Adie, E. (2016). The rise of altmetrics. In A. Tattersall (Ed.), Altmetrics: A practical guide for librarians, researchers and academics (pp. 67–82). Facet Publishing.
Costas, R., Mongeon, P., Ferreira, M. R., Honk, J., & Franssen, T. (2020). Large-scale identification and characterization of scholars on Twitter. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(2), 771–791. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00047
Costas, R., de Rijcke, S., & Marres, N. (2021). “Heterogeneous couplings”: Operationalizing network perspectives to study science-society interactions through social media metrics. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(5), 595–610. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24427
[+]
Adie, E. (2016). The rise of altmetrics. In A. Tattersall (Ed.), Altmetrics: A practical guide for librarians, researchers and academics (pp. 67–82). Facet Publishing.
Costas, R., Mongeon, P., Ferreira, M. R., Honk, J., & Franssen, T. (2020). Large-scale identification and characterization of scholars on Twitter. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(2), 771–791. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00047
Costas, R., de Rijcke, S., & Marres, N. (2021). “Heterogeneous couplings”: Operationalizing network perspectives to study science-society interactions through social media metrics. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(5), 595–610. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24427
Delgado López-Cózar, E., Orduña-Malea, E., & Martín-Martín, A. (2019). Google Scholar as a data source for research assessment. In W. Glänzel, H. F. Moed, U. Schmod, & M. Thelwall (Eds.), Springer handbook of science and technology indicators (pp. 95–127). Springer.
Díaz-Faes, A. A., Bowman, T. D., & Costas, R. (2019). Towards a second generation of ‘social media metrics’: Characterizing Twitter communities of attention around science. PLoS ONE, 14(5), e0216408. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216408
Didegah, F., Mejlgaard, N., & Sørensen, M. P. (2018). Investigating the quality of interactions and public engagement around scientific papers on twitter. Journal of Informetrics, 12(3), 960–971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.08.002
Fang, Z., & Costas, R. (2020). Studying the accumulation velocity of altmetric data tracked by Altmetric. com. Scientometrics, 123(2), 1077–1101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03405-9
Fang, Z., Costas, R., Tian, W., Wang, X., & Wouters, P. (2020a). An extensive analysis of the presence of altmetric data for Web of Science publications across subject fields and research topics. Scientometrics, 124(3), 2519–2549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03564-9
Fang, Z., Dudek, J., & Costas, R. (2020b). The stability of twitter metrics: A study on unavailable twitter mentions of scientific publications. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(12), 1455–1469. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24344
Fang, Z., Costas, R., Tian, W., Wang, X., & Wouters, P. (2021). How is science clicked on Twitter? Click metrics for Bitly short links to scientific publications. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(7), 918–932. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24458
Fang, Z., Costas, R., & Wouters, P. (2022). User engagement with scholarly tweets of scientific papers: A large-scale and cross-disciplinary analysis. Scientometrics, 127(8), 4523–4546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04468-6
Font-Julián, C. I., Ontalba-Ruipérez, J. A., Orduña-Malea, E., & Thelwall, M. (2022). Which types of online resource support US patent claims? Journal of Informetrics, 16(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101247
Friedrich, N., Bowman, T. D., Stock, W. G., & Haustein, S. (2015). Adapting sentiment analysis for tweets linking to scientific papers. In A. Ali Salah, Y. Tonta, A.A.A., Salah, C. Sugimoto, & U. Al (Eds.). Proceedings of the 15th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference (pp. 107–108) https://www.issi-society.org/proceedings/issi_2015/0107.pdf
Graham, S., & Hegde, D. (2015). Disclosing patents’ secrets. Science, 347(6219), 236–237. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1262080
Hammarfelt, B. (2021). Linking science to technology: The “patent paper citation” and the rise of patentometrics in the 1980s. Journal of Documentation, 77(6), 1413–1429. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-12-2020-0218
Hassan, S.-U., Saleem, A., Soroya, S. H., Safder, I., Iqbal, S., Jamil, S., Bukhari, F., Aljohani, N. R., & Nawaz, R. (2021). Sentiment analysis of tweets through Altmetrics: A machine learning approach. Journal of Information Science, 47(6), 712–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551520930917
Haustein, S., Costas, R., & Larivière, V. (2015). Characterizing social media metrics of scholarly papers: The effect of document properties and collaboration patterns. PLoS ONE, 10(3), e0120495. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120495
Haustein, S., Bowman, T. D., & Costas, R. (2016a). Interpreting “altmetrics”: Viewing acts on social media through the lens of citation and social theories. In C. R. Sugimoto (Ed.), Theories of informetrics and scholarly communication: A festschrift in honor of Blaise Cronin (pp. 372–405). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110308464-022
Haustein, S., Bowman, T. D., Holmberg, K., Tsou, A., Sugimoto, C. R., & Larivière, V. (2016b). Tweets as impact indicators: Examining the implications of automated ‘bot’ accounts on Twitter. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(1), 232–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23456
Holmberg, K. J. (2015). Altmetrics for information professionals: Past, present and future. Chandos Publishing.
Haustein, S. (2019). Scholarly twitter metrics. In W. Glänzel, F. H. Moed, U. Schmoch, & M. Thelwall (Eds.), Springer handbook of science and technology indicators (pp. 729–760). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_28
Htoo, T. H. H., & Na, J. C. (2017). Disciplinary differences in altmetrics for social sciences. Online Information Review, 41(2), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-12-2015-0386
Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2015). Patent citation analysis with Google. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(1), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23608
Lemley, M. A. (2008). Ignoring Patents. Michigan State Law Review, 2008(1), 19–34.
Marley, M. (2014). Full-text patent searching on free websites: Tools, tips and tricks. Business Information Review, 31(4), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382114564265
Martínez, C. (2011). Patent families: When do different definitions really matter? Scientometrics, 86(1), 39–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0251-3
Mohammadi, E., Thelwall, M., Kwasny, M., & Holmes, K. L. (2018). Academic information on twitter: A user survey. PLoS ONE, 13(5), e0197265. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197265
Moskovkin, V. M., Shigorina, N. A., & Popov, D. (2012). The possibility of using the Google Patents search tool in patentometric analysis (based on the example of the world’s largest innovative companies). Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 39(2), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688212020086
Narayanankutty, A. (2019). PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway as a therapeutic target for colorectal cancer: A review of preclinical and clinical evidence. Current Drug Targets, 20(12), 1217–1226. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389450120666190618123846
Narayanankutty, A. (2022). Pharmacological potentials and nutritional values of tropical and subtropical fruits of India: Emphasis on their anticancer bioactive components. Recent Patents on Anti-Cancer Drug Discovery, 17(2), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.2174/1574892816666211130165200
Noruzi, A., & Abdekhoda, M. (2014). Google Patents: The global patent search engine. Webology, 11(1). https://www.webology.org/2014/v11n1/a122.pdf
Ouellette, L. (2012). Do Patents Disclose Useful Information. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 25(2), 545–608.
Ouellette, L. (2017). Who reads patents? Nature Biotechnology, 35(5), 421–424. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3864
Orduña-Malea, E., Martín-Martín, A., & Delgado-López-Cózar, E. (2016). The next bibliometrics: ALMetrics (Author Level Metrics) and the multiple faces of author impact. Profesional De La Información, 25(3), 485–496. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2016.may.18
Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2017). Web citations in patents: Evidence of technological impact? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(8), 1967–1974. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23821
Ortega, J. L. (2018a). Disciplinary differences of the impact of altmetric. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 365(7), fny049. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fny049
Ortega, J. L. (2018b). Reliability and accuracy of altmetric providers: a comparison among Altmetric. com PlumX and crossref event data. Scientometrics, 116(3), 2123–2138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2838-z
Orduna-Malea, E., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2019). Demography of Altmetrics under the light of Dimensions: Locations, institutions, journals, disciplines and funding bodies in the global research framework. Journal of Altmetrics, 2(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.29024/joa.13
Ortega, J. L. (2020). Altmetrics data providers: A metaanalysis review of the coverage of metrics and publication. Profesional De La Información, 29(1), e290107. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.07
Priem, J., & Hemminger, B. H. (2010). Scientometrics 2.0: New metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v15i7.2874
Sayyadiharikandeh, M., Varol, O., Yang, K. C., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2020). Detection of novel social bots by ensembles of specialized classifiers. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM international conference on information & knowledge management (CIKM’2’). ACM, (pp. 2725–2732) https://doi.org/10.1145/3340531.3412698
Sugimoto, C. R., Work, S., Larivière, V., & Haustein, S. (2017). Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(9), 2037–2062. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23833
Tahamtan, I., & Bornmann, L. (2020). Altmetrics and societal impact measurements: Match or mismatch? A literature review. Profesional De La Información, 29(1), e290102. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.02
Thelwall, M. (2015). Evaluating the comprehensiveness of Twitter Search API results A: Four step method. Cybermetrics: International Journal of Scientometrics Informetrics and Bibliometrics, 18, 1.
Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2015a). Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 1: Citations and links to academic articles from the Web. Profesional De La Información, 24(5), 587–606. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015a.sep.08
Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2015b). Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 2: Social media metrics. Profesional De La Informacion, 24(5), 607–620. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015b.sep.09
Thelwall, M. (2018). Altmetric prevalence in the social sciences, arts and humanities: Where are the online discussions? Journal of Altmetrics, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.29024/joa.6
Warren, H. R., Raison, N., & Dasgupta, P. (2017). The Rise of Altmetrics. JAMA, 317(2), 131–132. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.18346
Yu, H., Xiao, T., Xu, S., & Wang, Y. (2019). Who posts scientific tweets? An investigation into the productivity, locations, and identities of scientific tweeters. Journal of Informetrics, 13(3), 841–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.08.001
Zahedi, Z., Costas, R., & Wouters, P. (2014). How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1491–1513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1264-0
Zahedi, Z., Fenner, M., & Costas, R. (2015). Consistency among altmetrics data provider/aggregators: What are the challenges?. In: Altmetrics15: 5 years in, what do we know? (pp. 1–3). Amsterdam, The Netherlands. http://altmetrics.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/altmetrics15_paper_14.pdf
[-]
