- -

Research opportunities for argumentation in social networks

RiuNet: Institutional repository of the Polithecnic University of Valencia

Share/Send to

Cited by

Statistics

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Research opportunities for argumentation in social networks

Show simple item record

Files in this item

dc.contributor.author Heras Barberá, Stella María es_ES
dc.contributor.author Atkinson, Katie Marie es_ES
dc.contributor.author Botti Navarro, Vicente Juan es_ES
dc.contributor.author Grasso, Floriana es_ES
dc.contributor.author Julian Inglada, Vicente Javier es_ES
dc.contributor.author Mcburney, Peter John es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2014-01-08T09:11:39Z
dc.date.issued 2013-01-01
dc.identifier.issn 0269-2821
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/34804
dc.description.abstract Nowadays, many websites allow social networking between their users in an explicit or implicit way. In this work, we show how argumentation schemes theory can provide a valuable help to formalize and structure on-line discussions and user opinions in decision support and business oriented websites that held social networks between their users. Two real case studies are studied and analysed. Then, guidelines to enhance social decision support and recommendations with argumentation are provided. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship This work summarises results of the authors joint research, funded by an STMS of the Agreement Technologies COST Action 0801, by the Spanish government grants [CONSOLIDER-INGENIO 2010 CSD2007-00022, and TIN2012-36586-C03-01] and by the GVA project [PROMETEO 2008/051]. en_EN
dc.format.extent 24 es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Springer Verlag es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Artificial Intelligence Review es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Social networks es_ES
dc.subject Customer support es_ES
dc.subject Recommendations es_ES
dc.subject Argumentation es_ES
dc.subject.classification LENGUAJES Y SISTEMAS INFORMATICOS es_ES
dc.title Research opportunities for argumentation in social networks es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.embargo.lift 10000-01-01
dc.embargo.terms forever es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s10462-012-9389-0
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/COST//IC0801/EU/Agreement Technologies/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MEC//CSD2007-00022/ES/Agreement Technologies/ / es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/GVA//PROMETEO08%2F2008%2F051/ES/Advances on Agreement Technologies for Computational Entities (atforce)/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//TIN2012-36586-C03-01/ES/SOCIEDADES HUMANO-AGENTE: DISEÑO, FORMACION Y COORDINACION/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Sistemas Informáticos y Computación - Departament de Sistemes Informàtics i Computació es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Heras Barberá, SM.; Atkinson, KM.; Botti Navarro, VJ.; Grasso, F.; Julian Inglada, VJ.; Mcburney, PJ. (2013). Research opportunities for argumentation in social networks. Artificial Intelligence Review. 39(1):39-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-012-9389-0 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10462-012-9389-0 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 39 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 62 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 39 es_ES
dc.description.issue 1 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 229920
dc.contributor.funder Generalitat Valenciana es_ES
dc.contributor.funder European Cooperation in Science and Technology es_ES
dc.description.references Amgoud L (2009) Argumentation for decision making. Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Springer, Berlin es_ES
dc.description.references Anderson P (2007) What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. JISC Iechnology and Standards Watch report es_ES
dc.description.references Bentahar J, Meyer CJJ, Moulin B (2007) Securing agent-oriented systems: an argumentation and reputation-based approach. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on information technology: new generations (ITNG 2007), IEEE Computer Society, pp 507–515 es_ES
dc.description.references Buckingham Shum S (2008) Cohere: towards Web 2.0 argumentation. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on computational models of argument, COMMA, pp 28–30 es_ES
dc.description.references Burke R (2002) Hybrid recommender systems: survey and experiments. User Model User-Adapt Interact 12:331–370 es_ES
dc.description.references Cartwright D, Atkinson K (2008) Political engagement through tools for argumentation. In: Proceedings of the second international conference on computational models of argument (COMMA 2008), pp 116–127 es_ES
dc.description.references Chesñevar C, McGinnis J, Modgil S, Rahwan I, Reed C, Simari G, South M, Vreeswijk G, Willmott S (2006) Towards an argument interchange format. Knowl Eng Rev 21(4):293–316 es_ES
dc.description.references Chesñevar CI, Maguitman AG, Gonzàlez MP (2009) Empowering recommendation technologies through argumentation. Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Springer, Berlin, pp 403–422 es_ES
dc.description.references García AJ, Dix J, Simari GR (2009) Argument-based logic programming. Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Springer, Berlin es_ES
dc.description.references Golbeck J (2006) Generating predictive movie recommendations from trust in social networks. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on trust management, LNCS, vol 3986, 93–104 es_ES
dc.description.references Gordon T, Prakken H, Walton D (2007) The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof. Artif Intell 171(10–15):875–896 es_ES
dc.description.references Guha R, Kumar R, Raghavan P, Tomkins A (2004) Propagating trust and distrust. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on, World Wide Web, pp 403–412 es_ES
dc.description.references Heras S, Navarro M, Botti V, Julián V (2009) Applying dialogue games to manage recommendation in social networks. In: Proceedings of the 6th international workshop on argumentation in multi-agent aystems, ArgMAS es_ES
dc.description.references Heras S, Atkinson K, Botti V, Grasso F, Julián V, McBurney P (2010a) How argumentation can enhance dialogues in social networks. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on computational models of argument, COMMA, vol 216, pp 267–274 es_ES
dc.description.references Heras S, Atkinson K, Botti V, Grasso F, Julián V, McBurney P (2010b) Applying argumentation to enhance dialogues in social networks. In: ECAI 2010 workshop on computational models of natural argument, CMNA, pp 10–17 es_ES
dc.description.references Karacapilidis N, Tzagarakis M (2007) Web-based collaboration and decision making support: a multi-disciplinary approach. Web-Based Learn Teach Technol 2(4):12–23 es_ES
dc.description.references Kim D, Benbasat I (2003) Trust-related arguments in internet stores: a framework for evaluation. J Electron Commer Res 4(2):49–64 es_ES
dc.description.references Kim D, Benbasat I (2006) The effects of trust-assuring arguments on consumer trust in internet stores: application of Toulmin’s model of argumentation. Inf Syst Rese 17(3):286–300 es_ES
dc.description.references Laera L, Tamma V, Euzenat J, Bench-Capon T, Payne T (2006) Reaching agreement over ontology alignments. In: Proceedings of the 5th international semantic web conference (ISWC 2006) es_ES
dc.description.references Lange C, Bojãrs U, Groza T, Breslin J, Handschuh S (2008) Expressing argumentative discussions in social media sites. In: Social data on the web (SDoW2008) workshop at the 7th international semantic web conference es_ES
dc.description.references Linden G, Smith B, York J (2003) Amazon.com recommendations: item-to-item collaborative filtering. IEEE Internet Comput 7(1):76–80 es_ES
dc.description.references Linden G, Hong J, Stonebraker M, Guzdial M (2009) Recommendation algorithms, online privacy and more. Commun ACM, 52(5) es_ES
dc.description.references Mika P (2007) Ontologies are us: a unified model of social networks and semantics. J Web Semant 5(1):5–15 es_ES
dc.description.references Montaner M, López B, de la Rosa JL (2002) Opinion-based filtering through trust. In: Cooperative information agents VI, LNCS, vol 2446, pp 127–144 es_ES
dc.description.references Ontañón S, Plaza E (2008) Argumentation-based information exchange in prediction markets. In: Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on argumentation in multi-agent systems, ArgMAS es_ES
dc.description.references Pazzani MJ, Billsus D (2007) Content-based recommendation systems. In: The adaptive web, LNCS, vol 4321, pp 325–341 es_ES
dc.description.references Rahwan I, Zablith F, Reed C (2007) Laying the foundations for a world wide argument web. Artif Intell 171(10–15):897–921 es_ES
dc.description.references Rahwan I, Banihashemi B (2008) Arguments in OWL: a progress report. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on computational models of argument (COMMA), pp 297–310 es_ES
dc.description.references Reed C, Walton D (2007) Argumentation schemes in dialogue. In: Dissensus and the search for common ground, OSSA-07, volume CD-ROM, pp 1–11 es_ES
dc.description.references Sabater J, Sierra C (2002) Reputation and social network analysis in multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the 1st international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, vol 1, pp 475–482 es_ES
dc.description.references Schafer JB, Konstan JA, Riedl J (2001) E-commerce recommendation applications. Data Min Knowl Discov 5:115–153 es_ES
dc.description.references Schafer JB, Frankowski D, Herlocker J, Sen S (2007) Collaborative filtering recommender systems. In: The adaptive web, LNCS, vol 4321, pp 291–324 es_ES
dc.description.references Schneider J, Groza T, Passant A (2012) A review of argumentation for the aocial semantic web. Semantic web-interoperability, usability, applicability. IOS Press, Washington, DC es_ES
dc.description.references Tempich C, Pinto HS, Sure Y, Staab S (2005) An argumentation ontology for distributed, loosely-controlled and evolvInG Engineering processes of oNTologies (DILIGENT). In: Proceedings of the 2nd European semantic web conference, ESWC, pp 241–256 es_ES
dc.description.references Toulmin SE (1958) The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK es_ES
dc.description.references Trojahn C, Quaresma P, Vieira R, Isaac A (2009) Comparing argumentation frameworks for composite ontology matching. in: Proceedings of the 6th international workshop on argumentation in multi-agent systems, ArgMAS es_ES
dc.description.references TruthMapping. http://truthmapping.com/ es_ES
dc.description.references Walter FE, Battiston S, Schweitzer F (2007) A model of a trust-based recommendation system on a social network. J Auton Agents Multi-Agent Syst 16(1):57–74 es_ES
dc.description.references Walton D, Krabbe E (1995) Commitment in dialogue: basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. State University of New York Press, New York, NY es_ES
dc.description.references Walton D, Reed C, Macagno F (2008) Argumentation schemes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge es_ES
dc.description.references Wells S, Gourlay C, Reed C (2009) Argument blogging. Computational models of natural argument, CMNA es_ES
dc.description.references Wyner A, Schneider J (2012) Arguing from a point of view. In: Proceedings of the first international conference on agreement technologies es_ES


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record