- -

The role of the environment in agreement technologies

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

The role of the environment in agreement technologies

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

[Cerrado]
Nombre: E. Argente;O. ...
Tamaño: 281.6Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Solicitar una copia al autor
dc.contributor.author Argente Villaplana, Estefanía es_ES
dc.contributor.author Boissier, Olivier es_ES
dc.contributor.author Carrascosa Casamayor, Carlos es_ES
dc.contributor.author Fornara, Nicoletta es_ES
dc.contributor.author McBurney, Peter es_ES
dc.contributor.author Noriega, Pablo es_ES
dc.contributor.author Ricci, Alexandro es_ES
dc.contributor.author Sabater-Mir, Jordi es_ES
dc.contributor.author Ignaz Schumacher, Michael es_ES
dc.contributor.author Tampitsikas, Charalampos es_ES
dc.contributor.author Taveter, Kuldar es_ES
dc.contributor.author Vizzari, Giuseppe es_ES
dc.contributor.author Vouros, George es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2014-10-14T11:29:09Z
dc.date.available 2014-10-14T11:29:09Z
dc.date.issued 2013-01-29
dc.identifier.issn 0269-2821
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/43241
dc.description The final publication is available at link.springer.com es_ES
dc.description.abstract The notion of Multi-Agent System environment is currently considered as a mediating entity, functioning as enabler but possibly also as a manager and constrainer of agent actions, perceptions, and interactions. In this paper, we analyze how the environment could be a first class abstraction to support the building, the development and the management of Agreements in decentralized and open systems between autonomous agents. To this aim we analyze the synergies between the environment and the foundational dimensions of agreement technologies such as semantics, norms, organizations, argumentation & negotiation, trust. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship This paper is the synthesis of the discussions from the workshop and panel about Environment in Agreement Technologies, held during the COST Action IC0801 Agreement Technologies meeting June 1 and 2, 2012, organized by O. Boissier, C. Carrascosa, A. Ricci, M. Schumacher. We would like to thank the COST Action IC0801 for the support. en_EN
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Springer Verlag (Germany) es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Artificial Intelligence Review es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Environment es_ES
dc.subject Semantic es_ES
dc.subject Norm es_ES
dc.subject Organization es_ES
dc.subject Argumentation es_ES
dc.subject Negotiation es_ES
dc.subject Trust es_ES
dc.subject Agreement technologies es_ES
dc.subject.classification LENGUAJES Y SISTEMAS INFORMATICOS es_ES
dc.title The role of the environment in agreement technologies es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s10462-012-9388-1
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/COST//IC0801/EU/Agreement Technologies/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Cerrado es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Sistemas Informáticos y Computación - Departament de Sistemes Informàtics i Computació es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Argente Villaplana, E.; Boissier, O.; Carrascosa Casamayor, C.; Fornara, N.; Mcburney, P.; Noriega, P.; Ricci, A.... (2013). The role of the environment in agreement technologies. Artificial Intelligence Review. 39(1):21-38. doi:10.1007/s10462-012-9388-1 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-012-9388-1 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 21 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 38 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 39 es_ES
dc.description.issue 1 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 232740
dc.contributor.funder European Cooperation in Science and Technology es_ES
dc.description.references Arcos JL, Noriega P, Rodriguez-Aguilar JA, Sierra C (2007) E4mas through electronic institutions. In: Weyns D, Parunak H, Michel F (eds), Environments for multi-agent systems III., number 4389 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 184–202. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 08/05/2006 es_ES
dc.description.references Bandini S, Manzoni S, Vizzari G (2009) Agent based modeling and simulation: an informatics perspective. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 12(4):4 es_ES
dc.description.references Beun R-J, Eijk R (2004) A co-operative dialogue game for resolving ontological discrepancies. In: Dignum F (ed) Advances in agent communication, LNAI 2922. Springer, Berlin pp 349–363 es_ES
dc.description.references Bromuri S, Stathis K (2008) Situating cognitive agents in GOLEM. In: Weyns D, Brueckner S, Demazeau Y (eds) Engineering environment-mediated multi-agent systems, vol. 5049., of LNCSSSpringer Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 115–134 es_ES
dc.description.references Bromuri S, Stathis K (2009) Distributed agent environments in the ambient event calculus. In: Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on distributed event-based systems, DEBS ’09, pp 12:1–12:12, New York, NY, USA, ACM es_ES
dc.description.references da Silva VT, Choren R, Lucena CD (2008) MAS-ML: a multi-agent system modeling language. Int J Agent-Oriented Softw Eng 2(4):381–421 es_ES
dc.description.references da Silva Figueiredo K, Torres da Silva V, de Oliveira Braga C (2011) Modeling norms in multi-agent systems with normml. In: De Vos M, Fornara N, Pitt J, Vouros G (eds) Coordination, organizations, institutions, and norms in agent systems VI, vol. 6541., of Lecture Notes in Computer ScienceSpringer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 39–57 es_ES
dc.description.references Dignum V (2009) Handbook of research on multi-agent systems : semantics and dynamics of organizational models, chapter the role of organization in agent systems, pp 1–16. Information Science Reference Publisher, ISBN 978-1-60566-256-5, doi: 10.4018/978-1-60566-256-5.ch001 es_ES
dc.description.references d’Inverno M, Luck M, Noriega P, Rodriguez-Aguilar JA, Sierra C (2012) Communicating open systems. Artif Intell 186:38–94 es_ES
dc.description.references dos Santos CT, Quaresma P, Vieira R, Isaac A (2009) Comparing argumentation frameworks for composite ontology matching. In: McBurney P, Rahwan I, Parsons S, Maudet N (eds), ArgMAS, vol. 6057 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, pp 305–320 es_ES
dc.description.references Esparcia S, Argente E, Centeno R, Hermoso R (2011) Enhancing MAS environments with organizational mechanisms. Int J Artif Intell Tools (IJAIT) 20(4):663–690 es_ES
dc.description.references Esparcia S, Centeno R, Hermoso R, Argente E (2011) Artifacting and regulating the environment of a virtual organization. In: 23rd IEEE international conference on tools with artificial intelligence (ICTAI 2011). IEEE es_ES
dc.description.references Ferber J, Michel F, Baez J (2005) AGRE: integrating environments with organizations. In: Environments for multi-agent systems, vol. 3374 of LNCS, pp 48–56. Springer es_ES
dc.description.references Fornara N, Colombetti M (2009) Specifying and enforcing norms in artificial institutions. In: Baldoni M, Son T, van Riemsdijk M, Winikoff M (eds) Declarative agent languages and technologies VI, vol. 5397. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–17 es_ES
dc.description.references Fornara N, Tampitsikas C (2012) Using OWL artificial institutions for dynamically creating open spaces of interaction. In: Proceedings of the AT 2012 first international conference on agreement technologies, October 15–16, 2012 in Dubrovnik, Croatia., page to appear es_ES
dc.description.references Garca-Camino A, Noriega P, Rodrguez-Aguilar JA (2005) Implementing norms in electronic institutions. In: Proceedings of the 4th international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS ’05, (ed) Michal Pechoucek ST, Steinernald. Utrecht, NL, ACM Press, pp 667–673 es_ES
dc.description.references Gordon TF, Karacapilidis N (1997) The zeno argumentation framework. In: Proceedings sixth international conference on AI and law, pp 10–18, New York, ACM Press es_ES
dc.description.references Hodge BJ, Anthony W, Gales L (2002) Organization theory: a strategic approach. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs es_ES
dc.description.references Hübner J, Boissier O, Kitio R, Ricci A (2010) Instrumenting multi-agent organisations with organisational artifacts and agents. Auton Agents Multi-Agent Syst 20:369–400 es_ES
dc.description.references Hulstijn J, Dastani M, van der Torre L (2000) Negotiation protocols and dialogue games. In: Proceedings Belgian-Dutch AI conference (BNAIC-2000), Kaatsheuvel es_ES
dc.description.references Karunatillake NC (2006) Argumentation-based negotiation in a social context. Phd, School of electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK es_ES
dc.description.references Koster A, Schorlemmer WM, Sabater-Mir J (2012) Engineering trust alignment: theory, method and experimentation. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 70(6):450–473 es_ES
dc.description.references Kraus S, Sycara K, Evenchik A (1998) Reaching agreement through argumentation: a logical model and implementation. Artif Intell 104:1–69 es_ES
dc.description.references Krummenacher R, Simperl EPB, Cerizza D, Valle ED, Nixon LJB, Foxvog D (2009) Enabling the European patient summary through triplespaces. Comput Methods Programs Biomed, 95(2–S1):33–43 es_ES
dc.description.references Kullerkupp R (2012) Analysis and preliminary design of a social networking system for supporting information exchange about medicines. Master’s thesis. Department of Informatics, Tallinn University of Technology, Estonia es_ES
dc.description.references Locatelli MP, Vizzari G (2007) Awareness in collaborative ubiquitous environments: the multilayered multi-agent situated system approach. TAAS 2(4) es_ES
dc.description.references McBurney P, Parsons S (2009) Dialogue games for agent argumentation. In: Rahwan I, Simari G (eds) Argumentation in artificial intelligence, chapter 13. Springer, Berlin, pp 261–280 es_ES
dc.description.references Miller T, McBurney P (2011) Propositional dynamic logic for reasoning about first-class agent interaction protocols. Comput Intell 27(3):422–457 es_ES
dc.description.references Miller T, McBurney P (2008) Annotation and matching of first-class agent interaction protocols. In: Proceedings seventh international joint conference on autonomous agents and multi-agent systems (AAMAS 2008, (ed) Padgham L, Parkes D, Mueller JP, Parsons S. NY, SA, ACM Press, New York es_ES
dc.description.references Miller T, McBurney P (2010) Characterising and matching iterative and recursive agent interaction protocols. In: Proceedings ninth international conference on autonomous agents and multi-agent systems (AAMAS 2010, (ed) van der Hoek W, Kaminka G, Luck M, Sen S. Toronto, Canada, IFAAMAS, ACM Press, pp 1207–1214 es_ES
dc.description.references Odell J, Parunak HVD, Fleischer M, Brueckner S (2003) Modeling agents and their environment. In: Agent-oriented software engineering III, vol. 2585 of LNCS, pp 16–31. Springer, Berlin es_ES
dc.description.references Okuyama FY, Bordini RH, da Rocha Costa AC (2008) A distributed normative infrastructure for situated multi-agent organisations. In: Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems - vol. 3, AAMAS ’08. Richland, SC, International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp 1501–1504 es_ES
dc.description.references Oliva E, McBurney P, Omicini A (2007) Co-argumentation artifact for agent societies. In: Rahwan I, Reed C, Parsons S, (eds), Proceedings fourth international workshop on argumentation in multi-agent systems (ArgMAS 2007), pp. 115–130, AAMAS (2007) Honolulu. Hawai’i, USA es_ES
dc.description.references Omicini A, Ricci A, Viroli M (2008) Artifacts in the A &A meta-model for multi-agent systems. Auton Agents Multi-Agent Syst 17(3):432–456 es_ES
dc.description.references Oren N, Norman T, Preece A, Chalmers S (2004) Policing virtual organizations. In: Proceedings second european conference on multi-agent systems (EUMAS 2004, (ed) Ghidini C, Giorgini P, Hoek W. Barcelona, Spain, EUMAS, pp 499–508 es_ES
dc.description.references Pinyol I, Sabater-Mir J (2012) Computational trust and reputation models for open multi-agent systems: a review. Artif Intell Rev, pp 1–25 es_ES
dc.description.references Piunti M, Ricci A, Boissier O, Hübner JF (2009) Embodied organisations in MAS environments. In: Proceedings of the 7th German conference on multiagent system technologies MATES’09, vol. 5774 of LNAI, pp 115–127. Springer es_ES
dc.description.references Reed C, Norman TJ, Jennings NR (2002) Negotiating the semantics of agent communications languages. Comput Intell 18(2):229–252 es_ES
dc.description.references Ricci A, Piunti M, Viroli M, Omicini A (2009) Environment programming in cartago. In: Bordini RH, Dastani M, Dix J, El Fallah-Seghrouchni A (eds) Multi-agent programming: languages, platforms and applications, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, pp 259–288 es_ES
dc.description.references Ricci A, Piunti M, Viroli M (2011) Environment programming in multi-agent systems: an artifact-based perspective. Auton Agents Multi-Agent Syst 23(2):158–192 es_ES
dc.description.references Sarrasin JJ, Schumacher M, Hay C, Richard P (June 2010) Health-identity: mobile services for consumers of medicines. In: Special topic conference “Seamless care - safe care: the challenges of interoperability” es_ES
dc.description.references Searle JR (1995) The construction of social reality. Free Press, NY es_ES
dc.description.references Sensoy M, Norman TJ, Vasconcelos WW, Sycara KP (2012) Owl-polar: a framework for semantic policy representation and reasoning. J Web Sem 12:148–160 es_ES
dc.description.references Sterling L, Taveter K (2009) The art of agent-oriented modeling. The MIT Press, Massachusetts es_ES
dc.description.references Tampitsikas C, Bromuri S, Fornara N, Schumacher MI (2012) Interdependent artificial institutions in agent environments. Appl Artif Intell 26(4):398–427 es_ES
dc.description.references Tinnemeier N, Dastani M, Meyer J-J (2010) Programming norm change. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems: vol. 1, AAMAS ’10. Richland, SC, ACM, pp 957–964 es_ES
dc.description.references Wagner J, Hollenbeck J (2001) Organizational behavior. South-Western Pub es_ES
dc.description.references Weyns D, Holvoet T (2004) Formal model for situated multiagent systems. Fundam Inform 63(2–3):125–158 es_ES
dc.description.references Weyns D, Omicini A, Odell JJ (2007) Environment as a first-class abstraction in multi-agent systems. Auton Agents Multi-Agent Syst 14(1):5–30 es_ES
dc.description.references Weyns D, Parunak HVD (eds) (2007) Special issue on environments for multi-agent systems, vol, 14 (1) of autonomous agents and multi-agent systems. Springer Netherlands es_ES
dc.description.references Weyns D, Parunak HVD, Michel F, Holvoet T, Ferber J (2005) Environments for multiagent systems: state-of-the-art and research challenges. In: Weyns D, Parunak HVD, Michel F, Holvoet T, Ferber J (eds) Environment for multi-agent systems, vol. 3374. Springer, Berlin pp 1–47 es_ES
dc.description.references Weyns D, Schelfthout K, Holvoet T, Lefever T (2005) Decentralized control of E’GV transportation systems. In: Pechoucek M, Steiner D, Thompson SG (eds) AAMAS industrial applications, pp 67–74. ACM es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem