- -

On the difficulty of automatically detecting irony: beyond a simple case of negation

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

On the difficulty of automatically detecting irony: beyond a simple case of negation

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Reyes Pérez, Antonio es_ES
dc.contributor.author Rosso, Paolo es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2014-09-26T17:08:07Z
dc.date.issued 2014-09
dc.identifier.issn 0219-1377
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/40330
dc.description The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10115-013-0652-8 es_ES
dc.description.abstract It is well known that irony is one of the most subtle devices used to, in a refined way and without a negation marker, deny what is literally said. As such, its automatic detection would represent valuable knowledge regarding tasks as diverse as sentiment analysis, information extraction, or decision making. The research described in this article is focused on identifying key values of components to represent underlying characteristics of this linguistic phenomenon. In the absence of a negation marker, we focus on representing the core of irony by means of three conceptual layers. These layers involve 8 different textual features. By representing four available data sets with these features, we try to find hints about how to deal with this unexplored task from a computational point of view. Our findings are assessed by human annotators in two strata: isolated sentences and entire documents. The results show how complex and subjective the task of automatically detecting irony could be. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship The research work of Paolo Rosso was done in the framework of the European Commission WIQ-EI Web Information Quality Evaluation Initiative (IRSES grant no. 269180) project within the FP 7 Marie Curie People, the DIANA-APPLICATIONS - Finding Hidden Knowledge in Texts: Applications (TIN2012-38603-C02-01) project, and the VLC/CAMPUS Microcluster on Multimodal Interaction in Intelligent Systems. en_EN
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Springer Verlag (Germany) es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Knowledge and Information Systems es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Irony detection es_ES
dc.subject Negation es_ES
dc.subject Figurative language processing es_ES
dc.subject.classification LENGUAJES Y SISTEMAS INFORMATICOS es_ES
dc.title On the difficulty of automatically detecting irony: beyond a simple case of negation es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.embargo.lift 10000-01-01
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s10115-013-0652-8
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//TIN2012-38603-C02-01/ES/DIANA-APPLICATIONS: FINDING HIDDEN KNOWLEDGE IN TEXTS: APPLICATIONS/
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/IRSES grant no. 269180/EU/
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Sistemas Informáticos y Computación - Departament de Sistemes Informàtics i Computació es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Reyes Pérez, A.; Rosso, P. (2014). On the difficulty of automatically detecting irony: beyond a simple case of negation. Knowledge and Information Systems. 40(3):595-614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-013-0652-8 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10115-013-0652-8 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 595 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 614 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 40 es_ES
dc.description.issue 3 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 255764
dc.identifier.eissn 0219-3116
dc.contributor.funder European Commission
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad es_ES
dc.description.references Artstein R, Poesio M (2008) Inter-coder agreement for computational linguistics. Comput Linguistics 34(4):555–596 es_ES
dc.description.references Atserias J, Casas B, Comelles E, González M, Padró L, Padró M (2006) Freeling 1.3: syntactic and semantic services in an open-source nlp library. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on language resources and evaluation, pp 48–55 es_ES
dc.description.references Attardo S (2007) Irony as relevant inappropriateness. In: Gibbs R, Colston H (eds) Irony in language and thought. Taylor and Francis Group, London, pp 135–174 es_ES
dc.description.references Banerjee S, Agarwal N (2012) Analyzing collective behavior from blogs using swarm intelligence. Knowl Inf Syst. doi: 10.1007/s10115-012-0512-y es_ES
dc.description.references Beydoun G, Hoffmann A (2012) Dynamic evaluation of the development process of knowledge-based information systems. Knowl Inf Syst. doi: 10.1007/s10115-012-0491-z es_ES
dc.description.references Burfoot C, Baldwin T (2009) Automatic satire detection: are you having a laugh? In: ACL-IJCNLP ’09: proceedings of the ACL-IJCNLP 2009 conference short papers, pp 161–164 es_ES
dc.description.references Carvalho P, Sarmento L, Silva M, de Oliveira E (2009) Clues for detecting irony in user-generated contents: oh...!! It’s “so easy”; -). In: TSA ’09: proceeding of the 1st international CIKM workshop on topic-sentiment analysis for mass opinion. ACM, Hong Kong, China, pp 53–56 es_ES
dc.description.references Clark H, Gerrig R (1984) On the pretense theory of irony. J Exp Psychol Gen 113(1):121–126 es_ES
dc.description.references Colston H (2007) On necessary conditions for verbal irony comprehension. In: Gibbs R, Colston H (eds) Irony in language and thought. Taylor and Francis Group, London, pp 97–134 es_ES
dc.description.references Colston H, Gibbs R (2007) A brief history of irony. In: Gibbs R, Colston H (eds) Irony in language and thought. Taylor and Francis Group, London, pp 3–24 es_ES
dc.description.references Curcó C (2007) Irony: negation, echo, and metarepresentation. In: Gibbs R, Colston H (eds) Irony in language and thought. Taylor and Francis Group, London, pp 269–296 es_ES
dc.description.references Davidov D, Tsur O, Rappoport A (2010) Semi-supervised recognition of sarcastic sentences in Twitter and Amazon. In: Proceedings of the 14th conference on computational natural language learning, CoNLL ’10. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, pp 107–116 es_ES
dc.description.references Francisco V, Gervás P, Peinado F (2010) Ontological reasoning for improving the treatment of emotions in text. Knowl Inf Syst 24(2):23 es_ES
dc.description.references Gibbs R (2007) Irony in talk among friends. In: Gibbs R, Colston H (eds) Irony in language and thought. Taylor and Francis Group, London, pp 339–360 es_ES
dc.description.references Gibbs R, Colston H (2007) The future of irony studies. In: Gibbs R, Colston H (eds) Irony in language and thought. Taylor and Francis Group, London es_ES
dc.description.references Giora R (1995) On irony and negation. Discourse Process 19(2):239–264 es_ES
dc.description.references Giora R, Balaban N, Fein O, Alkabets I (2005) Negation as positivity in disguise. In: Colston H, Katz A (eds) Figurative language comprehension: social and cultural influences. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 233–258 es_ES
dc.description.references Giora R, Federman S, Kehat A, Fein O, Sabah H (2005) Irony aptness. Humor 18:23–39 es_ES
dc.description.references Grice H (1975) Logic and conversation. In: Cole P, Morgan JL (eds) Syntax and semantics, vol 3. Academic Press, New York, pp 41–58 es_ES
dc.description.references Horn L, Kato Y (2000) Introduction: negation and polarity at the millennium. In: Horn L, Kato Y (eds) Studies in negation and polarity. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–19 es_ES
dc.description.references Kaup B, Lüdtke J, Zwaan R (2006) Processing negated sentences with contradictory predicates: is a door that is not open mentally closed? J Pragmat 38:1033–1050 es_ES
dc.description.references Kisilevich S, Ang CS, Last M (2011) Large-scale analysis of self-disclosure patterns among online social networks users: A Russian context. Knowl Inf Syst. doi: 10.1007/s10115-011-0443-z es_ES
dc.description.references Kreuz R (2001) Using figurative language to increase advertising effectiveness. In: Office of Naval Research Military Personnel Research Science Workshop. University of Memphis, Memphis, TN es_ES
dc.description.references Kumon-Nakamura S, Glucksberg S, Brown M (2007) How about another piece of pie: the allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. In: Gibbs R, Colston H (eds) Irony in language and thought. Taylor and Francis Group, London es_ES
dc.description.references Langacker R (1991) Concept, image and symbol, the cognitive basis of grammar. Mounton de Gruyter, Berlin es_ES
dc.description.references Liu J, Wang K (2012) Anonymizing bag-valued sparse data by semantic similarity-based clustering. Knowl Inf Syst. doi: 10.1007/s10115-012-0515-8 es_ES
dc.description.references Lucariello J (2007) Situational irony: a concept of events gone away. In: Gibbs R, Colston H (eds) Irony in language and thought. Taylor and Francis Group, London, pp 467–498 es_ES
dc.description.references Miller G (1995) Wordnet: a lexical database for english. Commun ACM 38(11):39–41 es_ES
dc.description.references Pang B, Lee L (2004) A sentimental education: sentiment analysis using subjectivity summarization based on minimum cuts. In: Proceedings of the ACL, pp 271–278 es_ES
dc.description.references Pang B, Lee L, Vaithyanathan S (2002) Thumbs up? Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In: Proceedings of the 2002 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP). Association for Computational Linguistics, Morristown, NJ, USA, pp 79–86 es_ES
dc.description.references Pedersen T, Patwardhan S, Michelizzi J (2004) Wordnet:similarity—measuring the relatedness of concepts. In: Proceeding of the 9th national conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI-04). Association for Computational Linguistics, Morristown, NJ, USA, pp 1024–1025 es_ES
dc.description.references Reyes A, Rosso P (2011) Mining subjective knowledge from customer reviews: a specific case of irony detection. In: Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on computational approaches to subjectivity and sentiment analysis (WASSA 2.011). Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 118–124 es_ES
dc.description.references Reyes A, Rosso P (2012) Making objective decisions from subjective data: detecting irony in customers reviews. Decis Support Syst 53(4):754–760. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.027 es_ES
dc.description.references Reyes A, Rosso P, Buscaldi D (2012) From humor recognition to irony detection: the figurative language of social media. Data Knowl Eng 74:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.datak.2012.02.005 es_ES
dc.description.references Sarmento L, Carvalho P, Silva M, de Oliveira E (2009) Automatic creation of a reference corpus for political opinion mining in user-generated content, In: TSA ’09: proceeding of the 1st international CIKM workshop on topic-sentiment analysis for mass opinion. ACM, Hong Kong, China, pp 29–36 es_ES
dc.description.references Sperber D, Wilson D (1992) On verbal irony. Lingua 87:53–76 es_ES
dc.description.references Tsur O, Davidov D, Rappoport A (2010) ICWSM—a great catchy name: semi-supervised recognition of sarcastic sentences in online product reviews. In: Cohen WW, Gosling S (eds) Proceedings of the 4t international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media. The AAAI Press, Washington, DC, pp 162–169 es_ES
dc.description.references Utsumi A (1996) A unified theory of irony and its computational formalization. In: Proceedings of the 16th conference on computational linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, Morristown, NJ, USA, pp 962–967 es_ES
dc.description.references Veale T, Hao Y (2009) Support structures for linguistic creativity: a computational analysis of creative irony in similes. In: Proceedings of CogSci 2009, the 31st annual meeting of the cognitive science society, pp 1376–1381 es_ES
dc.description.references Veale T, Hao Y (2010) Detecting ironic intent in creative comparisons. In: Proceedings of 19th European conference on artificial intelligence—ECAI 2010. IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 765–770 es_ES
dc.description.references Whissell C (2009) Using the revised dictionary of affect in language to quantify the emotional undertones of samples of natural language. Psychol Rep 105(2):509–521 es_ES
dc.description.references Wilson D, Sperber D (2007) On verbal irony. In: Gibbs R, Colston H (eds) Irony in language and thought. Taylor and Francis Group, London, pp 35–56 es_ES
dc.description.references Zagibalov T, Belyatskaya K, Carroll J (2010) Comparable English-Russian book review corpora for sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the 1st workshop on computational approaches to subjectivity and sentiment analysis. Lisbon, Portugal, pp 67–72 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem