- -

A critical review of the current research mainstreams and the influencing factors of green total factor productivity

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

A critical review of the current research mainstreams and the influencing factors of green total factor productivity

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Zhang, Jingxiao es_ES
dc.contributor.author Lu, Guanyang es_ES
dc.contributor.author Skitmore, Martin es_ES
dc.contributor.author Ballesteros-Pérez, Pablo es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2022-01-28T07:41:14Z
dc.date.available 2022-01-28T07:41:14Z
dc.date.issued 2021-07 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 0944-1344 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/180330
dc.description.abstract [EN] The current world economy needs to undergo a green transformation. Green total factor productivity provides the basis for judging whether a country or region can attain long-term sustainable development. However, there is little research into the factors that influence green total factor productivity and this has become an obstacle in the transition to a greener economy. On filtering relevant articles and interviews data collected from 2009 to 2019, open decoding, spindle decoding, and selective decoding are carried out to classify research conducted into green total factor productivity. From this analysis, cutting-edge research and knowledge gaps in green total factor productivity are identified. Also, an influencing factor model of green total factor productivity is built. Findings suggest that technical, economic, and government are the three main research streams involved in this transformation process. In particular, technology plays a decisive role, economy plays a guaranteeing role, and government plays a regulatory role. Moreover, the impact of these factors cannot be isolated, as each influence and mediate the other two. Results from this study will help further popularize green total factor productivity and provide a new starting point for reducing energy consumption and environmental pollution. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71301013) and Major Projects of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.71942006-4), and this support is gratefully acknowledged. The fourth author acknowledges the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities for his Ramon y Cajal contract (RYC-2017-22222) co-funded by the European Social Fund. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Springer-Verlag es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Environmental Science and Pollution Research es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Green total factor productivity es_ES
dc.subject Green transformation es_ES
dc.subject Grounded theory es_ES
dc.subject Qualitative research es_ES
dc.subject.classification PROYECTOS DE INGENIERIA es_ES
dc.title A critical review of the current research mainstreams and the influencing factors of green total factor productivity es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s11356-021-14467-4 es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/NSFC//71301013/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/NSFC//71942006-4/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MCIU//RYC-2017-22222//AYUDAS RAMON Y CAJAL/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Proyectos de Ingeniería - Departament de Projectes d'Enginyeria es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Zhang, J.; Lu, G.; Skitmore, M.; Ballesteros-Pérez, P. (2021). A critical review of the current research mainstreams and the influencing factors of green total factor productivity. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 28(27):35392-35405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14467-4 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14467-4 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 35392 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 35405 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 28 es_ES
dc.description.issue 27 es_ES
dc.identifier.pmid 34018106 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\439470 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder European Social Fund es_ES
dc.contributor.funder National Natural Science Foundation of China es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades es_ES
dc.description.references Ahmad M, Khan REA (2019) Does demographic transition with human capital dynamics matter for economic growth? A dynamic panel data approach to GMM. Soc Indic Res 142(2):753–772 es_ES
dc.description.references Ahmed Z, Asghar MM, Malik MN, Nawaz K (2020) Moving towards a sustainable environment: the dynamic linkage between natural resources, human capital, urbanization, economic growth, and ecological footprint in China. Res Policy 67:101677 es_ES
dc.description.references Ali G, Ashraf A, Bashir MK, Cui S (2017) Exploring environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) in relation to green revolution: a case study of Pakistan. Environ Sci Pol 77:166–171 es_ES
dc.description.references Amani N, Valami HB, Ebrahimnejad A (2018) Application of Malmquist productivity index with carry-overs in power industry. Alex Eng J 57(4):3151–3165 es_ES
dc.description.references Amri F (2018) Carbon dioxide emissions, total factor productivity, ICT, trade, financial development, and energy consumption: testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Tunisia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(33):33691–33701 es_ES
dc.description.references Apergis N, Gangopadhyay P (2020) The asymmetric relationships between pollution, energy use and oil prices in vietnam: some behavioural implications for energy policy-making. Energy Policy 140:111430 es_ES
dc.description.references Balezentis T, Blancard S, Shen ZY, Streimikiene D (2020) Analysis of environmental total factor productivity evolution in European agricultural sector. Decis Sci 52(2):483–511 es_ES
dc.description.references Ben Jebli M, Ben Youssef S, Apergis N (2019) The dynamic linkage between renewable energy, tourism, CO2 emissions, economic growth, foreign direct investment, and trade. Lat Am Econ Rev 28:2 es_ES
dc.description.references Cao Y, Liu J, Yu Y, Wei G (2020) Impact of environmental regulation on green growth in China's manufacturing industry-based on the Malmquist-Luenberger index and the system GMM model. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(33):41928–41945 es_ES
dc.description.references Chen CF, Lan QX, Gao M, Sun YW (2018) Green total factor productivity growth and its determinants in China’s industrial economy. Sustainability 10(4):152 es_ES
dc.description.references Cheng ZH, Li LS, Liu J, Zhang HM (2018) Total-factor carbon emission efficiency of China’s provincial industrial sector and its dynamic evolution. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 94:330–339 es_ES
dc.description.references Deng P, Lu H, Hong J, Chen Q, Yang Y (2019) Government R&D subsidies, intellectual property rights protection and innovation. Chin Manag Stud 13(2):363–378 es_ES
dc.description.references Dong YX, Shao S, Zhang Y (2019) Does FDI have energy-saving spillover effect in China? A perspective of energy-biased technical change. J Clean Prod 234:436–450 es_ES
dc.description.references Dong BY, Xu YZ, Fan XM (2020) How to achieve a win-win situation between economic growth and carbon emission reduction: empirical evidence from the perspective of industrial structure upgrading. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(35):43829–43844 es_ES
dc.description.references Du KR, Li JL (2019) Towards a green world: how do green technology innovations affect total-factor carbon productivity. Energy Policy 131:240–250 es_ES
dc.description.references Farhadi M (2015) Transport infrastructure and long-run economic growth in OECD countries. Transp Res A Policy Pract 74:73–90 es_ES
dc.description.references Feng G, Serletis A (2014) Undesirable outputs and a primal Divisia productivity index based on the directional output distance function. J Econ 183(1):135–146 es_ES
dc.description.references Feng C, Wang M, Liu GC, Huang JB (2017) Green development performance and its influencing factors: a global perspective. J Clean Prod 144:323–333 es_ES
dc.description.references Feng YJ, Zhong SY, Li QY, Zhao XM, Dong X (2019) Ecological well-being performance growth in China (1994-2014): from perspectives of industrial structure green adjustment and green total factor productivity. J Clean Prod 236:117556 es_ES
dc.description.references Ge T, Qiu W, Li JY, Hao XL (2020) The impact of environmental regulation efficiency loss on inclusive growth: evidence from China. J Environ Manag 268:110700 es_ES
dc.description.references Ghosal V, Stephan A, Weiss JF (2019) Decentralized environmental regulations and plant-level productivity. Bus Strateg Environ 28(6):998–1011 es_ES
dc.description.references Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine, Chicago es_ES
dc.description.references Hao LN, Umar M, Khan Z, Ali W (2021) Green growth and low carbon emission in G7 countries: how critical the network of environmental taxes, renewable energy and human capital is? Sci Total Environ 752:141853 es_ES
dc.description.references Herzer D, Donaubauer J (2018) The long-run effect of foreign direct investment on total factor productivity in developing countries: a panel cointegration analysis. Empir Econ 54(2):309–342 es_ES
dc.description.references Jiang YQ, Jiang YL, Zheng JH (2020) Investment in infrastructure and regional growth in China. Emerg Mark Financ Trade 56(9):1942–1956 es_ES
dc.description.references Jung SH, Feng T (2020) Government subsidies for green technology development under uncertainty. Eur J Oper Res 286(2):726–739 es_ES
dc.description.references Lei XB, Wu SS (2019) Nonlinear effects of governmental and civil environmental regulation on green total factor productivity in China. Adv Meteorol 2019:8351512 es_ES
dc.description.references Li Q, Gao N (2016) Influence of government and market on the relationship between institutional change and Chinese total factor productivity. In: 2016 International Conference on Industrial Economics System and Industrial Security Engineering (IEIS) 1-6 es_ES
dc.description.references Li TH, Liao GK (2020) The heterogeneous impact of financial development on green total factor productivity. Front Energy Res 8:29 es_ES
dc.description.references Li K, Lin BQ (2017) Economic growth model, structural transformation, and green productivity in China. Appl Energy 187:489–500 es_ES
dc.description.references Lin BQ, Chen ZY (2018) Does factor market distortion inhibit the green total factor productivity in China? J Clean Prod 197:25–33 es_ES
dc.description.references Liu Z, Xin L (2019) Has China’s Belt and Road Initiative promoted its green total factor productivity?– Evidence from primary provinces along the route. Energy Policy 129:360–369 es_ES
dc.description.references Liu J, Murshed M, Chen F, Shahbaz M, Kirikkaleli D, Khan Z (2021) An empirical analysis of the household consumption-induced carbon emissions in China. Sustain Prod Consump 26:943–957 es_ES
dc.description.references Loganathan N, Mursitama TN, Pillai LLK, Khan A, Taha R (2020) The effects of total factor of productivity, natural resources and green taxation on CO2 emissions in Malaysia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(36):45121–45132 es_ES
dc.description.references Lu XH, Jiang X, Gong MQ (2020) How land transfer marketization influence on green total factor productivity from the approach of industrial structure? Evidence from China. Land Use Policy 95:104610 es_ES
dc.description.references Männasoo K, Hein H, Ruubel R (2018) The contributions of human capital, R&D spending and convergence to total factor productivity growth. Reg Stud 52(12):1598–1611 es_ES
dc.description.references Martinez-Zarzoso I, Bengochea-Morancho A, Morales-Loge R (2019) Does environmental policy stringency foster innovation and productivity in OECD countries? Energy Policy 134:110982 es_ES
dc.description.references Murshed M (2019) Are trade liberalization policies aligned with renewable energy transition in low and middle income countries? An instrumental variable approach. Renew Energy S0960-1481(19):31799–31799 es_ES
dc.description.references Murshed M (2020) An empirical analysis of the non-linear impacts of ICT-trade openness on renewable energy transition, energy efficiency, clean cooking fuel access and environmental sustainability in South Asia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:36254–36281 es_ES
dc.description.references Murshed M (2021) Can regional trade integration facilitate renewable energy transition to ensure energy sustainability in South Asia? Energy Rep 7:808–821 es_ES
dc.description.references Murshed M, Alam MS (2021) Estimating the macroeconomic determinants of total, renewable, and non-renewable energy demands in Bangladesh: the role of technological innovations. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12516-6 es_ES
dc.description.references Murshed M, Tanha MM (2020) Oil price shocks and renewable energy transition: empirical evidence from net oil-importing South Asian economies. Energ Ecol Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40974-020-00168-0 es_ES
dc.description.references Murshed U, Dogan B, Sinha A, Fareed Z (2021) Does Export product diversification help to reduce energy demand: exploring the contextual evidences from the newly industrialized countries. Energy 214:118881 es_ES
dc.description.references Naz S, Sultan R, Zaman K, Aldakhil AM, Nassani AA, Abro MMQ (2019) Moderating and mediating role of renewable energy consumption, FDI inflows, and economic growth on carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from robust least square estimator. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(3):2806–2819 es_ES
dc.description.references Paramati SR, Apergis N, Ummalla M (2017) Dynamics of renewable energy consumption and economic activities across the agriculture, industry, and service sectors: evidence in the perspective of sustainable development. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(2):1375–1387 es_ES
dc.description.references Rath BN, Akram V, Bal DP, Mahalik MK (2019) Do fossil fuel and renewable energy consumption affect total factor productivity growth? Evidence from cross-country data with policy insights. Energy Policy 127:186–199 es_ES
dc.description.references Saito Y (2018) On the trade, growth, and welfare effects of intellectual property rights protection. South Econ J 85(1):235–254 es_ES
dc.description.references Shahzad U, Lv Y, Doğan B (2020) Unveiling the heterogeneous impacts of export product diversification on renewable energy consumption: new evidence from G-7 and E-7 countries. Renew Energy 164:1457–1470 es_ES
dc.description.references Shahzad U, Doğan B, Sinha A, Fareed Z (2021) Does Export product diversification help to reduce energy demand: exploring the contextual evidences from the newly industrialized countries. Energy 214:118881 es_ES
dc.description.references Shao SA, Luan RR, Yang ZB, Li CY (2016) Does directed technological change get greener: empirical evidence from Shanghai's industrial green development transformation. Ecol Indic 69:758–770 es_ES
dc.description.references Shen XB, Lin BQ, Wu W (2019) R&D Efforts, Total factor productivity, and the energy intensity in China. Emerg Mark Financ Trade 55(11):2566–2588 es_ES
dc.description.references Song M, Li H (2019) Total factor productivity and the factors of green industry in Shanxi Province. China. Growth Change 51(1):488–504 es_ES
dc.description.references Song ML, Wang SH, Sun J (2018) Environmental regulations, staff quality, green technology, R&D efficiency, and profit in manufacturing. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 133:1–14 es_ES
dc.description.references Song Y, Yang TT, Li ZR, Zhang X, Zhang M (2020) Research on the direct and indirect effects of environmental regulation on environmental pollution: empirical evidence from 253 prefecture-level cities in China. J Clean Prod 269:122425 es_ES
dc.description.references Wang SJ (2017) Impact of FDI on energy efficiency: an analysis of the regional discrepancies in China. Nat Hazards 85(2):1209–1222 es_ES
dc.description.references Wang M, Feng C (2019) Technological gap, scale economy, and China’s industrial energy demand. J Clean Prod 236:117618 es_ES
dc.description.references Wang KL, Pang SQ, Ding LL, Miao Z (2020) Combining the biennial Malmquist-Luenberger index and panel quantile regression to analyze the green total factor productivity of the industrial sector in China. Sci Total Environ 739:140280 es_ES
dc.description.references WHO (2018) Clean Air For Health: Geneva Action Agenda. In 2018 the first World Health Organization (WHO) Global Conference on Air Pollution and Health. https://www.who.int/news/item/01-11-2018-clean-air-for-health-geneva-action-agenda es_ES
dc.description.references World Bank (2015) World Development Indicators2015. World Bank Publications. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/21634 es_ES
dc.description.references Wu HT, Li YW, Hao Y, Ren SY, Zhang PF (2020) Environmental decentralization, local government competition, and regional green development: evidence from China. Sci Total Environ 708:135085 es_ES
dc.description.references Xie F, Zhang B (2020) Impact of China’s outward foreign direct investment on green total factor productivity in “Belt and Road” participating countries: a perspective of institutional distance. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(4):4704–4715 es_ES
dc.description.references Xu QQ, Wang L, Zhu Y (2019) The effect of OFDI intensity on TFP: the moderating role of R&D. Transform Bus Econ 18(3C):381–393 es_ES
dc.description.references Yang ZB, Shao S, Yang LL, Miao Z (2018) Improvement pathway of energy consumption structure in China’s industrial sector: from the perspective of directed technical change. Energy Econ 72:166–176 es_ES
dc.description.references Yang XZ, Zhang ZF, Luo W, Tang Z, Gao X, Wan ZC, Zhang X (2019) The impact of government role on high-quality innovation development in mainland China. Sustainability 11(20):5780 es_ES
dc.description.references You DM, Zhang Y, Yuan BL (2019) Environmental regulation and firm eco-innovation: evidence of moderating effects of fiscal decentralization and political competition from listed Chinese industrial companies. J Clean Prod 207:1072–1083 es_ES
dc.description.references Yuan BL, Xiang QL (2018) Environmental regulation, industrial innovation and green development of Chinese manufacturing: based on an extended CDM model. J Clean Prod 176:895–908 es_ES
dc.description.references Zhang SP (2015) Evaluating the method of total factor productivity growth and analysis of its influencing factors during the economic transitional period in China. J Clean Prod 107:438–444 es_ES
dc.description.references Zhang YJ, Liu Z, Zhang H, Tan TD (2014) The impact of economic growth, industrial structure and urbanization on carbon emission intensity in China. Nat Hazards 73(2):579–595 es_ES
dc.description.references Zhang Q, Yan FH, Li K, Ai HS (2019) Impact of market misallocations on green TFP: evidence from countries along the Belt and Road. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(34):35034–35048 es_ES
dc.description.references Zhang ZY, Ma XJ, Lian XY, Guo YS, Song YQ, Chang BS, Luo LQ (2020) Research on the relationship between China’s greenhouse gas emissions and industrial structure and economic growth from the perspective of energy consumption. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(33):41839–41855 es_ES
dc.description.references Zhu X, Chen Y, Feng C (2018) Green total factor productivity of China’s mining and quarrying industry: A global data envelopment analysis. Res Policy 57:1–9 es_ES
dc.subject.ods 09.- Desarrollar infraestructuras resilientes, promover la industrialización inclusiva y sostenible, y fomentar la innovación es_ES
dc.subject.ods 10.- Reducir las desigualdades entre países y dentro de ellos es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem