Substrate Mapping for Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Through High-Density Whole-Chamber Double Extra Stimuli The S3 Protocol

Abstract

[EN] Background: A partial delineation of targets for ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) during a stable rhythm is likely responsible for a suboptimal success rate. The abnormal low-voltage near-field functional components may be hidden within the high-amplitude far-field signal. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefit and feasibility of functional substrate mapping using a full-ventricle S3 protocol and to assess its colocalization with arrhythmogenic conducting channels (CCs) on late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance. Methods: An S3 mapping protocol with a drive train of S1 followed by S2 (effective refractory period + 30 ms) and S3 (effective refractory period + 50 ms) from the right ventricular apex was performed in 40 consecutive patients undergoing scar-related VT ablation. Deceleration zones (DZs) and areas of late potentials (LPs) were identified for all maps. A preprocedural noninvasive substrate assessment was done using late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance and postprocessing with automated CC identification. Results: The S3 protocol was completed in 34 of the 40 procedures (85.0%). The S3 protocol enhanced the identification of VT isthmus on the basis of DZ (89% vs 62%; P < 0.01) and LP (93% vs 78%; P = 0.04) assessment. The percentage of CCs unmasked by DZs and LPs using S3 maps was significantly higher than the ones using S2 and S1 maps (78%, 65%, and 48% [P < 0.001] and 88%, 81%, and 68% [P < 0.01], respectively). The functional substrate identified during S3 activation mapping was significantly more extensive than the one identified using S2 and S1, including a greater number of DZs (2.94, 2.47, and 1.82, respectively; P < 0.001) and a wider area of LPs (44.1, 38.2, and 29.4 cm(2), respectively; P < 0.001). After VT ablation, 77.9% of patients have been VT free during a median follow-up period of 13.6 months. Conclusions: The S3 protocol was feasible in 85% of patients, allows a better identification of targets for ablation, and might improve VT ablation results.