- -

Which firms want PhDs? An analysis of the determinants of the demand

RiuNet: Institutional repository of the Polithecnic University of Valencia

Share/Send to

Cited by

Statistics

Which firms want PhDs? An analysis of the determinants of the demand

Show full item record

García-Quevedo, J.; Mas Verdú, F.; Polo-Otero, J. (2012). Which firms want PhDs? An analysis of the determinants of the demand. Higher Education. 63(5):607-620. doi:10.1007/s10734-011-9461-8

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/38047

Files in this item

Item Metadata

Title: Which firms want PhDs? An analysis of the determinants of the demand
Author: García-Quevedo, José Mas Verdú, Francisco Polo-Otero, José
UPV Unit: Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Economía y Ciencias Sociales - Departament d'Economia i Ciències Socials
Issued date:
Abstract:
[EN] PhD graduates hold the highest education degree, are trained to conduct research and can be considered a key element in the creation, commercialization and diffusion of innovations. The impact of PhDs on innovation ...[+]
Subjects: PhD , University , R&D , Technology transfer
Copyrigths: Cerrado
Source:
Higher Education. (issn: 0018-1560 )
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-011-9461-8
Publisher:
Springer Verlag (Germany)
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9461-8
Project ID:
GC/2009SGR102
MEC/ECO2008-04708/ECON
MEC/ECO2010-16934
Thanks:
The authors thank the Alto Consejo Consultivo en I?D of the Generalitat Valenciana and IMPIVA for facilitating access to the survey on which this article is based and, particularly, Manuel Lo´pez Estornell and Emilio Cubel ...[+]
Type: Artículo

References

Azagra-Caro, J. (2007). What type of faculty member interacts with what type of firm? Some reasons for the delocalization of university-industry interaction. Technovation, 27, 704–715.

Azagra-Caro, J., Archontakis, F., Gutiérrez-Gracia, A., & Fernández-de-Lucio, I. (2006). Faculty support for the objectives of university-industry relations versus degree of R&D cooperation: the importance of regional absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 35, 37–55.

Azagra-Caro, J., Fernández-de-Lucio, I., Perruchas, F., & Mattsson, P. (2009). What do patent examiner inserted citations indicate for a region with low absorptive capacity? Scientometrics, 80, 443–457. [+]
Azagra-Caro, J. (2007). What type of faculty member interacts with what type of firm? Some reasons for the delocalization of university-industry interaction. Technovation, 27, 704–715.

Azagra-Caro, J., Archontakis, F., Gutiérrez-Gracia, A., & Fernández-de-Lucio, I. (2006). Faculty support for the objectives of university-industry relations versus degree of R&D cooperation: the importance of regional absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 35, 37–55.

Azagra-Caro, J., Fernández-de-Lucio, I., Perruchas, F., & Mattsson, P. (2009). What do patent examiner inserted citations indicate for a region with low absorptive capacity? Scientometrics, 80, 443–457.

Beltramo, J., Paul, J., & Perret, C. (2001). The recruitment of researchers and the organization of scientific activity in industry. International Journal of Technology Management, 22, 811–834.

Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Economic Journal, 99, 569–596.

European Commission. (2001). The use of mobility schemes in European innovation policy. European trend chart on innovation. Brussels: European Commission.

European Commission. (2003). Researchers in the European research area: one profession, multiple careers. COM(2003) 436 final. Brussels: European Commission.

Cruz-Castro, L., & Sanz-Menéndez, L. (2005). The employment of PhDs in firms: Trajectories, mobility and innovation. Research evaluation, 14, 57–69.

Enders, J. (2002). Serving many masters: The PhD on the labour market, the everlasting need of inequality, and the premature death of Humbolt. Higher Education, 44, 493–517.

Faulkner, W., & Senker, J. (1995). Knowledge frontiers: Public sector research and industrial innovation in biotechnology, engineering ceramics, and parallel computing. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Grimpe, C., & Sofka, W. (2009). Search patterns and absorptive capacity: Low and high-technology sectors in Europe countries. Research Policy, 38, 495–506.

Heyer, N. (1985). Managing human resources in a high technology enterprise. Human Resource Policy Analysis: Organizational Application, 1985, 45–66.

Hicks, D. (1995). Published papers, tacit competencies and corporate management of the public/private character of knowledge. Industrial and Corporate Change, 4, 401–424.

Huergo, E., & Jaumandreu, J. (2004). How does probability of innovation change with firm age? Small Business Economics, 22, 193–207.

INE. (2008). Encuesta sobre recursos humanos en ciencia y tecnología. Madrid, Spain: National Institute of Statistics.

Jensen, M., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B. (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy, 36, 680–693.

Lam, A. (2001). Changing R&D organisation and innovation: Knowledge sourcing and competence building. Higher education systems and industrial innovation, final report of contract no. SOE 1-1054—project no. 1297. Funded under the targeted socio-economic research and development/directorate F, European Commission.

Leahya, D., & Neary, J. P. (2007). Absorptive capacity, R&D spillovers, and public policy. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 25, 1089–1108.

Liao, J., Welsch, H., & Stoica, M. (2003). Organizational absorptive capacity and responsiveness: An empirical investigation of growth-oriented SMEs’. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 1, 63–86.

Lim, K. (2009). The many faces of absorptive capacity: Spillovers of copper interconnect technology for semiconductor chips. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18, 1249–1284.

Lucas, R. (1988). On the mechanisms of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3–42.

Lundvall, B., & Lorenz, E. (2008). Modes of innovation and knowledge taxonomies in the learning economy. CAS workshop on innovation in firms, Oslo, October, 2008.

Mangematin, V. (2000). PhD job market: Professional trajectories and incentives during PhD. Research Policy, 29, 741–756.

Mangematin, V., & Robin, S. (2003). The two faces of PhD students: Management of early careers of French PhDs in life sciences. Science and Public Policy, 30, 405–414.

Mas-Verdú, F. (2007). Services and innovation systems: European models of technological centres. Service business. An International Journal, 1, 7–23.

Mowery, D., Oxley, J., & Silverman, B. (1996). Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 77–91.

Murovec, N., & Prodanb, I. (2009). Absorptive capacity, its determinants, and influence on innovation output: Cross-cultural validation of the structural model. Technovation, 29, 859–872.

Navarro, M. (2009). El sistema de innovación de la CAPV a partir de las estadísticas de I+D. Instituto Vasco de Competitividad; Universidad de Deusto, San Sebastián, Spain.

OECD. (2007). Mapping careers and mobility of doctorate holders: drat guideline, model questionnaire and indicators—The OECD/UNESCO institute for statistics/eurostat careers of doctorate holders (CDH) project. Paris: OECD rapport.

Rao, H., & Drazin, R. (2002). Overcoming resource constraints on product innovation by recruiting talent from rivals: A study of the mutual fund industry, 1984–94. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 491–507.

Slaughter, S., Campbell, T., Holleman, M., & Morgan, E. (2002). The “traffic” in graduate students: Graduate students as tokens of exchange between academe and industry. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 27, 282–312.

Sorensen, J. B., & Stuart, T. E. (2000). Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 81–112.

Stephan, P., Sumell, A., Black, G., & Adams, J. (2004). Doctoral education and economic development: The flow of new Ph.D.s to industry. Economic Development Quarterly, 18, 151–167.

Thune, T. (2009a). Doctoral students on the university-industry interface: A review of the literature. Higher Education, 58, 637–651.

Thune, T. (2009b). Proximity and interactive learning in university—firm relationships. Industry and Higher education, 23, 1–10.

Tushman, M., & Romanelli, E. (1985). Organizational evolution interactions between external and emergent processes and strategic choice. In B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behaviour (Vol. 8, pp. 171–222).

Vinding, A. (2004). Interaction between firms and knowledge institutions. In J. L. Christensen & B.-A. Lundvall (Eds.), Product innovation, interactive learning and economic performance-research on technological innovation and management policy. Oxford: Elsevier.

Wallgren, L., & Dahlgren, L. O. (2005). Doctoral education as social practice for knowledge development. Conditions and demands encountered by industry PhD students. Industry and Higher Education, 19, 433–443.

[-]

recommendations

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record