- -

Accuracy of Two Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices During Aerobic and High-Intensity Interval Training in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Accuracy of Two Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices During Aerobic and High-Intensity Interval Training in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Cuerda del Pino, Alba es_ES
dc.contributor.author Rodrigo Martín-San Agustín es_ES
dc.contributor.author Diez, José-Luís es_ES
dc.contributor.author Laguna Sanz, Alejandro José es_ES
dc.contributor.author Palanca, Ana es_ES
dc.contributor.author Rossetti, Paolo es_ES
dc.contributor.author Gumbau-Gimenez, Maria es_ES
dc.contributor.author Ampudia-Blasco, Francisco Javier es_ES
dc.contributor.author Bondía Company, Jorge es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2024-07-29T18:04:34Z
dc.date.available 2024-07-29T18:04:34Z
dc.date.issued 2024-06-01 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 1520-9156 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/206789
dc.description This is a copy of an article published in the Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics © 2024 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.; Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is available online at: http://online.liebertpub.com. es_ES
dc.description.abstract [EN] Background: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of Dexcom G6 (DG6) and FreeStyle Libre-2 (FSL2) during aerobic training and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in individuals with type 1 diabetes. Methods: Twenty-six males (mean age 29.3 +/- 6.3 years and mean duration of diabetes 14.9 +/- 6.1 years) participated in this study. Interstitial glucose levels were measured using DG6 and FSL2, while plasma glucose levels were measured every 10 min using YSI 2500 as the reference for glucose measurements in this study. The measurements began 20 min before the start of exercise and continued for 20 min after exercise. Seven measurements were taken for each subject and exercise. Results: Both DG6 and FSL2 devices showed significant differences compared to YSI glucose data for both aerobic and HIIT exercises. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices exhibited superior performance during HIIT than aerobic training, with DG6 showing a mean absolute relative difference of 14.03% versus 31.98%, respectively. In the comparison between the two devices, FSL2 demonstrated significantly higher effectiveness in aerobic training, yet its performance was inferior to DG6 during HIIT. According to the 40/40 criteria, both sensors performed similarly, with marks over 93% for all ranges and both exercises, and above 99% for HIIT and in the >180 mg/dL range, which is in accordance with FDA guidelines. Conclusions: The findings suggest that the accuracy of DG6 and FSL2 deteriorates during and immediately after exercise but remains acceptable for both devices during HIIT. However, accuracy is compromised with DG6 during aerobic exercise. This study is the first to compare the accuracy of two CGMs, DG6, and FSL2, during two exercise modalities, using plasma glucose YSI measurements as the gold standard for comparisons. It was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06080542). es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship This work received support from grants PID2019-107722RB-C21 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and CIBER (Consorcio Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red), group number CB17/08/00004, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, and from the European Union-European Regional Development Fund. AP was additionally supported by a Sara Borrell postdoctoral grant from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (CD22/00012). es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Mary Ann Liebert es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Type 1 diabetes es_ES
dc.subject Accuracy es_ES
dc.subject Continuous glucose monitoring es_ES
dc.subject High-intensity interval training es_ES
dc.subject Aerobic exercise es_ES
dc.subject.classification INGENIERIA DE SISTEMAS Y AUTOMATICA es_ES
dc.title Accuracy of Two Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices During Aerobic and High-Intensity Interval Training in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1089/dia.2023.0535 es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020/PID2019-107722RB-C21/ES/SOLUCIONES A MEDIDA DEL PACIENTE PARA EL CONTROL DE GLUCOSA EN SANGRE EN DIABETES TIPO 1/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ISCIII//CB17%2F08%2F00004//CIBERdem/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ISCIII//CD22%2F00012/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Industriales - Escola Tècnica Superior d'Enginyers Industrials es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Cuerda Del Pino, A.; Rodrigo Martín-San Agustín; Diez, J.; Laguna Sanz, AJ.; Palanca, A.; Rossetti, P.; Gumbau-Gimenez, M.... (2024). Accuracy of Two Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices During Aerobic and High-Intensity Interval Training in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics. 26(6):411-419. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2023.0535 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2023.0535 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 411 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 419 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 26 es_ES
dc.description.issue 6 es_ES
dc.identifier.pmid 38215205 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\523323 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Instituto de Salud Carlos III es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Agencia Estatal de Investigación es_ES
dc.contributor.funder European Regional Development Fund es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem