Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Cuerda del Pino, Alba | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Rodrigo Martín-San Agustín | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Diez, José-Luís | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Laguna Sanz, Alejandro José | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Palanca, Ana | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Rossetti, Paolo | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Gumbau-Gimenez, Maria | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Ampudia-Blasco, Francisco Javier | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Bondía Company, Jorge | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-29T18:04:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-07-29T18:04:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-06-01 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 1520-9156 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/206789 | |
dc.description | This is a copy of an article published in the Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics © 2024 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.; Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is available online at: http://online.liebertpub.com. | es_ES |
dc.description.abstract | [EN] Background: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of Dexcom G6 (DG6) and FreeStyle Libre-2 (FSL2) during aerobic training and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in individuals with type 1 diabetes. Methods: Twenty-six males (mean age 29.3 +/- 6.3 years and mean duration of diabetes 14.9 +/- 6.1 years) participated in this study. Interstitial glucose levels were measured using DG6 and FSL2, while plasma glucose levels were measured every 10 min using YSI 2500 as the reference for glucose measurements in this study. The measurements began 20 min before the start of exercise and continued for 20 min after exercise. Seven measurements were taken for each subject and exercise. Results: Both DG6 and FSL2 devices showed significant differences compared to YSI glucose data for both aerobic and HIIT exercises. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices exhibited superior performance during HIIT than aerobic training, with DG6 showing a mean absolute relative difference of 14.03% versus 31.98%, respectively. In the comparison between the two devices, FSL2 demonstrated significantly higher effectiveness in aerobic training, yet its performance was inferior to DG6 during HIIT. According to the 40/40 criteria, both sensors performed similarly, with marks over 93% for all ranges and both exercises, and above 99% for HIIT and in the >180 mg/dL range, which is in accordance with FDA guidelines. Conclusions: The findings suggest that the accuracy of DG6 and FSL2 deteriorates during and immediately after exercise but remains acceptable for both devices during HIIT. However, accuracy is compromised with DG6 during aerobic exercise. This study is the first to compare the accuracy of two CGMs, DG6, and FSL2, during two exercise modalities, using plasma glucose YSI measurements as the gold standard for comparisons. It was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06080542). | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | This work received support from grants PID2019-107722RB-C21 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and CIBER (Consorcio Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red), group number CB17/08/00004, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, and from the European Union-European Regional Development Fund. AP was additionally supported by a Sara Borrell postdoctoral grant from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (CD22/00012). | es_ES |
dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Mary Ann Liebert | es_ES |
dc.relation.ispartof | Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics | es_ES |
dc.rights | Reserva de todos los derechos | es_ES |
dc.subject | Type 1 diabetes | es_ES |
dc.subject | Accuracy | es_ES |
dc.subject | Continuous glucose monitoring | es_ES |
dc.subject | High-intensity interval training | es_ES |
dc.subject | Aerobic exercise | es_ES |
dc.subject.classification | INGENIERIA DE SISTEMAS Y AUTOMATICA | es_ES |
dc.title | Accuracy of Two Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices During Aerobic and High-Intensity Interval Training in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1089/dia.2023.0535 | es_ES |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020/PID2019-107722RB-C21/ES/SOLUCIONES A MEDIDA DEL PACIENTE PARA EL CONTROL DE GLUCOSA EN SANGRE EN DIABETES TIPO 1/ | es_ES |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ISCIII//CB17%2F08%2F00004//CIBERdem/ | es_ES |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ISCIII//CD22%2F00012/ | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | Abierto | es_ES |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universitat Politècnica de València. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Industriales - Escola Tècnica Superior d'Enginyers Industrials | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Cuerda Del Pino, A.; Rodrigo Martín-San Agustín; Diez, J.; Laguna Sanz, AJ.; Palanca, A.; Rossetti, P.; Gumbau-Gimenez, M.... (2024). Accuracy of Two Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices During Aerobic and High-Intensity Interval Training in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics. 26(6):411-419. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2023.0535 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | S | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2023.0535 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 411 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpfin | 419 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.volume | 26 | es_ES |
dc.description.issue | 6 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.pmid | 38215205 | es_ES |
dc.relation.pasarela | S\523323 | es_ES |
dc.contributor.funder | Instituto de Salud Carlos III | es_ES |
dc.contributor.funder | Agencia Estatal de Investigación | es_ES |
dc.contributor.funder | European Regional Development Fund | es_ES |