- -

Multivariate Analysis and Classification of 146 Odor Character Descriptors

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Multivariate Analysis and Classification of 146 Odor Character Descriptors

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Zarzo Castelló, Manuel es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2022-05-09T18:04:38Z
dc.date.available 2022-05-09T18:04:38Z
dc.date.issued 2021-10 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 1936-5802 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/182443
dc.description.abstract [EN] Introduction: Smells can be described by assigning the words that come to mind when sniffing an odorous material. A great number of terms can be applied, but not all of them are independent, and it is possible to establish groups of words often applied together when describing a smell. Such classification of olfactory descriptors is of scientific interest in order to better understand the dimensionality and structure of human olfactory perception space. For this purpose, compilations of olfactory profiles contain valuable information that may lead to certain consensus in odor classification. Methods: One of the most comprehensive odor databases is the Dravnieks¿ Atlas, which contains quantitative olfactory profiles for 160 samples. For each one, a large panel rated the applicability of 146 odor character descriptors on a numeric scale. Results: By applying principal component analysis to this Atlas, 105 descriptors were reorganized in 24 classes, and 33 attributes were considered as odors intermediate of two or three categories. The similarities between classes were studied by means of a further multivariate analysis based on latent variables, which provides valuable information about the most salient dimensions of odor space. Conclusions: Consistent with other reported statistical analyses of olfactory databases, the perceptual space of odor character is multidimensional with about 20¿30 dimensions, and it is better described as a continuum spectrum rather than as a segmented space. Implications: Attempts to classify all possible odor descriptors in a restricted number of classes appear to be inappropriate. Instead, 24 categories of related terms are proposed here, regarding the rest as intermediate smells, assuming that olfactory classes are not independent and follow certain hierarchy according to particular underlying dimensions. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship Partial financial support was received from the Spanish Ministry or Education and Science under grant no. FU2004-1119. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Springer-Verlag es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Chemosensory Perception es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Odor classification es_ES
dc.subject Sensory analysis es_ES
dc.subject Olfactory psychophysics es_ES
dc.subject.classification ESTADISTICA E INVESTIGACION OPERATIVA es_ES
dc.title Multivariate Analysis and Classification of 146 Odor Character Descriptors es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s12078-021-09288-1 es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN//IDI-20111190/ES/SISTEMA INTEGRADO PARA TRATAMIENTO DE ÁREAS CONTAMINADAS/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MEC//FU2004-1119/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Estadística e Investigación Operativa Aplicadas y Calidad - Departament d'Estadística i Investigació Operativa Aplicades i Qualitat es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Zarzo Castelló, M. (2021). Multivariate Analysis and Classification of 146 Odor Character Descriptors. Chemosensory Perception. 14(2):79-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-021-09288-1 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-021-09288-1 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 79 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 101 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 14 es_ES
dc.description.issue 2 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\446882 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación es_ES
dc.description.references Abe H, Kanaya S, Komukai T et al (1990) Systemization of semantic descriptions of odors. Anal Chim Acta 239:73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(00)83837-4 es_ES
dc.description.references Amoore J E (1962) The stereochemical theory of olfaction. I. Identification of seven primary odours. Proc Sci Sect Toilet Goods Assoc 37(suppl):1–13 es_ES
dc.description.references Amoore JE, Venstrom D (1967) Correlations between stereochemical assessments and organoleptic analysis of odorous compounds. In: Hayashi T (ed) Olfaction and taste II. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 3–17 es_ES
dc.description.references Arctander S (1969) Perfume and flavor chemicals (aroma chemicals), Vol. I and II. Arctander S publisher, Montclair, NJ es_ES
dc.description.references Boelens H, Haring HG (1981) Molecular structure and olfactive quality [Internal report]. Naarden International, Bussum, The Netherlands es_ES
dc.description.references Brud WS (1986) Words versus odours: how perfumers communicate. Perf Flavor 11:27–44 es_ES
dc.description.references Burdock GA (ed) (2004) Fenaroli’s handbook of flavor ingredients, 5th edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL es_ES
dc.description.references Callegari P, Rouault J, Laffort P (1997) Olfactory quality: from descriptor profiles to similarities. Chem Senses 22:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/22.1.1 es_ES
dc.description.references Castro JB, Ramanathan A, Chennubhotla CS (2013) Categorical dimensions of human odor descriptor space revealed by non-negative matrix factorization. PLoS ONE 8:e73289. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073289 es_ES
dc.description.references Cerbelaud R (1951) Formulaire de parfumerie. Opera, Paris es_ES
dc.description.references Chastrette M, Elmouaffek A, Sauvegrain P (1988) A multidimensional statistical study of similarities between 74 notes used in perfumery. Chem Senses 13:295–305. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/13.2.295 es_ES
dc.description.references Chastrette M, de Saint Laumer JY, Sauvegrain P (1991) Analysis of a system of description of odors by means of four different multivariate statistical methods. Chem Senses 16:81–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/16.1.81 es_ES
dc.description.references Coxon JM, Gregson RAM, Paddick RG (1978) Multidimensional scaling of perceived odour of bicyclo[2.2.1]heptane, 1,7,7-trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptane and cyclohexane derivatives. Chem Senses 3:431–441. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/3.4.431 es_ES
dc.description.references Crocker EC, Henderson LF (1927) Analysis and classification of odours: an effort to develop a workable method. Amer Perf Essent Oil Rev 22:325–356 es_ES
dc.description.references Davis RG (1979) Olfactory perceptual space models compared by quantitative methods. Chem Senses 4:21–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/4.1.21 es_ES
dc.description.references Dravnieks A (1982) Odor quality: semantically generated multidimensional profiles are stable. Science 218:799–801. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7134974 es_ES
dc.description.references Dravnieks A (1985) Atlas of odor character profiles, data Series DS 61. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia. https://doi.org/10.1520/DS61-EB es_ES
dc.description.references Dravnieks A, Bock FC, Powers JJ et al (1978) Comparison of odors directly and through profiling. Chem Senses 3:191–225. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/3.2.191 es_ES
dc.description.references Dravnieks A, Masurat T, Lamm RA (1984) Hedonics of odors and odor descriptors. J Air Pollut Control Assoc 34:752–755. https://doi.org/10.1080/00022470.1984.10465810 es_ES
dc.description.references Ennis DM, Boelens H, Haring H et al (1982) Multivariate analysis in sensory evaluation. Food Technol 36:83–90 es_ES
dc.description.references Harper R, Bate-Smith EC, Land DG (1968a) Odour description and odour classification: a multidisciplinary examination. Elsevier, New York es_ES
dc.description.references Harper R, Bate-Smith EC, Land DG et al (1968b) A glossary of odour stimuli and their qualities. Perf Essent Oil Rec 59:22–37 es_ES
dc.description.references Henning H (1916) Der geruch. Barth, Leipzig, Germany es_ES
dc.description.references Jaubert JN, Gordon G, Doré JC (1986) Classification of odours and their sensorial perception. Quintessenza 5:27–42 es_ES
dc.description.references Jaubert JN, Gordon G, Doré JC (1987) Une organisation du champ des odeurs. II. Modèle descriptif de l’organisation de l’espace odorant. Parfum Cosmét Arômes 78:71–82 es_ES
dc.description.references Jeltema MA, Southwick EW (1986) Evaluation and applications of odor profiling. J Sensory Stud 1:123–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.1986.tb00165.x es_ES
dc.description.references Jennings-White C (1984) Human Primary Odors Perfum Flavor 9:46–58 es_ES
dc.description.references Kaeppler K, Mueller F (2013) Odor classification: a review of factors influencing perception-based odor arrangements. Chem Senses 38:189–209. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjs141 es_ES
dc.description.references Keller A, Vosshall LB (2004) Human olfactory psychophysics. Current Biol 14:875–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.09.066 es_ES
dc.description.references Keller A, Vosshall LB (2016) Olfactory perception of chemically diverse molecules. BMC Neurosci 17:55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-016-0287-2 es_ES
dc.description.references Khan RM, Luk CH, Flinker A et al (2007) Predicting odor pleasantness from odorant structure: pleasantness as a reflection of the physical world. J Neurosci 27:10015–10023. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1158-07.2007 es_ES
dc.description.references Klein S (1947) Primary odour element classification. Amer Perfum Essent Oil Rev 50:453–454 es_ES
dc.description.references Koulakov AA, Kolterman BE, Enikolopov AG et al (2011) In search of the structure of human olfactory space. Front Syst Neurosci 5:1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2011.00065 es_ES
dc.description.references Kumar R, Kaur R, Auffarth B et al (2015) Understanding the odour spaces: a step towards solving olfactory stimulus-percept problem. PLoS ONE 10:e0141263. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141263 es_ES
dc.description.references Licon CC, Manesse C, Dantec M et al (2018) Pleasantness and trigeminal sensations as salient dimensions in organizing the semantic and physiological spaces of odors. Sci Rep 8:8444. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26510-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Linnaeus C (1756) Odores medicamentorum. In: Amoenitates academicae, Vol. 3. Lars Salvius, Stockholm, pp 183–201 es_ES
dc.description.references Lovell JH (1923) Classification of flower odours. Amer Bee J 63:392–394 es_ES
dc.description.references Madany-Mamlouk A, Martinetz T (2004) On the dimensions of the olfactory perception space. Neurocomput 58–60:1019–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2004.01.161 es_ES
dc.description.references Madany-Mamlouk A, Chee-Ruiter C, Hofmann UG et al (2003) Quantifying olfactory perception: mapping olfactory perception space by using multidimensional scaling and self-organizing maps. Neurocomput 52–54:591–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-2312(02)00805-6 es_ES
dc.description.references Martínez-Mayorga K, Peppard TL, Yongye AB et al (2011) Characterization of a comprehensive flavor database. J Chemom 25:550–560. https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.1399 es_ES
dc.description.references Meister M (2015) On the dimensionality of odor space. Elife 4:e07865. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.07865.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Moskowitz HR, Gerbers CL (1974) Dimensional salience of odors. Ann NY Acad Sci 237:1–16 es_ES
dc.description.references Pintore M, Wechman C, Sicard G et al (2006) Comparing the information content of two large olfactory databases. J Chem Inf Model 46:32–38. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci0502505 es_ES
dc.description.references Randebrock RE (1985) Geruch und konstitution. Eine beweisführung für die molekulartheorie des geruches. I: Eine objektivierbare sprache für den geruch. Parfüm Kosmet 66:435–443 es_ES
dc.description.references Ravia A, Snitz K, Honigstein D, Finkel M, Zirler R, Perl O, Secundo L, Laudamiel C, Harel D, Sobel N (2020) A measure of smell enables the creation of olfactory metamers. Nature 588:118–123. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2891-7 es_ES
dc.description.references Rimmel E (1895) The base of perfumes. London. (French translation 1990, Le livre des parfums. Les éditions 1900, Paris) es_ES
dc.description.references Schiffman SS (1974) Physicochemical correlates of olfactory quality. Science 185:112–117. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4146.112 es_ES
dc.description.references Schutz HG (1964) A matching-standards method for characterizing odor qualities. Ann NY Acad Sci 116:517–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1964.tb45081.x es_ES
dc.description.references Secundo L, Snitz K, Sobel N (2014) The perceptual logic of smell. Curr Opin Neurobiol 25:107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2013.12.010 es_ES
dc.description.references Sell CS (2004) Scent through the looking glass. Chem Biodivers 1:1899–1920. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.200490146 es_ES
dc.description.references Sigma–Aldrich Fine Chemicals Company (2005) Flavors and fragrances 2005–2006 catalog. Author, Milwaukee, WI es_ES
dc.description.references Stevenson RJ, Boakes RA (2003) A mnemonic theory of odor perception. Psychol Rev 110:340–364. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.340 es_ES
dc.description.references Tromelin A, Chabanet C, Audouze K et al (2017) Multivariate statistical analysis of a large odorants database aimed at revealing similarities and links between odorants and odors. Flav Fragr J 33:106–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/ffj.3430 es_ES
dc.description.references Urdapilleta I, Giboreau A, Manetta C et al (2006) The mental context for the description of odors: a semantic space. Eur Rev Appl Psychol 56:261–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2005.09.013 es_ES
dc.description.references von Haller A (1763) Classes odorum. In: Elementa physiologiae, Vol. 5. Grasset, Lausanne, pp 162–168 es_ES
dc.description.references Willis JH (1944) Flower perfumes and their classification. Victorian Naturalist 61:131–136 es_ES
dc.description.references Wise PM, Olsson MJ, Cain WS (2000) Quantification of odor quality. Chem Senses 25:429–443. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/25.4.429 es_ES
dc.description.references Wright RH, Michels KM (1964) Evaluation of far infrared relation to odors by a standard similarity method. Ann NY Acad Sci 116:535–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1964.tb45083.x es_ES
dc.description.references Woskow MH (1968) Multidimensional scaling of odors. In Tanyolac, N. (ed.), Theories of odors and odor measurement. Robert College Research Center, Istanbul, pp 147–188 es_ES
dc.description.references Yoshida M (1975) Psychometric classification of odors. Chem Senses 1:443–464. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/1.4.443 es_ES
dc.description.references Zarzo M (2008) Psychologic dimensions in the perception of everyday odors: pleasantness and edibility. J Sensory Stud 23:354–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.2008.00160.x es_ES
dc.description.references Zarzo M (2011) Hedonic judgments of chemical compounds are correlated with molecular size. Sensors 11:3667–3686. https://doi.org/10.3390/s110403667 es_ES
dc.description.references Zarzo M (2013) What is a fresh scent in perfumery? Perceptual freshness is correlated with substantivity. Sensors 13:463–483. https://doi.org/10.3390/s130100463 es_ES
dc.description.references Zarzo M, Stanton DT (2006) Identification of latent variables in a semantic odor profile database using principal component analysis. Chem Senses 31:713–724. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjl013 es_ES
dc.description.references Zarzo M, Stanton DT (2009) Understanding the underlying dimensions in perfumers’ odor perception space as a basis for developing meaningful odor maps. Atten Percept Psychophys 71:225–247. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.2.225 es_ES
dc.description.references Zwaardemaker H (1925) Classification des odeurs. L’odorat. Doin, Paris, pp 178–224 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem