Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Hervás Oliver, Jose Luis | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Parrilli, Mario Davide | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Sempere-Ripoll, Francisca | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-10-26T10:49:11Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-10-26T10:49:11Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-11 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 0048-7333 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/175593 | |
dc.description.abstract | [EN] European Union (EU) innovation policies have for long remained mostly research driven. The fundamental goal has been to achieve a rate of R&D investment of 3% of GDP. Small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) inno-vation, however, relies on a variety of internal sources -both R&D and non-R&D based- and external drivers, such as collaboration with other firms and research centres, and is profoundly influence by location and context. Given this multiplicity of innovation activities, this study argues that innovation policies fundamentally based on a place-blind increase of R&D investment may not deliver the best outcomes in regions where the capacity of SMEs is to benefit from R&D is limited. We posit that collaboration and regional specificities can play a greater role in determining SME innovation, beyond just R&D activities. Using data from the Regional Innovation Scoreboard (RIS), covering 220 regions across 22 European countries, we find that regions in Europe differ significantly in terms of SME innovation depending on their location. SMEs in more innovative regions benefit to a far greater extent from a combination of internal R&D, external collaboration of all sorts, and non-R&D inputs. SMEs in less innovative regions rely fundamentally on external sources and, particularly, on collaboration with other firms. Greater investment in public R&D does not always lead to improvements in regional SME innova-tion, regardless of context. Collaboration is a central innovation activity that can complement R&D, showing an even stronger effect on SME innovation than R&D. Hence, a more collaboration-based and place-sensitive policy is required to maximise SME innovation across the variety of European regional contexts. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | Dr. Hervas-Oliver acknowledges financial support from Generalitat Valenciana AICO/2020/123 and AEI/FEDER EU RTI-2018-095739-B-100 (Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades, ES). Also, Francisca Sempere-Ripoll thanks "Salvador Madariaga Program" funded by the Spanish Ministry Science, Innovation and Universities (ref: PRX19/00538). | es_ES |
dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | es_ES |
dc.relation.ispartof | Research Policy | es_ES |
dc.rights | Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd) | es_ES |
dc.subject | Regional innovation | es_ES |
dc.subject | SMEs | es_ES |
dc.subject | R&D | es_ES |
dc.subject | Place-based | es_ES |
dc.subject | Collaboration | es_ES |
dc.subject | EU regions | es_ES |
dc.subject.classification | ORGANIZACION DE EMPRESAS | es_ES |
dc.title | The drivers of SME innovation in the regions of the EU | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104316 | es_ES |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020/RTI2018-095739-B-I00/ES/INNOVACION RADICAL EN LOS CLUSTERS: ANALIZANDO ESTRATEGIAS DE EXPLORACION Y EXPLOTACION/ | es_ES |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MCIU//PRX19%2F00538/ | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | Abierto | es_ES |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Organización de Empresas - Departament d'Organització d'Empreses | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Hervás Oliver, JL.; Parrilli, MD.; Rodríguez-Pose, A.; Sempere-Ripoll, F. (2021). The drivers of SME innovation in the regions of the EU. Research Policy. 50(9):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104316 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | S | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104316 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 1 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpfin | 13 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.volume | 50 | es_ES |
dc.description.issue | 9 | es_ES |
dc.relation.pasarela | S\441542 | es_ES |
dc.contributor.funder | GENERALITAT VALENCIANA | es_ES |
dc.contributor.funder | AGENCIA ESTATAL DE INVESTIGACION | es_ES |
dc.contributor.funder | European Regional Development Fund | es_ES |
dc.contributor.funder | Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Alhusen, H., Bennat, T., Bizer, K., Cantner, U., Horstmann, E., Kalthaus, M., … Töpfer, S. (2021). A New Measurement Conception for the ‘Doing-Using-Interacting’ Mode of Innovation. Research Policy, 50(4), 104214. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2021.104214 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Antonelli, C., & Crespi, F. (2013). The «Matthew effect» in R&D public subsidies: The Italian evidence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(8), 1523-1534. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.008 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Apanasovich, N., Alcalde Heras, H., & Parrilli, M. D. (2016). The impact of business innovation modes on SME innovation performance in post-Soviet transition economies: The case of Belarus. Technovation, 57-58, 30-40. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2016.05.001 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Arundel, A., Bordoy, C., Kanerva, M., 2008. Neglected innovators: how do innovative firms that do not perform R&D innovate? – results of an analysis of the Innobarometer 2007 survey No 215, INNO-Metrics Thematic Paper, European Commission, DG Enterprise, Brussels. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Asheim, B. T., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing Regional Advantage: Platform Policies Based on Related Variety and Differentiated Knowledge Bases. Regional Studies, 45(7), 893-904. doi:10.1080/00343404.2010.543126 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Asheim, B. T., & Coenen, L. (2005). Contextualising Regional Innovation Systems in a Globalising Learning Economy: On Knowledge Bases and Institutional Frameworks. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 163-173. doi:10.1007/s10961-005-5028-0 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Barca, F., McCann, P., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2012). THE CASE FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT INTERVENTION: PLACE-BASED VERSUS PLACE-NEUTRAL APPROACHES*. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), 134-152. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Barge-Gil, A., Jesús Nieto, M., & Santamaría, L. (2011). Hidden innovators: the role of non-R&D activities. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 23(4), 415-432. doi:10.1080/09537325.2011.558400 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Camagni, R., & Capello, R. (2013). Regional Innovation Patterns and the EU Regional Policy Reform: Toward Smart Innovation Policies. Growth and Change, 44(2), 355-389. doi:10.1111/grow.12012 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Capello, R., & Lenzi, C. (2017). Structural dynamics of regional innovation patterns in Europe: the role of inventors’ mobility. Regional Studies, 53(1), 30-42. doi:10.1080/00343404.2017.1379600 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Chen, J., Chen, Y., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2011). The influence of scope, depth, and orientation of external technology sources on the innovative performance of Chinese firms. Technovation, 31(8), 362-373. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2011.03.002 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128. doi:10.2307/2393553 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Cooke, P. (2001). Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters, and the Knowledge Economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 945-974. doi:10.1093/icc/10.4.945 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Czarnitzki, D., & Hussinger, K. (2017). Input and output additionality of R&D subsidies. Applied Economics, 50(12), 1324-1341. doi:10.1080/00036846.2017.1361010 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | De Marco, C. E., Martelli, I., & Di Minin, A. (2020). European SMEs’ engagement in open innovation When the important thing is to win and not just to participate, what should innovation policy do? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 152, 119843. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119843 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | De Noni, I., Orsi, L., & Belussi, F. (2018). The role of collaborative networks in supporting the innovation performances of lagging-behind European regions. Research Policy, 47(1), 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.006 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Demirel, P., & Mazzucato, M. (2012). Innovation and Firm Growth: Is R&D Worth It? Industry & Innovation, 19(1), 45-62. doi:10.1080/13662716.2012.649057 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Doloreux, D., & Parto, S. (2005). Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues. Technology in Society, 27(2), 133-153. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.01.002 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Fitjar, R. D., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Firm collaboration and modes of innovation in Norway. Research Policy, 42(1), 128-138. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.009 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Fitjar, R. D., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2016). Nothing is in the Air. Growth and Change, 48(1), 22-39. doi:10.1111/grow.12161 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Flikkema, M., Castaldi, C., de Man, A.-P., & Seip, M. (2019). Trademarks’ relatedness to product and service innovation: A branding strategy approach. Research Policy, 48(6), 1340-1353. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.018 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Fritsch, M., & Slavtchev, V. (2011). Determinants of the Efficiency of Regional Innovation Systems. Regional Studies, 45(7), 905-918. doi:10.1080/00343400802251494 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Garnsey, E., & Heffernan, P. (2005). High‐technology clustering through spin‐out and attraction: The Cambridge case. Regional Studies, 39(8), 1127-1144. doi:10.1080/00343400500328289 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Greunz, L. (2005). Intra- and inter-regional knowledge spillovers: Evidence from European regions. European Planning Studies, 13(3), 449-473. doi:10.1080/09654310500089746 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Grillitsch, M., & Trippl, M. (2013). Combining Knowledge from Different Sources, Channels and Geographical Scales. European Planning Studies, 22(11), 2305-2325. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.835793 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Haus-Reve, S., Fitjar, R. D., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2019). Does combining different types of collaboration always benefit firms? Collaboration, complementarity and product innovation in Norway. Research Policy, 48(6), 1476-1486. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.02.008 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Heidenreich, M. (2009). Innovation patterns and location of European low- and medium-technology industries. Research Policy, 38(3), 483-494. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.005 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Hervas-Oliver, J.-L., & Albors-Garrigos, J. (2008). The role of the firm’s internal and relational capabilities in clusters: when distance and embeddedness are not enough to explain innovation. Journal of Economic Geography, 9(2), 263-283. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbn033 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Hervás-Oliver, J. L., & Albors-Garrigós, J. (2007). Do clusters capabilities matter? An empirical application of the resource-based view in clusters. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 19(2), 113-136. doi:10.1080/08985620601137554 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Hervas-Oliver, J.-L., Albors Garrigos, J., & Gil-Pechuan, I. (2011). Making sense of innovation by R&D and non-R&D innovators in low technology contexts: A forgotten lesson for policymakers. Technovation, 31(9), 427-446. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2011.06.006 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Hervas-Oliver, J.-L., Estelles-Miguel, S., Mallol-Gasch, G., & Boix-Palomero, J. (2019). A place-based policy for promoting Industry 4.0: the case of the Castellon ceramic tile district. European Planning Studies, 27(9), 1838-1856. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1642855 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Hervas-Oliver, J.-L., Lleo, M., & Cervello, R. (2017). The dynamics of cluster entrepreneurship: Knowledge legacy from parents or agglomeration effects? The case of the Castellon ceramic tile district. Research Policy, 46(1), 73-92. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.10.006 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Hervas-Oliver, J.-L., Sempere-Ripoll, F., & Boronat-Moll, C. (2021). Technological innovation typologies and open innovation in SMEs: Beyond internal and external sources of knowledge. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120338. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120338 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Hervas-Oliver, J.-L., Sempere-Ripoll, F., Boronat-Moll, C., & Rojas, R. (2014). Technological innovation without R&D: unfolding the extra gains of management innovations on technological performance. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 27(1), 19-38. doi:10.1080/09537325.2014.944147 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Hervas-Oliver, J.-L., Sempere-Ripoll, F., Rojas Alvarado, R., & Estelles-Miguel, S. (2017). Beyond product innovation: deciphering process-oriented innovators, complementarities and performance effects. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 30(5), 582-595. doi:10.1080/09537325.2017.1347623 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Iammarino, S. (2005). An evolutionary integrated view of Regional Systems of Innovation: Concepts, measures and historical perspectives. European Planning Studies, 13(4), 497-519. doi:10.1080/09654310500107084 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Iammarino, S., Rodriguez-Pose, A., & Storper, M. (2018). Regional inequality in Europe: evidence, theory and policy implications. Journal of Economic Geography, 19(2), 273-298. doi:10.1093/jeg/lby021 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Isaksen, A., & Karlsen, J. (2010). Different Modes of Innovation and the Challenge of Connecting Universities and Industry: Case Studies of Two Regional Industries in Norway. European Planning Studies, 18(12), 1993-2008. doi:10.1080/09654313.2010.516523 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Jensen, M. B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B. Å. (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy, 36(5), 680-693. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.006 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Leydesdorff, L., & Fritsch, M. (2006). Measuring the knowledge base of regional innovation systems in Germany in terms of a Triple Helix dynamics. Research Policy, 35(10), 1538-1553. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.027 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Maclaurin, W. R. (1953). The Sequence from Invention to Innovation and its Relation to Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 67(1), 97. doi:10.2307/1884150 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Moodysson, J., Coenen, L., & Asheim, B. (2008). Explaining Spatial Patterns of Innovation: Analytical and Synthetic Modes of Knowledge Creation in the Medicon Valley Life-Science Cluster. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 40(5), 1040-1056. doi:10.1068/a39110 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ortega-Argilés, R., Vivarelli, M., & Voigt, P. (2009). R&D in SMEs: a paradox? Small Business Economics, 33(1), 3-11. doi:10.1007/s11187-009-9187-5 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Parrilli, M. D., & Alcalde Heras, H. (2016). STI and DUI innovation modes: Scientific-technological and context-specific nuances. Research Policy, 45(4), 747-756. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.001 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Parrilli, M. D., Aranguren, M. J., & Larrea, M. (2010). The Role of Interactive Learning to Close the «Innovation Gap» in SME-Based Local Economies: A Furniture Cluster in the Basque Country and its Key Policy Implications. European Planning Studies, 18(3), 351-370. doi:10.1080/09654310903497660 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Parrilli, M. D., Balavac, M., & Radicic, D. (2020). Business innovation modes and their impact on innovation outputs: Regional variations and the nature of innovation across EU regions. Research Policy, 49(8), 104047. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.104047 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Parrilli, M. D., & Radicic, D. (2020). STI and DUI innovation modes in micro-, small-, medium- and large-sized firms: distinctive patterns across Europe and the U.S. European Planning Studies, 29(2), 346-368. doi:10.1080/09654313.2020.1754343 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Rammer, C., Czarnitzki, D., & Spielkamp, A. (2009). Innovation success of non-R&D-performers: substituting technology by management in SMEs. Small Business Economics, 33(1), 35-58. doi:10.1007/s11187-009-9185-7 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2001). Is R&D investment in lagging areas of Europe worthwhile? Theory and empirical evidence. Papers in Regional Science, 80(3), 275-295. doi:10.1007/pl00013631 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Do Institutions Matter for Regional Development? Regional Studies, 47(7), 1034-1047. doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.748978 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Crescenzi, R. (2008). Research and Development, Spillovers, Innovation Systems, and the Genesis of Regional Growth in Europe. Regional Studies, 42(1), 51-67. doi:10.1080/00343400701654186 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Wilkie, C. (2018). Innovating in less developed regions: What drives patenting in the lagging regions of Europe and North America. Growth and Change, 50(1), 4-37. doi:10.1111/grow.12280 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Rodríguez-Pose, A., Wilkie, C., & Zhang, M. (2021). Innovating in «lagging» cities: A comparative exploration of the dynamics of innovation in Chinese cities. Applied Geography, 132, 102475. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102475 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Santamaría, L., Nieto, M. J., & Barge-Gil, A. (2009). Beyond formal R&D: Taking advantage of other sources of innovation in low- and medium-technology industries. Research Policy, 38(3), 507-517. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.004 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Strambach, S., & Klement, B. (2013). Exploring plasticity in the development path of the automotive industry in Baden-Württemberg: the role of combinatorial knowledge dynamics. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, 57(1-2), 67-82. doi:10.1515/zfw.2013.0006 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Thomä, J. (2017). DUI mode learning and barriers to innovation—A case from Germany. Research Policy, 46(7), 1327-1339. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.06.004 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Thomä, J., & Zimmermann, V. (2019). Interactive learning — The key to innovation in non-R&D-intensive SMEs? A cluster analysis approach. Journal of Small Business Management, 58(4), 747-776. doi:10.1080/00472778.2019.1671702 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Tödtling, F., Grillitsch, M., & Höglinger, C. (2012). Knowledge Sourcing and Innovation in Austrian ICT Companies—How Does Geography Matter? Industry & Innovation, 19(4), 327-348. doi:10.1080/13662716.2012.694678 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Research Policy, 34(8), 1203-1219. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Trippl, M. (2011). Regional Innovation Systems and Knowledge-Sourcing Activities in Traditional Industries—Evidence from the Vienna Food Sector. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 43(7), 1599-1616. doi:10.1068/a4416 | es_ES |