- -

The overlapping of national IC and Innovation Systems

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

The overlapping of national IC and Innovation Systems

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Hervás Oliver, Jose Luis es_ES
dc.contributor.author Rojas, Ronald es_ES
dc.contributor.author Martins, Blanca-Maria es_ES
dc.contributor.author Cervelló Royo, Roberto Elías es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2014-06-10T15:24:38Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.identifier.issn 1469-1930
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/38057
dc.description.abstract [EN] Purpose: This paper aims to present a focus for identifying the convergence between the theory of the intellectual capital of nations and that of the National Systems of Innovation from the literature of innovation systems, with the aim of providing a more robust theoretical framework to explore the drivers of intangibles and the policies which foster competitiveness through the development of the national intellectual capital platforms. Design/methodology/approach: Selecting 28 indicators which best fit the analyzed theoretic principles and taking into account the member countries of the European Union as a sample (15) with the data taken from the IMD, a simple analysis of the seven-year (2000-2006) window was carried out to compare the intangibles pointed out in the two aforementioned perspectives. Findings: The homogeneity of the results using models of measurement of intellectual capital of countries with those obtained through the models of the National Systems of Innovation prove the considerable convergence between these two theoretic fields, validating the hypotheses proposed in the study. Research limitations/implications: The system provided is not an exhaustive use of all the available measures and countries. A more comprehensive practical application on more countries and indicators would be necessary to validate the model. Practical implications: The study has implications for the business, politicians and academia. The study opens new lines of research in the sense that it advocates a theoretical approximation and the integration of the abundant literature on the National Systems of Innovation as basic drivers to explain the intangibles at a macro level, their management and politics related to the maintaining and renewal of said assets of intellectual capital. Originality/value: To the best of the authors' knowledge, so far no study analyzing this convergence has been designed or published. This paper extends and adds robustness to the national IC measurement model to help policymakers and scholars. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship This paper is part of the project ECO2010-17318 (ECON) "Análisis de la Innovación Empresarial a través de la Capacidad de Absorción Tecnológica...", Dirección General de Investigación y Gestión del Plan Nacional de I+D+i, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Spanish Government. The authors are also thankful for financial support provided by the Institu Ignaci Villalonga d'Economia i Empresa, València. The usual disclaimers apply.
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Emerald es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Intellectual Capital es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject European Union es_ES
dc.subject Innovation es_ES
dc.subject Intellectual capital es_ES
dc.subject National cultures es_ES
dc.subject.classification ECONOMIA FINANCIERA Y CONTABILIDAD es_ES
dc.title The overlapping of national IC and Innovation Systems es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.embargo.lift 10000-01-01
dc.embargo.terms forever es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1108/14691931111097935
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN//ECO2010-17318/ES/ANALISIS DE LA INNOVACION EMPRESARIAL A TRAVES DE LA CAPACIDAD DE ABSORCION TECNOLOGICA Y LA INTERACCION EMPRESA-CLUSTERS INDUSTRIALES: MEDICION DE LA INFLUENCIA MICRO EN LO M/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Cerrado es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Economía y Ciencias Sociales - Departament d'Economia i Ciències Socials es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Hervás Oliver, JL.; Rojas, R.; Martins, B.; Cervelló Royo, RE. (2011). The overlapping of national IC and Innovation Systems. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 12(1):111-131. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691931111097935 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14691931111097935 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 111 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 131 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 12 es_ES
dc.description.issue 1 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 41445
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
dc.description.references Balconi, M., Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2004). Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data. Research Policy, 33(1), 127-145. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00108-2 es_ES
dc.description.references Benner, C. (2003). Learning Communities in a Learning Region: The Soft Infrastructure of Cross-Firm Learning Networks in Silicon Valley. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 35(10), 1809-1830. doi:10.1068/a35238 es_ES
dc.description.references Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37(3), 407-429. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003 es_ES
dc.description.references Bontis, N. (2004). National Intellectual Capital Index. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(1), 13-39. doi:10.1108/14691930410512905 es_ES
dc.description.references Bontis, N., Chua Chong Keow, W., & Richardson, S. (2000). Intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian industries. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(1), 85-100. doi:10.1108/14691930010324188 es_ES
dc.description.references Brusco, S. (1986), “Small firms and industrial districts: the experience of Italy”,Economia Internazionale, Vol. 39 Nos 2‐4, pp. 98‐103. es_ES
dc.description.references EDVINSSON, L., & STENFELT, C. (1999). Intellectual Capital of Nations — for Future Wealth Creation. Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, 4(1), 21-33. doi:10.1108/eb029051 es_ES
dc.description.references Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and «Mode 2» to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00055-4 es_ES
dc.description.references Fagerberg, J. (1987). A technology gap approach to why growth rates differ. Research Policy, 16(2-4), 87-99. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(87)90025-4 es_ES
dc.description.references Fagerberg, J., & Srholec, M. (2008). National innovation systems, capabilities and economic development. Research Policy, 37(9), 1417-1435. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.06.003 es_ES
dc.description.references Foss, N. J. (1996). Higher-order industrial Capabilities and competitive advantage. Journal of Industry Studies, 3(1), 1-20. doi:10.1080/13662719600000001 es_ES
dc.description.references Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31(6), 899-933. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00152-4 es_ES
dc.description.references Harrison, B. (1992). Industrial Districts: Old Wine in New Bottles? Regional Studies, 26(5), 469-483. doi:10.1080/00343409212331347121 es_ES
dc.description.references Hekkert, M. P., & Negro, S. O. (2009). Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: Empirical evidence for earlier claims. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(4), 584-594. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2008.04.013 es_ES
dc.description.references Luis Hervas‐Oliver, J., & Dalmau‐Porta, J. I. (2007). Which IC components explain national IC stocks? Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8(3), 444-469. doi:10.1108/14691930710774867 es_ES
dc.description.references Luis Hervas Oliver, J., & Dalmau Porta, J. I. (2006). How to measure IC in clusters: empirical evidence. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7(3), 354-380. doi:10.1108/14691930610681456 es_ES
dc.description.references Klein, P.A. (2000), “National statistics, portrait of the value floor”,Journal of Economy, No. 34, pp. 445‐52. es_ES
dc.description.references Lawson, C. (1999). Towards a competence theory of the region. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(2), 151-166. doi:10.1093/cje/23.2.151 es_ES
dc.description.references Liu, X., & White, S. (2001). Comparing innovation systems: a framework and application to China’s transitional context. Research Policy, 30(7), 1091-1114. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(00)00132-3 es_ES
dc.description.references McEvily, B., & Zaheer, A. (1999). Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 20(12), 1133-1156. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199912)20:12<1133::aid-smj74>3.0.co;2-7 es_ES
dc.description.references Maskell, P. (1999). Localised learning and industrial competitiveness. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(2), 167-185. doi:10.1093/cje/23.2.167 es_ES
dc.description.references Nelson, R. R. (2008). What enables rapid economic progress: What are the needed institutions? Research Policy, 37(1), 1-11. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.10.008 es_ES
dc.description.references Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179-191. doi:10.1002/smj.4250140303 es_ES
dc.description.references Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S71-S102. doi:10.1086/261725 es_ES
dc.description.references Rondé, P., & Hussler, C. (2005). Innovation in regions: What does really matter? Research Policy, 34(8), 1150-1172. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.011 es_ES
dc.description.references Russo, M. (1997), “Relazioni tra imprese e svolupo locale”,Economia e Politica Industriale, Vol. 93, pp. 105‐37. es_ES
dc.description.references Ståhle, P., & Bounfour, A. (2008). Understanding dynamics of intellectual capital of nations. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(2), 164-177. doi:10.1108/14691930810870283 es_ES
dc.description.references Ståhle, P. and Pöyhönene, A. (2005), “Intellectual capital and national competitiveness: a critical examination. Case Finland”,Proceedings of 6th European Conference of Knowledge Management (ECKM), University of Limerick, ECKM. es_ES
dc.description.references Yeh‐Yun Lin, C., & Edvinsson, L. (2008). National intellectual capital: comparison of the Nordic countries. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(4), 525-545. doi:10.1108/14691930810913140 es_ES
dc.description.references Porter, M. (1998), “Clusters and the new economics of competition”,Harvard Business Review, Vol. 76 No. 6, pp. 77‐90. es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem