- -

A Model-Driven approach for the design and implementation of software development methods

RiuNet: Institutional repository of the Polithecnic University of Valencia

Share/Send to

Cited by

Statistics

A Model-Driven approach for the design and implementation of software development methods

Show full item record

Cervera Úbeda, M.; Albert Albiol, M.; Torres Bosch, MV.; Pelechano Ferragud, V. (2012). A Model-Driven approach for the design and implementation of software development methods. International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design. 3(4):86-103. doi:10.4018/jismd.2012100105

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/34005

Files in this item

Item Metadata

Title: A Model-Driven approach for the design and implementation of software development methods
Author: Cervera Úbeda, Mario Albert Albiol, Manuela Torres Bosch, María Victoria Pelechano Ferragud, Vicente
UPV Unit: Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Sistemas Informáticos y Computación - Departament de Sistemes Informàtics i Computació
Universitat Politècnica de València. Centro de Investigación en Métodos de Producción de Software - Centre d'Investigació en Mètodes de Producció de Software
Issued date:
Abstract:
The Situational Method Engineering (SME) discipline emerged two decades ago to address the challenge of the in-house definition of software development methods and the construction of the corresponding supporting tools. ...[+]
Subjects: Computer-Aided Method Engineering (CAME) Environment , Eclipse , Method engineering , Model-Driven development , Modeling Software Kit (MOSKitt)
Copyrigths: Cerrado
Source:
International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design. (issn: 1947-8186 )
DOI: 10.4018/jismd.2012100105
Publisher:
IGI Global
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jismd.2012100105
Type: Artículo

References

Arni-Bloch, N. (2005). Towards a CAME tools for situational method engineering. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Interoperability of Enterprise Software and Applications.

Atkinson, C., & Kuhne, T. (2003). Model-driven development: a metamodeling foundation. IEEE Software, 20(5), 36-41. doi:10.1109/ms.2003.1231149

Brinkkemper, S. (1996). Method engineering: engineering of information systems development methods and tools. Information and Software Technology, 38(4), 275-280. doi:10.1016/0950-5849(95)01059-9 [+]
Arni-Bloch, N. (2005). Towards a CAME tools for situational method engineering. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Interoperability of Enterprise Software and Applications.

Atkinson, C., & Kuhne, T. (2003). Model-driven development: a metamodeling foundation. IEEE Software, 20(5), 36-41. doi:10.1109/ms.2003.1231149

Brinkkemper, S. (1996). Method engineering: engineering of information systems development methods and tools. Information and Software Technology, 38(4), 275-280. doi:10.1016/0950-5849(95)01059-9

Brinkkemper, S., Saeki, M., & Harmsen, F. (1999). Meta-modelling based assembly techniques for situational method engineering. Information Systems, 24(3), 209-228. doi:10.1016/s0306-4379(99)00016-2

Cervera, M., Albert, M., Torres, V., Pelechano, V., Bonet, B., & Cano, J. (2010). A technological framework to support model driven method engineering. In Actas de los Talleres de las Jornadas de Ingeniera del Software y Bases de Datos (pp. 47-56).

Ferguson, R. ., Parrington, N. ., Dunne, P., Hardy, C., Archibald, J. ., & Thompson, J. . (2000). MetaMOOSE—an object-oriented framework for the construction of CASE tools. Information and Software Technology, 42(2), 115-128. doi:10.1016/s0950-5849(99)00081-6

Grundy, J. C., & Venable, J. R. (1996). Towards an integrated environment for method engineering. In Proceedings of the IFIP TC8, WG8.1/8.2 Working Conference on Method Engineering (pp. 45-62).

Gupta, D., & Prakash, N. (2001). Engineering Methods from Method Requirements Specifications. Requirements Engineering, 6(3), 135-160. doi:10.1007/s007660170001

Harmsen, A. F. (1997). Situational method engineering (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Utrecht, The Netherlands: University of Twente.

Hevner, March, Park, & Ram. (2004). Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75. doi:10.2307/25148625

Heym, M., & Osterle, H. (1992). A semantic data model for methodology engineering. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Computer-Aided Software Engineering (pp. 142-155).

Karlsson, F., & Ågerfalk, P. (2009). Exploring agile values in method configuration. European Journal of Information Systems, 18(4), 300-316. doi:10.1057/ejis.2009.20

Kelly, S., Lyytinen, K., & Rossi, M. (1996). MetaEdit+ A fully configurable multi-user and multi-tool CASE and CAME environment. In P. Constantopoulos, J. Mylopoulos, & Y. Vassiliou (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (LNCS 1080, pp. 1-21).

Mathiassen, L. (2002). Collaborative practice research. Information Technology & People, 15(4), 321-345. doi:10.1108/09593840210453115

Mirbel, I., & Ralyté, J. (2005). Situational method engineering: combining assembly-based and roadmap-driven approaches. Requirements Engineering, 11(1), 58-78. doi:10.1007/s00766-005-0019-0

Niknafs, A., & Asadi, M. (2009). Towards a process modeling language for method engineering support. In Proceedings of the WRI World Congress on Computer Science and Information Engineering (pp. 674-681).

Niknafs, A., & Ramsin, R. (2008). Computer-aided method engineering: An analysis of existing environments. In Z. Bellahsène & M. Léonard (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (LNCS 5074, pp. 525-540).

Object Management Group. (2005). Reusable asset specification (v2.2). Retrieved from http://www.omg.org/spec/RAS/

Object Management Group. (2007). Software & systems process engineering metamodel (v2.0). Retrieved from http://www.omg.org/spec/SPEM/2.0/

Object Management Group. (2011). Business process model and notation (v2.0). Retrieved from http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/

Prakash, N. (1997). Towards a formal definition of methods. Requirements Engineering, 2(1), 23-50. doi:10.1007/bf02802896

Ralyté, J., Deneckère, R., & Rolland, C. (2003). Towards a generic model for situational method engineering. In J. Eder & M. Missikoff (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (LNCS 2681, p. 1029).

Rolland, C., Prakash, N., & Benjamen, A. (1999). A Multi-Model View of Process Modelling. Requirements Engineering, 4(4), 169-187. doi:10.1007/s007660050018

Saeki, M. (2003). CAME: The first step to automated method engineering. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Process Engineering for Object-Oriented and Component-Based Development.

Wistrand, K., & Karlsson, F. (2004). Method components – Rationale revealed. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (pp. 189-201).

[-]

recommendations

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record