- -

How and Why the Metric Management Model Is Unsustainable: The Case of Spanish Universities from 2005 to 2020

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

How and Why the Metric Management Model Is Unsustainable: The Case of Spanish Universities from 2005 to 2020

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: JodarDe - How and ...
Tamaño: 579.6Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Jódar Sánchez, Lucas Antonio es_ES
dc.contributor.author De la Poza, Elena es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2021-09-15T03:30:58Z
dc.date.available 2021-09-15T03:30:58Z
dc.date.issued 2020-08 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/172521
dc.description.abstract [EN] The metric management model is a method based on quantitative indicators called metrics and is used to evaluate individuals and organizations. Organizations' sustainability is related to risk and expectation concepts and both are, in turn, related to the metric management model (MMM). The main objective of the present research work is to analyze the MMM applied to the Spanish university system (SUS) and the propagation of its consequences. The secondary objective is to study alternatives to the metric management system applied to the SUS to avoid its negative socio-economic consequences. Our results reveal how applying the MMM to the SUS, based on the metric evaluation and the ranking monitor model, deteriorates research quality, students' levels of education and working people's well-being at university. Finally, university managerial boards, teased with the "mirror" of university rankings and the picture a simulacrum of reality, are still unaware of the damage. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher MDPI AG es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Sustainability es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Sustainability es_ES
dc.subject Metric management model es_ES
dc.subject University ranking es_ES
dc.subject Labor welfare es_ES
dc.subject Patriotism es_ES
dc.subject Public management es_ES
dc.subject.classification ECONOMIA FINANCIERA Y CONTABILIDAD es_ES
dc.subject.classification MATEMATICA APLICADA es_ES
dc.title How and Why the Metric Management Model Is Unsustainable: The Case of Spanish Universities from 2005 to 2020 es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/su12156064 es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Matemática Aplicada - Departament de Matemàtica Aplicada es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Economía y Ciencias Sociales - Departament d'Economia i Ciències Socials es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Jódar Sánchez, LA.; De La Poza, E. (2020). How and Why the Metric Management Model Is Unsustainable: The Case of Spanish Universities from 2005 to 2020. Sustainability. 12(15):1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156064 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156064 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 19 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 12 es_ES
dc.description.issue 15 es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn 2071-1050 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\416416 es_ES
dc.description.references Tsvetkova, E., & Lomer, S. (2019). Academic excellence as «competitiveness enhancement» in Russian higher education. International Journal of Comparative Education and Development, 21(2), 127-144. doi:10.1108/ijced-08-2018-0029 es_ES
dc.description.references Hazelkorn, E. (Ed.). (2016). Global Rankings and the Geopolitics of Higher Education. doi:10.4324/9781315738550 es_ES
dc.description.references Pietrucha, J. (2017). Country-specific determinants of world university rankings. Scientometrics, 114(3), 1129-1139. doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2634-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Olcay, G. A., & Bulu, M. (2017). Is measuring the knowledge creation of universities possible?: A review of university rankings. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 153-160. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.029 es_ES
dc.description.references Casani, F., De Filippo, D., Garcia-Zorita, C., & Sanz-Casado, E. (2013). Public versus private universities: Assessment of research performance; case study of the Spanish university system. Research Evaluation, 23(1), 48-61. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvt028 es_ES
dc.description.references De la Torre, E. M., Gómez-Sancho, J.-M., & Perez-Esparrells, C. (2017). Comparing university performance by legal status: a Malmquist-type index approach for the case of the Spanish higher education system. Tertiary Education and Management, 23(3), 206-221. doi:10.1080/13583883.2017.1296966 es_ES
dc.description.references Levy, D. C. (2018). Global private higher education: an empirical profile of its size and geographical shape. Higher Education, 76(4), 701-715. doi:10.1007/s10734-018-0233-6 es_ES
dc.description.references Las Cifras de la Universidad Pública y la Universidad Privada en España: 1983–2016https://www.universidadsi.es/las-cifras-la-universidad-publica-la-universidad-privada-espana-1983-2016/ es_ES
dc.description.references Merry, S. E. (2011). Measuring the World. Current Anthropology, 52(S3), S83-S95. doi:10.1086/657241 es_ES
dc.description.references Fire, M., & Guestrin, C. (2019). Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart’s Law in action. GigaScience, 8(6). doi:10.1093/gigascience/giz053 es_ES
dc.description.references Biagioli, M. (2016). Watch out for cheats in citation game. Nature, 535(7611), 201-201. doi:10.1038/535201a es_ES
dc.description.references Fanelli, D. (2009). How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data. PLoS ONE, 4(5), e5738. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005738 es_ES
dc.description.references Raafat, R. M., Chater, N., & Frith, C. (2009). Herding in humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(10), 420-428. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.08.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Goyanes, M., & Rodríguez-Gómez, E.-F. (2018). ¿Por qué publicamos? Prevalencia, motivaciones y consecuencias de publicar o perecer. El Profesional de la Información, 27(3), 548. doi:10.3145/epi.2018.may.08 es_ES
dc.description.references Burke-Smalley, L. A., Rau, B. L., Neely, A. R., & Evans, W. R. (2017). Factors perpetuating the research-teaching gap in management: A review and propositions. The International Journal of Management Education, 15(3), 501-512. doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2017.08.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Van Dalen, H. P., & Henkens, K. (2012). Intended and unintended consequences of a publish‐or‐perish culture: A worldwide survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(7), 1282-1293. doi:10.1002/asi.22636 es_ES
dc.description.references Barómetro Juvenil de Vida y Salud 2017, Fundación Reina Sofia sobre Adolescencia y Juventud, Fundación de Ayuda a La Drogadicciónhttp://www.proyectoscopio.es/barometro/barometro-juvenil-de-vida-y-salud-2017 es_ES
dc.description.references Bell, A. S., Rajendran, D., & Theiler, S. (2012). Job stress, wellbeing, work-life balance and work-life conflict among Australian academics. E-Journal of Applied Psychology, 8(1). doi:10.7790/ejap.v8i1.320 es_ES
dc.description.references Abramo, G., Cicero, T., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2011). The dangers of performance-based research funding in non-competitive higher education systems. Scientometrics, 87(3), 641-654. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0355-4 es_ES
dc.description.references McIntosh, S., McKinley, J., Milligan, L. O., & Mikolajewska, A. (2019). Issues of (in)visibility and compromise in academic work in UK universities. Studies in Higher Education, 1-12. doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1637846 es_ES
dc.description.references Dearden, J. A., Grewal, R., & Lilien, G. L. (2019). Strategic Manipulation of University Rankings, the Prestige Effect, and Student University Choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(4), 691-707. doi:10.1177/0022243719831258 es_ES
dc.description.references Carson, L., Bartneck, C., & Voges, K. (2013). Over-Competitiveness in Academia: A Literature Review. Disruptive Science and Technology, 1(4), 183-190. doi:10.1089/dst.2013.0013 es_ES
dc.description.references Kallio, K.-M., Kallio, T. J., Tienari, J., & Hyvönen, T. (2015). Ethos at stake: Performance management and academic work in universities. Human Relations, 69(3), 685-709. doi:10.1177/0018726715596802 es_ES
dc.description.references Albert, C., Davia, M. A., & Legazpe, N. (2015). Determinants of Research Productivity in Spanish Academia. European Journal of Education, 51(4), 535-549. doi:10.1111/ejed.12142 es_ES
dc.description.references Lee, I. (2012). Publish or perish: The myth and reality of academic publishing. Language Teaching, 47(2), 250-261. doi:10.1017/s0261444811000504 es_ES
dc.description.references Wessels, J. S. (2015). The human spirit as a necessary condition for higher education: a risk assessment. The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 11(2). doi:10.4102/td.v11i2.75 es_ES
dc.subject.ods 04.- Garantizar una educación de calidad inclusiva y equitativa, y promover las oportunidades de aprendizaje permanente para todos es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem