Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Cloquell Ballester, Victor Andres | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Lo-Iacono-Ferreira, Vanesa G. | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Artacho Ramírez, Miguel Ángel | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Capuz-Rizo, Salvador F. | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-04T03:32:45Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-04T03:32:45Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-11-04 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/167329 | |
dc.description.abstract | [EN] Maritime transport is responsible for 13% of the Greenhouse Gases (GHG) emissions of the transport sector. Port authorities, terminals, shipping companies, and other stakeholders have joined e orts to improve this sector¿s environmental performance. In Spain, the Ministry for Ecological Transition and Demographic Challenge has developed a methodology to assess the carbon footprint. This methodology has been adapted to ports and applied to processes under the Port Authority of Valencia¿s umbrella achieving scopes 1, 2, and 3. The results highlight that ship tra c, within the port, of containers and cruises (categorized in scope 3) had a major impact on the carbon footprint. Buildings lighting managed by the terminals has a significant e ect on scope 2. Diesel consumption shares with gasoline consumption the primary representation in scope 1. The carbon footprint between 2008 and 2016 was maintained, although tra c in the port increased by 24% during this period. The results show a decrease of 17% when emissions are compared using the base year¿s emissions factors to avoid external factors. Future projects that include self-consumption or renewable energy policies seem to be the next step in a port that shows good results but still has room for improvement in activities of scope 3. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | Authors want to thank the Valencia Port Authority for their collaboration in the data collection process. Special thanks to Federico Torres Monfort, Alicia Marti, Pilar Sanchez and Rafael Company for their support. | es_ES |
dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
dc.publisher | MDPI AG | es_ES |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Environmental research and Public Health (Online) | es_ES |
dc.rights | Reconocimiento (by) | es_ES |
dc.subject | GHG | es_ES |
dc.subject | Emissions | es_ES |
dc.subject | Maritime transport | es_ES |
dc.subject | Energy consumption | es_ES |
dc.subject | Environmental performance | es_ES |
dc.subject.classification | PROYECTOS DE INGENIERIA | es_ES |
dc.title | The Carbon Footprint of Valencia Port: A Case Study of the Port Authority of Valencia (Spain) | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/ijerph17218157 | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | Abierto | es_ES |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Proyectos de Ingeniería - Departament de Projectes d'Enginyeria | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Cloquell Ballester, VA.; Lo-Iacono-Ferreira, VG.; Artacho Ramírez, MÁ.; Capuz-Rizo, SF. (2020). The Carbon Footprint of Valencia Port: A Case Study of the Port Authority of Valencia (Spain). International Journal of Environmental research and Public Health (Online). 17(21):1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218157 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | S | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218157 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 1 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpfin | 16 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.volume | 17 | es_ES |
dc.description.issue | 21 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1660-4601 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.pmid | 33158225 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.pmcid | PMC7662751 | es_ES |
dc.relation.pasarela | S\426601 | es_ES |
dc.contributor.funder | Autoridad Portuaria de Valencia | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Visor Cartográfic de la Generalitat http://visor.gva.es/visor/ | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Eurostat https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do | es_ES |
dc.description.references | EMAS Register https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/emas2/public/registration/list | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Environmental Statement 2018 https://www.valenciaport.com/wp-content/uploads/Memoria-Ambiental-2018ENG.pdf | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Li, Y., Wang, Y., He, Q., & Yang, Y. (2020). Calculation and Evaluation of Carbon Footprint in Mulberry Production: A Case of Haining in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(4), 1339. doi:10.3390/ijerph17041339 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | 2019 Status Report. The Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures https://www.fsb-tcfd.org/publications/tcfd-2019-status-report/ | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Jalkanen, J.-P., Johansson, L., & Kukkonen, J. (2016). A comprehensive inventory of ship traffic exhaust emissions in the European sea areas in 2011. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 16(1), 71-84. doi:10.5194/acp-16-71-2016 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Carballo-Penela, A., Mateo-Mantecón, I., Doménech, J. L., & Coto-Millán, P. (2012). From the motorways of the sea to the green corridors’ carbon footprint: the case of a port in Spain. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 55(6), 765-782. doi:10.1080/09640568.2011.627422 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | International Standard Organization ISO 14067:2018 Greenhouse Gases—Carbon Footprint of Products—Requirements and Guidelines for Quantification https://www.iso.org/standard/71206.html | es_ES |
dc.description.references | PAS 2050:2011: Specification for the Assessment of the Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas; Emissions of Goods and Services https://shop.bsigroup.com/upload/shop/download/pas/pas2050.pdf | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Schmalensee, R., Stoker, T. M., & Judson, R. A. (1998). World Carbon Dioxide Emissions: 1950–2050. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(1), 15-27. doi:10.1162/003465398557294 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | DORE, A., VIENO, M., TANG, Y., DRAGOSITS, U., DOSIO, A., WESTON, K., & SUTTON, M. (2007). Modelling the atmospheric transport and deposition of sulphur and nitrogen over the United Kingdom and assessment of the influence of SO2 emissions from international shipping. Atmospheric Environment, 41(11), 2355-2367. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.11.013 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Doudnikoff, M., & Lacoste, R. (2014). Effect of a speed reduction of containerships in response to higher energy costs in Sulphur Emission Control Areas. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 27, 19-29. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2013.12.008 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | (2011). Environmental Impacts of International Shipping. doi:10.1787/9789264097339-en | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Hongisto, M. (2014). Impact of the emissions of international sea traffic on airborne deposition to the Baltic Sea and concentrations at the coastline⁎⁎The research has received funding from the European Regional Development Fund, Central Baltic INTERREG IV A programme within the SNOOP project. Oceanologia, 56(2), 349-372. doi:10.5697/oc.56-2.349 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Lee, P. T. ‐W., Hu, K., & Chen, T. (2010). External Costs of Domestic Container Transportation: Short‐Sea Shipping versus Trucking in Taiwan. Transport Reviews, 30(3), 315-335. doi:10.1080/01441640903010120 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Medda, F., & Trujillo, L. (2010). Short-sea shipping: an analysis of its determinants. Maritime Policy & Management, 37(3), 285-303. doi:10.1080/03088831003700678 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Carbon Emissions Study in the European Straits of the PASSAGE Project https://www.interregeurope.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/tx_tevprojects/library/file_1528203599.pdf | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Carbon Footprint of Container Terminal Port in Mumbai; International Conference on Impact of climate change on Food, Energy and Environment. Elsevier https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269702576_Carbon_Footprinting_of_Container_Terminal_Ports_in_Mumbai | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Jurong Port. Carbon Footprint Report 2010 https://esi.nus.edu.sg/publications/esi-publications/publication/2015/12/18/jurong-port-carbon-footprint-report-2010 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Tool to Assess Global Warming at Port Facilities https://www.portoflosageneles.org/references/news_112911_calculator | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Carbon Footprint a Key in Port Sustainability. CIP 2017. 14–15 https://issuu.com/revistacip3/docs/revista_cip_06_octubre_2017 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Mamatok, Y., Huang, Y., Jin, C., & Cheng, X. (2019). A System Dynamics Model for CO2 Mitigation Strategies at a Container Seaport. Sustainability, 11(10), 2806. doi:10.3390/su11102806 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Azarkamand, S., Wooldridge, C., & Darbra, R. M. (2020). Review of Initiatives and Methodologies to Reduce CO2 Emissions and Climate Change Effects in Ports. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11), 3858. doi:10.3390/ijerph17113858 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Guía de Cálculo Guía Para el Cálculo y Gestión de la Huella de Carbono en Instalaciones Portuarias Por Niveles https://www.valenciaport.com/wp-content/uploads/guia-calculo-gestion-huella-carbono.pdf | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Memoria Verificación Gases Efecto Invernadero. Puerto de Valencia; Valencia. Year 2008–2016 https://www.valenciaport.com/en/publicaciones/ | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ministry for Ecological Transition and Demographic Challenge https://www.miteco.gob.es/en/ministerio/default.aspxhttps://www.miteco.gob.es/es/cambio-climatico/temas/mitigacion-politicas-y-medidas/instruccionescalculadorahc_tcm30-485627.pdf | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Real Decreto 163/2014, de 14 de Marzo, por el que se Crea el Registro de Huella de Carbono, Compensación y Proyectos de Absorción de Dióxido de Carbono https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2014-3379 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Japan: N. p., 2006 https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/ | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Cloquell-Ballester, V., Lo-Iacono-Ferreira, V. G., Artacho-Ramírez, M. Á., & Capuz-Rizo, S. F. (2020). RUE Index as a Tool to Improve the Energy Intensity of Container Terminals—Case Study at Port of Valencia. Energies, 13(10), 2556. doi:10.3390/en13102556 | es_ES |
dc.subject.ods | 08.- Fomentar el crecimiento económico sostenido, inclusivo y sostenible, el empleo pleno y productivo, y el trabajo decente para todos | es_ES |
dc.subject.ods | 07.- Asegurar el acceso a energías asequibles, fiables, sostenibles y modernas para todos | es_ES |
dc.subject.ods | 09.- Desarrollar infraestructuras resilientes, promover la industrialización inclusiva y sostenible, y fomentar la innovación | es_ES |
dc.subject.ods | 14.- Conservar y utilizar de forma sostenible los océanos, mares y recursos marinos para lograr el desarrollo sostenible | es_ES |
dc.subject.ods | 13.- Tomar medidas urgentes para combatir el cambio climático y sus efectos | es_ES |
dc.subject.ods | 12.- Garantizar las pautas de consumo y de producción sostenibles | es_ES |
dc.subject.ods | 11.- Conseguir que las ciudades y los asentamientos humanos sean inclusivos, seguros, resilientes y sostenibles | es_ES |