- -

Regional innovation system research trends: toward knowledge management and entrepreneurial ecosystems

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Regional innovation system research trends: toward knowledge management and entrepreneurial ecosystems

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Lopez-RubioRoig-T ...
Tamaño: 780.9Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Abrir
dc.contributor.author López-Rubio, Pedro es_ES
dc.contributor.author Roig-Tierno, Norat es_ES
dc.contributor.author Mas-Tur, Alicia es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2021-07-20T03:30:56Z
dc.date.available 2021-07-20T03:30:56Z
dc.date.issued 2020 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/169539
dc.description.abstract [EN] The regional innovation system (RIS) is a popular way of explaining a region¿s development and competitiveness based on innovation activities and processes. In this paper, bibliometric techniques are used to analyze all RIS studies indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoS CC) database as of December 2017. The goal of the analysis is to identify the main trends in RIS research. The evolution of the total number of publications and citations per year indicates that this research field has garnered considerable attention from the scientific community, public administrations, and international organizations. Analysis of the most common keywords and their co-occurrence sheds light on the conceptual framework of RIS research, where knowledge, innovation, clusters, policy, networks, systems, R&D, firms, and industry are key concepts. The 17 most influential RIS articles indexed in WoS CC are identified according to the total number of citations and the ratio of number of citations per year. Reviewing these 17 articles reveals 3 groups of underlying research trends: (1) research on innovation systems, which was mainly conducted in the 1990s, (2) research on knowledge management since the beginning of the 2000s, and (3) research on entrepreneurial ecosystems in recent years. Finally, analysis of citations to these 17 most influential RIS articles reveals strong interconnections according to the number of times they are cited together. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship Norat Roig-Tierno wish to thank Project GV/2019/063, funded by the Generalitat Valenciana, for supporting this research. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Springer (Biomed Central Ltd.) es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof International Journal of Quality Innovation es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Regional innovation system es_ES
dc.subject Innovation systems es_ES
dc.subject Knowledge management es_ES
dc.subject Entrepreneurial ecosystems es_ES
dc.subject Bibliometrics es_ES
dc.subject Web of Science es_ES
dc.subject.classification ECONOMIA APLICADA es_ES
dc.title Regional innovation system research trends: toward knowledge management and entrepreneurial ecosystems es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1186/s40887-020-00038-x es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/GVA//GV%2F2019%2F063/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Economía y Ciencias Sociales - Departament d'Economia i Ciències Socials es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation López-Rubio, P.; Roig-Tierno, N.; Mas-Tur, A. (2020). Regional innovation system research trends: toward knowledge management and entrepreneurial ecosystems. International Journal of Quality Innovation. 6:1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40887-020-00038-x es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1186/s40887-020-00038-x es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 16 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 6 es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn 2363-7021 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\433978 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Generalitat Valenciana es_ES
dc.description.references Freeman C (1987) Technology policy and economic performance: lessons from Japan. Pinter Publishers es_ES
dc.description.references Lundvall BA (1992) National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter, London es_ES
dc.description.references Nelson RR (1993) In: Nelson RR (ed) National innovation systems. a comparative analysis es_ES
dc.description.references Isard W (1975) Introduction to regional science. Prentice Hall, New York es_ES
dc.description.references Cooke P, Uranga MG, Etxebarria G (1998) Regional systems of innovation: an evolutionary perspective. Environ Plan A 30:1563–1584. https://doi.org/10.1068/a301563 es_ES
dc.description.references Forrest JE (1991) Models of the process of technological innovation. Tech Anal Strat Manag 4(3):439–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537329108524070 es_ES
dc.description.references Cooke P, Uranga MG, Etxebarria G (1997) Regional innovation systems: institutional and organisational dimensions. Res Policy 26(4–5):475–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Cooke P (1992) Regional innovation systems: competitive regulation in the new Europe. Geoforum 23(3):365–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7185(92)90048-9 es_ES
dc.description.references Asheim BT, Smith HL, Oughton C (2011) Regional innovation systems: theory, empirics and policy. Reg Stud 45(7):875–891. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.596701 es_ES
dc.description.references Doloreux, D., & Parto, S. (2004). Regional innovation systems: a critical synthesis. United Nations University, Institute for New Technologies, Discussion Paper Series #2004-17. es_ES
dc.description.references Asheim BT, Coenen L (2005) Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: comparing Nordic clusters. Res Policy 34(8):1173–1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.013 es_ES
dc.description.references Borrás S, Jordana J (2016) When regional innovation policies meet policy rationales and evidence: a plea for policy analysis. Eur Plan Stud 24(12):2133–2153. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1236074 es_ES
dc.description.references Buesa M, Heijs J, Pellitero MM, Baumert T (2006) Regional systems of innovation and the knowledge production function: the Spanish case. Technovation 26(4):463–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.11.007 es_ES
dc.description.references Isaksen A, Normann RH, Spilling OR (2017) Do general innovation policy tools fit all? Analysis of the regional impact of the Norwegian Skattefunn scheme. J Innov Entrep 6(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-017-0068-x es_ES
dc.description.references Mytelka LK (2000) Local systems of innovation in a globalized world economy. Ind Innov 7(1):15–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/713670244 es_ES
dc.description.references Freeman C (1995) The national system of innovation in historical perspective. Camb J Econ 19:5–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035309 es_ES
dc.description.references Edler J, Fagerberg J (2017) Innovation policy: what, why, and how. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 33(1):2–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grx001 es_ES
dc.description.references European Commission (2014). The European Union explained: research and innovation. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union, 2014. doi:https://doi.org/10.2775/74012. es_ES
dc.description.references OECD (2015) The innovation imperative: contributing to productivity, growth and well-being. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239814-en es_ES
dc.description.references Lundvall BA, Johnson B, Andersen ES, Dalum B (2002) National systems of production, innovation and competence-building. Res Policy 31(2):213–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00137-8 es_ES
dc.description.references Sharif N (2006) Emergence and development of the national innovation systems concept. Res Policy 35(5):745–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L (2000) The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Res Policy 29:109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4 es_ES
dc.description.references Chesbrough H (2003) Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press es_ES
dc.description.references Todtling F, Trippl M (2005) One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Res Policy 34(8):1203–1219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018 es_ES
dc.description.references Uyarra E (2010) What is evolutionary about ‘regional systems of innovation’? Implications for regional policy. J Evol Econ 20:115–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-009-0135-y es_ES
dc.description.references Metcalfe JS (1995) Technology systems and technology policy in an evolutionary framework. Camb J Econ 19:25–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035307 es_ES
dc.description.references Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap, Cambridge es_ES
dc.description.references Dosi G (1988) The nature of the innovative process. In: Dosi G et al (eds) Technical change and economic theory. Pinter, London es_ES
dc.description.references Kline S, Rosenberg N (1986) An overview of innovation. Reprinted. In: Edquist C, McKelvey M (eds) Systems of innovation: growth, competitiveness and employment. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham es_ES
dc.description.references Edquist C, Johnson B (1997) Institutions and organisations in systems of innovation. In: Edquist C (ed) , pp 41–63 es_ES
dc.description.references Edquist C (ed) (1997) Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions and organisations. Pinter, London es_ES
dc.description.references Boschma R (2004) Competitiveness of regions from an evolutionary perspective. Reg Stud 38(9):1001–1014. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340042000292601 es_ES
dc.description.references Iammarino S (2005) An evolutionary integrated view of regional systems of innovation: concepts, measures and historical perspectives. Eur Plan Stud 13(4):497–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310500107084 es_ES
dc.description.references Asheim B, Coenen L, Moodysson J, Vang J (2007) Constructing knowledge-based regional advantage: implications for regional innovation policy. Int J Entrep Innov Manag 7(2-5):140–155. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2007.012879 es_ES
dc.description.references Asheim B, Moodysson J (2017). Innovation policy for economic resilience: the case of Sweden (No. 2017/5). Lund University, CIRCLE-Center for Innovation, Research and Competences in the Learning Economy. es_ES
dc.description.references Pritchard A (1969) Statistical bibliographic or bibliometrics? J Doc 25(4):348–349 es_ES
dc.description.references Lawani S (1981) Bibliometrics: its theoretical foundations, methods and applications. Libri 31(4):294–315. https://doi.org/10.1515/libr.1981.31.1.294 es_ES
dc.description.references Thelwall M (2008) Bibliometrics to webometrics. J Inf Sci 34(4):605–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551507087238 es_ES
dc.description.references Hirsch JE (2005) An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102 es_ES
dc.description.references Small H (1999) Visualizing science by citation mapping. J Am Soc Inf Sci 50(9):799–813 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:9<799::AID-ASI9>3.0.CO;2-G es_ES
dc.description.references Noyons ECM, Moed HF, Van Raan AFJ (1999) Integrating research performance analysis and science mapping. Scientometrics 46(3):591–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459614 es_ES
dc.description.references Callon M, Courtial P, Turner WA, Bauin S (1983) From translations to problematic networks: an introduction to co-word analysis. Soc Sci Inf 22(2):191–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901883022002003 es_ES
dc.description.references Kessler MM (1963) Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. Am Doc 14:10–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140103 es_ES
dc.description.references Small H (1973) Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of relationship between two documents. J Am Soc Inf Sci 24:265–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406 es_ES
dc.description.references White HD, Griffith BC (1981) Author co-citation: a literature measure of intellectual structure. J Am Soc Inf Sci 21:163–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630320302 es_ES
dc.description.references Van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2010) Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84(2):523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 es_ES
dc.description.references Cobo MJ, López-Herrera AG, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F (2011) Science mapping software tools: review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 62(7):1382–1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525 es_ES
dc.description.references Merigó JM, Yang JB (2016) A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science. Omega 73:37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2016.12.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Acs ZJ, Anselin L, Varga A (2002) Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Res Policy 31(7):1069–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00184-6 es_ES
dc.description.references Muller E, Zenker A (2001) Business services as actors of knowledge transformation: the role of KIBS in regional and national innovation systems. Res Policy 30(9):1501–1516. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00164-0 es_ES
dc.description.references Rodriguez-Pose A, Crescenzi R (2008) Research and development, spillovers, innovation systems, and the genesis of regional growth in Europe. Reg Stud 42(1):51–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701654186 es_ES
dc.description.references Ter Wal ALJ, Boschma RA (2009) Applying social network analysis in economic geography: framing some key analytic issues. Ann Reg Sci 43(3):739–756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0258-3 es_ES
dc.description.references Cooke P (2005) Regionally asymmetric knowledge capabilities and open innovation. Exploring ‘Globalisation 2’ – a new model of industry organization. Res Policy 34(8):1128–1149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.12.005 es_ES
dc.description.references Fritsch M, Franke G (2004) Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and R&D cooperation. Res Policy 33(2):245–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00123-9 es_ES
dc.description.references Hansen HK, Niedomysl T (2009) Migration of the creative class: evidence from Sweden. J Econ Geogr 9(2):191–206. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbn046 es_ES
dc.description.references Yam RCM, Lo W, Tang EPY, Lau AKW (2011) Analysis of sources of innovation, technological innovation capabilities, and performance: an empirical study of Hong Kong manufacturing industries. Res Policy 40(3):391–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.10.013 es_ES
dc.description.references Spigel B (2017) The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrep Theory Pract 41(1):49–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167 es_ES
dc.description.references Oh DS, Phillips F, Park S, Lee E (2016) Innovation ecosystems: a critical examination. Technovation 54:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Audretsch DB, Belitski M (2017) Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: establishing the framework conditions. J Technol Transfer 42(5):1030–1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9473-8 es_ES
dc.description.references Gaviria-Marin M, Merigó JM, Baier-Fuentes H (2019) Knowledge management: a global examination based on bibliometric analysis. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 140:194–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.006 es_ES
dc.description.references Huber F (2011) Do clusters really matter for innovation practices in Information Technology? Questioning the significance of technological knowledge spillovers. J Econ Geogr 12(1):107–126. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbq058 es_ES
dc.description.references Miles I, Kastrinos N, Bilderbeek R, Hertog PD, Flanagan K, Huntink W, Bouman M (1995) Knowledge-intensive business services: users, carriers and sources of information. European Innovation Monitoring System (EIMS) Reports, European Commission, Brussels es_ES
dc.description.references Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ Sci 5(1):14–37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 es_ES
dc.description.references Acs ZJ, Autio E, Szerb L (2014) National systems of entrepreneurship: measurement issues and policy implications. Res Policy 43(3):476–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.016 es_ES
dc.description.references Autio E, Kenney M, Mustar P, Siegel D, Wright M (2014) Entrepreneurial innovation: the importance of context. Res Policy 43(7):1097–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.015 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem