Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Psarommatis-Giannakopoulos, Foivos | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | May, Gokan | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-28T18:17:19Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-05-28T18:17:19Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-01 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 0360-8352 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/204456 | |
dc.description.abstract | [EN] This paper presents a comparative analysis of three distinct Zero Defect Manufacturing (ZDM) strategies: Detection - Repair (DR), Detection - Prevention (DP), and Prediction - Prevention (PP). We evaluated these strategies based on their effectiveness in optimizing ZDM parameters, considering the specific needs and constraints of various manufacturing setups. Our analysis found that while DR and DP simulation models closely reflected original results, PP models demonstrated lower predictability, underscoring the need for further research and specialized modeling approaches. Nonetheless, the selection of an optimal strategy was determined to be context-dependent, hinging on the characteristics of the manufacturing system. The study also highlights the necessity of validating these strategies across diverse manufacturing setups to assess their performance and suitability. This research augments the existing body of knowledge on ZDM, offering insights to drive future investigations for the development of robust, accurate, and efficient ZDM modeling techniques. The ultimate objective is to move modern manufacturing industries towards a zero-defect environment, thereby enhancing their efficiency, reliability, and overall productivity. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | The presented work was partially supported by the the projects RE4DY, PLOOTO, and TALON EU H2020 projects under grant agreements No 101058384, 101092008 and 101070181 accordingly. The article reflects the views of the authors and the Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains. | es_ES |
dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | es_ES |
dc.relation.ispartof | Computers & Industrial Engineering | es_ES |
dc.rights | Reconocimiento (by) | es_ES |
dc.subject | Zero Defect Manufacturing (ZDM) | es_ES |
dc.subject | Parameter optimization | es_ES |
dc.subject | Manufacturing strategies | es_ES |
dc.subject | Stochastic modeling | es_ES |
dc.subject | Manufacturing setup variation | es_ES |
dc.subject | Predictive accuracy | es_ES |
dc.title | Optimization of zero defect manufacturing strategies: A comparative study on simplified modeling approaches for enhanced efficiency and accuracy | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.cie.2023.109783 | es_ES |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/HE/101058384/EU/European Data as a PRoduct Value Ecosystems for Resilient Factory 4.0 Product and ProDuction ContinuitY and Sustainability/ | es_ES |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/HE/101070181/EU/Autonomous and Self-organized Artificial Intelligent Orchestrator for a Greener Industry 4.0/ | es_ES |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/HE/101092008/EU/Product Passport through Twinning of Circular Value Chains/ | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | Abierto | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Psarommatis-Giannakopoulos, F.; May, G. (2024). Optimization of zero defect manufacturing strategies: A comparative study on simplified modeling approaches for enhanced efficiency and accuracy. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109783 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | S | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109783 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.volume | 187 | es_ES |
dc.relation.pasarela | S\513785 | es_ES |
dc.contributor.funder | European Commission | es_ES |