- -

Worldwide research trends on the use of chemical-mechanical caries removal products over the years: a critical review

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Worldwide research trends on the use of chemical-mechanical caries removal products over the years: a critical review

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: SouzaMartinsMagno ...
Tamaño: 2.041Mb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Souza, T. F. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Martins, M. L. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Magno, M. B. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Vicente Gomila, José Miguel es_ES
dc.contributor.author Fonseca-Goncalves, A. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Maia, L. C. es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2023-01-17T19:00:11Z
dc.date.available 2023-01-17T19:00:11Z
dc.date.issued 2022-12 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 1818-6300 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/191383
dc.description.abstract [EN] Background Chemical¿mechanical caries removal (CMCR) products are in constant evolution and were recommended during the COVID-19 pandemic as substitutes for conventional caries removal. Aim Characterize the worldwide scientifc literature about CMCR products, over the years, by means of a critical review. Design Electronic search was performed on Medline/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Lilacs, and Embase up to November 2020. Year, journal, country of authors, and type of study were the data extracted from the retrieved studies. Additional data of the clinical studies and systematic reviews were investigated. Results 2221 records were identifed, 397 selected. 2011¿2020 period concentrates higher number of publications (n=169), in the Journal of Dental Research (n=51), developed in Brazil (n=45) and India (n=44). Most studies were in vitro (n=211) and clinical trials (n=101). Carisolv¿ (n=48) and Papacarie Duo Gel¿ (n=33) were the most used products, prescript in isolated usage (n=101), and compared with drills (n=77). CMCR were more studied in primary teeth (n=78), receiving glass ionomer cement (GIC) (n=51) as restorative material. The most evaluated outcomes were time spent (n=48) and pain (n=41). Clinical application of CMCR takes more time than other techniques, but can also reduce patient anxiety, pain, and need for anesthesia. Conclusion In vitro and clinical studies with CMCR products have been increasing, mostly carried out in developing countries, evaluating Carisolv¿ and Papacarie Duo Gel¿. Clinical studies tend to evaluate the time spent and pain compared to drills for removing caries in primary teeth, posteriorly restored with GIC. CMCR clinical application reduces anxiety, pain, and need for anesthesia, despite increase treatments¿ time. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship This study was financed in part by the Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior -Brazil (CAPES) -Finance code 001, and Fundacao Carlos Chagas de Amparo a Pesquisa no Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ)-Finance code E-26/202.766/2019, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) -Finance code 401058/2016-6 -for the VantagePointT software. This study is part of the Master's thesis of the primary author. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Springer es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Dental caries es_ES
dc.subject Papain es_ES
dc.subject Sodium hypochlorite es_ES
dc.subject.classification PROYECTOS DE INGENIERIA es_ES
dc.title Worldwide research trends on the use of chemical-mechanical caries removal products over the years: a critical review es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s40368-022-00726-6 es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/CNPq//401058%2F2016-6/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/CAPES//001/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FAPERJ//E-26%2F202.766%2F2019/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería del Diseño - Escola Tècnica Superior d'Enginyeria del Disseny es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Souza, TF.; Martins, ML.; Magno, MB.; Vicente Gomila, JM.; Fonseca-Goncalves, A.; Maia, LC. (2022). Worldwide research trends on the use of chemical-mechanical caries removal products over the years: a critical review. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 23(6):869-883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-022-00726-6 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-022-00726-6 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 869 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 883 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 23 es_ES
dc.description.issue 6 es_ES
dc.identifier.pmid 35831699 es_ES
dc.identifier.pmcid PMC9281217 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\471093 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Coordenaçao de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Brasil es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Brasil es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro es_ES
dc.description.references Abdelnur JP, Cerqueira DF, Castro GF, Maia LC, de Souza IP. Strategies for addressing restorative challenges in HIV-infected children. J Dent Child (chic). 2008;75(1):69–73. es_ES
dc.description.references AlHumaid J, Al-Harbi F, El Tantawi M, Elembaby A. X-ray microtomography assessment of Carisolv™andPapacárie effect on dentin mineral density and amount of removed tissue. Acta Odontol Scand. 2018;76(4):236–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2017.1406614. es_ES
dc.description.references Alkhouli MM, Al Nesser SF, Bshara NG, AlMidani AN, Comisi JC. Comparing the efficacies of two chemo-mechanical caries removal agents (2.25% sodium hypochlorite gel and brix 3000), in caries removal and patient cooperation: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent. 2020;93:103280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103280. es_ES
dc.description.references Associación Latinoamericana de Odontopediatria (ALOP). Tratamiento de la enfermedad de caries en época de COVID-19: protocolos clínicos para el control de aerosoles. 2020. https://www.revistaodontopediatria.org/ediciones/2020/2/art-2/-art1. Accessed in 5 May 2020 (in Portuguese) es_ES
dc.description.references Ammari MM, Moliterno LF, Hirata Júnior R, Séllos MC, Soviero VM, Coutinho Filho WP. Efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal in reducing cariogenic microbiota: a randomized clinical trial. Braz Oral Res. 2014;28:S1806-83242014000100240. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2014.vol28.0031. es_ES
dc.description.references Amorim RG, Frencken JE, Raggio DP, Chen X, Hu X, Leal SC. Survival percentages of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations and sealants in posterior teeth: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(8):2703–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2625-5. es_ES
dc.description.references Bussadori SK, Castro LC, Galvão AC. Papain gel: a new chemo-mechanical caries removal agent. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2005;30(2):115–9. https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.30.2.xq641w720u101048. es_ES
dc.description.references Carroll KM. New methods of treatment efficacy research: bridging clinical research and clinical practice. Alcohol Health Res World. 1997;21(4):352–9. es_ES
dc.description.references Chowdhry S, Saha S, Samadi F, Jaiswal JN, Garg A, Chowdhry P. Recent vs conventional methods of caries removal: a comparative in vivo study in pediatric patients. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015;8(1):6–11. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1275. es_ES
dc.description.references Deng Y, Feng G, Hu B, Kuang Y, Song J. Effects of papacarie on children with dental caries in primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018;28(4):361–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12364. es_ES
dc.description.references Ericson D, Zimmerman M, Raber H, Götrick B, Bornstein R, Thorell J. Clinical evaluation of efficacy and safety of a new method for chemo-mechanical removal of caries. A multi-centrestudy. Caries Res. 1999;33(3):171–7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000016513. es_ES
dc.description.references Frankenberger R, Van Meerbeek B. Editorial: Choosing wisely—it is time for dentistry. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20(3):179. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a40765. es_ES
dc.description.references Frencken JE, Makoni F, Sithole WD. ART restorations and glass ionomer sealants in Zimbabwe: survival after 3 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1998;26(6):372–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1998.tb01975.x. es_ES
dc.description.references Goldman M, Kronman JH. A preliminary report on a chemomechanical means of removing caries. J Am Dent Assoc. 1976;93(6):1149–53. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1976.0249. es_ES
dc.description.references Habib CM, Kronman J, Goldman M. A chemical evaluation of collagen and hydroxyproline after treatment with GK-101 (N-chloroglycine). Pharmacol Ther Dent. 1975;2(3–4):209–15. es_ES
dc.description.references Hamama H, Yiu C, Burrow M. Current update of chemomechanical caries removal methods. Aust Dent J. 2014;59(4):446–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12214. es_ES
dc.description.references Hamama HH, Yiu CK, Burrow MF, King NM. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on chemomechanical caries removal. Oper Dent. 2015;40(4):E167–78. https://doi.org/10.2341/14-021-LIT. es_ES
dc.description.references Hegde S, Kakti A, Bolar DR, Bhaskar SA. Clinical efficiency of three caries removal systems: rotary excavation, carisolv, and papacarie. J Dent Child (chic). 2016;83(1):22–8. es_ES
dc.description.references Innes NPT, Chu CH, Fontana M, Lo ECM, Thomson WM, Uribe S, Heiland M, Jepsen S, Schwendicke F. A century of change towards prevention and minimal intervention in cariology. J Dent Res. 2019;98(6):611–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034519837252. es_ES
dc.description.references Ismail MM, Al Haidar AH. Evaluation of the efficacy of caries removal using papain gel (Brix 3000) and smart preparation bur (in vivo comparative study). J Pharm Sci Res. 2019;11:444–9. es_ES
dc.description.references Jose SC, Khosla E, Abraham KK, James AR, Thenumkal E. Effects of different dentinal drying methods on the adhesion of glass ionomer restorations to primary teeth. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2019;37(2):127–32. https://doi.org/10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_337_18. es_ES
dc.description.references Juntavee A, Juntavee N, Peerapattana J, Nualkaew N, Sutthisawat S. Comparison of marginal microleakage of glass ionomer restorations in primary molars prepared by chemo-mechanical caries removal (CMCR), erbium: yttrium aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser and atraumatic restorative technique (ART). Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013;6(2):75–9. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1193 (Epub 2013 Aug 26). es_ES
dc.description.references Kochhar GK, Srivastava N, Pandit IK, Gugnani N, Gupta M. An evaluation of different caries removal techniques in primary teeth: a comparitive clinical study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011;36(1):5–9. https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.36.1.u2421l4j68847215. es_ES
dc.description.references Kumar J, Nayak M, Prasad KL, Gupta N. A comparative study of the clinical efficiency of chemomechanical caries removal using Carisolv and Papacarie—a papain gel. Indian J Dent Res. 2012;23(5):697. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.107429. es_ES
dc.description.references Ladewig NM, Tedesco TK, Gimenez T, Braga MM, Raggio DP. Patient-reported outcomes associated with different restorative techniques in pediatric dentistry: a systematic review and MTC meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018;13(12): e0208437. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208437. es_ES
dc.description.references Lai G, Lara Capi C, Cocco F, Cagetti MG, Lingström P, Almhöjd U, Campus G. Comparison of Carisolv system vs traditional rotating instruments for caries removal in the primary dentition: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Odontol Scand. 2015;73(8):569–80. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2015.1023353 (Epub 2015 Mar 14). es_ES
dc.description.references Law M, Stweart D, PollockN, Letts L, Bosch J, Westmorland M. Guidelines for critical review form—quantitative studies. 1998. https://canchild.ca/system/tenon/assets/attachments/000/000/366/original/quantguide.pdf es_ES
dc.description.references Leal SC, Abreu DM, Frencken JE. Dental anxiety and pain related to ART. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17(Suppl(spe)):84–8. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-77572009000700015. es_ES
dc.description.references Li R, Zhao Y, Ye L. How to make choice of the carious removal methods, carisolv or traditional drilling? A meta-analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 2014;41(6):432–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12161 (Epub 2014 Mar 24). es_ES
dc.description.references Li T, Zhai X, Song F, Zhu H. Selective versus non-selective removal for dental caries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Odontol Scand. 2018;76(2):135–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2017.1392602. es_ES
dc.description.references Lula EC, Monteiro-Neto V, Alves CM, Ribeiro CC. Microbiological analysis after complete or partial removal of carious dentin in primary teeth: a randomized clinical trial. Caries Res. 2009;43(5):354–8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000231572. es_ES
dc.description.references Marquezan M, Faraco Junior IM, Feldens CA, Tovo MF, Ottoni AB. Evaluation of the methodologies used in clinical trials and effectiveness of chemo-mechanical caries removal with Carisolv. Braz Oral Res. 2006;20(4):364–71. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1806-83242006000400015. es_ES
dc.description.references Maru VP, Shakuntala BS, Nagarathna C. Caries removal by chemomechanical (Carisolv™) vs. rotary drill: a systematic review. Open Dent J. 2015;9:462–72. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601509010462. es_ES
dc.description.references Mm J, Nv B, Pathak A. Minimal intervention dentistry - a new frontier in clinical dentistry. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(7):ZE04-8. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/9128.4583. es_ES
dc.description.references Moimaz SAS, Okamura AQC, Lima DC, Saliba TA, Saliba NA. Clinical and microbiological analysis of mechanical and chemomechanical methods of caries removal in deciduous teeth. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2019;17(3):283–8. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ohpd.a42659. es_ES
dc.description.references Montedori A, Abraha I, Orso M, D’Errico PG, Pagano S, Lombardo G. Lasers for caries removal in primary and permanent teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;9(9):CD10229. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010229.pub2. es_ES
dc.description.references Porter AL, Cunningham SW. Tech mining: exploiting new technologies for competitive advantage. Hoboken: Wiley; 2004. es_ES
dc.description.references Ramamoorthi S, Nivedhitha MS, Vanajassun PP. Effect of two different chemomechanical caries removal agents on dentin microhardness: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2013;16(5):429–33. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.117520. es_ES
dc.description.references Reddy MV, Shankar AJ, Pentakota VG, Kolli H, Ganta H, Katari PK. Efficacy of antimicrobial property of two commercially available chemomechanical caries removal agents (Carisolv and Papacarie): an ex vivo study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015;5(3):183–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.159955. es_ES
dc.description.references Schwendicke F. Caries removal in primary teeth using Papacarie. Evid Based Dent. 2018;19(3):74. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6401321. es_ES
dc.description.references Schwendicke F, Dörfer CE, Schlattmann P, Page LF, Thomson WM, Paris S. Socioeconomic inequality and caries. J Dent Res. 2014;94(1):10–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514557546. es_ES
dc.description.references Schwendicke F, Paris S, Tu YK. Effects of using different criteria for caries removal: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015;43(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.10.004. es_ES
dc.description.references Sontakke P, Jain P, Patil AD, Biswas G, Yadav P, Makkar DK, Jeph V, Sakina BP. A comparative study of the clinical efficiency of chemomechanical caries removal using Carie-Care gel for permanent teeth of children of age group of 12–15 years with that of conventional drilling method: a randomized controlled trial. Dent Res J (isfahan). 2019;16(1):42–6. es_ES
dc.description.references Turner EW, Shook LW, Lackey M. Accessing and restoring root caries: a case report. J Tenn Dent Assoc. 2007;87(2):20–2. es_ES
dc.description.references Venkataraghavan K, Kush A, Lakshminarayana C, Diwakar L, Ravikumar P, Patil S, Karthik S. Chemomechanical caries removal: a review & study of an indigen-ously developed agent (carie-care (TM) gel) in children. J Int Oral Health. 2013;5(4):84–90. es_ES
dc.description.references WHO Oral Health Programme. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) for tooth decay : a global initiative 1998–2000. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1998. es_ES
dc.subject.ods 03.- Garantizar una vida saludable y promover el bienestar para todos y todas en todas las edades es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem