- -

Hedonic judgments of chemical compounds are correlated with molecular size

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Hedonic judgments of chemical compounds are correlated with molecular size

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Sensors (Zarzo ...
Tamaño: 291.4Kb
Formato: PDF
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Zarzo Castelló, Manuel es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2013-05-14T08:27:39Z
dc.date.available 2013-05-14T08:27:39Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.identifier.issn 1424-8220
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/28809
dc.description.abstract Different psychophysical works have reported that, when a wide range of odors is assessed, the hedonic dimension is the most salient. Hence, pleasantness is the most basic attribute of odor perception. Recent studies suggest that the molecular size of a given odorant is positively correlated with its hedonic character. This correlation was confirmed in the present study, but further basic molecular features affecting pleasantness were identified by means of multiple linear regression for the compounds contained in five chemical sets. For three of them, hedonic judgments are available in the literature. For a further two chemical sets, hedonic scores were estimated from odor character descriptions based on numerical profiles. Generally speaking, fairly similar equations were obtained for the prediction of hedonic judgments in the five chemical sets, with R 2 values ranging from 0.46 to 0.71. The results suggest that larger molecules containing oxygen are more likely to be perceived as pleasant, while the opposite applies to carboxylic acids and sulfur compounds. © 2011 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. es_ES
dc.language Español es_ES
dc.publisher MDPI es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Sensors es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Hedonic valence es_ES
dc.subject Numerical odor profile es_ES
dc.subject Odor character descriptor es_ES
dc.subject Olfaction es_ES
dc.subject Pleasantness es_ES
dc.subject VOC es_ES
dc.subject Carboxylic acid es_ES
dc.subject Oxygen es_ES
dc.subject Sulfur derivative es_ES
dc.subject Article es_ES
dc.subject Chemistry es_ES
dc.subject Human es_ES
dc.subject Molecular weight es_ES
dc.subject Multivariate analysis es_ES
dc.subject Odor es_ES
dc.subject Physiology es_ES
dc.subject Pleasure es_ES
dc.subject Carboxylic Acids es_ES
dc.subject Humans es_ES
dc.subject Odors es_ES
dc.subject Smell es_ES
dc.subject Sulfur Compounds es_ES
dc.subject.classification ESTADISTICA E INVESTIGACION OPERATIVA es_ES
dc.title Hedonic judgments of chemical compounds are correlated with molecular size es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/s110403667
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Estadística e Investigación Operativa Aplicadas y Calidad - Departament d'Estadística i Investigació Operativa Aplicades i Qualitat es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Zarzo Castelló, M. (2011). Hedonic judgments of chemical compounds are correlated with molecular size. Sensors. 11(4):3667-3686. doi:10.3390/s110403667 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s110403667 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 3667 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 3686 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 11 es_ES
dc.description.issue 4 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 41298
dc.identifier.pmid 22163815 en_EN
dc.identifier.pmcid PMC3231300 en_EN
dc.description.references Doleman, B. J., Severin, E. J., & Lewis, N. S. (1998). Trends in odor intensity for human and electronic noses: Relative roles of odorant vapor pressure vs. molecularly specific odorant binding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95(10), 5442-5447. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.10.5442 es_ES
dc.description.references Zarzo, M. (2007). The sense of smell: molecular basis of odorant recognition. Biological Reviews, 82(3), 455-479. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2007.00019.x es_ES
dc.description.references Haddad, R., Medhanie, A., Roth, Y., Harel, D., & Sobel, N. (2010). Predicting Odor Pleasantness with an Electronic Nose. PLoS Computational Biology, 6(4), e1000740. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000740 es_ES
dc.description.references A. L. Williams, P. H. Heinemann, C. J. Wysocki, D. M. Beyer, & R. E. Graves. (2010). Prediction of Hedonic Tone Using an Electronic Nose and Artificial Neural Networks. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 26(2), 343-350. doi:10.13031/2013.29535 es_ES
dc.description.references Yokoyama, K., & Ebisawa, F. (1993). Detection and evaluation of fragrances by human reactions using a chemical sensor based on adsorbate detection. Analytical Chemistry, 65(6), 673-677. doi:10.1021/ac00054a004 es_ES
dc.description.references YOSHIDA, M. (1964). STUDIES IN PSYCHOMETRIC CLASSIFICATION OF ODORS (3). The Japanese journal of psychology, 35(1), 1-17. doi:10.4992/jjpsy.35.1 es_ES
dc.description.references Davis, R. G. (1979). Olfactory perceptual space models compared by quantitative methods. Chemical Senses, 4(1), 21-33. doi:10.1093/chemse/4.1.21 es_ES
dc.description.references BERGLUND, B., BERGLUND, U., ENGEN, T., & EKMAN, G. (1973). Multidimensional analysis of twenty-one odors. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 14(1), 131-137. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.1973.tb00104.x es_ES
dc.description.references YOSHIDA, M. (1975). PSYCHOMETRIC CLASSIFICATION OF ODORS. Chemical Senses, 1(4), 443-464. doi:10.1093/chemse/1.4.443 es_ES
dc.description.references SCHIFFMAN, S., ROBINSON, D. E., & ERICKSON, R. P. (1977). MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING OF ODORANTS: EXAMINATION OF PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PHYSICOCHEMICAL DIMENSIONS. Chemical Senses, 2(3), 375-390. doi:10.1093/chemse/2.3.375 es_ES
dc.description.references Schiffman, S. S. (1974). CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE PHYSICOCHEMICAL DIMENSIONS OF ODOR: A PSYCHOPHYSICAL APPROACH. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 237(1 Odors), 164-183. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1974.tb49852.x es_ES
dc.description.references Schiffman, S. S. (1974). Physicochemical Correlates of Olfactory Quality. Science, 185(4146), 112-117. doi:10.1126/science.185.4146.112 es_ES
dc.description.references Coxon, J. M., Gregson, R. A. M., & Paddick, R. G. (1978). Multidimensional Scaling of Perceived Odour of Bicyclo [2.2.1] heptane, 1,7,7-Trimethylbicyclo [2.2.1] heptane and Cyclohexane derivatives. Chemical Senses, 3(4), 431-441. doi:10.1093/chemse/3.4.431 es_ES
dc.description.references Stevens, D. A., & O’Connell, R. J. (1996). Semantic-free scaling of odor quality. Physiology & Behavior, 60(1), 211-215. doi:10.1016/0031-9384(96)00019-4 es_ES
dc.description.references Chrea, C., Valentin, D., Sulmont-Rossé, C., Ly Mai, H., Hoang Nguyen, D., & Abdi, H. (2004). Culture and odor categorization: agreement between cultures depends upon the odors. Food Quality and Preference, 15(7-8), 669-679. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2003.10.005 es_ES
dc.description.references Lawless, H. T. (1989). Exploration of fragrance categories and ambiguous odors using multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis. Chemical Senses, 14(3), 349-360. doi:10.1093/chemse/14.3.349 es_ES
dc.description.references Chrea, C. (2005). Semantic, Typicality and Odor Representation: A Cross-cultural Study. Chemical Senses, 30(1), 37-49. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjh255 es_ES
dc.description.references ZARZO, M. (2008). PSYCHOLOGIC DIMENSIONS IN THE PERCEPTION OF EVERYDAY ODORS: PLEASANTNESS AND EDIBILITY. Journal of Sensory Studies, 23(3), 354-376. doi:10.1111/j.1745-459x.2008.00160.x es_ES
dc.description.references Khan, R. M., Luk, C.-H., Flinker, A., Aggarwal, A., Lapid, H., Haddad, R., & Sobel, N. (2007). Predicting Odor Pleasantness from Odorant Structure: Pleasantness as a Reflection of the Physical World. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(37), 10015-10023. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1158-07.2007 es_ES
dc.description.references Haddad, R., Khan, R., Takahashi, Y. K., Mori, K., Harel, D., & Sobel, N. (2008). A metric for odorant comparison. Nature Methods, 5(5), 425-429. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1197 es_ES
dc.description.references Haddad, R., Lapid, H., Harel, D., & Sobel, N. (2008). Measuring smells. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 18(4), 438-444. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2008.09.007 es_ES
dc.description.references Yeshurun, Y., & Sobel, N. (2010). An Odor is Not Worth a Thousand Words: From Multidimensional Odors to Unidimensional Odor Objects. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 219-241. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163639 es_ES
dc.description.references Poncelet, J., Rinck, F., Ziessel, A., Joussain, P., Thévenet, M., Rouby, C., & Bensafi, M. (2010). Semantic Knowledge Influences Prewired Hedonic Responses to Odors. PLoS ONE, 5(11), e13878. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013878 es_ES
dc.description.references Mandairon, N., Poncelet, J., Bensafi, M., & Didier, A. (2009). Humans and Mice Express Similar Olfactory Preferences. PLoS ONE, 4(1), e4209. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004209 es_ES
dc.description.references Dravnieks, A., Bock, F. C., Powers, J. J., Tibbetts, M., & Ford, M. (1978). Comparison of odors directly and through profiling. Chemical Senses, 3(2), 191-225. doi:10.1093/chemse/3.2.191 es_ES
dc.description.references Dravnieks, A., Masurat, T., & Lamm, R. A. (1984). Hedonics of Odors and Odor Descriptors. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association, 34(7), 752-755. doi:10.1080/00022470.1984.10465810 es_ES
dc.description.references Wright, R. H., & Michels, K. M. (1964). EVALUATION OF FAR INFRARED RELATIONS TO ODOR BY A STANDARDS SIMILARITY METHOD. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 116(2 Recent Advanc), 535-551. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1964.tb45083.x es_ES
dc.description.references Callegari, P., Rouault, J., & Laffort, P. (1997). Olfactory Quality: From Descriptor Profiles to Similarities. Chemical Senses, 22(1), 1-8. doi:10.1093/chemse/22.1.1 es_ES
dc.description.references Zarzo, M. (2008). Relevant psychological dimensions in the perceptual space of perfumery odors. Food Quality and Preference, 19(3), 315-322. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.10.007 es_ES
dc.description.references Zarzo, M., & Stanton, D. T. (2009). Understanding the underlying dimensions in perfumers’ odor perception space as a basis for developing meaningful odor maps. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 71(2), 225-247. doi:10.3758/app.71.2.225 es_ES
dc.description.references Moskowitz, H. R., Dravnieks, A., & Klarman, L. A. (1976). Odor intensity and pleasantness for a diverse set of odorants. Perception & Psychophysics, 19(2), 122-128. doi:10.3758/bf03204218 es_ES
dc.description.references Chastrette, M., Elmouaffek, A., & Sauvegrain, P. (1988). A multidimensional statistical study of similarities between 74 notes used in perfumery. Chemical Senses, 13(2), 295-305. doi:10.1093/chemse/13.2.295 es_ES
dc.description.references Zarzo, M., & Stanton, D. T. (2006). Identification of Latent Variables in a Semantic Odor Profile Database Using Principal Component Analysis. Chemical Senses, 31(8), 713-724. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjl013 es_ES
dc.description.references Richardson, J. T. E., & Zucco, G. M. (1989). Cognition and olfaction: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 352-360. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.352 es_ES
dc.description.references Wise, P. M. (2000). Quantification of Odor Quality. Chemical Senses, 25(4), 429-443. doi:10.1093/chemse/25.4.429 es_ES
dc.description.references Rouby, C., Pouliot, S., & Bensafi, M. (2009). Odor hedonics and their modulators. Food Quality and Preference, 20(8), 545-549. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.05.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Distel, H. (1999). Perception of Everyday OdorsCorrelation between Intensity, Familiarity and Strength of Hedonic Judgement. Chemical Senses, 24(2), 191-199. doi:10.1093/chemse/24.2.191 es_ES
dc.description.references Soussignan, R., Schaal, B., Marlier, L., & Jiang, T. (1997). Facial and Autonomic Responses to Biological and Artificial Olfactory Stimuli in Human Neonates. Physiology & Behavior, 62(4), 745-758. doi:10.1016/s0031-9384(97)00187-x es_ES
dc.description.references Kobayakawa, K., Kobayakawa, R., Matsumoto, H., Oka, Y., Imai, T., Ikawa, M., … Sakano, H. (2007). Innate versus learned odour processing in the mouse olfactory bulb. Nature, 450(7169), 503-508. doi:10.1038/nature06281 es_ES
dc.description.references Dielenberg, R. A., & McGregor, I. S. (2001). Defensive behavior in rats towards predatory odors: a review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 25(7-8), 597-609. doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(01)00044-6 es_ES
dc.description.references Laska, M. (2000). Olfactory Discrimination Ability for Aliphatic Odorants as a Function of Oxygen Moiety. Chemical Senses, 25(2), 189-197. doi:10.1093/chemse/25.2.189 es_ES
dc.description.references Chrea, C., Grandjean, D., Delplanque, S., Cayeux, I., Le Calve, B., Aymard, L., … Scherer, K. R. (2008). Mapping the Semantic Space for the Subjective Experience of Emotional Responses to Odors. Chemical Senses, 34(1), 49-62. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjn052 es_ES
dc.description.references Gostelow, P., Parsons, S. A., & Stuetz, R. M. (2001). Odour measurements for sewage treatment works. Water Research, 35(3), 579-597. doi:10.1016/s0043-1354(00)00313-4 es_ES
dc.description.references Stevenson, R. J. (2009). An Initial Evaluation of the Functions of Human Olfaction. Chemical Senses, 35(1), 3-20. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjp083 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem