- -

Ambidexterity in entrepreneurial universities and performance measurement systems. A literature review

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Ambidexterity in entrepreneurial universities and performance measurement systems. A literature review

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: s11365-022-00795-5.pdf
Tamaño: 925.1Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Abrir
dc.contributor.author García-Hurtado, Dayanis es_ES
dc.contributor.author Devece Carañana, Carlos Alberto es_ES
dc.contributor.author Zegarra-Saldaña, Pablo E. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Crisanto-Pantoja, Mario es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-05T19:03:09Z
dc.date.available 2023-12-05T19:03:09Z
dc.date.issued 2022-02-10 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/200517
dc.description.abstract [EN] The main purpose of this research is to analyze the exploration and exploitation of knowledge in universities that support innovation and entrepreneurship in their environment. For this, the Performance Measurement Systems (PMS) of the universities management are analyzed as a proxy for the implementation of the strategic vision of the universities. This study is based on a systematic literature review on the subject, supported by the technical possibilities offered by the MAXQDA (The Art of Data Analysis) program. The databases used were the following: Elsevier (Science Direct), Springer, Wiley and Taylor & Francis. The main findings suggest that organizational ambidexterity, in general, develops unevenly and from different approaches, among which innovation, learning and strategy stand out. However, organizational ambidexterity hardly develops in a university context, where most of the university activities require some knowledge of the technological frontier. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze and understand these two dimensions (exploration and exploitation) and their positive influence on entrepreneurship. In a context where the development of technology and science happens at an ever-increasing speed, a balance between exploration and exploitation is necessary, which should be reflected in the different control mechanisms in academic environments, such as the Performance Measurement Systems (PMS). The analysis of these systems will allow to know the position of the universities in the face of ambidexterity. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Springer-Verlag es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Ambidexterity es_ES
dc.subject Innovation es_ES
dc.subject Performance measurement system es_ES
dc.subject Universities es_ES
dc.subject Entrepreneurial es_ES
dc.subject.classification ORGANIZACION DE EMPRESAS es_ES
dc.title Ambidexterity in entrepreneurial universities and performance measurement systems. A literature review es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s11365-022-00795-5 es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Facultad de Administración y Dirección de Empresas - Facultat d'Administració i Direcció d'Empreses es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation García-Hurtado, D.; Devece Carañana, CA.; Zegarra-Saldaña, PE.; Crisanto-Pantoja, M. (2022). Ambidexterity in entrepreneurial universities and performance measurement systems. A literature review. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. 20:1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-022-00795-5 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-022-00795-5 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 345
dc.description.upvformatpfin 22 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 366
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 20
dc.identifier.eissn 1555-1938 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\460958 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Universitat Politècnica de València es_ES
dc.description.references Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C., & Di Costa, F. (2011). University-industry research collaboration: A model to assess university capability. Higher Education, 62(2), 163–181. es_ES
dc.description.references Adiloglu, L.-Y., & Besler, S. (2021). Journal of Air Transport Management Institutional factors influencing business models : The case of Turkish Airlines. Journal of Air Transport Management, 91, 101–989. es_ES
dc.description.references Agostino, D., & Arnaboldi, M. (2012). Design issues in Balanced Scorecards : The “ what ” and “ how ” of control. European Management Journal, 30, 327–339. es_ES
dc.description.references Al-Hosaini, F., & Sofian, S. (2015). A Review of Balanced Scorecard Framework in Higher Education Institution (HEIs). International Review of Management and Marketing, 5(1), 26–35. es_ES
dc.description.references Almeida, V., Ferreira, J., & Ferreira, F. (2019). Developing a multi-criteria decision support system for evaluating knowledge transfer by higher education institutions. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 17(4), 358–372. es_ES
dc.description.references Amador, S. R., Pérez, M. D., López-Huertas, M. J., & Rodríguez- Font, R. J. (2018). Indicator system for managing science, tecnology and innovation in universities. Scientometrics, 115, 1575–1587. es_ES
dc.description.references Apa, R., De Marchi, V., Grandinetti, R., & Sedita, S. R. (2021). University -SME collaboration and innovation performance the role of informal relationships and absorptive capacity. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46, 961–988. es_ES
dc.description.references Asif, M., & De Vries, H. J. (2014). Creating ambidexterity through quality management. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 26(11–12), 1226–1241. es_ES
dc.description.references Barra, C., & Zotti, R. (2018). The contribution of university, private and public sector resources to Italian regional innovation system (in)efficiency. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(2), 432–457. es_ES
dc.description.references Bausch, M., Barmeyer, C., & Mayrhofer, U. (in press). Facilitating factors in the cross-cultural transfer of management practices : The case of a German multinational in Brazil. International Business Review, (September 2021). es_ES
dc.description.references Bedford, D. S. (2015). Management control systems across different modes of innovation : Implications for firm performance. Management Accounting Research, 28, 12–30. es_ES
dc.description.references Benitez, J., Castillo, A., Llorens, J., & Braojos, J. (2017). IT-enabled knowledge ambidexterity and innovation performance in small U.S. firms: The moderator role of social media capability. Information & Management, 55(1), 131–143. es_ES
dc.description.references Benner, M., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–256. es_ES
dc.description.references Birkel, H., & Müller, J. M. (2021). Potentials of industry 4. 0 for supply chain management within the triple bottom line of sustainability - A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 289, 125–612. es_ES
dc.description.references Birkinshaw, J., & Gupta, K. (2013). Clarifying the distinctive contribution of ambidexterity to the field of organization studies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 287–298. es_ES
dc.description.references Bisbe, J., & Otley, D. (2004). The effects of the interactive use of management control systems on product innovation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, 709–737. es_ES
dc.description.references Blankesteijn, M., Bossink, B., & van der Sijde, P. (2021). Science-based entrepreneurship education as a means for university-industry technology transfer. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 17(2), 779–808. es_ES
dc.description.references Blass, E., & Hayward, P. (2014). Innovation in higher education; will there be a role for “ the academe / university ” in 2025 ? The European Journal of Futures Research, 2(41), 1–9. es_ES
dc.description.references Bocquet, R., & Mothe, C. (2015). Can a governance structure foster cluster ambidexterity through knowledge management ? An empirical study of two French SME clusters. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13, 329–343. es_ES
dc.description.references Burgess, N., Strauss, K., Currie, G., & Wood, G. (2015). Organizational ambidexterity and the Hybrid Middle Manager: The case of patient safety in UK Hospitals. Human Resource Managemen, 54, 87–109. es_ES
dc.description.references Bustinza, O. F., Vendrell-Herrero, F., & Gomes, E. (2020). Unpacking the effect of strategic ambidexterity on performance. A crosscountry comparison of MMNEs developing product-service innovation. International Business Review, 26(6), 101569. es_ES
dc.description.references Cabeza-Pulles, D., Fernandez-Perez, V., & Roldan-Bravo, M. I. (2020). Internal networking and innovation ambidexterity : The mediating role of knowledge management processes in university research. European Management Journal, 38(3), 450–461. es_ES
dc.description.references Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., & Esposito, E. (2019). Exploration and exploitation in the development of more entrepreneurial universities : A twisting learning path model of ambidexterity. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 141, 172–194. es_ES
dc.description.references Chang, K. H., & Gotcher, D. F. (2020). How and when does co-production facilitate eco-innovation in international buyer-supplier relationships ? The role of environmental innovation ambidexterity and institutional pressures. International Business Review, 29(5), 101731. es_ES
dc.description.references Chang, Y- C., Yang, P. Y, Martin, B. R., Chi, H- R., & Tsai-lin, T- F. (2016). Entrepreneurial universities and research ambidexterity : A multilevel analysis. Technovation, 54, 7–21. es_ES
dc.description.references Chen, M., Yang, Z., Dou, W., & Wang, F. (2018). Flying or dying ? Organizational change, customer participation, and innovation ambidexterity in emerging economies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35(1), 97–119. es_ES
dc.description.references Cho, M., Bonn, M. A., & Han, S. J. (2020). Innovation ambidexterity : Balancing exploitation and exploration for startup and established restaurants and impacts upon performance. Industry and Innovation, 27(4), 340–362. es_ES
dc.description.references Da Silva, E., & Segatto, A. P. (2017). Innovation In Universities: Brazilian Academic Research in The Period of 2001–2010. International Journal of Innovation, 5(3), 289–310. es_ES
dc.description.references Damanpour, F. (2017). Organizacional Innovation. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management, 1–47. es_ES
dc.description.references Donada, C., Mothe, C., & Alegre, J. (2021). Managing skunkworks to achieve ambidexterity : The Robinson Crusoe effect. European Management Journal, 39(2), 214–225. es_ES
dc.description.references Donate, M. J., & Guadamillas, F. (2015). An empirical study on the relationships between knowledge management, knowledge-oriented human resource practices and innovation. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13(2), 134–148. es_ES
dc.description.references Duc, L. A., Tho, N. D., Nakandala, D., & Lan, Y. (2020). Team innovation in retail services: The role of ambidextrous leadership and team learning. Service Business, 14(1), 167–186. es_ES
dc.description.references Duncan, R. B. (1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. The Management of Organization, 1, 167–188. es_ES
dc.description.references Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix – University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development. EASST Review, 14(1), 14–19. es_ES
dc.description.references Ferreira, A., & Otley, D. (2009). The design and use of performance management systems: An extended framework for analysis. Management Accounting Research, 20(4), 263–282. es_ES
dc.description.references Ferreira, J., & Carayannis, E. G. (2019). University-industry knowledge transfer - unpacking the “ black box ”: An introduction. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 17(4), 353–357. es_ES
dc.description.references Foss, N. J., & Kirkegaard, M. F. (2020). Blended ambidexterity : The copresence of modes of ambidexterity in William Demant Holding. Long Range Planning, 53(6), 102049. es_ES
dc.description.references Franceschini, F., Galetto, M., & Maisano, D. (2019). Theory and Practice of Key Performance Indicators. In Designing Performance Measurement Systems. es_ES
dc.description.references Franco-Santos, M., & Otley, D. (2018). Reviewing and Theorizing the Unintended Consequences of Performance Management Systems. International Journal of Management Review, 20(3), 696–730. es_ES
dc.description.references Fudickar, R., & Hottenrott, H. (2018). Public research and the innovation performance of new technology based firms. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(2), 326–358. es_ES
dc.description.references Fundin, & A., Backström, T., Johansson, P. E. (2021). Exploring the emergent quality management paradigm. Total Quality Management, 32(5–6), 476–488. es_ES
dc.description.references Giménez-Toledo, E., & Tejeda-Artigas, C. M. (2015). Process of publication, quality and prestige of scientific education publishers. Educación XX1, 18(1), 17–44. es_ES
dc.description.references Giones, F. (2019). University - industry collaborations : An industry perspective. Management Decision, 57(12), 3258–3278. es_ES
dc.description.references Harmancioglu, N., Sääksjärvi, M., & Jan, E. (2020). Cannibalize and combine ? The impact of ambidextrous innovation on organizational outcomes under market competition. Industrial Marketing Management, 85, 44–57. es_ES
dc.description.references Hiebl, M. R. W. (2015). Family involvement and organizational ambidexterity in later-generation family businesses A framework for further investigation. Management Decision, 53(5), 1061–1082. es_ES
dc.description.references Hsiang-Lin, C., & Huang, M.-C. (2021). Does dual Embeddedness matter ? Mechanisms and patterns of subsidiary ambidexterity that links a Subsidiary ’ s dual Embeddedness with its learning strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 38(4), 1431–1465. es_ES
dc.description.references Hsu, B., & Chen, Y.-M. (2020). Why university matters : The impact of university resources on foreign workers ’ human and social capital accumulation. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 17(1), 45–61. es_ES
dc.description.references Hu, B., & Chen, W. (2016). Business model ambidexterity and technological innovation performance : Evidence from China. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 28(5), 583–600. es_ES
dc.description.references Jackson, N. C. (2019). ScienceDirect Managing for competency with innovation change in higher education : Examining the pitfalls and pivots of digital transformation. Business Horizons, 62(6), 761–772. es_ES
dc.description.references Jakhar, S. K., Bhattacharya, A., Rathore, H., & Mangla, S. K. (2020). Stakeholder pressure for sustainability : Can “ innovative capabilities ” explain the idiosyncratic response in the manufacturing firms ? Business Strategy and the Enviroment, 29(6), 2635–2653. es_ES
dc.description.references Junni, P., Chang, Y. Y., & Sarala, R. (2019). Ambidextrous Orientation and Performance in Corporate Venture Units: A Multilevel Analysis of CV Units in Emerging Market Multinationals. Long Range Planning, 53(6), 101930. es_ES
dc.description.references Kassotaki, O. (2019). Explaining ambidextrous leadership in the aerospace and defense organizations. European Management Journal, 37(5), 552–563. es_ES
dc.description.references Khadhraoui, M., Plaisent, M., Lakhal, L., & Prosper, B. (2016). Factors Inhibiting University-Industry technology transfer. Journal of Information Technology & Economic Devolopment, 7(2), 1–11. es_ES
dc.description.references Khalid, S., Knouzi, N., Tanane, O., & Talbi, M. (2014). Balanced scoreboard, the performance tool in higher education: Establishment of performance indicators. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4552–4558. es_ES
dc.description.references Khan, S. J., & Mir, A. A. (2019). Ambidextrous culture, contextual ambidexterity and new product innovations : The role of organizational slack and environmental factors. Business Strategy and the Enviroment, 28(4), 652–663. es_ES
dc.description.references Khan, Z., Amankwah-Amoah, J., Kyu, Y., Puthusserry, P., & Czinkota, M. (2020). Strategic ambidexterity and its performance implications for emerging economies multinationals. International Business Review, 101762. es_ES
dc.description.references Kivleniece, I., & Quelin, B. V. (2012). Creating and capturing value in public-private ties: A private actor’s perspective. Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 272–299. es_ES
dc.description.references Kuckartz, U., & Rädiker, S. (2019). Analyzing qualitative data with MAXQDA. Text, audio, and video. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. es_ES
dc.description.references Kuo, T., Lim, S. S., & Sonko, L. K. (2018). Catch-up strategy of latecomer firms in Asia : A case study of innovation ambidexterity in PC industry. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 30(12), 1483–1497. es_ES
dc.description.references Kwak, C., Lee, J., & Lee, H. (2019). Do teams need both hands ? An analysis of team process ambidexterity and the enabling role of information technology. International Journal of Information Management, 51(11), 102038. es_ES
dc.description.references Lascaux, A. (2019). Absorptive Capacity , Research Output Sharing , and Research Output Capture in University-Industry Partnerships . Scandinavian Journal of Management, 35(3), 101045. es_ES
dc.description.references Lee, Y., & Lee, J. (2016). Knowledge workers ’ ambidexterity : Conceptual separation of competencies and behavioural dispositions. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 24(1), 22–40. es_ES
dc.description.references Li, C., Liu, Y., Lin, C., & Ma, H. (2016). Top management team diversity, ambidextrous innovation and the mediating effect of top team decision-making processes. Industry and Innovation, 23(3), 260–275. es_ES
dc.description.references Li, R., Fu, L., & Liu, Z. (2020a). Does openness to innovation matter ? The moderating role of open innovation between organizational ambidexterity and innovation performance. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 28(2), 251–271. es_ES
dc.description.references Li, S., Ruiqian, J., Seufert, J. H., Wang, X., & Luo, J. (2020b). Ambidextrous leadership and radical innovative capability : The moderating role of leader support. Creativity and Innovation Management, 29(4), 621–633. es_ES
dc.description.references Li, X. (2018). Is B Yin-Yang balancing superior to ambidexterity as an approach to paradox management ? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 36(1), 17–32. es_ES
dc.description.references Lin, C., & Chang, C. (2015). A patent-based study of the relationships among technological portfolio, ambidextrous innovation, and firm performance. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 27(10), 1193–1211. es_ES
dc.description.references Liu, Y., Li, W., & Li, Y. (2019). Ambidexterity between low cost strategy and CSR strategy : Contingencies of competition and regulation. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 37(12), 633–660. es_ES
dc.description.references March, J. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–89. es_ES
dc.description.references Mundy, J. (2010). Creating dynamic tensions through a balanced use of management control systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(5), 499–523. es_ES
dc.description.references Nguyen, B., Yu, X., Melewar, T. C., & Hemsley-brown, J. (2016). Brand ambidexterity and commitment in higher education : An exploratory study. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3105–3112. es_ES
dc.description.references Nicholls-Nixon, C. L., Valliere, D., Gedeon, S. A., & Wise, S. (2020). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and the lifecycle of university business incubators : An integrative case study. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 17, 809–837. es_ES
dc.description.references Nickerson, J. A., & Zenger, T. R. (2002). Being efficiently fickle: A dynamic theory of organizational choice. Organization Science, 13, 547–566. es_ES
dc.description.references Nisio, A., De Carolis, R., & Losurdo, S. (2018). Introducing performance management in universities : The case of a university in Southern Italy. International Journal of Management in Education, 12(2), 132–153. es_ES
dc.description.references Nowacki, C., & Monk, A. H. B (2020). Ambidexterity in government The influence of different types of legitimacy. Research Policy, 49 (1), 103840. es_ES
dc.description.references Pangarso, A., Siti, E., Raharjo, K., & Afrianty, T. W. (2020). Data in brief Data of innovation ambidexterity as a mediator in the absorptive capacity effect on sustainable competitive advantage. Data in Brief, 29, 105200. es_ES
dc.description.references Parmentola, A., Ferretti, M., & Panetti, E. (2020). Exploring the university-industry cooperation in a low innovative region. What differences between low tech and high tech industries ? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 17, 1469–1496. es_ES
dc.description.references Peris-Ortiz, M., García-Hurtado, D., & Devece, C. (2019). Influence of the balanced scorecard on the science and innovation performance of Latin American universities. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 4(17), 373–383. es_ES
dc.description.references Pietrzak, M., Paliszkiewicz, J., & Klepacki, B. (2015). The application of the balanced scorecard ( BSC ) in the higher education setting of a Polish university. Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management, 3(1), 151–164. es_ES
dc.description.references Pilonato, S., & Monfardini, P. (2020). Performance measurement systems in higher education: how levers of control reveal the ambiguities of reforms. The British Accounting Review, 52(3), 100908. es_ES
dc.description.references Posch, A., & Garaus, C. (2019). Boon or curse ? A contingent view on the relationship between strategic planning and organizational ambidexterity. Long Range Planning, 53(6), 101878. es_ES
dc.description.references Purchase, S., Kum, C., & Olaru, D. (2016). Industrial Marketing Management Paths, events and resource use : New developments in understanding innovation processes. Industrial Marketing Management, 58, 123–136. es_ES
dc.description.references Rafailidis, A., Trivellas, P., & Polychroniou, P. (2017). Total Quality Management & Business Excellence The mediating role of quality on the relationship between cultural ambidexterity and innovation performance. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 28(9–10), 1134–1148. es_ES
dc.description.references Revilla, E., & Rodríguez-Prado, B. (2018). Bulding ambidexterity through creativity mechanisms : Contextual drivers of innovation success. Research Policy, 47(9), 1611–1625. es_ES
dc.description.references Rhee, M., & Kim, T. (2019). Exploiting old lessons and exploring new ideas : A Confucian approach to exploitation and exploration. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 36, 773–795. es_ES
dc.description.references Ridley, D. (2012). The literature review: A step-by-step guide for students. Sage Publications Ltd. es_ES
dc.description.references Robertson, J., McCarthy, I., & Pitt, L. (2019). Leveraging social capital in university-industry knowledge transfer strategies: A comparative positioning framework. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1(12), 461–472. es_ES
dc.description.references Sengupta, A., & Ray, A. S. (2017). University research and knowledge transfer : A dynamic view of ambidexterity in british universities. Research Policy, 46(5), 881–897. es_ES
dc.description.references Shane, S. (2004). Academic Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham, U.K.,: Edward Elgar. es_ES
dc.description.references Siggelkow, N., & Levinthal, D. A. (2003). Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organization Science, 14, 650–669. es_ES
dc.description.references Simons, R. (1991). Strategic orientation and top management attention to control systems. Strategic Management Journal, 12(1), 49–62. es_ES
dc.description.references Simons, R. (1995). Levers of control: How managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renew. Harvard Business School Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Song, S. H., Kim, M. J., & Kang, J. (2016). The effects of ambidextrous alliances on product innovation. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 26(1), 14–18. es_ES
dc.description.references Strese, S., Meuer, M. W., Flatten, T. C., & Brettel, M. (2016). Examining cross-functional coopetition as a driver of organizational ambidexterity. Industrial Marketing Management, 57, 40–52. es_ES
dc.description.references Suzuki, O. (2018). Uncovering moderators of organisational ambidexterity : Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Industry and Innovation, 26(4), 391–418. es_ES
dc.description.references Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Managemen, 14, 207–222. es_ES
dc.description.references Tsen, F. C., Huang, M., & Chen, D. Z. (2020). Factors of university–industry collaboration afecting university innovation performance. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(2), 560–577. es_ES
dc.description.references Valero, A., & Van Reenen, J. (2019). The Economic Impact of Universities : Evidence from Across the Globe. Economic of Education Rewiew, 68, 53–67. es_ES
dc.description.references Wu, J., Wood, G., Chen, X., Meyer, M., & Liu, Z. (2020). Strategic ambidexterity and innovation in Chinese multinational vs . indigenous firms : The role of managerial capability. International Business Review, 29(6), 101652. es_ES
dc.description.references Xie, X., & Gao, Y. (2017). Strategic networks and new product performance : The mediating role of ambidextrous innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 30(7), 811–824. es_ES
dc.description.references Xie, X., Gao, Y., Zang, Z., & Meng, X. (2020). Collaborative ties and ambidextrous innovation : Insights from internal and external knowledge acquisition. Industry and Innovation, 27(3), 285–310. es_ES
dc.description.references Xie, X., & Zhu, Q. (2020). Exploring an innovative pivot : How green training can spur corporate sustainability performance. Business Strategy and the Enviroment, 29(6), 2432–2449. es_ES
dc.subject.ods 08.- Fomentar el crecimiento económico sostenido, inclusivo y sostenible, el empleo pleno y productivo, y el trabajo decente para todos es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem