- -

Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: KrausBreierLim - ...
Tamaño: 1.550Mb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Kraus, Sascha es_ES
dc.contributor.author Breier, Matthias es_ES
dc.contributor.author Lim, Weng Marc es_ES
dc.contributor.author Davic, Marina es_ES
dc.contributor.author Kumar, Satish es_ES
dc.contributor.author Kanbach, Dominik es_ES
dc.contributor.author Mukherjee, Debmalya es_ES
dc.contributor.author Corvello, Vincenzo es_ES
dc.contributor.author Piñeiro-Chousa, Juan es_ES
dc.contributor.author Liguori, Eric es_ES
dc.contributor.author Palacios Marqués, Daniel es_ES
dc.contributor.author Schiavone, Francesco es_ES
dc.contributor.author Ferraris, Alberto es_ES
dc.contributor.author Fernandes, Cristina es_ES
dc.contributor.author Ferreira, Joao J. es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2023-03-01T19:02:25Z
dc.date.available 2023-03-01T19:02:25Z
dc.date.issued 2022-11 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 1863-6683 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/192219
dc.description.abstract [EN] Review articles or literature reviews are a critical part of scientific research. While numerous guides on literature reviews exist, these are often limited to the philosophy of review procedures, protocols, and nomenclatures, triggering non-parsimonious reporting and confusion due to overlapping similarities. To address the aforementioned limitations, we adopt a pragmatic approach to demystify and shape the academic practice of conducting literature reviews. We concentrate on the types, focuses, considerations, methods, and contributions of literature reviews as independent, standalone studies. As such, our article serves as an overview that scholars can rely upon to navigate the fundamental elements of literature reviews as standalone and independent studies, without getting entangled in the complexities of review procedures, protocols, and nomenclatures. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship Open access funding provided by Libera Universita di Bolzano within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Springer-Verlag es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Review of Managerial Science es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Literature reviews es_ES
dc.subject Bibliometrics es_ES
dc.subject Meta analysis es_ES
dc.subject Methods es_ES
dc.subject Contributions es_ES
dc.subject.classification ORGANIZACION DE EMPRESAS es_ES
dc.title Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8 es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería del Diseño - Escola Tècnica Superior d'Enginyeria del Disseny es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Kraus, S.; Breier, M.; Lim, WM.; Davic, M.; Kumar, S.; Kanbach, D.; Mukherjee, D.... (2022). Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice. Review of Managerial Science. 16(8):2577-2595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 2577 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 2595 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 16 es_ES
dc.description.issue 8 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\483443 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Libera Università di Bolzano es_ES
dc.description.references Aguinis H, Jensen SH, Kraus S (2022) Policy implications of organizational behavior and human resource management research. Acad Manage Perspect 36(3):1–22 es_ES
dc.description.references Ammirato S, Felicetti AM, Rogano D, Linzalone R, Corvello V (2022) Digitalising the systematic literature review process: The My SLR platform. Knowl Manage Res Pract. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2022.2041375 es_ES
dc.description.references Aria M, Cuccurullo C (2017) bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetrics 11(4):959–975 es_ES
dc.description.references Baker WE, Mukherjee D, Perin MG (2022) Learning orientation and competitive advantage: A critical synthesis and future directions. J Bus Res 144:863–873 es_ES
dc.description.references Boell SK, Cecez-Kecmanovic D (2015) On being ‘systematic’ in literature reviews. J Inform Technol 30:161–173 es_ES
dc.description.references Borrego M, Foster MJ, Froyd JE (2014) Systematic literature reviews in engineering education and other developing interdisciplinary fields. J Eng Educ 103(1):45–76 es_ES
dc.description.references Breslin D, Gatrell C (2020) Theorizing through literature reviews: The miner-prospector continuum. Organizational Res Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120943288 (in press) es_ES
dc.description.references Cajal B, Jiménez R, Gervilla E, Montaño JJ (2020) Doing a systematic review in health sciences. Clínica y Salud 31(2):77–83 es_ES
dc.description.references Chen C (2013) Mapping scientific frontiers: The quest for knowledge visualization. Springer Science & Business Media es_ES
dc.description.references Creevey D, Coughlan J, O’Connor C (2022) Social media and luxury: A systematic literature review. Int J Manage Reviews 24(1):99–129 es_ES
dc.description.references Dabić M, González-Loureiro M, Harvey M (2015) Evolving research on expatriates: what is ‘known’after four decades (1970–2012). Int J Hum Resource Manage 26(3):316–337 es_ES
dc.description.references Dabić M, Vlačić B, Kiessling T, Caputo A, Pellegrini M(2021) Serial entrepreneurs: A review of literature and guidance for future research.Journal of Small Business Management,1–36 es_ES
dc.description.references Daim TU, Rueda G, Martin H, Gerdsri P (2006) Forecasting emerging technologies: Use of bibliometrics and patent analysis. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 73(8):981–1012 es_ES
dc.description.references Deng L, Yang M, Marcoulides KM (2018) Structural equation modeling with many variables: A systematic review of issues and developments. Front Psychol 9:580 es_ES
dc.description.references Donthu N, Kumar S, Pattnaik D (2020) Forty-five years of Journal of Business Research: A bibliometric analysis. J Bus Res 109:1–14 es_ES
dc.description.references Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM (2021) How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. J Bus Res 133:285–296 es_ES
dc.description.references Duan W, Jiang G (2008) A review of the theory of planned behavior. Adv Psychol Sci 16(2):315–320 es_ES
dc.description.references Durach CF, Kembro J, Wieland A (2017) A new paradigm for systematic literature reviews in supply chain management. J Supply Chain Manage 53(4):67–85 es_ES
dc.description.references Fan D, Breslin D, Callahan JL, Szatt-White M (2022) Advancing literature review methodology through rigour, generativity, scope and transparency. Int J Manage Reviews 24(2):171–180 es_ES
dc.description.references Ferreira MP, Reis NR, Miranda R (2015) Thirty years of entrepreneurship research published in top journals: Analysis of citations, co-citations and themes. J Global Entrepreneurship Res 5(1):1–22 es_ES
dc.description.references Ghauri P, Strange R, Cooke FL (2021) Research on international business: The new realities. Int Bus Rev 30(2):101794 es_ES
dc.description.references Gioia DA, Corley KG, Hamilton AL (2012) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the gioia methodology. Organizational Res Methods 16(1):15–31 es_ES
dc.description.references Gonzalez-Loureiro M, Dabić M, Kiessling T (2015) Supply chain management as the key to a firm’s strategy in the global marketplace: Trends and research agenda. Int J Phys Distribution Logistics Manage 45(1/2):159–181. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-05-2013-0124 es_ES
dc.description.references Grewal D, Puccinelli N, Monroe KB (2018) Meta-analysis: Integrating accumulated knowledge. J Acad Mark Sci 46(1):9–30 es_ES
dc.description.references Hansen C, Steinmetz H, Block J(2021) How to conduct a meta-analysis in eight steps: a practical guide.Management Review Quarterly,1–19 es_ES
dc.description.references Korherr P, Kanbach DK (2021) Human-related capabilities in big data analytics: A taxonomy of human factors with impact on firm performance. RMS. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00506-4 (in press) es_ES
dc.description.references Kraus S, Breier M, Dasí-Rodríguez S (2020) The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research. Int Entrepreneurship Manage J 16(3):1023–1042 es_ES
dc.description.references Kraus S, Durst S, Ferreira J, Veiga P, Kailer N, Weinmann A (2022) Digital transformation in business and management research: An overview of the current status quo. Int J Inf Manag 63:102466 es_ES
dc.description.references Kraus S, Jones P, Kailer N, Weinmann A, Chaparro-Banegas N, Roig-Tierno N (2021) Digital transformation: An overview of the current state of the art of research. Sage Open 11(3):1–15 es_ES
dc.description.references Kraus S, Mahto RV, Walsh ST (2021) The importance of literature reviews in small business and entrepreneurship research. J Small Bus Manage. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1955128 (in press) es_ES
dc.description.references Kumar S, Sahoo S, Lim WM, Dana LP (2022a) Religion as a social shaping force in entrepreneurship and business: Insights from a technology-empowered systematic literature review. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 175:121393 es_ES
dc.description.references Kumar S, Sahoo S, Lim WM, Kraus S, Bamel U (2022b) Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: A contemporary overview. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 178:121599 es_ES
dc.description.references Kumar S, Sharma D, Rao S, Lim WM, Mangla SK (2022c) Past, present, and future of sustainable finance: Insights from big data analytics through machine learning of scholarly research. Ann Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04410-8 (in press) es_ES
dc.description.references Laher S, Hassem T (2020) Doing systematic reviews in psychology. South Afr J Psychol 50(4):450–468 es_ES
dc.description.references Leemann N, Kanbach DK (2022) Toward a taxonomy of dynamic capabilities – a systematic literature review. Manage Res Rev 45(4):486–501 es_ES
dc.description.references Lahiri S, Mukherjee D, Peng MW (2020) Behind the internationalization of family SMEs: A strategy tripod synthesis. Glob Strategy J 10(4):813–838 es_ES
dc.description.references Lim WM (2018) Demystifying neuromarketing. J Bus Res 91:205–220 es_ES
dc.description.references Lim WM (2020) The sharing economy: A marketing perspective. Australasian Mark J 28(3):4–13 es_ES
dc.description.references Lim WM (2022) Ushering a new era of Global Business and Organizational Excellence: Taking a leaf out of recent trends in the new normal. Global Bus Organizational Excellence 41(5):5–13 es_ES
dc.description.references Lim WM, Rasul T (2022) Customer engagement and social media: Revisiting the past to inform the future. J Bus Res 148:325–342 es_ES
dc.description.references Lim WM, Weissmann MA (2021) Toward a theory of behavioral control. J Strategic Mark. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2021.1890190 (in press) es_ES
dc.description.references Lim WM, Kumar S, Ali F (2022a) Advancing knowledge through literature reviews: ‘What’, ‘why’, and ‘how to contribute’. Serv Ind J 42(7–8):481–513 es_ES
dc.description.references Lim WM, Rasul T, Kumar S, Ala M (2022b) Past, present, and future of customer engagement. J Bus Res 140:439–458 es_ES
dc.description.references Lim WM, Yap SF, Makkar M (2021) Home sharing in marketing and tourism at a tipping point: What do we know, how do we know, and where should we be heading? J Bus Res 122:534–566 es_ES
dc.description.references López-Duarte C, González-Loureiro M, Vidal-Suárez MM, González-Díaz B (2016) International strategic alliances and national culture: Mapping the field and developing a research agenda. J World Bus 51(4):511–524 es_ES
dc.description.references Mas-Tur A, Kraus S, Brandtner M, Ewert R, Kürsten W (2020) Advances in management research: A bibliometric overview of the Review of Managerial Science. RMS 14(5):933–958 es_ES
dc.description.references Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Reviews 4(1):1–9 es_ES
dc.description.references Mukherjee D, Kumar S, Donthu N, Pandey N (2021) Research published in Management International Review from 2006 to 2020: A bibliometric analysis and future directions. Manage Int Rev 61:599–642 es_ES
dc.description.references Mukherjee D, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Goyal K (2022a) Mapping five decades of international business and management research on India: A bibliometric analysis and future directions. J Bus Res 145:864–891 es_ES
dc.description.references Mukherjee D, Lim WM, Kumar S, Donthu N (2022b) Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research. J Bus Res 148:101–115 es_ES
dc.description.references Obradović T, Vlačić B, Dabić M (2021) Open innovation in the manufacturing industry: A review and research agenda. Technovation 102:102221 es_ES
dc.description.references Ojong N, Simba A, Dana LP (2021) Female entrepreneurship in Africa: A review, trends, and future research directions. J Bus Res 132:233–248 es_ES
dc.description.references Palmatier RW, Houston MB, Hulland J (2018) Review articles: Purpose, process, and structure. J Acad Mark Sci 46(1):1–5 es_ES
dc.description.references Post C, Sarala R, Gatrell C, Prescott JE (2020) Advancing theory with review articles. J Manage Stud 57(2):351–376 es_ES
dc.description.references Pranckutė R (2021) Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications 9(1):12 es_ES
dc.description.references R Core Team (2021) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/ Accessed 20th July 2022 es_ES
dc.description.references Rovelli P, Ferasso M, De Massis A, Kraus S(2021) Thirty years of research in family business journals: Status quo and future directions.Journal of Family Business Strategy,100422 es_ES
dc.description.references Salmony FU, Kanbach DK (2022) Personality trait differences across types of entrepreneurs: a systematic literature review. RMS 16:713–749 es_ES
dc.description.references Snyder H (2019) Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. J Bus Res 104:333–339 es_ES
dc.description.references Tranfield D, Denyer D, Smart P (2003) Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br J Manag 14(3):207–222 es_ES
dc.description.references Ulker-Demirel E, Ciftci G (2020) A systematic literature review of the theory of planned behavior in tourism, leisure and hospitality management research. J Hospitality Tourism Manage 43:209–219 es_ES
dc.description.references Van Eck NJ, Waltma L (2014) CitNetExplorer: A new software tool for analyzing and visualizing citation networks. J Informetrics 8(4):802–823 es_ES
dc.description.references Vlačić B, Corbo L, Silva e, Dabić M (2021) The evolving role of artificial intelligence in marketing: A review and research agenda. J Bus Res 128:187–203 es_ES
dc.description.references Wong D (2018) VOSviewer. Tech Serv Q 35(2):219–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2018.1425352 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem