Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Hervás Oliver, Jose Luis | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Rojas, Ronald | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Martins, Blanca-Maria | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Cervelló Royo, Roberto Elías | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-06-10T15:24:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1469-1930 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/38057 | |
dc.description.abstract | [EN] Purpose: This paper aims to present a focus for identifying the convergence between the theory of the intellectual capital of nations and that of the National Systems of Innovation from the literature of innovation systems, with the aim of providing a more robust theoretical framework to explore the drivers of intangibles and the policies which foster competitiveness through the development of the national intellectual capital platforms. Design/methodology/approach: Selecting 28 indicators which best fit the analyzed theoretic principles and taking into account the member countries of the European Union as a sample (15) with the data taken from the IMD, a simple analysis of the seven-year (2000-2006) window was carried out to compare the intangibles pointed out in the two aforementioned perspectives. Findings: The homogeneity of the results using models of measurement of intellectual capital of countries with those obtained through the models of the National Systems of Innovation prove the considerable convergence between these two theoretic fields, validating the hypotheses proposed in the study. Research limitations/implications: The system provided is not an exhaustive use of all the available measures and countries. A more comprehensive practical application on more countries and indicators would be necessary to validate the model. Practical implications: The study has implications for the business, politicians and academia. The study opens new lines of research in the sense that it advocates a theoretical approximation and the integration of the abundant literature on the National Systems of Innovation as basic drivers to explain the intangibles at a macro level, their management and politics related to the maintaining and renewal of said assets of intellectual capital. Originality/value: To the best of the authors' knowledge, so far no study analyzing this convergence has been designed or published. This paper extends and adds robustness to the national IC measurement model to help policymakers and scholars. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | This paper is part of the project ECO2010-17318 (ECON) "Análisis de la Innovación Empresarial a través de la Capacidad de Absorción Tecnológica...", Dirección General de Investigación y Gestión del Plan Nacional de I+D+i, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Spanish Government. The authors are also thankful for financial support provided by the Institu Ignaci Villalonga d'Economia i Empresa, València. The usual disclaimers apply. | |
dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Emerald | es_ES |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Intellectual Capital | es_ES |
dc.rights | Reserva de todos los derechos | es_ES |
dc.subject | European Union | es_ES |
dc.subject | Innovation | es_ES |
dc.subject | Intellectual capital | es_ES |
dc.subject | National cultures | es_ES |
dc.subject.classification | ECONOMIA FINANCIERA Y CONTABILIDAD | es_ES |
dc.title | The overlapping of national IC and Innovation Systems | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
dc.embargo.lift | 10000-01-01 | |
dc.embargo.terms | forever | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1108/14691931111097935 | |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN//ECO2010-17318/ES/ANALISIS DE LA INNOVACION EMPRESARIAL A TRAVES DE LA CAPACIDAD DE ABSORCION TECNOLOGICA Y LA INTERACCION EMPRESA-CLUSTERS INDUSTRIALES: MEDICION DE LA INFLUENCIA MICRO EN LO M/ | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | Cerrado | es_ES |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Economía y Ciencias Sociales - Departament d'Economia i Ciències Socials | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Hervás Oliver, JL.; Rojas, R.; Martins, B.; Cervelló Royo, RE. (2011). The overlapping of national IC and Innovation Systems. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 12(1):111-131. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691931111097935 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | S | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14691931111097935 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 111 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpfin | 131 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.volume | 12 | es_ES |
dc.description.issue | 1 | es_ES |
dc.relation.senia | 41445 | |
dc.contributor.funder | Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación | |
dc.description.references | Balconi, M., Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2004). Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data. Research Policy, 33(1), 127-145. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00108-2 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Benner, C. (2003). Learning Communities in a Learning Region: The Soft Infrastructure of Cross-Firm Learning Networks in Silicon Valley. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 35(10), 1809-1830. doi:10.1068/a35238 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37(3), 407-429. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Bontis, N. (2004). National Intellectual Capital Index. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(1), 13-39. doi:10.1108/14691930410512905 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Bontis, N., Chua Chong Keow, W., & Richardson, S. (2000). Intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian industries. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(1), 85-100. doi:10.1108/14691930010324188 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Brusco, S. (1986), “Small firms and industrial districts: the experience of Italy”,Economia Internazionale, Vol. 39 Nos 2‐4, pp. 98‐103. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | EDVINSSON, L., & STENFELT, C. (1999). Intellectual Capital of Nations — for Future Wealth Creation. Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, 4(1), 21-33. doi:10.1108/eb029051 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and «Mode 2» to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00055-4 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Fagerberg, J. (1987). A technology gap approach to why growth rates differ. Research Policy, 16(2-4), 87-99. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(87)90025-4 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Fagerberg, J., & Srholec, M. (2008). National innovation systems, capabilities and economic development. Research Policy, 37(9), 1417-1435. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.06.003 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Foss, N. J. (1996). Higher-order industrial Capabilities and competitive advantage. Journal of Industry Studies, 3(1), 1-20. doi:10.1080/13662719600000001 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31(6), 899-933. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00152-4 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Harrison, B. (1992). Industrial Districts: Old Wine in New Bottles? Regional Studies, 26(5), 469-483. doi:10.1080/00343409212331347121 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Hekkert, M. P., & Negro, S. O. (2009). Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: Empirical evidence for earlier claims. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(4), 584-594. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2008.04.013 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Luis Hervas‐Oliver, J., & Dalmau‐Porta, J. I. (2007). Which IC components explain national IC stocks? Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8(3), 444-469. doi:10.1108/14691930710774867 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Luis Hervas Oliver, J., & Dalmau Porta, J. I. (2006). How to measure IC in clusters: empirical evidence. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7(3), 354-380. doi:10.1108/14691930610681456 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Klein, P.A. (2000), “National statistics, portrait of the value floor”,Journal of Economy, No. 34, pp. 445‐52. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Lawson, C. (1999). Towards a competence theory of the region. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(2), 151-166. doi:10.1093/cje/23.2.151 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Liu, X., & White, S. (2001). Comparing innovation systems: a framework and application to China’s transitional context. Research Policy, 30(7), 1091-1114. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(00)00132-3 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | McEvily, B., & Zaheer, A. (1999). Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 20(12), 1133-1156. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199912)20:12<1133::aid-smj74>3.0.co;2-7 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Maskell, P. (1999). Localised learning and industrial competitiveness. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(2), 167-185. doi:10.1093/cje/23.2.167 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Nelson, R. R. (2008). What enables rapid economic progress: What are the needed institutions? Research Policy, 37(1), 1-11. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.10.008 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179-191. doi:10.1002/smj.4250140303 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S71-S102. doi:10.1086/261725 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Rondé, P., & Hussler, C. (2005). Innovation in regions: What does really matter? Research Policy, 34(8), 1150-1172. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.011 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Russo, M. (1997), “Relazioni tra imprese e svolupo locale”,Economia e Politica Industriale, Vol. 93, pp. 105‐37. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ståhle, P., & Bounfour, A. (2008). Understanding dynamics of intellectual capital of nations. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(2), 164-177. doi:10.1108/14691930810870283 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ståhle, P. and Pöyhönene, A. (2005), “Intellectual capital and national competitiveness: a critical examination. Case Finland”,Proceedings of 6th European Conference of Knowledge Management (ECKM), University of Limerick, ECKM. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Yeh‐Yun Lin, C., & Edvinsson, L. (2008). National intellectual capital: comparison of the Nordic countries. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(4), 525-545. doi:10.1108/14691930810913140 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Porter, M. (1998), “Clusters and the new economics of competition”,Harvard Business Review, Vol. 76 No. 6, pp. 77‐90. | es_ES |