- -

A systematic mapping review of European Political Science

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

A systematic mapping review of European Political Science

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: MasGarciaNieto-Aleman ...
Tamaño: 820.8Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión del Autor.
Abrir
[Cerrado]
Nombre: Mas-Verdu2021_Art ...
Tamaño: 1.171Mb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Solicitar una copia al autor
dc.contributor.author Mas Verdú, Francisco es_ES
dc.contributor.author García Alvarez-Coque, José María es_ES
dc.contributor.author Nieto-Alemán, Paula Andrea es_ES
dc.contributor.author Roig-Tierno, Norat es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2022-07-26T18:07:34Z
dc.date.available 2022-07-26T18:07:34Z
dc.date.issued 2021-03 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 1680-4333 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/184808
dc.description.abstract [EN] European Political Science (EPS) has been a leading political science journal since its launch in 2001. This article examines the contribution of European Political Science over its 20-year history. The bibliometric analysis draws on Web of Science data and VOSviewer software. These tools help detect collaboration networks, bibliographic coupling and co-citations to identify the most relevant topics and knowledge appearing in European Political Science. The evaluation of EPS reveals four areas of interest: migration, education, comparative politics and democracy. Recent interests include the current debate on populisms, social media and political parties, with antecedents and implications that transcend national boundaries. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship This research benefitted from: (i) grants RTI2018-093791-B-C21 and RTI2018-093791-B-C22 funded by Ministry of Science and Innovation and ERDF. (ii) GV063/19 by Generalitat Valenciana. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Palgrave Macmillan es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof European Political Science es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Bibliometrics es_ES
dc.subject Political science es_ES
dc.subject Vosviewer es_ES
dc.subject Web of science es_ES
dc.subject.classification ECONOMIA APLICADA es_ES
dc.title A systematic mapping review of European Political Science es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1057/s41304-021-00320-2 es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020/RTI2018-093791-B-C21/ES/FORTALECIMIENTO DEL SISTEMA DE INNOVACION AGROALIMENTARIA A LO LARGO DE LA CADENA DE VALOR/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/GVA//GV063%2F19/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020/RTI2018-093791-B-C22/ES/FORTALECIENDO LAS POLITICAS DE INNOVACION EN EL SECTOR AGROALIMENTARIO/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Economía y Ciencias Sociales - Departament d'Economia i Ciències Socials es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Mas Verdú, F.; García Alvarez-Coque, JM.; Nieto-Alemán, PA.; Roig-Tierno, N. (2021). A systematic mapping review of European Political Science. European Political Science. 20(1):85-104. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-021-00320-2 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-021-00320-2 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 85 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 104 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 20 es_ES
dc.description.issue 1 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\430419 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Generalitat Valenciana es_ES
dc.contributor.funder AGENCIA ESTATAL DE INVESTIGACION es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Agencia Estatal de Investigación es_ES
dc.contributor.funder European Regional Development Fund es_ES
dc.description.references Ahn, M., and S. Bretschneider. 2011. Politics of E-Government: E-Government and the Political Control of Bureaucracy. Public Administration Review 71 (3): 414–424. es_ES
dc.description.references Bach, T., G. Hammerschmid, and L. Löffler. 2020. More Delegation, More Political Control? Politicization of Senior-Level Appointments in 18 European Countries. Public Policy and Administration 35 (1): 3–23. es_ES
dc.description.references Bates, S., and H. Savigny. 2015. Introduction: Women in European Political Science. European Political Science 14 (2): 75–78. es_ES
dc.description.references Bates, S., L. Jenkins, and Z. Pflaeger. 2012. Women in the Profession: The Composition of UK Political Science Departments by Sex. Politics 32 (3): 139–152. es_ES
dc.description.references Bobba, G. 2019. Social Media Populism: Features and ‘Likeability’ of Lega Nord Communication on Facebook. European Political Science 18 (1): 11–23. es_ES
dc.description.references Bornmann, L., and R. Mutz. 2015. Growth Rates of Modern Science: A Bibliometric Analysis Based on the Number of Publications and Cited References. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66 (11): 2215–2222. es_ES
dc.description.references Bühlmann, M., W. Merkel, L. Müller, and B. Weßels. 2012. The democracy barometer: a new instrument to measure the quality of democracy and its potential for comparative research. European Political Science 11 (4): 519–536. es_ES
dc.description.references Burstein, P. 2010. Public Opinion, Public Policy, and Democracy. In Handbook of politics Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research, ed. K.T. Leicht and J.C. Jenkins, 63–79. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68930-2_4. es_ES
dc.description.references Cassani, A., and L. Tomini. 2020. Reversing Regimes and Concepts: From Democratization to Autocratization. European Political Science 19 (2): 272–287. es_ES
dc.description.references Chao, C., J. Yang, and W. Jen. 2007. Determining Technology Trends and Forecasts of RFID by a Historical Review and Bibliometric Analysis from 1991 to 2005. Technovation 27 (5): 268–279. es_ES
dc.description.references Chiu, W., and Y. Ho. 2007. Bibliometric Analysis of Tsunami Research. Scientometrics 73 (1): 3–17. es_ES
dc.description.references Dahlström, C., and M. Holmgren. 2019. The Political Dynamics of Bureaucratic Turnover. British Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 823–836. es_ES
dc.description.references De Bakker, F., P. Groenewegen, and F. Den Hond. 2005. A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business & Society 44 (3): 283–317. es_ES
dc.description.references Donnelly, J. 2020. International Human Rights. London: Routledge. es_ES
dc.description.references Evans, E., and F. Amery. 2016. Gender and Politics in the UK: Banished to the Sidelines. European Political Science 15 (3): 314–321. es_ES
dc.description.references Garand, J., and M. Giles. 2003. Journals in the Discipline: A Report on a New Survey of American Political Scientists. Political Science and Politics 36 (02): 293–308. es_ES
dc.description.references Giles, M., and J. Garand. 2007. Ranking Political Science Journals: Reputational and Citational Approaches. PS: Political Science & Politics 40 (04): 741–751. es_ES
dc.description.references Gratton, G., and B. Lee. 2020. Liberty, Security, and Accountability: The Rise and Fall of Illiberal Democracies. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3704156. es_ES
dc.description.references Heck, J., and W. Bremser. 1986. Six Decades of the Accounting Review: A Summary of Author and Institutional Contributors. Accounting Review [online] 61 (4): 735–744. es_ES
dc.description.references Heise, M. 2002. The past, present, and future of empirical legal scholarship: Judicial decision making and the new empiricism. Cornell Law Faculty Publications. Paper 733. Available at https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub/733/ es_ES
dc.description.references Helbling, M., L. Bjerre, F. Römer, and M. Zobel. 2017. Measuring Immigration Policies: The IMPIC Database. European Political Science 16 (1): 79–98. es_ES
dc.description.references Hix, S. 2004. A Global Ranking of Political Science Departments. Political Studies Review 2 (3): 293–313. es_ES
dc.description.references Howell, S., and C. Day. 2000. Complexities of the Gender Gap. The Journal of Politics 62 (3): 858–874. es_ES
dc.description.references Huggins, R., D. Prokop, and P. Thompson. 2019. Universities and Open Innovation: The Determinants of Network Centrality. The Journal of Technology Transfer 45 (3): 718–757. es_ES
dc.description.references Johnson, J., H. Reynolds, and J. Mycoff. 2015. Political Science Research Methods. Washington DC: Cq Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Kaufmann, K. 2006. The Gender Gap. PS Political Science & Politics 39 (03): 447–453. es_ES
dc.description.references Kellstedt, P., D. Peterson, and M. Ramirez. 2010. The Macro Politics of a Gender Gap. Public Opinion Quarterly 74 (3): 477–498. es_ES
dc.description.references Kessler, M. 1963. An Experimental Study of Bibliographic Coupling Between Technical Papers (Corresp.). IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 9 (1): 49–51. es_ES
dc.description.references Landström, H., G. Harirchi, and F. Åström. 2012. Entrepreneurship: Exploring the Knowledge Base. Research Policy 41 (7): 1154–1181. es_ES
dc.description.references Leblang, D., W. Milner, and S. Poe. 1999. Security Rights, Subsistence Rights and Liberties: A Theoretical Survey of the Empirical Landscape. Human Rights Quarterly 21 (2): 403–443. es_ES
dc.description.references López-Rubio, P., N. Roig-Tierno, and A. Mas-Tur. 2020. Regional Innovation System Research Trends: Toward Knowledge Management and Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. International Journal of Quality Innovation. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40887-020-00038-x. es_ES
dc.description.references Mas-Tur, A., N.M. Modak, J.M. Merigó, N. Roig-Tierno, M. Geraci, and V. Capecchi. 2019. Half a Century of Quality & Quantity: A Bibliometric Review. Quality & Quantity 53 (2): 981–1020. es_ES
dc.description.references Meier, K., and L. O’Toole. 2006. Political Control Versus Bureaucratic Values: Reframing the Debate. Public Administration Review 66 (2): 177–192. es_ES
dc.description.references Mendelberg, T., C. Karpowitz, and J. Oliphant. 2014. Gender Inequality in Deliberation: Unpacking the Black Box of Interaction. Perspectives on Politics 12 (1): 18–44. es_ES
dc.description.references Møller, J., and S. Skaaning. 2013. Autocracies, Democracies, and the Violation of Civil Liberties. Democratization 20 (1): 82–106. es_ES
dc.description.references Mora, L., R. Bolici, and M. Deakin. 2017. The First Two Decades of Smart-City Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Urban Technology 24 (1): 3–27. es_ES
dc.description.references Nai, A. 2019. Disagreeable Narcissists, Extroverted Psychopaths, and Elections: A New Dataset to Measure the Personality of Candidates Worldwide. European Political Science 18 (2): 309–334. es_ES
dc.description.references Narin, F. 1976. Evaluative Bibliometrics. Springfield: U.S. Department of Commerce. National Technical Information Service. es_ES
dc.description.references Oztig, L., and M. Donduran. 2020. Failed Coups, Political Survival, and Civil Liberties Restrictions in Nondemocratic Regimes. The Social Science Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2020.1827686. es_ES
dc.description.references Podsakoff, P., S. MacKenzie, N. Podsakoff, and D. Bachrach. 2008. Scholarly Influence in the Field of Management: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Determinants of University and Author Impact in the Management Literature in the Past Quarter Century. Journal of Management 34 (4): 641–720. es_ES
dc.description.references Salgado, S. 2019. Where’s Populism? Online Media and the Diffusion of Populist Discourses and Styles in Portugal. European Political Science 18 (1): 53–65. es_ES
dc.description.references Sarin, S., C. Haon, M. Belkhouja, A. Mas-Tur, N. Roig-Tierno, T. Sego, A. Porter, J. Merigó, and S. Carley. 2020. Uncovering the Knowledge Flows and Intellectual Structures of Research in Technological Forecasting and Social Change: A Journey Through History. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 160: 120210. es_ES
dc.description.references Schneider, J. 2009. An Outline of the Bibliometric Indicator Used for Performance-Based Funding of Research Institutions in Norway. European Political Science 8 (3): 364–378. es_ES
dc.description.references Shor, E., J. Charmichael, J. Nazif Munoz, J. Shandra, and M. Schwartz. 2014. Terrorism and State Repression of Human Rights: A Cross-National Time-Series Analysis. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 55 (4): 294–317. es_ES
dc.description.references Sivertsen, G. 2006. A bibliometric model for performance-based budgeting of research institutions’. In Book of abstracts, 9th international science and technology indicators conference, 7–9 September 2006, ed. K. Debackere and W. Glänzel, 133–135. Leuven: KatholiekeUniversiteit. es_ES
dc.description.references Stavrakakis, Y., and G. Katsambekis. 2019. The Populism/Anti-populism Frontier and Its Mediation in Crisis-ridden Greece: From Discursive Divide to Emerging Cleavage? European Political Science 18 (1): 37–52. es_ES
dc.description.references Stimson, J. 2019. Public Opinion in America: Moods, cycles, and swings. New York: Routledge. es_ES
dc.description.references Stockemer, D., A. Blair, and E. Rashkova. 2020. The Distribution of Authors and Reviewers in EPS. European Political Science 19 (3): 401–410. es_ES
dc.description.references Suominen, A., M. Seppänen, and O. Dedehayir. 2019. A Bibliometric Review on Innovation Systems and Ecosystems: A Research Agenda. European Journal of Innovation Management 22 (2): 335–360. es_ES
dc.description.references Teele, D., and K. Thelen. 2017. Gender in the Journals: Publication Patterns in Political Science. PS: Political Science & Politics 50 (02): 433–447. es_ES
dc.description.references Tur-Porcar, A., A. Mas-Tur, J. Merigó, N. Roig-Tierno, and J. Watt. 2018. A Bibliometric History of the Journal of Psychology Between 1936 and 2015. The Journal of Psychology 152 (4): 199–225. es_ES
dc.description.references van Eck, N. and Waltman, L. 2007. VOS: A New Method for Visualizing Similarities Between Objects. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization: 299–306. es_ES
dc.description.references van Eck, N., L. Waltman, E. Noyons, and R. Buter. 2010. Automatic Term Identification for Bibliometric Mapping. Scientometrics 82 (3): 581–596. es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem