- -

Assessing the Origins, Evolution and Prospects of National Innovation Systems

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Assessing the Origins, Evolution and Prospects of National Innovation Systems

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Lopez-RubioRoig-T ...
Tamaño: 862.5Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión del Autor.
Abrir
[Cerrado]
Nombre: López-Rubio2022_A ...
Tamaño: 1.142Mb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Solicitar una copia al autor
dc.contributor.author López-Rubio, Pedro es_ES
dc.contributor.author Roig-Tierno, Norat es_ES
dc.contributor.author Mas Verdú, Francisco es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2022-11-10T19:02:43Z
dc.date.available 2022-11-10T19:02:43Z
dc.date.issued 2022-03 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 1868-7865 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/189611
dc.description.abstract [EN] This paper assesses the origins, evolution and prospects of national innovation systems (NISs) using bibliometric techniques. All available data in the Web of Science Core Collection database up to and including the year 2017 are considered in the analysis. Both the number of NIS studies and the number of citations of these studies reflect the influence of this topic and the attention and growing interest of the scientific community, public administrations and international organisations in NIS research. The co-citation analysis of cited references provides a historical view of the origins of the NIS, and the bibliographic coupling between the documents gives a current overview of the status of NIS research. Our approach highlights the fact that many studies belong to previous, well-developed research streams. We also examine the topics covered by recent studies in each stream and the evolution of the most common keywords over time. In conclusion, we propose a research agenda based on three pillars: (1) the adaptation of innovation systems to the current global economic crisis and the application of the Quintuple Helix model to deal with this new scenario, (2) the adaptation of innovation systems to developing countries and (3) the specific fit of entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial innovations into NIS research. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Springer-Verlag es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of the Knowledge Economy es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject National innovation systems es_ES
dc.subject Quintuple Helix es_ES
dc.subject Adaptation es_ES
dc.subject Entrepreneurship es_ES
dc.subject Bibliometrics es_ES
dc.subject.classification ECONOMIA APLICADA es_ES
dc.title Assessing the Origins, Evolution and Prospects of National Innovation Systems es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s13132-020-00712-7 es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Facultad de Administración y Dirección de Empresas - Facultat d'Administració i Direcció d'Empreses es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation López-Rubio, P.; Roig-Tierno, N.; Mas Verdú, F. (2022). Assessing the Origins, Evolution and Prospects of National Innovation Systems. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 13(1):161-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00712-7 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00712-7 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 161 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 184 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 13 es_ES
dc.description.issue 1 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\459644 es_ES
dc.description.references Acs, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.016. es_ES
dc.description.references Archibugi, D., & Michie, J. (1995). The globalisation of technology: a new taxonomy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035299. es_ES
dc.description.references Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: the importance of context. Research Policy, 43(7), 1097–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.015. es_ES
dc.description.references Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: a scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37(3), 407–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003. es_ES
dc.description.references Borras, S., & Edquist, C. (2013). The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(8), 1513–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.002. es_ES
dc.description.references Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: an introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901883022002003. es_ES
dc.description.references Campbell, D. F. J., Carayannis, E. G., & Rehman, S. S. (2015). Quadruple helix structures of quality of democracy in innovation systems: the USA, OECD countries, and EU member countries in global comparison. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 6, 467–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0246-7. es_ES
dc.description.references Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). The quintuple helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-1-2. es_ES
dc.description.references Carlsson, B. (2006). Internationalization of innovation systems: a survey of the literature. Research Policy, 35(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.003. es_ES
dc.description.references Chiang, J. T. (1990). Management of national technology programs in a newly industrialized country – Taiwan. Technovation, 10(8), 531–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(90)90049-P. es_ES
dc.description.references Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382–1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525. es_ES
dc.description.references Colombo, M. G., & Delmastro, M. (2002). How effective are technology incubators?: evidence from Italy. Research Policy, 31(7), 1103–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00178-0. es_ES
dc.description.references Cooke, P. (2001). Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 945–974. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.4.945. es_ES
dc.description.references Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, 26(4-5), 475–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5. es_ES
dc.description.references Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & Etxebarria, G. (1998). Regional systems of innovation: an evolutionary perspective. Environment and Planning A, 30, 1563–1584. https://doi.org/10.1068/a301563. es_ES
dc.description.references Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., & Soete, L. (Eds.). (1988). Technical change and economic theory. London: Pinter. es_ES
dc.description.references Edquist, C. (Ed.). (1997). Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions and organizations. London: Frances Pinter. es_ES
dc.description.references Edquist, C. (2004). Systems of innovation: perspectives and challenges. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. Nelson (Eds.), Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 181–208). Oxford: Oxford University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7. es_ES
dc.description.references Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4. es_ES
dc.description.references European Commission. (2014). The European Union explained: Research and innovation (Vol. 2014). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2775/74012. es_ES
dc.description.references Faber, J., & Hesen, A. B. (2004). Innovation capabilities of European nations: cross-national analyses of patents and sales of product. Research Policy, 33(2), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00122-7. es_ES
dc.description.references Fagerberg, J. (2017). Innovation policy: rationales, lessons and challenges. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(2), 497–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12164. es_ES
dc.description.references Fagerberg, J., & Srholec, M. (2008). National innovation systems, capabilities and economic development. Research Policy, 37(9), 1417–1435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.06.003. es_ES
dc.description.references Filippetti, A., & Archibugi, D. (2011). Innovation in times of crisis: National Systems of Innovation, structure, and demand. Research Policy, 40(2), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.001. es_ES
dc.description.references Fischer, M. (2001). Innovation, knowledge creation and systems of innovation. The Annals of Regional Science, 35, 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001680000034. es_ES
dc.description.references Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., & Laranja, M. (2011). Reconceptualising the ‘policymix’ for innovation. Research Policy, 40(5), 702–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.005. es_ES
dc.description.references Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: lessons from Japan. Pinter Publishers. es_ES
dc.description.references Freeman, C. (1995). The National System of Innovation in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035309. es_ES
dc.description.references Freeman, C. (2002). Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems – complementarity and economic growth. Research Policy, 31(2), 191–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00136-6. es_ES
dc.description.references Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31(6), 899–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00152-4. es_ES
dc.description.references Garfield, E. (2001). From bibliographic coupling to co-citation analysis via algorithmic historio-bibliography: a citationist’s tribute to Belver C. Griffith. Philadelphia: Drexel University. es_ES
dc.description.references Glänzel, W., & Czerwon, H. J. (1996). A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to the national, regional and institutional level. Scientometrics, 37, 195–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02093621. es_ES
dc.description.references Gregersen, B., & Johnson, B. (1997). Learning economics, innovation systems and European integration. Regional Studies, 31(5), 479–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409750132270. es_ES
dc.description.references Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4), 1661–1707 https://www.jstor.org/stable/2727442. es_ES
dc.description.references Hall, A., Bockett, G., Taylor, S., Sivamohan, M. V. K., & Clark, N. (2001). Why research partnerships really matter: innovation theory, institutional arrangements and implications for developing new technology for the poor. World Development, 29(5), 783–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00004-3. es_ES
dc.description.references Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102. es_ES
dc.description.references Jarvening, B. (2007). Bibliographic coupling and its application to research-front and other core documents. Journal of Informetrics, 1(4), 287–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2007.07.004. es_ES
dc.description.references Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14, 10–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140103. es_ES
dc.description.references List, F. (1841). The national system of political economy. English Edition (1904). London, Longman. es_ES
dc.description.references Liu, X., & White, S. (2001). Comparing innovation systems: a framework and application to China’s transitional context. Research Policy, 30(7), 1091–1114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00132-3. es_ES
dc.description.references López-Rubio, P., Roig-Tierno, N., & Mas-Verdú, F. (2018). Technology transfer: a comparison between Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus. Information and Innovations, 13(2), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.31432/1994-2443-2018-13-2-53-69. es_ES
dc.description.references López-Rubio, P., Roig-Tierno, N., & Mas-Tur, A. (2020). Regional innovation system research trends: toward knowledge management and entrepreneurial ecosystems. International Journal of Quality Innovation, 6(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40887-020-00038-x. es_ES
dc.description.references Lundvall, B. A. (1985). Product innovation and user-producer interaction. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251542478_Product_Innovation_and_User-Producer_Interaction. es_ES
dc.description.references Lundvall, B. A. (1992). National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter. es_ES
dc.description.references Lundvall, B. A. (2007). National Innovation Systems – analytical concept and development tool. Industry & Innovation, 14, 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710601130863. es_ES
dc.description.references Lundvall, B. A. (2016). The learning economy and the economics of hope. NY: Anthem Press ISBN: 9781783085965. es_ES
dc.description.references Lundvall, B. A., Johnson, B., Andersen, E. S., & Dalum, B. (2002). National systems of production, innovation and competence-building. Research Policy, 31(2), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00137-8. es_ES
dc.description.references Lundvall, B. A., Joseph, K. J., Chaminade, C., & Vang, J. (2011). Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries. Building Domestic Capabilities in a Global Setting. In B. A. Lundvall, K. J. Joseph, C. Chaminade, & J. Vang (Eds.), ISBN: 978 1 84720 609 1. es_ES
dc.description.references Martin, B. (1996). The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research. Scientometrics, 36(3), 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02129599. es_ES
dc.description.references Martin, C. R., & Johnston, R. (1999). Technology foresight for wiring up the National Innovation System: experiences in Britain, Australia, and New Zealand. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 60(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(98)00022-5. es_ES
dc.description.references McKelvey, M. (1991). How do National Systems of Innovation differ?: a critical analysis of Porter, Freeman, Lundvall and Nelson. In G. M. Hodgson & E. Screpanti (Eds.), Rethinking economics. Markets, technology and economics evolution (pp. 117–137). Aldershot: Elgar, ISBN 1852784164. es_ES
dc.description.references Metcalfe, J. S. (1995). Technology systems and technology policy in an evolutionary framework. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035307. es_ES
dc.description.references Mowery, D. C. (1992). The U.S. National Innovation System: origins and prospects for change. Research Policy, 21(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(92)90037-5. es_ES
dc.description.references Muller, E., & Zenker, A. (2001). Business services as actors of knowledge transformation: the role of KIBS in regional and national innovation systems. Research Policy, 30(9), 1501–1516. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00164-0. es_ES
dc.description.references Nelson, R. R. (1993). National Innovation Systems. A comparative analysis. Edited by Richard R. Nelson. ISBN: 9780195076172. es_ES
dc.description.references Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Bellknap. es_ES
dc.description.references OECD. (1996). The knowledge-based economy. Paris: OECD Publishing. es_ES
dc.description.references OECD. (1999). Managing National Innovation Systems. Paris: OECD Publishing. es_ES
dc.description.references OECD. (2011). Regions and innovation policy. OECD Reviews of Regional Innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing. es_ES
dc.description.references OECD. (2015). The innovation imperative: contributing to productivity, growth and well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239814-en. es_ES
dc.description.references Owen-Smith, J., Riccaboni, M., Pammolli, F., & Powell, W. W. (2002). A comparison of U.S. and European university-industry relation in the life sciences. Management Science, 48(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.24.14275. es_ES
dc.description.references Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1994). National innovation systems: why they are important, and how they might be measured and compared. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 3(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599400000004. es_ES
dc.description.references Phene, A., Fladmoe-Lindquist, K., & Marsh, L. (2006). Breakthrough innovations in the U.S. biotechnology industry: the effects of technological space and geographic origin. Strategic Management Journal, 27(4), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.522. es_ES
dc.description.references Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., & Neely, A. (2004). Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 5/6(3&4), 137–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00101.x. es_ES
dc.description.references Porter, M. (1990). The competitive advantages of nations. The Free Press Edition. es_ES
dc.description.references Schneider, M. R., Schulze-Bentrop, C., & Paunescu, M. (2010). Mapping the institutional capital of high-tech firms: a fuzzy-set analysis of capitalist variety and export performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 246–266. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.36. es_ES
dc.description.references Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24, 265–269. es_ES
dc.description.references Small, H. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(9), 799–813. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:9<799::AID-ASI9>3.0.CO;2-G. es_ES
dc.description.references Suominen, A., Seppänen, M., & Dedehayir, O. (2019). A bibliometric review on innovation systems and ecosystems: a research agenda. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(2), 335–360. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-12-2017-0188. es_ES
dc.description.references Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: Vosviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3. es_ES
dc.description.references Vertova, G. (2014). The state and national systems of innovation: a sympathetic critique. The Levy Institute Working Paper Collection. Working Paper No. 823. es_ES
dc.description.references White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author co-citation: a literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 21, 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630320302. es_ES
dc.description.references Youtie, J., Kay, L., & Melkers, J. (2013). Bibliographic coupling and network analysis to assess knowledge coalescence in a research center environment. Research Evaluation, 22(3), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvt002. es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem