy AL, Cavanaugh JT, Dibble LE, et al. Are the average gait speeds during the 10 meter and 6 minute walk tests redundant in Parkinson disease? Gait Posture. 2017;52:178–82. es_ES
dc.description.references Robles-García V, Corral-Bergantiños Y, Espinosa N, Jácome MA, García-Sancho C, Cudeiro J, et al. Spatiotemporal gait patterns during overt and covert evaluation in patients with Parkinson’s disease and healthy subjects: Is there a Hawthorne effect? J Appl Biomech. 2015;31:189–94. es_ES
dc.description.references Mirelman A, Bernad-Elazari H, Thaler A, Giladi-Yacobi E, Gurevich T, Gana-Weisz M, et al. Arm swing as a potential new prodromal marker of Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2016;31:1527–34. es_ES
dc.description.references Ospina BM, Chaparro JAV, Paredes JDA, Pino YJC, Navarro A, Orozco JL. Objective arm swing analysis in early-stage Parkinson’s disease using an RGB-D Camera (Kinect ®). J Parkinsons Dis. 2018;8:563–70. es_ES
dc.description.references Song J, Sigward S, Fisher B, Salem GJ. Altered dynamic postural control during step turning in persons with early-stage Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsons Dis. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/386962. es_ES
dc.description.references Hausdorff JM, Cudkowicz ME, Firtion R, Wei JY, Goldberger AL. Gait variability and basal ganglia disorders: Stride-to-stride variations of gait cycle timing in Parkinson’s disease and Huntington’s disease. Mov Disord. 1998;13:428–37. es_ES
dc.description.references Lamberti P, Armenise S, Castaldo V, De Mari M, Iliceto G, Tronci P, et al. Freezing gait in parkinson’s disease. Eur Neurol. 1997;38:297–301. es_ES
dc.description.references Thenganatt MA, Jankovic J. Parkinson disease subtypes JAMA Neurol. 2014;71:499–504. es_ES
dc.description.references Lin J-H, Hsu M-J, Hsu H-W, Wu H-C, Hsieh C-L. Psychometric comparisons of 3 functional ambulation measures for patients with stroke. Stroke. 2010;41:2021–5. es_ES
dc.description.references McDonough AL, Batavia M, Chen FC, Kwon S, Ziai J. The validity and reliability of the GAITRite system’s measurements: A preliminary evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:419–25. es_ES
dc.description.references Greenberg M, Gronley J, Perry J, Lawthwaite R. Concurrent validity of observational gait analysis using the vicon motion analysis system. Gait Posture. 1996;4:167–8. es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem