Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Azagra-Caro, Joaquín M. | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Benito Amat, Carlos | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Planells-Aleixandre, Ester | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-28T18:00:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-08-28T18:00:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-08 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 0892-9912 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/195749 | |
dc.description.abstract | [EN] Academic artists are researchers who create artistic work. They form part of the cultural life of cities and contribute to welfare not only through research but also through art. They may commercialise their art or use it to engage in scientifc knowledge difusion. We seek to understand the relationship between art, academic commercialisation and engagement, and detect barriers to academic art. The resources needed to develop and difuse art in addition to conducting research may be incompatible with a career focused on science quality or an organisational logic based on teaching and pure basic research. We study the responses to a survey of some 7,000 Spanish academics and compare university research ers to other researchers. More than half of the researchers surveyed create artistic work; however, whereas engagement is the norm rather than the exception, commercialisation is rare. Working in a university and producing good quality science run counter to being an artist. The detrimental efect of science quality on being a commercial or engaged artist turns positive after a certain threshold, which suggests polarisation among academic art ists. Among commercial artists, this polarisation seems to apply specifcally to university researchers. We discuss the implications for the valorisation of art across knowledge trans fer channels and in research evaluations. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | The Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities funded this research through Project CSO2016-79045-C2-2-R of the Spanish National R&D&I Plan. We are grateful to Christopher S. Hayter and Einar Rasmussen for their constructive comments. Our special thanks go to the volunteers who pilot-tested the survey: David Barberá, Àngels Bernabeu, Joaquín Camps, Gérard Carat, María Ángeles Chavarría, Anabel Fernández, Ester Linde, Óscar Llopis, Francisco Rivas and Soberana Sáez. Thanks are due also to the survey respondents and, particularly, those who spontaneously provided supporting statements. Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature. | es_ES |
dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Springer-Verlag | es_ES |
dc.relation.ispartof | The Journal of Technology Transfer | es_ES |
dc.rights | Reconocimiento (by) | es_ES |
dc.subject | Knowledge transfer | es_ES |
dc.subject | University-industry interaction | es_ES |
dc.subject | Science quality | es_ES |
dc.subject | Public understanding of science | es_ES |
dc.title | Academic artists' engagement and commercialisation | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s10961-022-09940-2 | es_ES |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MCIU//CSO2016-79045-C2-2-R/ | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | Abierto | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Azagra-Caro, JM.; Benito Amat, C.; Planells-Aleixandre, E. (2022). Academic artists' engagement and commercialisation. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 47(4):1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09940-2 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | S | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09940-2 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 1273 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpfin | 1296 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.volume | 47 | es_ES |
dc.description.issue | 4 | es_ES |
dc.relation.pasarela | S\465387 | es_ES |
dc.contributor.funder | Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Acosta, M., Coronado, D., León, M. D., & Moreno, P. J. (2019). The production of academic technological knowledge: An exploration at the research group level. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1–23. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ayoub, M. R., Gottschalk, S., & Müller, B. (2017). Impact of public seed-funding on academic spin-offs. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 1100–1124. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Azagra-Caro, J. M., Carat, G., & Pontikakis, D. (2010). Inclining the columns to make the temple look straight: A first glance at monetary indicators on university-industry cooperation. Research Evaluation, 19(2), 119–128. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Azagra-Caro, J. M., Fernández-Mesa, A., & Robinson-García, N. (2020a). ‘Getting out of the closet’: Scientific authorship of literary fiction and knowledge transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(1), 56–85. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Azagra-Caro, J. M., González-Salmerón, L., & Marques, P. (2020b). Fiction lagging behind or non-fiction defending the indefensible? University–industry (et al.) interaction in science fiction. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46(6), 1889–1916. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Azagra-Caro, J. M., & Llopis, O. (2018). Who do you care about? Scientists’ personality traits and perceived impact on beneficiaries. R&D Management, 48(5), 566–579. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Azoulay, P., Ding, W., & Stuart, T. (2009). The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality and direction of (public) research output. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 57(4), 637–676. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. Free Press Glencoe. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Bhandari, M., Guyatt, G. H., Kulkarni, A. V., Devereaux, P. J., Leece, P., Bajammal, S., Heels-Ansdell, D., & Busse, J. W. (2014). Perceptions of authors’ contributions are influenced by both byline order and designation of corresponding author. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(9), 1049–1054. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Bol, T., de Vaan, M., & van de Rijt, A. (2018). The Matthew effect in science funding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), 4887–4890. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Bonaccorsi, A. (2017). Addressing the disenchantment: Universities and regional development in peripheral regions. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 20(4), 293–320. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Bozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2011). Job satisfaction among university faculty: Individual, work, and institutional determinants. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(2), 154–186. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Buenstorf, G. (2009). Is commercialization good or bad for science? Individual-level evidence from the Max Planck Society. Research Policy, 38(2), 281–292. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17(1), 37–50. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Edler, J., Fier, H., & Grimpe, C. (2011). International scientist mobility and the locus of knowledge and technology transfer. Research Policy, 40(6), 791–805. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Fischer, B. B., Schaeffer, P. R., Vonortas, N. S., & Queiroz, S. (2018). Quality comes first: University-industry collaboration as a source of academic entrepreneurship in a developing country. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(2), 263–284. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Florida, R. (2019). The rise of the creative class. Basic Books. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Fudickar, R., Hottenrott, H., & Lawson, C. (2018). What’s the price of academic consulting? Effects of public and private sector consulting on academic research. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(4), 699–722. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Garcia, R., Araújo, V., Mascarini, S., Santos, E. G., & Costa, A. R. (2020). How long-term university-industry collaboration shapes the academic productivity of research groups. Innovation, 22(1), 56–70. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Gaughan, M., & Bozeman, B. (2016). Using the prisms of gender and rank to interpret research collaboration power dynamics. Social Studies of Science, 46(4), 536–558. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Giones, F., Laufs, D., & Schultz, C. (2020). Co-creating science commercialization opportunities for blue biotechnologies: The FucoSan Project. Sustainability, 12(14), 5578. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Gonzales, L. D., Martinez, E., & Ordu, C. (2014). Exploring faculty experiences in a striving university through the lens of academic capitalism. Studies in Higher Education, 39(7), 1097–1115. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Gulbrandsen, M., & Smeby, J. C. (2005). Industry funding and university professors’ research performance. Research Policy, 34(6), 932–950. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Haeussler, C., & Colyvas, J. A. (2011). Breaking the ivory tower: Academic entrepreneurship in the life sciences in UK and Germany. Research Policy, 40(1), 41–54. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Hayter, C. S., Rasmussen, E., & Rooksby, J. H. (2020). Beyond formal university technology transfer: Innovative pathways for knowledge exchange. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(1), 1–8. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Hottenrott, H., & Lawson, C. (2017). Fishing for complementarities: Research grants and research productivity. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 51, 1–38. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Hottenrott, H., & Thorwarth, S. (2011). Industry funding of university research and scientific productivity. Kyklos, 64(4), 534–555. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Kwiek, M. (2019). Social stratification in Higher Education: What it means at the micro-level of the individual academic scientist. Higher Education Quarterly, 73(4), 419–444. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Lam, A. (2010). From ‘ivory tower traditionalists’ to ‘entrepreneurial scientists’? Academic scientists in fuzzy university—industry boundaries. Social Studies of Science, 40(2), 307–340. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Lam, A. (2018). Boundary-crossing careers and the ‘third space of hybridity’: Career actors as knowledge brokers between creative arts and academia. Environment and Planning a: Economy and Space, 50(8), 1716–1741. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Lam, A. (2020). Hybrids, identity and knowledge boundaries: Creative artists between academic and practitioner communities. Human Relations, 73(6), 837–863. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Martínez, C., Azagra-Caro, J. M., & Maraut, S. (2013). Academic inventors, scientific impact and the institutionalisation of Pasteur’s Quadrant in Spain. Industry and Innovation, 20(5), 438–455. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Mattsson, P., Sundberg, C. J., & Laget, P. (2011). Is correspondence reflected in the author position? A bibliometric study of the relation between corresponding author and byline position. Scientometrics, 87(1), 99–105. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Olmos-Peñuela, J., Castro-Martínez, E., & D’Este, P. (2014). Knowledge transfer activities in social sciences and humanities: Explaining the interactions of research groups with non-academic agents. Research Policy, 43(4), 696–706. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., Krabel, S., Kitson, M., Llerena, P., Lissoni, F., Salter, A., & Krabel, S. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ranga, M., Perälampi, J., & Kansikas, J. (2016). The new face of university–business cooperation in Finland. Science and Public Policy, 43(5), 601–612. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Rooksby, J. H., & Hayter, C. S. (2019). Copyrights in higher education: Motivating a research agenda. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(1), 250–263. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Root-Bernstein, R., & Root-Bernstein, M. (2013). Sparks of genius: The 13 thinking tools of the world's most creative people. HMH. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Root-Bernstein, R., Allen, L., Beach, L., Bhadula, R., Fast, J., Hosey, C., Kremkow, B., Lapp, J., Lonc, K., Pawelec, K., Podufaly, A., Russ, C., Tennant, L., Vrtis, E., & Weinlander, S. (2008). Arts foster scientific success: Avocations of Nobel, national academy, royal society, and sigma xi members. Journal of Psychology of Science and Technology, 1(2), 51–63. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Root-Bernstein, R. S., Bernstein, M., & Garnier, H. (1995). Correlations between avocations, scientific style, work habits, and professional impact of scientists. Creativity Research Journal, 8(2), 115–137. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Root-Bernstein, R., & Root-Bernstein, M. (2004). Artistic scientists and scientific artists: The link between polymathy and creativity. In R. Sternberg, E. Grigorenko, & J. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 127–151). American Psychological Association. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Scandura, A., & Iammarino, S. (2021). Academic engagement with industry: The role of research quality and experience. The Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09867-0 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Schaeffer, V., Öcalan-Özel, S., & Pénin, J. (2020). The complementarities between formal and informal channels of university–Industry knowledge transfer: A longitudinal approach. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(1), 31–55. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Teirlinck, P., & Spithoven, A. (2012). Fostering industry-science cooperation through public funding: Differences between universities and public research centres. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(5), 676–695. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Toole, A. A., & Czarnitzki, D. (2010). Commercializing science: Is there a university “brain drain” from academic entrepreneurship? Management Science, 56(9), 1599–1614. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Van Looy, B., Ranga, M., Callaert, J., Debackere, K., & Zimmermann, E. (2004). Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: Towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? Research Policy, 33(3), 425–441. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Weiss, P. S. (2012). Who are corresponding authors? ACS Nano, 2(177), 2861–2861. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Wren, J. D., Grissom, J. E., & Conway, T. (2006). E-mail decay rates among corresponding authors in MEDLINE: The ability to communicate with and request materials from authors is being eroded by the expiration of e-mail addresses. EMBO Reports, 7(2), 122–127. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Zucker, L. G., & Darby, M. R. (1996). Star scientists and institutional transformation: Patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93(23), 12709–12716. | es_ES |