Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Alemany Díaz, María Del Mar | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Alarcón Valero, Faustino | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Pérez Perales, David | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Guyon, C. | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-09T03:31:59Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-07-09T03:31:59Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 1868-4238 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/169027 | |
dc.description.abstract | [EN] Development and innovation agencies promote consortiums of agricultural stakeholders to collaborate in the proposal of projects for public calls. To achieve this partnerships, these agencies should select between different promoting actions to be performed with two objectives: maximize the number of project proposals presented and minimize the resources invested. To support agencies with these decisions, a computer tool based on a multi-objective integer linear programming model is proposed. To deal with the two objectives the weighting sum method is implemented. The model is validated in different scenarios by means a realistic case of an agency in Brittany (France). The results show the conflict between the two objectives considered and the dependency of the solutions on the scenarios defined. As a conclusion it can be stated that: 1) decision-makers should be careful in defining the weights of each objective and 2) the impact of the different promoting actions on the level of stakeholders¿ participation should be precisely estimated. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | The authors acknowledge the support of the project 691249, RUCAPS: "Enhancing and implementing knowledge based ICT solutions within high risk and uncertain conditions for agriculture production systems", funded by the European Union¿s research and innovation programme under the H2020 Marie Sk¿odowska-Curie Actions. | es_ES |
dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Springer | es_ES |
dc.relation.ispartof | IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology | es_ES |
dc.rights | Reserva de todos los derechos | es_ES |
dc.subject | Decision support | es_ES |
dc.subject | Optimization | es_ES |
dc.subject | Collaboration | es_ES |
dc.subject | Project proposals | es_ES |
dc.subject | Agriculture | es_ES |
dc.subject.classification | ORGANIZACION DE EMPRESAS | es_ES |
dc.title | A Decision Support Tool for the Selection of Promoting Actions to Encourage Collaboration in Projects for the Agriculture Sector | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/978-3-030-62412-5_44 | es_ES |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/691249/EU/Enhancing and implementing Knowledge based ICT solutions within high Risk and Uncertain Conditions for Agriculture Production Systems/ | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | Abierto | es_ES |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Organización de Empresas - Departament d'Organització d'Empreses | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Alemany Díaz, MDM.; Alarcón Valero, F.; Pérez Perales, D.; Guyon, C. (2020). A Decision Support Tool for the Selection of Promoting Actions to Encourage Collaboration in Projects for the Agriculture Sector. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. 598:534-545. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62412-5_44 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | S | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62412-5_44 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 534 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpfin | 545 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.volume | 598 | es_ES |
dc.relation.pasarela | S\421570 | es_ES |
dc.contributor.funder | European Commission | es_ES |
dc.description.references | European Comission Funded Programs. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Zoie, C., Radulescu, M.: Decision analysis for the project selection problem under risk. IFAC Proc. 34(8), 445–450 (2001) | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Sadi-Nezhad, S.: A state-of-art survey on project selection using MCDM techniques. J. Project Manage. 2, 1–10 (2017) | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Caballero, H.C., Chopra, S., Schmidt, E.K.: Project portfolio selection using mathematical programming and optimization methods. In: Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012–North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, Newtown Square, PA, Project Management Institute (2012) | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ahmad, B., Haq, I.: Project selection techniques, relevance and applications in Pakistan. Int. J. Technol. Res. 4, 52–60 (2016) | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Inuiguchi, M., Ramı́k, J.: Possibilistic linear programming: a brief review of fuzzy mathematical programming and a comparison with stochastic programming in portfolio selection problem. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 111(1), 3–28 (2000) | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Stewart, R., Mohamed, S.: IT/IS projects selection using multi-criteria utility theory. Log. Inf. Manage. 15(4), 254–270 (2002) | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Alzober, W., Yaakub, A.R.: Integrated model for MCDM: selection contractor in Malaysian construction industry. In: Applied Mechanics and Materials 548, pp. 1587–1595. Trans Tech Publications (2014) | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Adhikary, P., Roy, P.K., Mazumdar, A.: Optimal renewable energy project selection: a multi-criteria optimization technique approach. Global J. Pure Appl. Math. 11(5), 3319–3329 (2015) | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Strang, K.D.: Portfolio selection methodology for a nuclear project. Project Manage. J. 42(2), 81–93 (2011) | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Benjamin, C.O.: A linear goal-programming model for public-sector project selection. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 36(1), 13–23 (1985) | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Coronado, J.R., Pardo-Mora, E.M., Valero, M.: A multi-objective model for selection of projects to finance new enterprise SMEs in Colombia. J. Ind. Eng. Manage. 4(3), 407–417 (2011) | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Mat, N.A.C., Cheung, Y.: Partner selection: criteria for successful collaborative network. In: 20th Australian Conference on Information Systems, pp. 631–641 (2009) | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H.: Collaborative Networks. In: Wang, K., Kovacs, G.L., Wozny, M., Fang, M. (eds.) PROLAMAT 2006. IIFIP, vol. 207, pp. 26–40. Springer, Boston, MA (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34403-9_4 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Paixão, M., Sbragia, R., Kruglianskas, I.: Factors for selecting partners in innovation projects–evidences from alliances in the Brazilian petrochemical leader. Rev. Admin. Innov. São Paulo 11(2), 241–272 (2014) | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Duisters, D., Duysters, G., de Man, A.P.: The partner selection process: steps, effectiveness, governance. Ann. Hematol. 2, 7–25 (2011) | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Zhang, X.: Criteria for selecting the private-sector partner in public-private partnerships. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131(6), 631–644 (2005) | es_ES |