- -

A conceptual model of the social-ecological system of nature-based solutions in urban environments

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

A conceptual model of the social-ecological system of nature-based solutions in urban environments

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: TzoulasGalanVenn - ...
Tamaño: 407.8Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Tzoulas, Konstantinos es_ES
dc.contributor.author Galan, Juanjo es_ES
dc.contributor.author Venn, Stephen es_ES
dc.contributor.author Dennis, Matthew es_ES
dc.contributor.author Pedroli, Bas es_ES
dc.contributor.author Mishra, Himansu es_ES
dc.contributor.author Haase, Dagmar es_ES
dc.contributor.author Pauleit, Stephan es_ES
dc.contributor.author Niemela, Jari es_ES
dc.contributor.author James, Philip es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2022-05-10T18:07:15Z
dc.date.available 2022-05-10T18:07:15Z
dc.date.issued 2021-02 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 0044-7447 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/182488
dc.description.abstract [EN] This article provides a perspective on nature-based solutions. First, the argument is developed that nature-based solutions integrate social and ecological systems. Then, theoretical considerations relating to relational values, multifunctionality, transdisciplinarity, and polycentric governance are briefly outlined. Finally, a conceptual model of the social¿ecological system of nature-based solutions is synthesised and presented. This conceptual model comprehensively defines the social and ecological external and internal systems that make up nature-based solutions, and identifies theoretical considerations that need to be addressed at different stages of their planning and implementation The model bridges the normative gaps of existing nature-based solution frameworks and could be used for consistent, comprehensive, and transferable comparisons internationally. The theoretical considerations addressed in this article inform practitioners, policymakers, and researchers about the essential components of nature-based solutions. The conceptual model can facilitate the identification of social and ecological interconnections within nature-based solutions and the range of stakeholders and disciplines involved. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship The authors would like to thank the Aalto Seed Funding, Aalto University, for the financial support in organising a co-authors workshop for the development of this perspective paper. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Springer-Verlag es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof AMBIO es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Multifunctionality es_ES
dc.subject Polycentric governance es_ES
dc.subject Relational values es_ES
dc.subject Sustainable urban planning es_ES
dc.subject Transdisciplinarity es_ES
dc.subject.classification URBANISTICA Y ORDENACION DEL TERRITORIO es_ES
dc.title A conceptual model of the social-ecological system of nature-based solutions in urban environments es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s13280-020-01380-2 es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Urbanismo - Departament d'Urbanisme es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Tzoulas, K.; Galan, J.; Venn, S.; Dennis, M.; Pedroli, B.; Mishra, H.; Haase, D.... (2021). A conceptual model of the social-ecological system of nature-based solutions in urban environments. AMBIO. 50(2):335-345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01380-2 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01380-2 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 335 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 345 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 50 es_ES
dc.description.issue 2 es_ES
dc.identifier.pmid 32915446 es_ES
dc.identifier.pmcid PMC7782638 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\462238 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Aalto-Yliopisto es_ES
dc.description.references Andersson, E., S. Borgström, and T. McPhearson. 2017. Double insurance in dealing with extremes: Ecological and social factors for making nature-based solutions. In Nature-based solutions to climate change adaptation in urban areas, theory and practice of urban sustainability transition, ed. N. Kabisch, H. Korn, and J. Stadler, 51–64. Bonn: Springer. es_ES
dc.description.references Balian, E., H. Eggermont, and X. Le Roux. 2014. Outputs of the strategic foresight workshop “nature-based solutions in a BiodivERsA context”. Brussels: BiodivERsA Workshop Report. es_ES
dc.description.references Bodin, Ö. 2017. Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems. Science 357: 1114. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan1114. es_ES
dc.description.references Brandt, P., A. Ernst, F. Gralla, C. Luederitz, D. Lang, J. Newig, F. Reinert, D. Abson, and H. Wehrden. 2013. A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science. Ecological Economics 92: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.008. es_ES
dc.description.references Brink, E., T. Aalders, D. Ádám, R. Feller, Y. Henselek, A. Hoffmann, K. Ibe, A. Matthey-Doret, et al. 2016. Cascades of green: A review of ecosystem-based adaptation in urban areas. Global Environmental Change 36: 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.11.003. es_ES
dc.description.references Buijs, A., T. Mattijssen, A. van der Jagt, B. Ambrose-Oji, E. Andersson, B. Elands, and M. Steen Møller. 2016. Active citizenship for urban green infrastructure: Fostering the diversity and dynamics of citizen contributions through mosaic governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 22: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.002. es_ES
dc.description.references Carlisle, K., and R. Gruby. 2019. Polycentric systems of governance: A theoretical model for the commons. Policy Studies Journal 47: 927–952. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12212. es_ES
dc.description.references CBD. 2009. Connecting biodiversity and climate change mitigation and adaptation: Report of the second ad hoc technical expert group on biodiversity and climate change. Technical Series No. 41, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Canada. ISBN: 92-9225-134-1. es_ES
dc.description.references Chan, K., P. Balvanera, K. Benessaiah, M. Chapman, S. Díaz, E. Gómez-Baggethun, R. Gould, N. Hannahs, et al. 2016. Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. PNAS 113: 1462–1465. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525002113. es_ES
dc.description.references Cohen-Shacham, E., G. Walters, C. Janzen, and S. Maginnis (eds.). 2016. Nature-based solutions to address global societal challenges. Gland: International Union for Conservation of Nature. ISBN 978-2-8317-1812-5. es_ES
dc.description.references Cohen-Shacham, E., A. Andrade, J. Dalton, N. Dudley, M. Jones, C. Kumar, S. Maginnis, S. Maynard, et al. 2019. Core principles for successfully implementing and upscaling nature-based solutions. Environmental Science & Policy 98: 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.04.014. es_ES
dc.description.references Colding, J., Å. Gren, and S. Barthel. 2020. The incremental demise of urban green spaces. Land 9: 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9050162. es_ES
dc.description.references Díaz, S., S. Demissew, J. Carabias, C. Joly, M. Lonsdale, N. Ash, A. Larigauderie, J.R. Adhikari, et al. 2015. The IPBES conceptual framework—Connecting nature and people. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002. es_ES
dc.description.references Dudley, N., S. Stolton, A. Belokurov, L. Krueger, N. Lopoukhine, K. MacKinnon, T. Sandwith, and N. Sekhran (eds.). 2010. Natural solutions: Protected areas helping people cope with climate change, IUCN, WCPA, TNC, UNDP, WCS, The World Bank, WWF, Gland, Switzerland, Washington DC. ISBN: 978-2-88085-308-2. es_ES
dc.description.references Dustin, D., K. Bricker, and K. Schwab. 2010. People and nature: Toward an ecological model of health promotion. Leisure Sciences 32: 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400903430772. es_ES
dc.description.references EC. 2015. Towards an EU research and innovation policy agenda for nature-based solutions & re-naturing cities. Brussels: European Commission. es_ES
dc.description.references Eggermont, H., E. Balian, J. Azevedo, V. Beumer, T. Brodin, J. Claudet, B. Fady, M. Grube, et al. 2015. Nature-based solutions: New influence for environmental management and research in Europe. GAIA 24: 243–248. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.24.4.9. es_ES
dc.description.references Escobedo, F., V. Giannico, C. Jim, G. Sanesi, and R. Lafortezza. 2018. Urban forests, ecosystem services, green infrastructure and nature-based solutions: Nexus or evolving metaphors. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 37: 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.02.011. es_ES
dc.description.references Faivre, N., M. Fritz, T. Freitas, B. de Boissezon, and S. Vandewoestijne. 2017. Nature-based solutions in the EU: Innovating with nature to address social, economic and environmental challenges. Environmental Research 159: 509–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.032. es_ES
dc.description.references Fletcher, R. 2012. Orchestrating consent: Post-politics and intensification of nature TM Inc. at the 2012 World Conservation Congress. Conservation and Society 12: 329–342. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.145167. es_ES
dc.description.references Heymans, A., J. Breadsell, G.M. Morrison, J.J. Byrne, and C. Eon. 2019. Ecological urban planning and design: A systematic literature review. Sustainability 11: 3723. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133723. es_ES
dc.description.references Hoornweg, D., M. Hosseini, C. Kennedy, and A. Behdadi. 2016. An urban approach to planetary boundaries. Ambio 45: 567–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0764-y. es_ES
dc.description.references IUCN. 2009a. Ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA), position paper, fifteenth session of the conference of the parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP15) 7th–18th December, 2009. Copenhagen: Denmark. es_ES
dc.description.references IUCN. 2009b. No time to lose—Make full use of nature-based solutions in the post-2012 climate change regime, position paper, fifteenth session of the conference of the parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP15) 7th–18th December, 2009. Copenhagen: Denmark. es_ES
dc.description.references IUCN. 2012. The IUCN Programme 2013–2016, adopted by the IUCN World Conservation Congress, September 2012. Gland: International Union for Conservation of Nature. es_ES
dc.description.references Kabisch, N., N. Frantzeskaki, S. Pauleit, S. Naumann, M. Davis, M. Artmann, D. Haase, S. Knapp, et al. 2016. Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas—Perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers and opportunities for action. Ecology and Society 21: 39. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08373-210239. es_ES
dc.description.references Kronenberg, J. 2015. Betting against human ingenuity: The perils of the economic valuation of nature’s services. BioScience 65: 1096–1099. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biv135. es_ES
dc.description.references Lafortezza, R., J. Chen, C. Konijnendijk van den Bosch, and T. Randrup. 2018. Nature-based solutions for resilient landscapes and cities. Environmental Research 165: 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.11.038. es_ES
dc.description.references MacKinnon, K., and V. Hickey. 2009. Nature-based solutions to climate change. Oryx 43: 15–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605308431046. es_ES
dc.description.references MacKinnon, K., N. Dudley, and T. Sandwith. 2011. Natural solutions: Protected areas helping people to cope with climate change. Oryx 45: 461–462. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605311001608. es_ES
dc.description.references Maes, J., and S. Jacobs. 2017. Nature-based solutions for Europe’s sustainable development. Conservation Letters 10: 121–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12216. es_ES
dc.description.references Nesshöver, C., T. Assmuth, K. Irvine, G. Rusch, K. Waylen, B. Delbaere, D. Haase, L. Jones-Walters, et al. 2017. The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions: An interdisciplinary perspective. Science Total Environment 579: 1215–1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.106. es_ES
dc.description.references Nicolescu, B. 2014. Methodology of transdisciplinarity. World Futures 70: 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2014.934631. es_ES
dc.description.references Pascual, U., P. Balvanera, S. Díaz, G. Pataki, E. Roth, M. Stenseke, R.T. Watson, E.B. Dessane, et al. 2017. Valuing nature’s contributions to people: The IPBES approach. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 26: 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006. es_ES
dc.description.references Pauleit, S., T. Zölch, R. Hansen, T. Randrup, and C.K. van den Bosch. 2017. Nature-based solutions and climate change—Four shades of green. In Nature-based solutions to climate change adaptation in urban areas, ed. N. Kabisch, H. Korn, J. Stadler, and A. Bonn. Cham: Springer. es_ES
dc.description.references Poland, B., G. Krupa, and D. McCall. 2009. Settings for health promotion: An analytic framework to guide intervention design and implementation. Health Promotion Practice 10: 505–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839909341025. es_ES
dc.description.references Potschin, M., C. Kretsch, R. Haines-Young, E. Furman, P. Berry, and F. Baró. 2016. Nature-based solutions. In: OpenNESS ecosystem services reference book. ed M. Potschin, K. Jax. EC FP7 Grant Agreement no. 308428. es_ES
dc.description.references Scheuer, S., D. Haase, and V. Meyer. 2012. Spatial explicit multi criteria flood risk—Fundamentals and semantics of multi criteria flood risk assessment. In Flood risk and flood management, ed. T.S.W. Wong, 1–34. Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers. es_ES
dc.description.references Tzoulas, K., K. Korpela, S. Venn, V. Yli-Pelkonen, A. Kaźmierczak, J. Niemela, and P. James. 2007. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: A literature review. Landscape and Urban Planning 81: 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001. es_ES
dc.description.references WB. 2008. Biodiversity, climate change, and adaptation: Nature-based solutions from the World Bank Portfolio, Report No. 46726, The World Bank, Washington DC, USA. es_ES
dc.description.references Whitehead, M., and G. Dahlgren. 1991. What can be done about inequalities in health? The Lancet 338: 1059–1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(91)91911-D. es_ES
dc.description.references Zölch, T., L. Henze, P. Keilholz, and S. Pauleit. 2017. Regulating urban surface runoff through nature-based solutions—An assessment at the micro-scale. Environmental Research 157: 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.023. es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem